Phoenix Suns vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats

The phoenix suns vs charlotte hornets match player stats from March 9, 2026, reveal how Phoenix secured a 111-99 victory over Charlotte at Mortgage Matchup Center in Phoenix, Arizona. Devin Booker led the Suns with 30 points and 10 assists, while Collin Gillespie and Jalen Green each contributed 24 points. For Charlotte, LaMelo Ball finished as the leading scorer with 22 points, but his team’s offensive production was not enough to overcome Phoenix’s late-game performance.

The contest offered an interesting example of how shooting efficiency, free-throw accuracy, and ball security can influence an NBA result. Charlotte competed well during the opening half and entered the second quarter with an early advantage. However, Phoenix gradually took control and delivered its strongest scoring performance in the fourth quarter. The Suns finished with a 12-point win, demonstrating better overall shooting efficiency and greater control of possessions.

This breakdown examines the final score, individual performances, team statistics, quarter-by-quarter results, and the important moments that explain the outcome. It also compares the leading players from both teams to show where Phoenix gained its advantage and why Charlotte struggled to maintain its early momentum.

Table of Contents

Phoenix Suns vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The March 9 meeting between Phoenix and Charlotte brought together two teams looking to strengthen their positions during the regular season. Phoenix entered the contest with a 37-27 record, while Charlotte arrived with a 32-33 record.

The Suns had the advantage of playing at home, where they had recorded 22 wins and 13 losses. Charlotte, meanwhile, had an 18-16 away record. Those records provided useful context before tip-off, but the result ultimately depended on execution during the 48 minutes of basketball.

Final Game Information

Match Detail	Information
Match	Phoenix Suns vs Charlotte Hornets
Date	March 9, 2026
Final Score	Phoenix 111, Charlotte 99
Winner	Phoenix Suns
Venue	Mortgage Matchup Center
Location	Phoenix, Arizona
Attendance	17,071
Phoenix Record	37-27
Charlotte Record	32-33
Game Status	Final
Phoenix Top Scorer	Devin Booker, 30 points
Charlotte Top Scorer	LaMelo Ball, 22 points
Winning Margin	12 points

Phoenix finished the game with 111 points, while Charlotte managed 99. The difference was not simply the result of one player having an exceptional scoring night. Several Phoenix players contributed meaningful points, and the team converted its free throws at a much higher rate.

Booker’s performance was particularly important because he contributed as both a scorer and a playmaker. His 30 points gave Phoenix a reliable offensive foundation, while his 10 assists helped teammates find scoring opportunities.

Charlotte also received contributions from several players, including Miles Bridges, Brandon Miller, and Kon Knueppel. However, the Hornets could not match Phoenix’s overall efficiency.

Quarter-by-Quarter Score Breakdown

The scoring progression explains how the game developed. Charlotte started well, but Phoenix improved its performance as the contest moved forward.

Quarter	Charlotte Hornets	Phoenix Suns
First Quarter	30	28
Second Quarter	28	32
Third Quarter	19	21
Fourth Quarter	22	30
Final Score	99	111

First Quarter: Charlotte Starts Strong

Charlotte opened the game with 30 points and held Phoenix to 28. The Hornets established an early offensive rhythm and demonstrated that they could compete with the home team.

Phoenix remained close throughout the opening period, preventing Charlotte from creating a significant advantage. Although the Suns trailed by two points after the first quarter, the small margin left plenty of room for a comeback.

The opening quarter also established an important pattern. Charlotte could generate points, but Phoenix had enough offensive quality to remain within reach.

Second Quarter: Phoenix Takes Control

Phoenix scored 32 points in the second quarter, compared with Charlotte’s 28. That four-point advantage allowed the Suns to turn their early deficit into a halftime lead.

The improvement was important because Phoenix began converting its offensive opportunities more effectively. Rather than relying entirely on Booker, the Suns received contributions from other scoring options.

