The charlotte hornets vs denver nuggets match player stats tell the story of a surprising 23-point victory for Charlotte, which defeated Denver 110-87 at Ball Arena on January 19, 2026. The Hornets delivered an impressive performance on the road, controlling the game from the opening quarter and maintaining their advantage against one of the Western Conference’s stronger teams. Brandon Miller led Charlotte’s scoring effort with 23 points, while Ryan Kalkbrenner contributed 17 points and 11 rebounds. LaMelo Ball also played an important role with six assists and a team-best plus/minus of +22.

Denver struggled to establish its usual offensive rhythm. Jamal Murray finished as the Nuggets’ leading scorer with 16 points, but the team shot just 41% from the field and 21% from three-point range. Charlotte’s superior shooting, rebounding, and ball movement created a difficult night for the home team. The result was particularly notable because Denver entered the contest with a 29-14 record, while Charlotte had a 16-27 record. Despite the difference in season records, the Hornets produced the more complete performance when the two teams met in Denver.

This breakdown examines the final score, individual player contributions, team statistics, quarter-by-quarter performance, tactical differences, and the significance of the result in the 2025-26 NBA season. All match figures below follow the supplied game data.

Match Overview: Charlotte Hornets vs Denver Nuggets

The game took place at Ball Arena in Denver, Colorado. Charlotte entered with a 16-27 record, while Denver held a 29-14 record. The attendance was 19,971.

Basketball teams, players and shoes | Colendri

Charlotte Hornets

110

Winner

16-27 record

VS

Final

23-point margin

NBA schedule release: List of games for all 30 teams | NBA.com

Denver Nuggets

87

29-14 record

Date

January 18, 2026 (Denver local date)

Venue

Ball Arena

Attendance

19,971

Season series

Tied 1-1

The game is also listed as January 19 in some international records because of the time difference.

Quarter-by-Quarter Score

Charlotte established control early and never surrendered its lead. The Hornets scored 33 points in the opening quarter and followed that with another 27 in the second.

Quarter	Charlotte	Denver
First	33	18
Second	27	16
Third	27	23
Fourth	23	30
Final	110	87

The most important part of the scoring progression was Charlotte’s first-half performance. The Hornets entered halftime with a 60-34 advantage, creating a 26-point gap that Denver could not overcome.

Denver improved offensively in the fourth quarter, scoring 30 points compared with Charlotte’s 23. However, the late improvement was not enough to change the result.

Official Game Information

The NBA’s official box score identifies the contest as Charlotte’s 110-87 victory at Ball Arena. The league’s game report also records Brandon Miller’s 23-point performance and the significant impact of Denver’s injury absences. Readers can consult the official NBA box score and game report for the original scoring record.

Charlotte Hornets vs Denver Nuggets Match Player Stats

Individual performances explain why Charlotte won despite entering the contest with a less impressive season record. The Hornets received meaningful contributions from several players rather than depending entirely on one scorer.

Brandon Miller was the leading offensive performer. Ryan Kalkbrenner provided efficient scoring, while Tidjane Salaün made an important contribution on the boards. LaMelo Ball helped organize the offense and delivered the strongest plus/minus figure among the players listed in the supplied game data.

Charlotte Hornets Player Performance

Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists	Key contribution
Brandon Miller	23	4	1	Leading scorer
Ryan Kalkbrenner	17	6	1	Efficient interior scoring
Collin Sexton	14	2	5	Bench scoring and playmaking
Kon Knueppel	14	4	3	Balanced offensive contribution
Tidjane Salaün	13	11	2	Double-digit rebounds
LaMelo Ball	10	1	6	Playmaking and +22
Miles Bridges	7	4	1	Frontcourt contribution
Moussa Diabaté	4	9	2	Interior rebounding

The player figures above reflect the published box-score details. The original supplied summary incorrectly assigns the 11 rebounds to Kalkbrenner. The individual box score identifies Salaün as Charlotte’s leading rebounder with 11, while Kalkbrenner recorded six.

