New York Yankees vs Mets Match Player Stats

The new york yankees vs mets match player stats from the May 16, 2026 Subway Series show how the Mets turned a relatively even hitting battle into a convincing 6-3 win at Citi Field. New York recorded nine hits compared with eight for the Mets, yet the Mets produced the better run-scoring sequence, received eight strikeouts from David Peterson, and protected their lead when the Yankees created pressure late. MLB’s official game coverage confirms the 6-3 result and highlights Mark Vientos’ two-run double and Brett Baty’s RBI double as important scoring plays. (MLB.com)

One important date correction is necessary before looking at the numbers. The supplied stat sheet labels the game May 17, 2026, but the official MLB game story identifies the 6-3 contest at Citi Field as May 16, 2026. May 17 was the following Subway Series game, which the Mets won 7-6 in 10 innings. (MLB.com)

Table of Contents

New york yankees vs mets match player stats

The headline numbers tell an interesting story. The Yankees actually collected more hits than the Mets, but New York’s National League club was much more efficient with its opportunities.

Category	Yankees	Mets
Final Score	3	6
Hits	9	8
Runs	3	6
Errors	1	1
At-Bats	36	31
RBI	2	4
Home Runs	0	0
Walks	3	5
Strikeouts	14	11
RISP	3-for-15	1-for-7
Left on Base	11	6
Team Pitching IP	8.0	9.0
Team Pitching Strikeouts	11	14

The most revealing figures are not simply hits and runs. The Yankees went 3-for-15 with runners in scoring position and stranded 11 runners. The Mets went only 1-for-7 with runners in scoring position, but they did a better job of converting their most important opportunities and kept the Yankees from turning traffic on the bases into a comeback.

That distinction matters when evaluating player performance. A team can lead the hit column and still lose comfortably when those hits are scattered rather than concentrated around scoring opportunities.

Final score and game context

The Mets defeated the Yankees 6-3 at Citi Field, with David Peterson earning the victory in a four-inning bulk role.

The game was competitive early, but the Mets gradually created separation.

The scoring sequence was particularly important:

The Mets scored twice in the third inning.
New York added another run in the fourth.
Two more Mets runs came in the fifth.
The Mets added their final run in the seventh.
The Yankees managed three total runs but could not produce the big inning required to erase the deficit.

MLB’s official game coverage identifies the Mets’ fifth-inning scoring as a major turning point. Mark Vientos delivered a two-run double, while Brett Baty also contributed an RBI double during the game. (MLB.com)

The result was not simply about one big offensive performance. It was a game in which the Mets repeatedly answered Yankees pressure.

Yankees batting performance

The Yankees finished with nine hits, one more than the Mets, but those hits produced only three runs.

That immediately tells us where the offense struggled.

The Yankees generated opportunities but failed to maximize them. Their 3-for-15 performance with runners in scoring position was especially costly. Leaving 11 runners on base meant the Yankees repeatedly reached base without finishing the inning.

Aaron Judge

Aaron Judge recorded two hits and remained one of the Yankees’ most important offensive threats.

Even without a home run, his two-hit performance demonstrated why opposing pitchers cannot afford to lose command against him. Judge’s value in a game like this is not limited to his final line. His presence changes pitching decisions and can force pitchers to work around him.

However, two hits from Judge were not enough to compensate for the Yankees’ overall lack of run production.

Paul Goldschmidt

Paul Goldschmidt also collected two hits and drove in one run.

His RBI single represented one of the Yankees’ more productive offensive moments. The hit gave the Yankees a chance to stay within striking distance, but the offense could not build enough momentum afterward.

Goldschmidt’s contribution was particularly useful because the Yankees needed middle-of-the-order hitters to convert opportunities with runners aboard.

Jazz Chisholm Jr.

Jazz Chisholm Jr. finished with two hits.

His ability to create pressure through athleticism and contact gave the Yankees another productive offensive option. However, the larger problem was collective execution. Multiple Yankees reached base, yet the club could not string enough successful plate appearances together in the same inning.

Trent Grisham

Trent Grisham recorded one hit and one RBI.

His production was modest compared with the team’s nine-hit total, but his RBI was important because it represented one of only two Yankees RBI in the game.

The Yankees’ biggest offensive problem

The clearest weakness was situational hitting.