Charlotte continued to score, but its defensive performance did not prevent Phoenix from taking control of the scoreboard.

At halftime, Phoenix had moved ahead by two points. The game remained competitive, but the momentum had started shifting toward the home team.

Third Quarter: Both Teams Produce a Defensive Battle

The third quarter featured lower scoring from both sides. Charlotte managed 19 points, while Phoenix recorded 21.

Neither team produced a major offensive run during this period. The Suns maintained their advantage by adding two points to their halftime lead.

This quarter was important because Phoenix avoided giving Charlotte an opportunity to regain control. Even without a particularly explosive scoring performance, the Suns remained disciplined and protected their advantage.

Charlotte needed a stronger offensive response in the final period, but the Hornets entered the fourth quarter already facing a four-point deficit.

Fourth Quarter: Suns Deliver the Decisive Performance

Phoenix produced its best scoring quarter of the game when it mattered most. The Suns scored 30 points in the fourth quarter, while Charlotte managed only 22.

That eight-point difference increased Phoenix’s lead and helped secure the 111-99 victory.

The final period highlighted the difference between the teams. Phoenix continued to find productive scoring opportunities, while Charlotte could not generate enough offense to close the gap.

The Suns’ ability to finish strongly was one of the clearest reasons behind the final result.

Complete Phoenix Suns Player Stats

Phoenix’s offensive production was spread across several players. Devin Booker led the team, but Collin Gillespie and Jalen Green also reached 24 points. Rasheer Fleming provided another important contribution from the bench.

The combination gave Phoenix multiple scoring options and made it more difficult for Charlotte to concentrate its defensive attention on one player.

Phoenix Suns Individual Player Performance

Player	Points	Field Goals	Three-Pointers	Free Throws	Rebounds	Assists
Devin Booker	30	7-18	1-6	15-15	3	10
Collin Gillespie	24	8-15	5-10	3-3	5	4
Jalen Green	24	8-19	4-10	4-6	4	2
Rasheer Fleming	16	6-8	4-6	0-0	2	0
Royce O’Neale	3	1-6	1-6	0-0	7	1
Oso Ighodaro	2	1-3	0-0	0-0	4	5
Khaman Maluach	4	2-4	0-0	0-0	9	0
Haywood Highsmith	3	1-4	0-2	1-2	4	2
Ryan Dunn	3	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	0
Amir Coffey	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0

Player statistics are presented from the available game box-score data. Rebound and assist figures are included where available.

Devin Booker: 30 Points and 10 Assists

Devin Booker delivered the most influential individual performance of the game. He finished with 30 points and 10 assists, recording a double-double while leading Phoenix’s offense.

His shooting numbers were interesting because he did not have an especially efficient night from the field. Booker converted seven of his 18 field-goal attempts and made just one of six three-point attempts.

However, his free-throw performance made a major difference.

Booker converted all 15 of his free throws, giving Phoenix an important source of reliable points. His ability to reach the free-throw line helped compensate for his missed shots from the field.

His 10 assists were equally valuable. Rather than forcing difficult attempts, Booker created opportunities for teammates, including Gillespie and Green.

Three aspects made his performance especially important:

Scoring: His 30 points made him the game’s leading scorer.
Playmaking: His 10 assists helped distribute the offensive responsibility.
Free throws: His perfect 15-for-15 performance provided consistent scoring.

Booker’s contribution demonstrated that an influential performance does not always require exceptional three-point shooting. His scoring volume, playmaking, and ability to convert free throws helped Phoenix control the contest.

Collin Gillespie: An Important 24-Point Contribution

Collin Gillespie finished with 24 points and provided Phoenix with another dependable scoring option.

He converted eight of 15 field-goal attempts and connected on five of 10 three-point attempts. His 50% shooting from beyond the arc was particularly useful because it allowed Phoenix to maintain offensive pressure without depending entirely on Booker.