Brandon Miller: Charlotte’s Leading Scorer

How family competition shaped Charlotte Hornets rookie Brandon Miller’s work ethic – AOL

23 points

Brandon Miller

Charlotte Hornets | Shooting guard / forward

8-of-15 field goals, 4-of-9 three-pointers, 3-of-4 free throws.

Brandon Miller was the most productive scorer in the contest. His 23 points gave Charlotte a dependable offensive foundation and helped the visitors build a substantial first-half advantage.

His shooting efficiency was particularly important. Miller converted eight of his 15 attempts from the field, including four three-pointers. This meant he could generate points both inside the arc and from the perimeter.

His first-half performance was especially impressive. He scored 18 points before halftime, providing much of the offensive energy behind Charlotte’s 60-34 lead.

There were three important elements to Miller’s contribution:

1. Perimeter shooting: Four successful three-pointers forced Denver to respect his outside scoring.
2. Shot efficiency: Making eight of 15 attempts allowed him to produce without needing an unusually high number of possessions.
3. Early scoring pressure: His first-half production helped Charlotte establish control before Denver could find its rhythm.

Miller’s performance demonstrated why an effective scoring wing can change the direction of a game. Charlotte did not need him to dominate every statistical category. His ability to convert opportunities at important moments was enough to make him the game’s leading scorer.

Ryan Kalkbrenner: Efficient Scoring Around the Basket

Hornets officially have a positional battle they should be thrilled to host

17 points

Ryan Kalkbrenner

Charlotte Hornets | Center

8-of-10 field goals, six rebounds and one assist.

Ryan Kalkbrenner delivered one of Charlotte’s most efficient offensive performances. He scored 17 points while converting eight of his 10 field-goal attempts.

That shooting percentage highlights the value of selecting good opportunities rather than forcing difficult shots. His interior scoring gave Charlotte another dependable option when Denver concentrated defensive attention on Miller.

Kalkbrenner’s contribution was also important because Charlotte needed production from its frontcourt. A center who can finish around the basket gives perimeter players more options and makes defensive assignments harder for the opposition.

Although the supplied summary lists him as the leading rebounder with 11 boards, the individual box-score record credits that figure to Tidjane Salaün. Kalkbrenner’s recorded contribution was six rebounds.

Collin Sexton: Valuable Bench Production

The Utah Jazz miss the intensity and energy of Collin Sexton – Deseret News

14 points

Collin Sexton

Charlotte Hornets | Guard

Five assists, two rebounds and four successful free throws.

Collin Sexton helped Charlotte maintain offensive production beyond its starting group. He finished with 14 points and five assists.

His five assists were particularly useful because they show that his influence extended beyond personal scoring. He helped create opportunities for teammates and supported Charlotte’s balanced offensive approach.

Bench production often becomes especially important during road games. Coaches need players who can enter the contest, maintain energy and prevent the opposition from gaining momentum when starters rest.

Sexton’s contribution addressed that need. His scoring helped Charlotte preserve its advantage while his passing gave the offense another source of organization.

LaMelo Ball: Playmaking and Overall Impact

What LaMelo Ball said in post-game interview that cost him $100,000 | The Independent

10 points

LaMelo Ball

Charlotte Hornets | Point guard

Six assists, three steals and a +22 plus/minus.

LaMelo Ball’s performance was a good example of why scoring totals do not tell the entire story of a basketball game.

He recorded 10 points, six assists and three steals. His plus/minus was +22, the best figure among Charlotte’s players according to the supplied game data.

The plus/minus statistic measures the team’s point differential while a player is on the court. A +22 means Charlotte outscored Denver by 22 points during Ball’s playing time.

This does not mean that Ball personally scored 22 additional points. It indicates the overall team advantage during his minutes.

