Portland Trail Blazers vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats
The portland trail blazers vs golden state warriors match player stats from October 8, 2026, tell the story of an entertaining preseason contest at the Moda Center in Portland, Oregon. The Trail Blazers secured a 123-118 victory, overcoming a strong three-point shooting performance from Golden State. Although the Warriors shot an impressive 56% from beyond the arc, Portland created separation through rebounding, assists, interior defense, and a stronger fourth-quarter performance.
The five-point difference reflected an interesting contrast in playing styles. Golden State relied heavily on perimeter scoring and ball movement, while Portland found success through its work on the boards, defensive contributions, and balanced offensive production. Deni Avdija led Portland with 23 points, while Dalen Terry recorded 23 points for Golden State.
This matchup provides several useful insights into individual performances and team efficiency. Looking beyond the final score reveals why Portland came away with the win, which players made the biggest statistical contributions, and how the teams performed across all four quarters.
Portland Trail Blazers vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The preseason meeting took place on October 8, 2026, at the Moda Center. Portland entered the contest looking to establish its rhythm at home, while Golden State aimed to improve its performance on the road.
Portland finished with 123 points against Golden State’s 118. Both teams demonstrated offensive ability, but their approaches differed considerably.
GAME INFORMATION
| Category | Details |
| Matchup | Portland Trail Blazers vs Golden State Warriors |
| Date | October 8, 2026 |
| Competition | 2026-27 NBA Preseason |
| Final Score | Portland 123, Golden State 118 |
| Venue | Moda Center |
| Location | Portland, Oregon |
| Game Status | Final |
| Game ID | 401914129 |
| Portland Record | 1-0 |
| Golden State Record | 1-2 |
| Series Standing | Portland leads 1-0 |
The final score shows that Portland won a competitive game, but the statistical comparison provides a much clearer explanation of the result.
Portland attempted eight more field goals than Golden State and collected ten additional rebounds. The Trail Blazers also recorded eight more assists and two more blocks.
Golden State, meanwhile, had the advantage in three-point accuracy. The Warriors converted 19 of 34 attempts, compared with Portland’s 17 of 44.
That difference demonstrates why three-point percentage alone does not always determine the outcome of a basketball game.
Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
Portland’s victory was built on a strong opening half and an effective response in the fourth quarter. Golden State had its best scoring period in the third quarter, producing 36 points and briefly putting pressure on the home team.
However, Portland responded with 37 points in the final period to protect its advantage.
| Quarter | Golden State Warriors | Portland Trail Blazers |
| First Quarter | 31 | 36 |
| Second Quarter | 19 | 21 |
| Third Quarter | 36 | 29 |
| Fourth Quarter | 32 | 37 |
| Final Score | 118 | 123 |
First Quarter: Portland Establishes an Early Lead
Portland opened the game with 36 points, five more than Golden State’s 31.
The Trail Blazers established an early offensive rhythm and made good use of their scoring opportunities. Their ability to create points in different areas of the court helped them finish the opening period ahead.
Golden State also started well. Its 31-point quarter showed that the Warriors could generate offense without needing an extended adjustment period.
The five-point difference was important because Portland could begin the second quarter with a small cushion rather than immediately chasing the opposition.
Second Quarter: Both Teams Slow Down
The second quarter was considerably lower scoring.
Golden State managed just 19 points, while Portland added 21. Neither team matched its first-quarter production, but the Trail Blazers maintained control of the scoreboard.
Portland’s defense played an important role in limiting Golden State’s scoring opportunities. The Warriors were still capable of producing points, but their second-quarter output made it harder to close the gap.
At halftime, Portland had scored 57 points against Golden State’s 50.
Third Quarter: Golden State Responds
The Warriors delivered their strongest offensive quarter after halftime.
They scored 36 points, compared with Portland’s 29, reducing the difference between the teams. Their perimeter shooting and improved offensive production made the contest more competitive.
Golden State’s three-point shooting was particularly impressive throughout the game. Converting 19 of 34 attempts gave the team a reliable source of offense.
Portland did not completely lose its offensive rhythm, but the seven-point quarter disadvantage allowed the Warriors to regain momentum.
Fourth Quarter: Portland Finishes Strong
The final quarter became the deciding period.