Gillespie also converted all three of his free throws and recorded five rebounds and four assists.

His performance demonstrated the importance of secondary scoring. When the opposition concentrates on stopping the primary offensive player, another capable scorer can take advantage of available space.

Gillespie’s contribution helped prevent Charlotte from focusing all its defensive attention on Booker.

Jalen Green: 24 Points and Perimeter Scoring

Jalen Green matched Gillespie with 24 points and provided Phoenix with another significant offensive performance.

Green made eight of his 19 field-goal attempts, including four of 10 from three-point range. He also converted four of six free throws.

His 24 points gave Phoenix a third major scoring threat.

Green’s perimeter shooting was particularly important because Phoenix finished with 16 successful three-pointers. His four makes accounted for a quarter of that total.

He also contributed four rebounds and two assists.

Having Booker, Gillespie, and Green produce 24 or more points gave the Suns a balanced offensive structure. Charlotte could not focus exclusively on one scorer without creating opportunities for another.

Rasheer Fleming: Valuable Production From the Bench

Rasheer Fleming was another standout performer for Phoenix.

He scored 16 points while converting six of eight field-goal attempts. He also made four of six three-point attempts.

His shooting efficiency was one of the strongest individual contributions in the game.

Fleming did not need a large number of attempts to produce meaningful scoring. His 75% field-goal percentage and 66.7% three-point percentage made his bench contribution particularly valuable.

He also demonstrated how reserve players can influence a game without dominating possession.

When the starting lineup needs additional scoring, an efficient bench performance can help maintain offensive production. Fleming provided exactly that type of contribution.

Khaman Maluach: Rebounding Presence

Khaman Maluach finished with nine rebounds, making him Phoenix’s leading rebounder.

Although he scored only four points, his rebounding contribution was important for the team’s overall balance.

Rebounding helps teams finish defensive possessions and create additional offensive opportunities. Maluach’s nine rebounds gave Phoenix a valuable presence around the basket.

He also recorded two blocks, according to the available individual box-score figures.

His performance is a useful reminder that a player’s impact cannot be measured through points alone.

Phoenix’s Supporting Players

Several other Suns contributed in smaller but useful ways.

Royce O’Neale: Recorded seven rebounds and three points.
Oso Ighodaro: Added five assists and four rebounds.
Haywood Highsmith: Scored three points and collected four rebounds.
Ryan Dunn: Converted his only field-goal attempt, which was a three-pointer.
Amir Coffey: Finished with two points.

These contributions helped Phoenix distribute its responsibilities across the lineup.

The Suns did not need every player to produce double-digit scoring. Their leading scorers provided the offensive production, while the supporting players contributed rebounds, assists, and defensive activity.

Complete Charlotte Hornets Player Stats

Charlotte had several productive individual performances, but its scoring output was not enough to match Phoenix.

LaMelo Ball led the team with 22 points, followed by Miles Bridges with 16 and Kon Knueppel with 15. Brandon Miller also reached double figures with 11 points.

The Hornets finished with 99 points, 12 fewer than Phoenix.

Charlotte Hornets Individual Player Performance

Player	Points	Field Goals	Three-Pointers	Rebounds	Assists
LaMelo Ball	22	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	6
Miles Bridges	16	7-16	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified
Kon Knueppel	15	Not specified	2-8	Not specified	Not specified
Brandon Miller	11	Not specified	Not specified	9	Not specified
Coby White	7	3-10	1-5	1	4
Grant Williams	10	3-4	3-4	2	2
Ryan Kalkbrenner	10	4-6	0-0	7	0
Josh Green	3	1-3	1-2	0	1
Sion James	3	1-1	1-1	2	1
Moussa Diabate	2	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified
Pat Connaughton	0	0-1	0-0	1	0
Tre Mann	0	0-1	0-0	0	0

Not specified means the corresponding individual figure was not included in the supplied statistical information. The table does not estimate missing statistics.

