Oklahoma City Thunder vs Portland Trail Blazers Match Player Stats
The oklahoma city thunder vs portland trail blazers match player stats from March 7, 2025, tell a much more detailed story than the final score alone. Oklahoma City defeated Portland 107-89 at Paycom Center, but the box score reveals several important factors behind the 18-point margin, including Aaron Wiggins’ 30-point scoring night, Jaylin Williams’ unusual all-around contribution, Oklahoma City’s 14 made three-pointers, and Portland’s struggles from the field.
For readers searching for oklahoma city thunder vs portland trail blazers match player stats, this game is especially interesting because Oklahoma City did not need its usual headline stars to control the matchup. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Jalen Williams, and several other regular contributors were unavailable, yet the Thunder still produced a balanced offensive and defensive performance.
There is also an important correction to one commonly repeated version of the statistics. Deni Avdija did not play in this game because he was listed as out with a left quad contusion. Portland’s second-highest scorer was actually Scoot Henderson with 22 points, not Avdija. The official scorer’s report confirms that distinction.
Oklahoma City Thunder vs Portland Trail Blazers Match Player Stats
The game took place on March 7, 2025, at Paycom Center in Oklahoma City, with the Thunder entering the contest at 52-11 and Portland at 28-36.
| Category | Portland Trail Blazers | Oklahoma City Thunder |
| Final Score | 89 | 107 |
| Field Goals | 33-95 | 39-84 |
| Field Goal % | 34.7% | 46.4% |
| 3-Pointers | 8-43 | 14-38 |
| 3-Point % | 18.6% | 36.8% |
| Free Throws | 15-18 | 15-17 |
| Free Throw % | 83.3% | 88.2% |
| Rebounds | 53 | 43 |
| Assists | 15 | 25 |
| Turnovers | 17 | 11 |
| Steals | 6 | 12 |
| Blocks | 4 | 8 |
The statistical contrast is clear. Portland actually won the rebounding battle 53-43, but Oklahoma City compensated with better shooting, more assists, more steals, more blocks, and fewer turnovers.
Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
Oklahoma City won 107-89, but the game was not evenly distributed across all four quarters.
| Quarter | Portland | Oklahoma City |
| 1st | 24 | 29 |
| 2nd | 21 | 34 |
| 3rd | 28 | 17 |
| 4th | 16 | 27 |
| Final | 89 | 107 |
The Thunder built most of their advantage before halftime.
Oklahoma City led 29-24 after the opening period, then produced a 34-point second quarter while limiting Portland to 21. That gave the Thunder a 63-45 halftime advantage.
Portland responded in the third quarter, outscoring Oklahoma City 28-17. That reduced the deficit and demonstrated that the Trail Blazers could generate offense when their shooting improved.
The fourth quarter, however, swung back toward Oklahoma City. The Thunder scored 27 points while Portland managed only 16.
The quarter pattern therefore tells a useful story:
- Oklahoma City established control early.
- The Thunder extended the advantage significantly in the second quarter.
- Portland made its strongest push in the third.
- Oklahoma City closed the game efficiently in the fourth.
The 18-point final margin was therefore built primarily through Oklahoma City’s first-half execution and fourth-quarter response.
Aaron Wiggins Led Oklahoma City With 30 Points
Aaron Wiggins was the leading scorer in the game, finishing with 30 points for Oklahoma City.
His line was:
- 30 points
- 13-of-26 shooting
- 2-of-9 from three-point range
- 2-of-2 from the free-throw line
- 5 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 1 steal
- 1 block
- 2 turnovers
Wiggins played 31:32 and attempted 26 field goals, by far one of the largest offensive workloads in the game. His scoring mattered because Oklahoma City was missing several major contributors.
His 13 made field goals accounted for a significant portion of Oklahoma City’s 39 total field goals.
One interesting detail is that Wiggins did not rely heavily on three-point shooting. He made only two of nine attempts from beyond the arc, meaning most of his production came from inside the three-point line and at the free-throw line.
That makes his 30-point performance different from a typical high-scoring perimeter game dominated by long-range shooting.
Jaylin Williams Produced One of the Most Complete Lines
Jaylin Williams may have been the most statistically unusual Oklahoma City player in the box score.
He recorded:
- 10 points
- 11 rebounds
- 11 assists
- 3 steals
- 2 blocks
- 4-of-7 shooting
- 2-of-4 from three-point range
- 3 turnovers
The 11 assists stand out immediately.
Williams was the Thunder’s assist leader while also leading the team in rebounds. He also led Oklahoma City in steals and blocks.
That gives him a statistical profile of 10 points, 11 rebounds, 11 assists, 3 steals, and 2 blocks.
His contribution demonstrates why player evaluation cannot be reduced to scoring totals. Wiggins produced the highest scoring number, but Williams influenced several different areas of the game.
The official scorer’s report confirms that Williams played 35:56, nearly 36 minutes, while contributing across the offensive and defensive categories.
Alex Caruso Added Efficient Scoring
Alex Caruso scored 17 points in 24:17.
He shot 6-of-8 from the field and 2-of-2 from three-point range. He also made 3-of-4 free throws.
That was an efficient scoring performance.
Caruso did not need a large number of attempts to reach 17 points. His six made field goals represented a major return on eight attempts.
He also contributed three steals, one block, one assist, and one turnover.