Portland scored 37 points, five more than Golden State’s 32. That response prevented the Warriors from completing their comeback.
The Trail Blazers benefited from contributions across the lineup, with Deni Avdija leading the scoring effort and several other players providing important support.
Robert Williams III also delivered a notable defensive performance, recording five blocks and finishing with a team-best plus/minus of +16.
Portland’s ability to produce its highest-scoring quarter when the game was closest proved decisive.
Complete Team Statistics Comparison
Team statistics provide a broader explanation of how Portland won despite Golden State’s superior three-point accuracy.
| Statistical Category | Warriors | Trail Blazers |
| Points | 118 | 123 |
| Field Goals | 42/87 | 45/95 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 48% | 47% |
| Three-Pointers | 19/34 | 17/44 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 56% | 39% |
| Free Throws | 15/24 | 16/21 |
| Free Throw Percentage | 63% | 76% |
| Total Rebounds | 40 | 50 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 12 | 18 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 28 | 32 |
| Assists | 26 | 34 |
| Turnovers | 19 | 21 |
| Steals | 11 | 13 |
| Blocks | 7 | 9 |
| Personal Fouls | 24 | 20 |
Field Goal Efficiency
Golden State made 42 of its 87 field-goal attempts, producing a shooting percentage of approximately 48%.
Portland converted 45 of 95 attempts, finishing at approximately 47%.
The Warriors therefore held a slight advantage in overall shooting efficiency. However, Portland attempted eight additional shots and made three more field goals.
This distinction matters because shooting percentage measures conversion efficiency, while total makes and attempts help explain how much offensive volume a team generated.
Portland’s larger number of attempts helped compensate for its slightly lower overall percentage.
Three-Point Shooting
Three-point shooting was one of Golden State’s strongest statistical advantages.
The Warriors connected on 19 of 34 attempts, while Portland made 17 of 44.
| Three-Point Metric | Warriors | Trail Blazers |
| Made | 19 | 17 |
| Attempted | 34 | 44 |
| Percentage | 56% | 39% |
Golden State made two more three-pointers despite attempting ten fewer shots.
That is a significant difference in shooting efficiency. The Warriors demonstrated their ability to generate valuable points from the perimeter.
Portland’s lower percentage could have become a major problem if the team had not found other ways to score.
Instead, the Trail Blazers compensated through rebounding, interior scoring opportunities, and free-throw efficiency.
Free-Throw Performance
Portland also held an advantage at the free-throw line.
The Trail Blazers converted 16 of 21 attempts, giving them a 76% success rate.
Golden State made 15 of 24 attempts, finishing at 63%.
Portland attempted three fewer free throws but made one more.
This difference illustrates the importance of converting available opportunities. In a five-point game, missed free throws can become particularly costly.
Rebounding: Portland’s Biggest Statistical Advantage
Rebounding was one of the clearest reasons behind Portland’s victory.
The Trail Blazers collected 50 rebounds, while Golden State finished with 40.
That ten-rebound difference gave Portland more opportunities to regain possession and create additional scoring chances.
The offensive rebounding numbers were particularly important.
- Portland recorded 18 offensive rebounds.
- Golden State recorded 12 offensive rebounds.
- Portland collected 32 defensive rebounds.
- Golden State collected 28 defensive rebounds.
Portland’s six-rebound advantage on the offensive glass suggests that the team was more successful at extending possessions after missed shots.
Offensive rebounds do not automatically produce points, but they give a team another opportunity to attack the basket or reset its offense.
Donovan Clingan’s ten rebounds were especially valuable in this area.
Assists and Ball Movement
Portland recorded 34 assists compared with Golden State’s 26.
That eight-assist advantage highlights the Trail Blazers’ stronger collective playmaking performance.
The Warriors still produced 26 assists, showing that their offense involved considerable ball movement. However, Portland generated more assisted scoring opportunities.
Ja Morant led Portland’s playmaking contributions with five assists, tied with Jrue Holiday and Shaedon Sharpe.
For Golden State, Dalen Terry recorded nine assists, making him the game’s standout playmaker for the Warriors.
Turnovers and Possession Management
Golden State committed 19 turnovers, while Portland recorded 21.