Nine hits normally give a team a reasonable foundation for scoring more than three runs. But the Yankees:

Went 3-for-15 with runners in scoring position
Left 11 runners on base
Struck out 14 times
Produced only two RBI
Hit no home runs

That combination explains the final score better than the nine-hit total does.

Mets batting performance

The Mets produced only eight hits, but they scored six runs.

That is the central offensive lesson from this matchup.

The Mets did not need to dominate the hit count. Instead, they maximized several important opportunities and received major contributions from their middle and upper lineup.

Carson Benge

Carson Benge was one of the Mets’ most productive hitters, finishing with three hits and two runs scored.

Three hits in a game immediately stands out, but his two runs were equally important. Benge repeatedly helped put pressure on the Yankees’ pitching staff and became a key part of the Mets’ scoring sequences.

His performance was a good example of why box-score evaluation should look beyond RBI totals. A player does not need to drive in every run to have a major offensive impact.

Juan Soto

Juan Soto recorded two hits, drew two walks, stole two bases, and scored a run.

That is one of the most complete individual offensive lines from the game.

Soto’s value came from multiple dimensions:

He reached base consistently.
He created pressure with his speed.
He advanced the Mets into better scoring positions.
He contributed directly to the scoring sequence.
He forced the Yankees to account for him throughout the game.

His two walks are especially important. They demonstrate how a hitter can influence a game without necessarily producing an extra-base hit.

Mark Vientos

Mark Vientos was arguably the most important run producer for the Mets.

He recorded three RBI, including a key two-run double in the fifth inning.

That double was one of the game’s decisive offensive moments. MLB’s official coverage specifically identifies Vientos’ two-run double as a major part of the Mets’ 6-3 victory. (MLB.com)

When a game is decided by three runs, a two-run extra-base hit can fundamentally change the shape of the contest. Vientos supplied exactly that type of impact.

Brett Baty

Brett Baty added one RBI.

His production complemented Vientos and gave the Mets another source of run creation from the middle portion of the lineup.

The Mets did not rely on one player alone. Their offense worked because several hitters contributed at different points.

Pitching comparison

The pitching numbers reveal another important reason the Mets won.

The Yankees pitching staff allowed six runs on eight hits, while the Mets allowed three runs on nine hits.

At first glance, that may look strange. How can a team allow more hits and still win by three runs?

The answer is sequencing and strikeout production.

The Mets pitching staff recorded 14 strikeouts, compared with 11 for the Yankees. The Mets also limited the Yankees to two earned runs according to the supplied team totals.

David Peterson

David Peterson delivered one of the strongest pitching performances of the game.

He worked 4.0 innings, allowing six hits and two earned runs while striking out eight and walking three.

Eight strikeouts in four innings is significant. Peterson consistently found ways to finish plate appearances without allowing every baserunner to become a scoring threat.

MLB’s official coverage describes Peterson striking out eight in the Mets’ 6-3 win. (MLB.com)

His performance was particularly valuable because the Yankees were able to make contact. Peterson did not completely shut down the lineup, but his strikeout ability helped prevent the Yankees from turning every baserunner into a run.

Carlos Rodón

Carlos Rodón started for the Yankees and recorded:

3.2 innings
3 hits allowed
2 earned runs
6 strikeouts
3 walks

Rodón’s six strikeouts show that his stuff was effective in stretches.

The bigger problem was efficiency. Three walks in only 3.2 innings created additional pressure and contributed to an abbreviated outing.

A pitcher can strike out hitters at an impressive rate and still struggle to control the game if free passes extend innings.

Devin Williams

Devin Williams recorded the save for the Mets.

He worked one inning without allowing a hit or earned run and recorded one strikeout.

His ability to finish the game mattered because the Yankees had already demonstrated that they could put runners on base. The Mets needed a clean closing sequence rather than allowing the game to become a late-inning battle.

The battle with runners in scoring position

The most useful statistic in understanding the game is arguably the RISP split.

The Yankees went 3-for-15 with runners in scoring position.

The Mets went 1-for-7.

Neither number is impressive.

That is precisely why this game is more interesting than the basic score suggests.

The Mets were not simply better because they crushed the Yankees with runners in scoring position. Instead, they generated enough productive contact and timely scoring plays to create a lead, then protected it.