His six assists also demonstrate his role in connecting different parts of Charlotte’s offense. Ball helped teammates receive opportunities instead of allowing the game to become an isolated scoring contest.

Tidjane Salaün: A Major Rebounding Contribution

Should the Hornets begin to look to Tidjane Salaün as a starter?

13 points

Tidjane Salaün

Charlotte Hornets | Forward

11 rebounds and two assists.

Salaün provided one of the most important supporting performances of the game. His 13 points and 11 rebounds gave Charlotte valuable production from the bench.

Rebounding matters because it determines which team gets additional opportunities and which team can end defensive possessions. By collecting 11 rebounds, Salaün helped Charlotte maintain control of the glass.

His performance also illustrates the value of contributions that may not attract the same attention as a 20-point scoring night.

A player can influence a result through rebounding, defensive positioning, second-chance opportunities and consistent effort. Salaün provided several of those elements.

Kon Knueppel and Miles Bridges

Kon Knueppel finished with 14 points, four rebounds and three assists. His contribution gave Charlotte another scoring option and reduced the pressure on Miller to generate every important basket.

Knueppel also converted two of his four three-point attempts. His perimeter accuracy helped the Hornets maintain spacing and made it more difficult for Denver’s defense to concentrate entirely on the primary scorers.

Miles Bridges recorded seven points, four rebounds and one assist. Although his scoring total was lower than those of several teammates, his presence in the starting group contributed to Charlotte’s overall balance.

Moussa Diabaté added four points and nine rebounds. His work around the basket was valuable because Denver struggled to match Charlotte’s overall rebounding production.

Denver Nuggets Player Performance

Denver entered the contest with a considerably stronger season record, but its offense could not produce the scoring efficiency required to challenge Charlotte.

The Nuggets finished with 87 points. Jamal Murray led the team with 16, while Julian Strawther and Jalen Pickett supplied additional scoring.

Denver Nuggets Player Statistics

Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists	Key contribution
Jamal Murray	16	1	2	Leading scorer
Julian Strawther	15	Not specified here	Not specified here	Second-leading scorer
Jalen Pickett	12	Not specified here	7	Leading playmaker
Spencer Jones	Not specified here	6	Not specified here	Leading rebounder
Peyton Watson	Not specified here	Not specified here	Not specified here	Starting frontcourt player
DaRon Holmes II	Not specified here	Not specified here	Not specified here	Starting center
Zeke Nnaji	Not specified here	Not specified here	Not specified here	Best supplied plus/minus of +9

The available statistical summary does not provide every individual player’s complete shooting and defensive figures. Missing figures have therefore not been estimated or invented.

Jamal Murray: Denver’s Leading Scorer

Jamal Murray Injury Update: Is Murray Playing Tonight vs. Thunder?

16 points

Jamal Murray

Denver Nuggets | Point guard

Denver’s leading scorer in the contest.

Jamal Murray finished with 16 points, making him Denver’s leading scorer.

However, his total was considerably lower than Miller’s 23 points. That difference illustrates one of the central problems for the Nuggets: their leading offensive option could not produce enough scoring to keep the team competitive.

Murray was also playing without several important teammates. Denver’s reduced offensive options placed greater responsibility on the available players.

The Nuggets needed more consistent shooting and better offensive support to challenge Charlotte. Murray’s scoring was useful, but the team required a more productive collective performance.

Julian Strawther: Supporting Offensive Production

Julian Strawther selected to NBA Rising Stars game

15 points

Julian Strawther

Denver Nuggets | Guard / forward

Denver’s second-leading scorer.

Julian Strawther scored 15 points, finishing just one point behind Murray.

His contribution was important because Denver needed additional scoring from players outside its primary offensive options.

Nevertheless, the Nuggets could not turn those individual points into a sustained scoring run. Charlotte continued to protect its advantage through the first three quarters.

Jalen Pickett: Denver’s Leading Playmaker

Denver Nuggets v Dallas Mavericks

7 assists

Jalen Pickett

Denver Nuggets | Guard

12 points and seven assists.