Neither team was particularly careful with possession.
Portland’s two additional turnovers are worth considering because they represent extra opportunities that could have gone to the opposition.
However, the Trail Blazers offset this disadvantage through their rebounding, defensive activity, and offensive production.
Golden State’s 11 steals also demonstrate that its defense created opportunities to disrupt Portland’s possession.
Defensive Contributions
Portland finished with 13 steals and nine blocks.
Golden State recorded 11 steals and seven blocks.
The Trail Blazers therefore held a two-steal advantage and a two-block advantage.
Robert Williams III was particularly influential, recording five blocks. His performance gave Portland an important defensive presence around the basket.
The Warriors received three blocks from Charles Bassey, who also led the team in rebounds with six.
These numbers show that both teams had players capable of changing possessions defensively, although Portland produced more overall defensive statistics.
Portland Trail Blazers Player Stats
Portland’s victory was supported by several individual performances. Deni Avdija led the team in scoring, Donovan Clingan controlled the rebounding numbers, and Robert Williams III made a major impact defensively.
The team’s production was spread across different roles, which helped Portland maintain its offensive output throughout the game.
Portland’s Leading Performers
| Player | Statistical Category | Performance |
| Deni Avdija | Points | 23 |
| Damian Lillard | Points | 15 |
| Jeremy Sochan | Points | 10 |
| Donovan Clingan | Rebounds | 10 |
| Ja Morant | Assists | 5 |
| Jrue Holiday | Assists | 5 |
| Shaedon Sharpe | Assists | 5 |
| Damian Lillard | Steals | 2 |
| Robert Williams III | Blocks | 5 |
| Robert Williams III | Plus/Minus | +16 |
Note: These are the individual statistical highlights available in the supplied game data, not complete individual box-score lines.
Deni Avdija Leads Portland With 23 Points
Deni Avdija was Portland’s leading scorer, finishing with 23 points.
His scoring contribution was central to the Trail Blazers’ offensive performance. Portland needed consistent production from its primary scoring options, especially when Golden State began increasing its offensive output in the third quarter.
Avdija’s 23 points gave the team a dependable scoring presence.
His performance also highlights the importance of having multiple offensive contributors. Rather than depending on one player to generate every important basket, Portland received production from several players.
In preseason basketball, this type of balanced scoring can be valuable when coaches are evaluating combinations and offensive roles.
Damian Lillard Adds 15 Points
Damian Lillard finished with 15 points, ranking second among Portland’s listed leading scorers.
His contribution provided another important offensive option alongside Avdija.
Lillard’s presence also gave Portland an experienced scoring guard capable of contributing in different offensive situations.
The Trail Blazers did not need him to lead the entire scoring effort because Avdija handled that responsibility. Instead, his 15 points helped maintain a balanced offensive attack.
He also recorded two steals, adding defensive value to his scoring contribution.
Jeremy Sochan Contributes 10 Points
Jeremy Sochan finished with 10 points.
His contribution was useful because Portland received double-digit scoring from another player outside its top two scorers.
Sochan’s performance demonstrated the value of bench and rotation contributions in a preseason matchup.
According to the available game report, he also made an encouraging debut for Portland. His scoring helped the team maintain its offensive pressure during the second half.
Donovan Clingan Controls the Rebounds
Donovan Clingan led Portland with 10 rebounds.
His contribution was particularly important because Portland finished the game with a ten-rebound advantage over Golden State.
Rebounding is often less noticeable than scoring, but it can have a major influence on a close contest.
Clingan’s performance helped Portland compete for missed shots and maintain possession.
The Trail Blazers recorded 18 offensive rebounds overall, and their advantage in this category created additional opportunities to score.
Clingan’s ten rebounds made him one of Portland’s most important contributors beyond the scoring column.
Ja Morant, Jrue Holiday, and Shaedon Sharpe Share the Assist Lead
Portland had three players tied for the team lead in assists.
| Player | Assists |
| Ja Morant | 5 |
| Jrue Holiday | 5 |
| Shaedon Sharpe | 5 |
This shared leadership is an interesting feature of Portland’s performance.
Instead of relying on one player to create every scoring opportunity, the Trail Blazers received playmaking contributions from multiple guards.