The Yankees had considerably more RISP opportunities but did not convert enough of them.

This is where the 11 left-on-base figure becomes important.

A team can have a high number of opportunities and still lose if the opportunities are spread across different innings rather than concentrated into one productive sequence.

Why the Yankees’ nine hits were not enough

Nine hits normally sound like an encouraging offensive number.

But baseball scoring is not determined by hit totals alone.

Consider the Yankees’ combination:

9 hits
3 runs
3 walks
14 strikeouts
11 runners left on base
3-for-15 with RISP
0 home runs

The problem becomes clear.

The Yankees were getting on base, but they were not consistently advancing those opportunities into runs.

The 14 strikeouts also removed a large number of chances to move runners or extend innings.

This is an important lesson when reading new york yankees vs mets match player stats. Looking only at batting averages or hit totals can produce the wrong conclusion. The context surrounding those hits is often more valuable.

Why the Mets’ eight hits produced six runs

The Mets’ offense was much more efficient.

Their eight hits came with:

6 runs
4 RBI
5 walks
11 strikeouts
6 runners left on base
0 home runs

The Mets did not need a home run to score six times.

They combined walks, singles, extra-base hits, stolen bases, and timely contact.

Vientos’ three RBI were central to that process, while Benge’s three hits and Soto’s ability to reach base added sustained pressure.

The result was an offense that produced more runs despite fewer total hits.

Juan Soto’s all-around impact

Soto’s performance deserves separate attention because his contribution went beyond traditional batting totals.

He finished with:

2 hits
2 walks
1 run
2 stolen bases

That means he reached base four times and created additional pressure with his legs.

For a player evaluating this game from a baseball-analysis perspective, that is much more meaningful than simply saying Soto had two hits.

His plate discipline forced the Yankees to give him pitches worth attacking. Once on base, his two stolen bases added another layer of pressure.

Soto’s performance shows how modern player evaluation needs to consider the entire offensive sequence rather than one isolated statistic.

Mark Vientos’ importance to the result

Vientos’ three RBI made him the Mets’ leading run producer.

His two-run double in the fifth inning was especially important because it created separation.

Extra-base hits are valuable in close games because they can bring multiple runners home at once. Vientos did exactly that.

The play also demonstrates the difference between accumulating hits and creating runs.

The Yankees had nine hits. The Mets had eight.

Yet Vientos’ key double helped the Mets turn fewer hits into a much larger scoring total.

Defensive mistakes

Both teams committed one error.

The Yankees’ error was charged to Carlos Rodón on a throwing mistake.

The Mets also made one fielding error, involving Carson Benge.

Neither team was flawless defensively, but the Mets were able to overcome their mistake more effectively.

Errors become particularly damaging when they extend innings or put additional runners into scoring position. In this game, the Mets’ ability to limit the consequences of their defensive mistake helped preserve their advantage.

Strikeouts and offensive rhythm

The Yankees struck out 14 times, while the Mets struck out 11 times.

The difference of three strikeouts may not look enormous, but it matters when combined with the Yankees’ 11 runners left on base.

Strikeouts eliminate the possibility of advancing runners through productive contact. They can also stop innings when a team has already invested several plate appearances in creating an opportunity.

The Mets did not have an exceptionally low strikeout total either, but their offensive production was more concentrated around successful scoring sequences.

What the box score says about both teams

The box score presents a clear contrast.

Yankees

The Yankees showed:

Good overall contact volume
Several multi-hit contributors
Strong strikeout production from Rodón
Too many missed scoring opportunities
Too many runners left on base
Difficulty converting RISP chances

Mets

The Mets showed:

Strong situational offense
High strikeout production from Peterson and the pitching staff
Important extra-base hits
Better run efficiency
Productive performances from Benge, Soto, and Vientos
Effective late-game pitching

That combination explains why the Mets won despite being out-hit.

What these stats mean for evaluating players

Player statistics are most useful when they answer a specific question.

If the question is who had the most hits, the answer is straightforward.

If the question is who influenced the result most, the analysis becomes more complicated.

For this game, several players stand out for different reasons.