Pickett recorded 12 points and seven assists, making him Denver’s leading playmaker.

His seven assists showed that he was involved in creating opportunities for teammates. However, assists alone cannot guarantee an effective offense. The players receiving those passes must convert their attempts.

Denver’s overall field-goal percentage of 41% and three-point percentage of approximately 21% demonstrate how difficult it was for the team to turn offensive possessions into points.

Spencer Jones: Rebounding Contribution

Spencer Jones led Denver with six rebounds according to the supplied player data.

His work on the boards was important because Charlotte generated considerably more rebounding opportunities throughout the game.

Denver needed stronger collective rebounding to prevent the Hornets from controlling possession and creating additional scoring chances.

Aaron Gordon’s Absence

Aaron Gordon was unavailable because of a right hamstring strain. His absence reduced Denver’s available frontcourt options.

Gordon is an important type of player for a team because forwards who can defend multiple positions, rebound and contribute offensively provide flexibility.

Without him, Denver had fewer options for matching Charlotte’s physical presence around the basket.

The broader injury situation was also significant. The official NBA game report identified other important Denver absences, including Nikola Jokić, Cameron Johnson, Christian Braun and Jonas Valančiūnas.

These absences help explain the unusual circumstances surrounding Denver’s performance.

Team Statistics Comparison

Team statistics provide a clearer picture of why Charlotte won by 23 points. The Hornets were more efficient from the field, made more three-pointers and controlled the rebounding battle.

Statistical category	Charlotte	Denver
Total points	110	87
Field goals	44/89	32/79
Field-goal percentage	49.4%	40.5%
Three-pointers	11/34	8/38
Three-point percentage	32.4%	21.1%
Free throws	11/13	15/18
Free-throw percentage	84.6%	83.3%
Total rebounds	61	36
Offensive rebounds	16	8
Defensive rebounds	36	21
Assists	30	21
Steals	4	7
Blocks	3	5
Turnovers	12	8
Personal fouls	19	18

Note: The individual and team box-score records show 61 rebounds for Charlotte and 36 for Denver. The supplied summary lists 52 and 29, respectively. The figures in this comparison follow the published box-score totals.

Field-Goal Percentage: Charlotte Had the Advantage

One of the biggest differences was shooting accuracy.

Charlotte converted 44 of 89 field-goal attempts, producing a 49.4% shooting percentage. Denver made 32 of 79 attempts, finishing at approximately 40.5%.

This difference mattered because both teams had opportunities to score throughout the contest. Charlotte simply converted a greater percentage of its attempts.

The Hornets also generated 12 more successful field goals than Denver.

When a team combines efficient shooting with strong rebounding, it can create a difficult situation for its opponent. Denver struggled to stop Charlotte’s scoring while also failing to generate enough points at the other end.

Three-Point Shooting: A Major Difference

Three-point shooting was another important factor.

Charlotte made 11 of 34 attempts, while Denver converted only eight of 38.

Three-point statistic	Charlotte	Denver
Successful shots	11	8
Attempts	34	38
Accuracy	32.4%	21.1%

The percentage gap was substantial.

Charlotte did not need an exceptional three-point shooting night to win. Its 32.4% conversion rate was enough because the team also scored efficiently from inside the arc.

Denver, on the other hand, attempted more three-pointers but converted fewer.

This is an important distinction when evaluating basketball shooting statistics. Attempt volume does not automatically create offensive efficiency. A team must balance perimeter attempts with high-quality opportunities closer to the basket.

Denver’s 21.1% accuracy made it difficult to close the scoring gap.

Rebounding: Charlotte Controlled the Glass

Rebounding was arguably one of Charlotte’s strongest advantages.

The Hornets recorded 61 total rebounds compared with Denver’s 36. They also collected 16 offensive rebounds, double Denver’s eight.