Ja Morant’s five assists showed his involvement in creating opportunities for teammates.
Holiday provided another experienced playmaking option, while Sharpe added further support.
The team’s 34 total assists suggest that this distribution of responsibility was reflected in its overall offensive production.
Robert Williams III Delivers Five Blocks
Robert Williams III was one of Portland’s most influential defensive players.
He recorded five blocks and finished with a plus/minus rating of +16.
Five blocks represent a substantial defensive contribution in a single game.
A blocked shot can prevent an opponent from scoring, interrupt an offensive possession, and change the way opposing players approach the basket.
Williams’ defensive presence helped Portland finish with nine total blocks.
His +16 plus/minus was also the best among the highlighted Portland players.
Plus/minus measures the difference between a team’s scoring and its opponent’s scoring while a player is on the court. It does not independently prove that a player caused the difference, but it provides useful context when considered alongside individual statistics.
In Williams’ case, the combination of five blocks and a +16 rating makes his performance particularly noteworthy.
Golden State Warriors Player Stats
Golden State produced several impressive individual performances despite losing by five points.
Dalen Terry led the team in scoring, assists, and steals. Brandon Williams and Will Richard also provided important scoring support.
Charles Bassey contributed on the defensive end through his rebounding and shot-blocking.
Warriors’ Leading Performers
| Player | Statistical Category | Performance |
| Dalen Terry | Points | 23 |
| Brandon Williams | Points | 17 |
| Will Richard | Points | 15 |
| Charles Bassey | Rebounds | 6 |
| Dalen Terry | Assists | 9 |
| Dalen Terry | Steals | 4 |
| Charles Bassey | Blocks | 3 |
| Miles Kelly | Plus/Minus | +14 |
Dalen Terry Leads Golden State With 23 Points
Dalen Terry was Golden State’s leading scorer, finishing with 23 points.
His performance was particularly notable because he also led the team in assists and steals.
Terry recorded:
- 23 points.
- 9 assists.
- 4 steals.
These numbers demonstrate contributions across multiple areas of the game.
His nine assists were especially important for Golden State’s offensive organization. The Warriors finished with 26 assists as a team, meaning Terry accounted for a substantial portion of their recorded playmaking.
His four steals also made him the team’s defensive leader in that category.
Although Golden State did not secure the victory, Terry’s overall statistical contribution was one of the strongest individual performances in the matchup.
Brandon Williams Scores 17 Points
Brandon Williams finished with 17 points, making him Golden State’s second-highest scorer.
His contribution helped the Warriors maintain their offensive production.
Golden State scored 118 points despite finishing with 19 turnovers. That scoring output demonstrates that the team was capable of creating opportunities even when its possession management was not perfect.
Williams’ 17 points provided useful support behind Terry’s 23-point performance.
Will Richard Adds 15 Points
Will Richard recorded 15 points, giving Golden State another important scoring contributor.
His production helped the Warriors avoid depending entirely on Terry.
The difference between the two teams was not simply the number of players capable of scoring. Golden State had three highlighted players with at least 15 points.
Portland’s advantage came from its broader statistical contributions, especially its rebounding and playmaking numbers.
Charles Bassey Provides Interior Defense
Charles Bassey led Golden State with six rebounds and three blocks.
His performance demonstrated his value as a defensive contributor.
Golden State recorded seven blocks overall, with Bassey accounting for three of them.
Although Portland finished with more rebounds and blocks, Bassey’s individual production helped the Warriors compete around the basket.
His six rebounds also made him the team’s leading rebounder according to the supplied statistics.
Miles Kelly Finishes With a +14 Plus/Minus
Miles Kelly recorded the best plus/minus among Golden State’s highlighted players at +14.
This figure indicates that Golden State outscored Portland by 14 points during his time on the floor.
However, plus/minus should always be interpreted carefully. It is influenced by teammates, opponents, substitutions, and the timing of scoring runs.
Kelly’s rating is an interesting detail because Golden State still lost the overall contest.
It illustrates why individual impact cannot always be evaluated using the final score alone.
Starting Lineups and Bench Players
The available lineup information provides additional context about the players involved in the matchup.