LaMelo Ball: Charlotte’s Leading Scorer

LaMelo Ball led Charlotte with 22 points and six assists.

His scoring performance made him the Hornets’ most productive offensive player, while his playmaking helped teammates find opportunities throughout the game.

Ball’s six assists were especially important because Charlotte needed multiple players to contribute offensively against Phoenix.

However, his individual production could not overcome the Suns’ more efficient overall shooting.

The difference between the leading scorers also tells part of the story. Booker scored 30 points, eight more than Ball, and added four more assists.

That combination gave Phoenix a meaningful advantage in its primary playmaking role.

Miles Bridges: A Strong Supporting Performance

Miles Bridges finished with 16 points and made seven of his 16 field-goal attempts.

He provided Charlotte with another scoring option behind Ball and helped the team remain competitive during the early stages.

Bridges’ ability to contribute from the field was useful, but Charlotte needed additional scoring consistency during the second half.

His 16 points were respectable, yet Phoenix had three players who scored at least 24 points.

That difference in top-end scoring production became an important factor in the final result.

Kon Knueppel: 15 Points for the Hornets

Kon Knueppel recorded 15 points and was another important contributor for Charlotte.

He made two of eight attempts from three-point range. Although he struggled to find consistent success from beyond the arc, he still provided 15 points.

His performance was particularly relevant because Charlotte needed perimeter shooting to keep pace with Phoenix.

The Suns made 16 three-pointers, compared with Charlotte’s 15. The difference in total makes was small, but Phoenix’s overall shooting efficiency was better.

Knueppel’s contribution helped Charlotte remain competitive, but the team needed more consistent perimeter production.

Brandon Miller: Rebounding and Early Scoring

Brandon Miller finished with 11 points and nine rebounds.

His nine rebounds tied him for Charlotte’s leading individual rebounding contribution in the available game information.

Miller’s scoring came during the first half, when Charlotte was still competing closely with Phoenix.

His rebounding helped the Hornets remain active around the basket, but Charlotte struggled to maintain its offensive momentum after halftime.

A player who contributes in both scoring and rebounding can provide significant value, even when the final result does not favor his team.

Contributions From Charlotte’s Supporting Lineup

Charlotte received additional points from several players.

Grant Williams: Scored 10 points and converted three of four three-point attempts.
Ryan Kalkbrenner: Added 10 points and seven rebounds.
Coby White: Finished with seven points and four assists.
Josh Green: Contributed three points.
Sion James: Recorded three points.
Moussa Diabate: Scored two points.
Pat Connaughton: Finished without a field goal.
Tre Mann: Also finished without scoring.

Grant Williams and Ryan Kalkbrenner were useful scoring contributors from the supporting group. Their 10 points each helped Charlotte avoid relying entirely on its primary scorers.

However, Phoenix’s offensive balance remained stronger.

Team Statistics Comparison: Phoenix vs Charlotte

The team statistics provide a clearer explanation of why Phoenix won.

Charlotte actually attempted more field goals and made more total field goals. However, Phoenix converted its attempts at a higher percentage and was much more effective at the free-throw line.

Statistical Category	Charlotte Hornets	Phoenix Suns
Total Points	99	111
Field Goals Made	37	36
Field Goals Attempted	88	79
Field-Goal Percentage	42%	46%
Three-Pointers Made	15	16
Three-Pointers Attempted	45	41
Three-Point Percentage	33%	39%
Free Throws Made	10	23
Free Throws Attempted	15	26
Free-Throw Percentage	67%	88%
Total Rebounds	41	40
Assists	24	24
Turnovers	11	6
Steals	1	5
Blocks	6	5

Field-Goal Efficiency Favored Phoenix

One of the most interesting details is that Charlotte made 37 field goals, while Phoenix made 36.

At first glance, that might suggest the Hornets were more productive from the field.