Offensive rebounds can be especially valuable because they give a team another opportunity to score after missing an initial shot.

Charlotte’s advantage in this category helped it maintain pressure throughout the game.

The difference was not limited to one player. Salaün, Diabaté and other Charlotte players contributed to the team’s collective work around the basket.

Denver struggled to match that production.

A team that consistently loses the rebounding battle can find itself defending multiple possessions in the same sequence. This places additional pressure on its defense and makes it harder to establish a comfortable offensive rhythm.

Assists: Better Ball Movement From Charlotte

Charlotte recorded 30 assists, compared with Denver’s 21.

This nine-assist difference provides useful insight into how the Hornets generated their offense.

A high assist total often indicates that players are finding teammates in scoring positions rather than relying entirely on individual creation.

Ball’s six assists and Sexton’s five were particularly important. Knueppel also contributed three assists.

Denver’s seven assists from Pickett were a positive individual contribution, but the team’s overall total remained lower.

The Hornets demonstrated better collective offensive coordination during the game.

Turnovers: Denver Protected Possession Better

Denver committed eight turnovers, while Charlotte committed 12.

This was one statistical category in which the Nuggets performed better.

Turnovers represent lost offensive possessions. A team that protects the basketball can limit its opponent’s opportunities to score following mistakes.

However, Denver’s advantage in this area was not enough to overcome its shooting and rebounding disadvantages.

Charlotte managed to win despite committing four more turnovers.

This is an important reminder that no single statistic determines a basketball result. Teams must evaluate several categories together to understand how a game developed.

Steals and Blocks: Denver’s Defensive Activity

Denver recorded seven steals and five blocks, compared with Charlotte’s four steals and three blocks.

These numbers suggest that the Nuggets were able to produce defensive plays despite their overall defeat.

However, defensive activity did not translate into enough successful offensive possessions.

Charlotte’s ability to maintain shooting efficiency and win the rebounding battle outweighed Denver’s advantage in steals and blocks.

How Charlotte Hornets Built a 23-Point Victory

Charlotte’s victory was not the result of one isolated scoring run. The team established an advantage early and maintained it across the first three quarters.

Three major factors explain the result.

1. A Strong Opening Quarter

Charlotte scored 33 points in the first quarter, while Denver managed only 18.

The 15-point difference gave the visitors an immediate advantage.

Early scoring matters because it influences how teams approach the remaining game. A team that falls behind may feel pressure to take more difficult shots or increase its offensive pace.

Denver faced that problem from the beginning.

Charlotte, meanwhile, could continue using its preferred offensive approach without needing to chase the scoreboard.

The Hornets’ first-quarter performance established the foundation for their victory.

2. Maintaining Pressure Before Halftime

Charlotte scored another 27 points in the second quarter.

Denver managed just 16.

The result was a 60-34 halftime score.

This was arguably the decisive period of the game. A 26-point halftime deficit is difficult to overcome, especially against an opponent that is shooting more efficiently and controlling the boards.

Denver needed a significant offensive improvement after halftime.

Charlotte only needed to avoid allowing the Nuggets to produce a major comeback.

3. Managing the Second Half

Charlotte scored 27 points in the third quarter and 23 in the fourth.

Denver improved to 23 points in the third and 30 in the fourth.

The final quarter was Denver’s best scoring period, but the improvement arrived too late.

The Hornets had already created a substantial advantage. Their ability to maintain that lead demonstrated the importance of building an early cushion rather than relying on a close finish.

Why Denver Nuggets Struggled Against Charlotte

Denver’s defeat involved several factors. The team did not perform well enough offensively, and its injury situation created additional challenges.

Limited Offensive Efficiency

Denver finished with 87 points, making it difficult to compete against a team that scored 110.

Its 40.5% field-goal percentage was considerably lower than Charlotte’s 49.4%.

The Nuggets also made just eight three-pointers from 38 attempts.

This combination reduced their scoring potential and prevented them from building sustained momentum.