Golden State Warriors Starting Lineup
| Position in Listed Lineup | Player |
| Starter 1 | Malevy Leons |
| Starter 2 | Charles Bassey |
| Starter 3 | Brandon Williams |
| Starter 4 | Dalen Terry |
| Starter 5 | Will Richard |
Golden State Warriors Bench
The supplied lineup information lists the following players as bench options:
- Graham Ike
- Alex Toohey
- LJ Cryer
- Miles Kelly
- Jimmy Butler III
- Moses Moody
These players provided additional rotation options for Golden State.
The presence of several younger and developing players is consistent with the experimental nature of preseason basketball.
Portland Trail Blazers Starting Lineup
| Position in Listed Lineup | Player |
| Starter 1 | Toumani Camara |
| Starter 2 | Deni Avdija |
| Starter 3 | Donovan Clingan |
| Starter 4 | Damian Lillard |
| Starter 5 | Ja Morant |
Portland Trail Blazers Bench
Portland’s supplied bench list included:
- John Tonje
- Jeremy Sochan
- Robert Williams III
- Micah Potter
- Branden Carlson
- Yang Hansen
- Jrue Holiday
- Vit Krejci
- Scoot Henderson
- Jayson Kent
- Chris Youngblood
- Sidy Cissoko
- Jaylen Martin
- Shaedon Sharpe
This is a broad group of players, offering several possible combinations for the coaching staff.
The presence of different player types also provides opportunities to evaluate defensive versatility, shooting, ball handling, and frontcourt depth.
Lineup note: The names and starting/bench designations above follow the supplied game data. They should not be interpreted as proof that every listed player entered the game. Players designated DNP did not play because of the coach’s decision.
Why Portland Won the Game
The five-point victory was not the result of one statistical advantage. Portland performed better in several important areas, and those combined contributions helped the team overcome Golden State’s perimeter shooting.
Four factors stand out when examining the result.
1. Portland Won the Rebounding Battle
Portland finished with 50 rebounds, compared with Golden State’s 40.
This was a ten-rebound advantage, giving the Trail Blazers more opportunities to control possessions.
The offensive rebounding difference was also significant. Portland collected 18 offensive rebounds, while Golden State managed 12.
Extra possessions can be especially valuable when a team is not shooting particularly well from three-point range.
Portland converted only 39% of its three-point attempts, but its ability to recover missed shots helped compensate for that weakness.
2. Portland Created More Assists
The Trail Blazers recorded 34 assists, eight more than Golden State.
This suggests that Portland generated more assisted scoring opportunities and distributed playmaking responsibilities across multiple players.
The Warriors also demonstrated good ball movement, but their 26 assists were not enough to match Portland’s total.
The individual numbers support this observation. Three Portland players recorded five assists each, while Dalen Terry led Golden State with nine.
3. Portland Was More Effective at the Free-Throw Line
Portland converted 76% of its free throws, compared with Golden State’s 63%.
The difference was important because both teams attempted more than 20 free throws.
Portland made 16 of 21 attempts, while Golden State converted 15 of 24.
The Trail Blazers therefore gained an advantage in a scoring area that does not depend on three-point shooting.
In a close game, making available free throws can help protect a lead and reduce the opponent’s opportunities to recover.
4. Portland Produced a Stronger Fourth Quarter
Golden State scored 36 points in the third quarter, but Portland responded with 37 in the fourth.
That final-period performance was crucial.
A team can have excellent shooting numbers and still lose if it cannot maintain its production during important stretches.
Golden State’s 56% three-point shooting was impressive, but Portland’s fourth-quarter response helped secure the victory.
Golden State’s Three-Point Shooting Was Not Enough
One of the most interesting aspects of this game was the difference between Golden State’s shooting efficiency and its final result.
The Warriors made 19 three-pointers on 34 attempts.
That is an excellent shooting performance, particularly for a preseason game in which players are often experimenting with different offensive combinations.
However, the Warriors still lost.
There are several reasons why this can happen.
First, three-point shooting represents only one part of offensive production. Teams also need to score through two-point field goals, free throws, and second-chance opportunities.
Second, defensive performance matters. Golden State allowed Portland to score 123 points and record nine blocks.
Third, turnovers can reduce the value of efficient shooting. The Warriors committed 19 turnovers, giving Portland additional opportunities to regain possession.