However, Charlotte needed 88 attempts to make those 37 baskets. Phoenix needed only 79 attempts to make 36.

The difference becomes clearer when shooting percentages are considered.

Charlotte: 42% from the field.
Phoenix: 46% from the field.

Phoenix converted its opportunities more efficiently.

This is important because basketball teams do not simply need more shooting attempts. They need to turn possessions into points.

Phoenix generated a higher percentage of successful shots despite attempting fewer field goals.

Three-Point Shooting Provided Another Advantage

Both teams made a similar number of three-pointers.

Charlotte converted 15 of 45 attempts, while Phoenix made 16 of 41.

The Suns therefore finished with a 39% three-point percentage, compared with Charlotte’s 33%.

Although the difference was only one successful three-pointer, Phoenix needed four fewer attempts to achieve that total.

This suggests that the Suns were more efficient from the perimeter.

Gillespie and Green were particularly important in this category, combining for nine successful three-pointers.

Fleming added four more, giving Phoenix a strong contribution from its perimeter scorers.

Free-Throw Shooting Was a Major Difference

The free-throw statistics provide one of the clearest explanations for Phoenix’s victory.

Charlotte made 10 of 15 free throws, while Phoenix converted 23 of 26.

That means Phoenix scored 13 more points from the free-throw line.

Booker’s perfect 15-for-15 performance was especially significant.

A player who converts every free throw provides reliable points during situations when the defense commits fouls.

Phoenix also benefited from strong free-throw contributions from Gillespie and Green.

Charlotte’s 67% conversion rate was considerably lower than Phoenix’s 88%.

The Suns’ advantage at the line helped create a scoring gap that Charlotte could not overcome.

Rebounding Was Nearly Even

Charlotte recorded 41 rebounds, compared with Phoenix’s 40.

This statistic shows that the Hornets were competitive on the boards.

Brandon Miller and the team’s other frontcourt players helped Charlotte collect rebounds throughout the contest.

Phoenix also received a strong contribution from Maluach, who led the Suns with nine rebounds.

Because the overall rebounding numbers were so close, it would be inaccurate to suggest that Phoenix won primarily through rebounding dominance.

Instead, its advantages came from shooting efficiency, free throws, and turnovers.

Ball Security Helped Phoenix Control the Game

Charlotte committed 11 turnovers, while Phoenix committed only six.

That five-turnover difference was important.

Every turnover represents a possession that ends without a normal field-goal or free-throw opportunity.

Teams that protect the ball generally have more opportunities to execute their offensive systems.

Phoenix’s six turnovers demonstrated better possession management.

Charlotte also recorded only one steal, compared with five for Phoenix. This indicates that the Suns were more active in creating defensive disruptions.

The turnover difference was another factor that helped Phoenix maintain its advantage.

Why the Phoenix Suns Won the Game

Phoenix’s 111-99 victory was built on several statistical advantages rather than one isolated factor.

The Suns were more accurate from the field, converted significantly more free throws, and protected possession more effectively. Those advantages became increasingly important as the game progressed.

1. Phoenix Had Three Major Scoring Threats

Booker, Gillespie, and Green combined for 78 points.

That represented more than 70% of Phoenix’s final scoring total.

The three players provided different offensive strengths:

Booker controlled the offense through scoring and playmaking.
Gillespie provided efficient perimeter shooting.
Green added another scoring threat through a combination of field goals and three-pointers.

Charlotte could not rely on stopping one player to control the Suns’ offense.

Even when Booker missed shots, Gillespie and Green continued to produce points.

2. The Suns Won the Free-Throw Battle

Phoenix’s 23 successful free throws compared with Charlotte’s 10 created a 13-point advantage.

Interestingly, the final winning margin was 12 points.

This means the free-throw scoring difference alone was greater than the final margin between the teams.

It does not mean free throws were the only reason Phoenix won, but it highlights their importance.

Booker’s perfect performance at the line was particularly influential.