Best Mets run producer: Mark Vientos, because of his three RBI and decisive two-run double.
Best Mets all-around offensive performance: Juan Soto, because he combined two hits with two walks, a run, and two stolen bases.
Best Mets contact performance: Carson Benge, with three hits and two runs.
Best pitching contribution: David Peterson, particularly because of his eight strikeouts across four innings.

Most notable Yankees offensive contributors: Aaron Judge, Paul Goldschmidt, and Jazz Chisholm Jr., who each recorded two hits.

This type of role-based evaluation is more useful than declaring one player the best solely because of the number of hits.

New york yankees vs mets match player stats: key takeaways

The most important lessons from the game can be summarized through several numbers.

1. Hits did not determine the winner

The Yankees had nine hits.

The Mets had eight.

The Mets won 6-3.

That alone demonstrates why hit totals should never be used as the only measure of offensive performance.

2. Vientos was the key run producer

Three RBI put Vientos at the center of the Mets’ scoring production.

3. Soto created pressure in multiple ways

Two hits, two walks, a run, and two stolen bases made Soto one of the game’s most complete offensive contributors.

4. Peterson’s strikeouts mattered

Eight strikeouts in four innings helped the Mets navigate a Yankees lineup that still managed six hits against him.

5. Yankees opportunities went unfinished

The Yankees’ 3-for-15 RISP performance and 11 runners left on base were major reasons nine hits became only three runs.

6. Mets pitching finished the job

The Mets pitching staff allowed nine hits but held the Yankees to three runs and struck out 14.

For official MLB game information and continuing statistics, readers can consult MLB.com.

How to read a box score like this one

A useful approach is to move through the statistics in layers.

Start with the final score.

Then compare runs, hits, walks, and strikeouts.

After that, examine RISP and runners left on base.

Finally, look at individual contributions and the timing of scoring plays.

For this game, that process produces a much clearer conclusion than simply looking at batting totals.

The Yankees did enough to create opportunities.

The Mets did more with the opportunities that mattered most.

That difference is often what separates a close loss from a comfortable win.

FAQ

Who won the Yankees vs Mets game on May 16, 2026?

The New York Mets defeated the New York Yankees 6-3 at Citi Field on May 16, 2026. MLB’s official game coverage confirms the final score. (MLB.com)

Who was the Mets’ leading RBI hitter?

Mark Vientos led the Mets with three RBI. His two-run double was one of the game’s most important scoring plays. (MLB.com)

How many hits did the Yankees have?

The Yankees recorded nine hits, one more than the Mets’ eight. Despite that advantage, they scored only three runs.

How many strikeouts did David Peterson record?

David Peterson struck out eight Yankees hitters over four innings. (MLB.com)

What was Juan Soto’s performance?

Juan Soto recorded two hits, two walks, scored once, and stole two bases. His ability to reach base and create pressure was an important part of the Mets’ offensive performance.

Why did the Yankees lose despite having more hits?

The Yankees struggled to turn their baserunners into runs. They went 3-for-15 with runners in scoring position, struck out 14 times, and left 11 runners on base.

Conclusion

The May 16 Subway Series provided a strong example of why baseball analysis should go deeper than the basic hit count.

The Yankees collected nine hits, but the Mets scored six runs from eight hits. Mark Vientos supplied three RBI, Carson Benge produced three hits and two runs, and Juan Soto combined hitting, plate discipline, baserunning, and scoring impact. On the mound, David Peterson’s eight strikeouts helped the Mets manage a dangerous Yankees lineup, while the Mets pitching staff ultimately held New York to three runs.

For the Yankees, Aaron Judge, Paul Goldschmidt, and Jazz Chisholm Jr. each produced two-hit games, but the club’s inability to convert enough scoring opportunities proved costly. The 3-for-15 RISP performance and 11 runners left on base provide the clearest statistical explanation for the defeat.

The biggest lesson from these new york yankees vs mets match player stats is that efficiency matters as much as volume. Nine hits can lose to eight when the opposing team gets better timing from its extra-base hits, receives stronger situational production, and finishes the game with more effective pitching.

The statistics also show why individual player evaluation should consider context. Vientos’ RBI production, Soto’s four times reaching base, Benge’s three hits, and Peterson’s strikeout total all contributed in different ways. Together, those performances produced a 6-3 Mets victory and demonstrated how a team can win without leading every major offensive category.