Finally, rebounding can create a significant difference in the number of scoring opportunities available to each team.
Portland’s ten-rebound advantage was particularly relevant in this matchup.
The larger lesson is that shooting percentages should always be examined alongside possession statistics, defensive contributions, and scoring distribution.
Individual Matchup Analysis
Comparing players from both teams helps identify where the strongest individual performances occurred.
Deni Avdija vs Dalen Terry: Scoring Leaders
Both players finished with 23 points.
This made them the leading scorers for their respective teams.
| Category | Deni Avdija | Dalen Terry |
| Points | 23 | 23 |
| Team | Portland | Golden State |
| Leading Contribution | Scoring | Scoring, playmaking and steals |
| Additional Highlight | Portland’s leading scorer | 9 assists and 4 steals |
Their scoring totals were identical, but Terry’s additional contributions in assists and steals made his statistical profile particularly well-rounded.
Avdija, meanwhile, helped lead the winning team’s offensive production.
Neither player’s performance should be judged only by the final score. Individual contributions can remain valuable even when the team result goes the other way.
Donovan Clingan vs Charles Bassey: Rebounding and Interior Defense
Clingan and Bassey were their respective teams’ leading rebounders.
| Category | Donovan Clingan | Charles Bassey |
| Rebounds | 10 | 6 |
| Blocks | Not specified | 3 |
| Team | Portland | Golden State |
Clingan finished with four more rebounds than Bassey.
This was an important contribution because Portland also won the overall rebounding battle.
Bassey, however, demonstrated defensive value through his three blocks.
The comparison shows two different forms of interior contribution: controlling the glass and protecting the basket.
Robert Williams III vs Charles Bassey: Shot Blocking
Robert Williams III was Portland’s leading shot blocker with five blocks.
Charles Bassey recorded three for Golden State.
| Player | Team | Blocks |
| Robert Williams III | Portland | 5 |
| Charles Bassey | Golden State | 3 |
Williams produced two more blocks than Bassey.
His five-block performance was one of the most important defensive highlights of the game.
It also contributed to Portland’s overall advantage in blocked shots.
Ja Morant vs Dalen Terry: Playmaking
Ja Morant recorded five assists, sharing Portland’s team lead with Jrue Holiday and Shaedon Sharpe.
Dalen Terry recorded nine assists for Golden State.
Terry therefore finished with four more assists than Morant.
However, the overall team comparison favored Portland, which recorded 34 assists against Golden State’s 26.
This demonstrates why an individual comparison and a team comparison can produce different conclusions.
Terry led the individual playmaking numbers, but Portland distributed its assists across more players.
Understanding Plus/Minus in This Matchup
Plus/minus is a useful basketball statistic, but it is often misunderstood.
It measures the difference between the points scored by a player’s team and the points scored by its opponent while that player is on the court.
For this game, two figures stand out:
| Player | Team | Plus/Minus |
| Robert Williams III | Portland | +16 |
| Miles Kelly | Golden State | +14 |
Both players recorded positive plus/minus figures despite the five-point final margin.
This is possible because plus/minus is calculated during a player’s individual minutes, not across the entire game.
For example, a player can have a positive rating if his team performs well during his time on the court, even if the team loses after he leaves the game.
However, plus/minus should not be treated as a complete measurement of individual quality.
It does not account for every defensive assignment, missed opportunity, or individual decision.
The best approach is to examine it alongside points, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, and the player’s role in the game.
What This Preseason Result Means for Both Teams
Preseason basketball has a different purpose from regular-season competition.
The final score matters, but coaching staffs are also interested in player development, lineup combinations, conditioning, and tactical adjustments.
A preseason victory can provide encouragement, but it does not automatically predict regular-season success.
What Portland Can Take From the Victory
Portland can take several positives from its performance.
Rebounding strength: Collecting 50 rebounds demonstrated an ability to compete for possession and create additional offensive opportunities.
Defensive presence: Nine team blocks and 13 steals highlighted the team’s activity on the defensive end.
Distributed playmaking: Recording 34 assists showed that Portland could create opportunities through multiple players.