Missing Important Players

The injury situation had a significant impact.

Denver was without several important contributors, including:

• Nikola Jokić, who was unavailable with a left knee bone bruise.
• Aaron Gordon, who was unavailable with a right hamstring strain.
• Cameron Johnson, who was unavailable with a right knee bone bruise.
• Christian Braun, who was unavailable with a left ankle sprain.
• Jonas Valančiūnas, who was unavailable with a right calf strain.

The absence of these players reduced Denver’s available scoring, rebounding and defensive options.

This does not take away from Charlotte’s victory. The Hornets still had to execute their game plan and take advantage of the available opportunities.

However, understanding the injury situation provides important context when evaluating Denver’s performance.

Failure to Match Charlotte’s Interior Production

Charlotte’s 61 rebounds compared with Denver’s 36 represent a substantial difference.

The Hornets were able to secure more possessions and limit Denver’s opportunities to recover missed shots.

Denver’s eight offensive rebounds were also considerably lower than Charlotte’s 16.

When an opponent collects offensive rebounds consistently, defenders must remain active throughout the possession. This can create additional scoring chances and increase defensive pressure.

Charlotte took advantage of this area.

Tactical Analysis: What the Statistics Reveal

Looking beyond the final score reveals several useful basketball lessons.

Charlotte Benefited From Balanced Scoring

Miller led the team with 23 points, but four other Hornets players reached double figures.

Kalkbrenner scored 17, Sexton and Knueppel each recorded 14, and Salaün added 13.

This scoring distribution made Charlotte difficult to defend.

Denver could not focus entirely on Miller because other players were capable of contributing meaningful points.

Balanced scoring is particularly valuable when facing a team with strong individual defenders. If one scoring option is limited, other players can help maintain offensive production.

Ball Movement Created Better Opportunities

Charlotte’s 30 assists indicate a strong collective passing performance.

The Hornets had multiple players involved in creating opportunities, including Ball and Sexton.

This helped reduce the pressure on individual scorers and supported a more varied offense.

Denver recorded 21 assists, showing that it also created opportunities for teammates. However, the lower shooting percentage meant that many possessions did not produce the desired scoring result.

Rebounding Supported Charlotte’s Defensive Control

Rebounding was not simply an offensive advantage.

When Charlotte collected defensive rebounds, it ended Denver’s possessions and prevented the Nuggets from getting additional opportunities.

When the Hornets collected offensive rebounds, they gained chances to extend their own possessions.

This two-way impact helps explain why the rebounding difference was so important.

Denver’s Late Improvement Was Not Enough

Denver’s 30 fourth-quarter points showed that the team could produce better offensive output as the game progressed.

However, a stronger final quarter cannot always compensate for poor first-half execution.

Charlotte’s early lead meant that Denver needed a much larger scoring run to change the outcome.

The Hornets avoided giving the Nuggets that opportunity.

Season Series: Charlotte and Denver Split Their Meetings

The two teams finished their 2025-26 regular-season series tied 1-1 according to the supplied season-series record.

Meeting	Result	Winner
December 8, 2025	Denver 115-106 Charlotte	Denver
January 18/19, 2026	Charlotte 110-87 Denver	Charlotte

The first meeting ended with a nine-point Denver victory.

The second meeting produced a much larger margin in Charlotte’s favor.

The difference between these results demonstrates how much circumstances can change between NBA matchups.

Player availability, shooting efficiency, defensive execution and rebounding can all influence the result.

The January contest was especially notable because Charlotte entered with a weaker season record but delivered the more convincing performance on the court.

Plus/Minus Analysis

Plus/minus is a useful statistic for examining a player’s overall team impact during his time on the floor.

It measures the difference between the points scored by a player’s team and the points scored by the opposition while that player is playing.

For example:

• A +10 means the player’s team outscored its opponent by 10 points during his playing time.
• A -5 means the player’s team was outscored by five points during his playing time.
• A 0 means both teams scored the same number of points during those minutes.