3. Phoenix Protected Its Possessions

The Suns committed only six turnovers.

Charlotte committed 11.

The difference gave Phoenix more opportunities to complete offensive possessions without losing the ball.

Turnover control is especially valuable in close games because it reduces unnecessary scoring opportunities for the opposition.

Phoenix also recorded five steals, showing greater activity in disrupting Charlotte’s offense.

4. The Suns Finished Better in the Fourth Quarter

Phoenix scored 30 points in the final period, while Charlotte scored 22.

The eight-point difference in that quarter helped secure the victory.

The Suns had already established a narrow lead, but they needed to maintain their concentration and avoid allowing Charlotte to create a comeback.

Their fourth-quarter performance accomplished that objective.

5. Bench Scoring Strengthened Phoenix’s Offense

Rasheer Fleming’s 16 points were particularly valuable.

He made six of eight field-goal attempts and four of six three-point attempts.

This type of efficient production can make a major difference because it reduces pressure on the starting lineup.

Phoenix also received smaller contributions from several other players, allowing the team to maintain its offensive balance.

The Most Important Statistical Matchups

Individual matchups help explain how the two teams approached the game.

Devin Booker vs LaMelo Ball

Category	Devin Booker	LaMelo Ball
Points	30	22
Assists	10	6
Team Result	Win	Loss

Booker had the stronger statistical performance.

He scored eight more points and recorded four additional assists.

Both players were important to their teams’ offensive systems, but Booker produced more scoring and playmaking.

His perfect free-throw shooting also gave Phoenix an important advantage.

Ball remained Charlotte’s leading scorer, but he did not receive enough overall offensive support to match Phoenix’s production.

Collin Gillespie vs Charlotte’s Perimeter Defense

Gillespie’s five successful three-pointers were a significant part of Phoenix’s offensive performance.

He attempted 10 shots from beyond the arc and converted half of them.

Charlotte made 15 three-pointers as a team, but its lower shooting percentage limited the value of that production.

The difference was not simply the number of successful shots. It was how efficiently each team created and converted those opportunities.

Khaman Maluach vs Charlotte’s Rebounding Group

Maluach recorded nine rebounds for Phoenix.

Brandon Miller also collected nine rebounds for Charlotte.

Their identical individual totals show that both players contributed on the glass.

Charlotte actually finished with one more total rebound than Phoenix, so this matchup was relatively balanced.

However, Phoenix’s overall efficiency in other statistical categories proved more influential.

Game Context: Why Charlotte’s Road Streak Mattered

The result was significant for Charlotte because the Hornets entered the game with a 10-game road winning streak.

That run had been the longest active road winning streak in the NBA.

Phoenix ended the streak with its 111-99 victory.

Charlotte had shown strong form during the period leading up to the matchup, winning 16 of its previous 21 games as it recovered from a difficult start to the season.

The loss therefore represented an important interruption to the team’s recent progress.

For Phoenix, the result provided another positive home performance. The Suns had won four of their previous five games according to the game coverage.

The contest also demonstrated that a team can enter a matchup with excellent recent form and still struggle when its opponent executes more effectively.

What the Statistics Reveal About Both Teams

The game provides several useful lessons about the strengths and weaknesses displayed by Phoenix and Charlotte.

Phoenix Suns: Main Strengths

Offensive versatility

Phoenix had three players score at least 24 points. That made the offense less predictable and created different scoring opportunities.

Free-throw accuracy

The Suns made 88% of their free throws. This was one of the biggest differences between the teams.

Three-point efficiency

Phoenix made 39% of its three-point attempts, giving it an advantage over Charlotte’s 33%.

Possession management

Committing only six turnovers helped the Suns maintain offensive control.

Strong finishing

Phoenix increased its advantage during the fourth quarter rather than allowing Charlotte to recover.

Phoenix Suns: Areas to Improve

Despite winning, Phoenix had some areas that could have been better.