Fourth-quarter execution: Scoring 37 points in the final period demonstrated the team’s ability to maintain offensive production late in the contest.
There are also areas worth monitoring.
Portland committed 21 turnovers and converted only 39% of its three-point attempts.
Those numbers suggest that ball security and perimeter efficiency remain useful areas for further evaluation.
What Golden State Can Take From the Defeat
Golden State also had several positive performances.
Its 56% three-point percentage was the most impressive shooting statistic in the matchup.
Dalen Terry’s 23 points, nine assists, and four steals provided an excellent all-around statistical contribution.
Brandon Williams and Will Richard also scored 17 and 15 points, respectively.
The Warriors’ seven blocks and 11 steals showed defensive activity.
However, Golden State will want to examine its rebounding disadvantage, free-throw conversion, and turnover total.
The team recorded 19 turnovers and collected ten fewer rebounds than Portland.
Improving those areas could help create a more balanced performance in future games.
The Importance of Preseason Player Statistics
Preseason statistics are useful, but they should be interpreted differently from regular-season numbers.
Coaches frequently experiment with rotations and playing combinations. Some established players may receive limited minutes, while younger players may be given additional responsibilities.
This creates opportunities to identify developing strengths and weaknesses.
Evaluating Offensive Roles
Scoring totals can help identify which players are comfortable taking on larger offensive responsibilities.
For example, Deni Avdija’s 23 points and Dalen Terry’s 23 points demonstrate their scoring contributions in this matchup.
However, a single game cannot establish a player’s long-term scoring role.
It is more useful to monitor performance across multiple games.
Evaluating Defensive Responsibilities
Steals, blocks, and rebounds provide different information about defensive performance.
A player who records several blocks may be effective at protecting the basket.
A player who collects offensive rebounds may help extend possessions.
A player who records steals may be successful at disrupting passing lanes or pressuring ball handlers.
Robert Williams III, Charles Bassey, and Donovan Clingan each provided useful examples of these different contributions.
Evaluating Ball Movement
Assist totals can help coaches understand how effectively players create opportunities for teammates.
Portland’s 34 assists were particularly notable.
Golden State’s 26 assists also showed that the Warriors could move the ball effectively, although they finished behind Portland in this category.
Coaches can use these numbers alongside game footage to examine whether players are making good decisions and creating efficient scoring opportunities.
How to Read the Box Score Correctly
Understanding basketball statistics makes it easier to evaluate a game beyond the final result.
Here are the most important categories to understand when reviewing this matchup.
| Statistic | Meaning | Why It Matters |
| PTS | Points | Measures scoring production |
| FG | Field goals | Shows successful shots from the field |
| FG% | Field-goal percentage | Measures shooting efficiency |
| 3PM | Three-pointers made | Measures perimeter scoring |
| 3P% | Three-point percentage | Shows accuracy from beyond the arc |
| FT | Free throws | Measures successful free-throw attempts |
| REB | Rebounds | Measures possession recovery |
| OREB | Offensive rebounds | Shows second-chance opportunities |
| DREB | Defensive rebounds | Helps end opponent possessions |
| AST | Assists | Measures passes leading to baskets |
| STL | Steals | Measures defensive takeaways |
| BLK | Blocks | Measures shots rejected by defenders |
| TO | Turnovers | Measures lost possessions |
| +/- | Plus/minus | Measures team scoring difference during player minutes |
For example, Golden State’s 19 turnovers indicate that the Warriors lost possession 19 times through recorded turnovers.
Portland’s 18 offensive rebounds indicate that the Trail Blazers recovered 18 missed shots on their offensive end.
These two statistics describe different aspects of the game, but both help explain how possessions were managed.
Why Field-Goal Percentage Is Not Enough
A team can shoot a higher percentage and still lose.
That is exactly what happened in this matchup.
Golden State finished with a 48% field-goal percentage, while Portland finished at 47%.
The difference was small.
Portland, however, made three more field goals and generated advantages in rebounds and assists.
This is why a complete statistical evaluation should consider both efficiency and total production.
Why Offensive Rebounds Matter
Offensive rebounds create opportunities that would otherwise disappear after a missed shot.
A team that repeatedly recovers missed shots can generate additional possessions and put pressure on the opponent’s defense.