According to the supplied figures, LaMelo Ball recorded Charlotte’s best plus/minus at +22.

For Denver, Zeke Nnaji had the best supplied figure at +9.

These numbers should not be interpreted as individual player ratings. A player can record a strong plus/minus because of the team’s overall performance, his teammates’ production or the circumstances of his minutes.

Ball’s +22 figure is particularly interesting because it was achieved in a game Charlotte won by 23 points.

It reflects the team’s strong performance during his time on the court.

What This Game Reveals About Both Teams

The result offers several observations about Charlotte and Denver.

What Charlotte Did Well

The Hornets demonstrated that a team can overcome a disadvantage in season records through efficient execution.

Their strongest areas included:

• Consistent scoring from several players.
• Better overall field-goal accuracy.
• More effective rebounding.
• Strong first-half execution.
• Productive contributions from the bench.
• Effective playmaking.

The 110-point performance was supported by a balanced team effort.

What Denver Needs to Improve

Denver’s performance highlighted several areas that require attention.

The Nuggets needed:

• More consistent perimeter shooting.
• Better defensive rebounding.
• Greater offensive efficiency.
• Stronger production from available players.
• Better early-game execution.

The injury situation also limited the team’s options.

When important players are unavailable, the remaining roster must adjust its responsibilities. This makes communication, shot selection and defensive discipline even more important.

Why the Result Was Significant

A 23-point road victory against a team with a 29-14 record was a notable result for Charlotte.

The Hornets entered the contest with a losing record, but their performance demonstrated the importance of evaluating individual games separately from season standings.

A team’s overall record describes its performance across many games. It does not guarantee how that team will perform in one particular matchup.

The Hornets took advantage of the circumstances and delivered an impressive result.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Charlotte Hornets vs Denver Nuggets game on January 19, 2026?

The Charlotte Hornets defeated the Denver Nuggets 110-87 at Ball Arena. Charlotte secured a 23-point victory after building a 60-34 halftime lead.

2. Who was the leading scorer for the Charlotte Hornets?

Brandon Miller was Charlotte’s leading scorer with 23 points. He made eight of 15 field-goal attempts and four of nine three-point attempts.

3. Who scored the most points for the Denver Nuggets?

Jamal Murray led Denver with 16 points. Julian Strawther followed with 15 points, while Jalen Pickett contributed 12 points.

4. How many rebounds did Charlotte record against Denver?

Charlotte recorded 61 total rebounds in the published box-score statistics. Tidjane Salaün led the Hornets with 11 individual rebounds.

5. How many assists did LaMelo Ball record?

LaMelo Ball recorded six assists. He also scored 10 points, collected three steals and finished with a plus/minus of +22.

6. What was the final score of each quarter?

Charlotte scored 33, 27, 27 and 23 points across the four quarters. Denver scored 18, 16, 23 and 30 points, respectively. The final score was 110-87.

Conclusion

The January 2026 meeting between Charlotte and Denver demonstrated how shooting efficiency, rebounding and balanced scoring can determine an NBA result.

Charlotte won 110-87 because it performed better in several important statistical categories. The Hornets shot 49.4% from the field, collected 61 rebounds and recorded 30 assists.

Brandon Miller led the scoring with 23 points, while Ryan Kalkbrenner contributed 17 points. Tidjane Salaün’s 11 rebounds and LaMelo Ball’s six assists also played important roles in the victory.

Denver struggled to find offensive consistency. Jamal Murray finished with 16 points, but the Nuggets made only 21.1% of their three-point attempts and could not overcome their early deficit.

The injury situation was another important part of the result, as Denver played without several key contributors.

Ultimately, Charlotte’s 23-point victory demonstrated the importance of team execution rather than relying exclusively on season records or individual reputations. The statistical comparison provides a clear explanation of how the Hornets controlled the game and secured an impressive road win.