Booker converted only seven of his 18 field-goal attempts. His overall shooting percentage was below the team’s 46% figure.

The Suns also collected one fewer rebound than Charlotte.

Although their overall performance was strong, improving defensive rebounding and field-goal consistency could help Phoenix in more difficult matchups.

Charlotte Hornets: Main Strengths

Multiple scoring contributors

Ball, Bridges, Knueppel, and Miller all reached double figures.

Rebounding

Charlotte finished with 41 rebounds, one more than Phoenix.

Three-point volume

The Hornets attempted 45 three-pointers, demonstrating their willingness to use perimeter shooting as an offensive option.

Playmaking

Charlotte matched Phoenix with 24 assists.

These numbers demonstrate that the Hornets were not completely outplayed in every category.

Charlotte Hornets: Areas to Improve

The most obvious concern was shooting efficiency.

Charlotte attempted nine more field goals than Phoenix but made only one additional basket.

Its 42% field-goal percentage and 33% three-point percentage were below Phoenix’s figures.

Free-throw accuracy was another problem. Converting 10 of 15 attempts left points on the table.

Turnovers also affected Charlotte’s ability to maintain offensive possessions.

Reducing mistakes and improving shot selection would be important adjustments in similar matchups.

What Made the Fourth Quarter Different?

The fourth quarter deserves additional attention because it was the period that turned Phoenix’s narrow advantage into a comfortable final margin.

The Suns scored 30 points during the final 12 minutes.

Charlotte scored 22.

There are three useful ways to understand this difference.

First, Phoenix had several established scoring options. The team did not need to depend exclusively on one player to generate offense.

Second, the Suns had already demonstrated strong free-throw shooting. Their ability to convert opportunities at the line helped them maintain their scoring advantage.

Third, Charlotte needed to produce a stronger offensive response than it had managed in the third quarter. Instead, the Hornets scored only 22 points.

The final period therefore reflected a difference in execution.

Phoenix maintained its offensive productivity, while Charlotte could not produce enough points to challenge the lead.

Understanding Important NBA Statistical Terms

Readers who regularly follow player box scores can gain more value from the numbers by understanding what each category represents.

Points

Points measure the total number of points a player scores through field goals and free throws.

A regular field goal is worth two points, a successful three-pointer is worth three, and a free throw is worth one.

Booker’s 30 points made him the highest scorer in this matchup.

Field Goals Made and Attempted

Field goals show how many shots a player or team successfully converts compared with the total number attempted.

For example, Booker’s 7-18 shooting means he made seven of his 18 field-goal attempts.

The percentage is calculated by dividing successful shots by total attempts and multiplying by 100.

Three-Point Percentage

Three-point percentage measures shooting accuracy from beyond the three-point line.

Gillespie’s 5-10 performance represented a 50% conversion rate.

This category helps readers understand whether a player is producing perimeter points efficiently.

Free-Throw Percentage

Free-throw percentage measures successful free throws divided by total attempts.

Booker’s 15-15 performance represented 100% accuracy.

It was one of the most notable individual statistics in the game.

Rebounds

Rebounds are recorded when a player gains possession after a missed shot.

There are two main types:

Offensive rebounds, which can create additional scoring opportunities.
Defensive rebounds, which help end the opposition’s possession.

Maluach and Miller each recorded nine rebounds, making them important contributors in this category.

Assists

An assist is credited when a player passes the ball to a teammate who scores directly from that opportunity.

Booker’s 10 assists reflected his contribution to Phoenix’s offensive organization.

Ball recorded six assists for Charlotte.

Turnovers

A turnover occurs when a team loses possession without completing a scoring attempt.

Phoenix committed six turnovers, while Charlotte committed 11.

This difference is useful when evaluating how effectively teams manage their possessions.

Plus/Minus

Plus/minus measures the difference between a team’s points scored and points allowed while a particular player is on the court.