Portland’s 18 offensive rebounds were six more than Golden State’s 12.
This difference was one of the clearest statistical advantages for the winning team.
Why Assists Matter
Assists provide information about teamwork and offensive creation.
Portland’s 34 assists suggest that the team was able to involve several players in its scoring actions.
Golden State’s 26 assists were also a respectable total, but Portland finished with the advantage.
Assists should not be interpreted as a complete measure of offensive quality because not every successful possession ends with an assist.
Nevertheless, they provide useful information when combined with shooting percentages and turnovers.
Head-to-Head Series and Upcoming Matchup
According to the supplied matchup information, Portland took a 1-0 lead in the preseason series with its 123-118 victory.
The teams are also scheduled to meet again on November 28, 2026, in Portland.
| Category | Details |
| Previous Result | Portland 123, Golden State 118 |
| Series Standing | Portland leads 1-0 |
| Next Scheduled Meeting | November 28, 2026 |
| Listed Venue | Portland |
| Listed Broadcast | KUNP 16, BlazerVision |
The next meeting will provide another opportunity to compare the teams’ performances.
However, the October preseason result should not be treated as a prediction of the next game’s outcome.
Regular-season conditions, player availability, rotations, and coaching decisions can all change between meetings.
For a meaningful comparison, analysts should examine the next game’s player minutes, shooting performance, turnovers, rebounding, and defensive contributions rather than relying entirely on the previous score.
Official Box Score and Match Data
For readers who want to examine the original player-by-player statistics, the official game record is the most useful reference.
The supplied dataset identifies ESPN as the box-score source for Game ID 401914129.
The following information is available in the game record:
- Individual player performances.
- Team shooting percentages.
- Rebounds and assists.
- Steals and blocked shots.
- Starting lineup information.
- Bench and DNP designations.
- Quarter-by-quarter scoring.
- Game officials and matchup details.
You can review the official ESPN box score for the complete statistical record.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Portland Trail Blazers vs Golden State Warriors game on October 8, 2026?
The Portland Trail Blazers won 123-118 against the Golden State Warriors. The preseason game took place at the Moda Center in Portland, Oregon.
2. Who was the leading scorer for Portland?
Deni Avdija was Portland’s leading scorer with 23 points. Damian Lillard followed with 15 points, while Jeremy Sochan contributed 10 points.
3. Who scored the most points for the Golden State Warriors?
Dalen Terry led Golden State with 23 points. Brandon Williams scored 17 points, and Will Richard finished with 15 points.
4. Which player recorded the most rebounds?
Donovan Clingan led Portland with 10 rebounds. Charles Bassey was Golden State’s leading rebounder with six rebounds.
5. How many three-pointers did the Warriors make?
Golden State made 19 of its 34 three-point attempts, finishing with an impressive 56% shooting percentage from beyond the arc. Portland made 17 of 44 attempts.
6. Which Portland player recorded the most blocks?
Robert Williams III led Portland with five blocks. He also recorded the team’s best highlighted plus/minus rating of +16.
Conclusion
The October 8, 2026, preseason matchup between Portland and Golden State produced an entertaining 123-118 victory for the Trail Blazers.
The portland trail blazers vs golden state warriors match player stats highlight the importance of balanced basketball performance. Golden State demonstrated excellent perimeter shooting, converting 56% of its three-point attempts, but Portland found ways to overcome that advantage.
Deni Avdija led Portland with 23 points, while Donovan Clingan contributed 10 rebounds. Robert Williams III added five blocks, providing an important defensive presence. On the Warriors’ side, Dalen Terry delivered 23 points, nine assists, and four steals.
The most significant team advantages belonged to Portland in rebounding, assists, and defensive activity. The Trail Blazers collected ten more rebounds, recorded eight additional assists, and finished with two more blocks than Golden State.
Portland’s 37-point fourth quarter ultimately helped secure the five-point win.
Although preseason results do not determine regular-season success, this game offered useful information about individual contributions, offensive production, and defensive execution. The statistics also demonstrate why a complete basketball analysis requires more than looking at points and shooting percentages.
For both teams, the most meaningful lessons involve maintaining possession, controlling rebounds, creating efficient scoring opportunities, and producing consistent defensive performances.