For example, a positive plus/minus indicates that the player’s team outscored its opponent during that player’s court time.

It is important to understand that plus/minus does not measure individual performance in isolation. Teammates, opponents, lineup combinations, and playing time all influence the number.

Double-Double

A double-double occurs when a player records at least 10 in two of the five main statistical categories: points, rebounds, assists, steals, or blocks.

Booker’s 30 points and 10 assists gave him a double-double in this game.

These statistical terms help readers move beyond the final score and understand the different ways players influence a basketball contest.

Historical and Season Context

The March 9 matchup was part of the regular-season competition between Phoenix and Charlotte.

The Suns entered with a 37-27 record, while the Hornets had a 32-33 record.

Phoenix’s home record was 22-13, and Charlotte’s road record was 18-16.

These figures provided useful context for understanding the matchup.

The game also ended Charlotte’s 10-game road winning streak, making the result notable beyond the two teams’ immediate standings.

For Phoenix, winning against an opponent in strong recent form demonstrated the value of maintaining consistency at home.

For Charlotte, the defeat highlighted the importance of converting offensive opportunities efficiently, particularly against teams with multiple scoring threats.

The available game report and official scoring information can be checked through the NBA’s official game summary.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Phoenix Suns vs Charlotte Hornets game on March 9, 2026?

The Phoenix Suns defeated the Charlotte Hornets 111-99 on March 9, 2026, at Mortgage Matchup Center in Phoenix, Arizona. Phoenix secured the 12-point victory after outscoring Charlotte 30-22 in the fourth quarter.

2. How many points did Devin Booker score against the Charlotte Hornets?

Devin Booker scored 30 points and recorded 10 assists. He made seven of 18 field-goal attempts and converted all 15 of his free throws.

3. Who was Charlotte’s leading scorer against Phoenix?

LaMelo Ball was Charlotte’s leading scorer with 22 points. He also recorded six assists, providing an important contribution to the Hornets’ offense.

4. How many points did Collin Gillespie and Jalen Green score?

Collin Gillespie and Jalen Green each scored 24 points for Phoenix. Gillespie made five three-pointers, while Green converted four from beyond the arc.

5. Which team had better shooting statistics?

Phoenix had better overall shooting efficiency. The Suns shot 46% from the field and 39% from three-point range, while Charlotte shot 42% overall and 33% from beyond the arc.

6. How many rebounds did Khaman Maluach record?

Khaman Maluach recorded nine rebounds, making him Phoenix’s leading rebounder in the game. Brandon Miller also collected nine rebounds for Charlotte.

Conclusion

The March 9, 2026, matchup between Phoenix and Charlotte demonstrated the importance of shooting efficiency, reliable scoring options, and disciplined possession management.

Phoenix secured a 111-99 victory by combining strong performances from its leading players. Devin Booker finished with 30 points and 10 assists, while Collin Gillespie and Jalen Green contributed 24 points each. Rasheer Fleming added 16 points, providing valuable scoring from the bench.

Charlotte also had several impressive individual performances. LaMelo Ball led the Hornets with 22 points, Miles Bridges scored 16, and Kon Knueppel contributed 15. Brandon Miller added 11 points and nine rebounds.

The team statistics reveal why Phoenix came out on top. The Suns shot more accurately from the field, converted 23 free throws, and committed only six turnovers. Charlotte collected slightly more rebounds and matched Phoenix in assists, but its lower shooting efficiency and free-throw production proved costly.

Ultimately, Phoenix’s strongest advantage came from its balanced offense and ability to execute during the fourth quarter. The Suns turned a competitive contest into a 12-point victory, while Charlotte’s 10-game road winning streak came to an end.

The individual performances also demonstrate why evaluating a basketball game requires more than looking at the final score. Points, assists, rebounds, shooting percentages, and turnovers collectively provide a much clearer understanding of how a team wins or loses.