The defensive numbers are particularly relevant because Oklahoma City finished with 12 steals as a team.
Ousmane Dieng and Isaiah Joe Provided Secondary Scoring
Ousmane Dieng finished with 16 points while shooting 6-of-10 from the field.
His three-point shooting was especially important. Dieng made 4-of-6 attempts from beyond the arc.
That gave Oklahoma City another efficient perimeter option and helped the Thunder reach 14 made three-pointers.
Isaiah Joe also scored 16 points.
Joe finished 4-of-12 from the field, including 3-of-9 from three-point range, and made all five of his free throws.
His six assists were also significant. Along with Jaylin Williams’ 11 assists, Joe helped Oklahoma City reach 25 total assists.
Oklahoma City’s Starting Lineup and Contributions
The Thunder starters were Jaylin Williams, Ousmane Dieng, Kenrich Williams, Isaiah Joe, and Aaron Wiggins.
Their scoring totals were:
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Aaron Wiggins | 30 | 5 | 3 |
| Ousmane Dieng | 16 | 6 | 1 |
| Isaiah Joe | 16 | 6 | 6 |
| Jaylin Williams | 10 | 11 | 11 |
| Kenrich Williams | 10 | 6 | 1 |
The starting group combined for 82 of Oklahoma City’s 107 points.
That is significant because it shows how much of the offensive production came from the initial five-man group.
Kenrich Williams added 10 points, six rebounds, one assist, one steal, and one block while shooting 3-of-9.
Portland’s Scoring Was Led by Scoot Henderson
Portland’s scoring numbers require careful reading because the supplied data includes an incorrect reference to Deni Avdija.
Avdija did not play. The official report lists him as out with a left quad contusion.
Scoot Henderson actually led Portland’s scoring with 22 points.
Henderson shot 8-of-15 from the field, including 2-of-5 from three-point range, and made 4-of-5 free throws.
He also recorded:
- 4 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 4 turnovers
- 1 personal technical foul
His eight made field goals were Portland’s highest total.
Shaedon Sharpe Scored 19 Points
Shaedon Sharpe finished with 19 points.
His line included:
- 19 points
- 7-of-14 field goals
- 2-of-7 three-pointers
- 3-of-3 free throws
- 3 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 1 steal
- 5 turnovers
Sharpe was one of Portland’s most active offensive players, but his five turnovers were also notable.
His 14 field-goal attempts were second only to Henderson among Portland players.
Donovan Clingan Controlled the Offensive Glass
Donovan Clingan produced Portland’s best rebounding performance.
He finished with 12 rebounds, including eight defensive rebounds and four offensive rebounds.
He also scored eight points and added one assist and one block.
Clingan’s 12 rebounds were important because Portland finished with 53 total rebounds compared with Oklahoma City’s 43.
The Trail Blazers therefore had a 10-rebound advantage overall.
However, that advantage did not translate into a victory because Oklahoma City was more efficient in several other statistical areas.
Anfernee Simons Was Portland’s Primary Playmaker
Anfernee Simons scored 14 points and led Portland with five assists.
He shot 5-of-16 from the field and 1-of-6 from three-point range.
Simons also recorded five rebounds and one steal.
His five assists represented one-third of Portland’s 15 total assists.
That is an important indicator of how much Portland relied on a relatively small number of players to create offense.
Portland’s Starting Lineup
The Trail Blazers started Jerami Grant, Toumani Camara, Donovan Clingan, Anfernee Simons, and Shaedon Sharpe.
Their combined scoring totals were:
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Jerami Grant | 4 | 5 | 0 |
| Toumani Camara | 7 | 10 | 2 |
| Donovan Clingan | 8 | 12 | 1 |
| Anfernee Simons | 14 | 5 | 5 |
| Shaedon Sharpe | 19 | 3 | 2 |
The starters combined for 52 points.
Scoot Henderson then added 22 points off the bench, giving Portland another major scoring source.
The Shooting Difference Decided the Game
One of the clearest lessons from the oklahoma city thunder vs portland trail blazers match player stats is the importance of shooting efficiency.
Portland shot 33-of-95 from the field.
That is 34.7 percent.
Oklahoma City shot 39-of-84.
That is 46.4 percent.
The difference was almost 12 percentage points.
The Thunder also attempted 11 fewer field goals while making six more shots.
That combination is extremely important.
Portland needed 95 attempts to make 33 field goals.
Oklahoma City needed 84 attempts to make 39.
The Thunder therefore converted a much greater proportion of their opportunities.
Three-Point Shooting Created Another Separation
The three-point numbers were even more revealing.
Portland:
- 8-of-43
- 18.6 percent
Oklahoma City:
- 14-of-38
- 36.8 percent
The Thunder made six more three-pointers while taking five fewer attempts.
That represents a major efficiency advantage.
Portland’s 43 three-point attempts also show how heavily the team relied on perimeter shooting despite its low conversion rate.
When a team shoots 18.6 percent from three, the volume has to be extremely productive in other areas to compensate.
Portland did not get enough efficiency from its overall field-goal attempts to overcome that problem.
Free Throw Shooting Was Strong on Both Sides
Neither team had a major free-throw problem.
Portland went 15-of-18 for 83.3 percent.
Oklahoma City went 15-of-17 for 88.2 percent.
The difference at the free-throw line was therefore small compared with the differences in field-goal and three-point shooting.
This is useful when analyzing the game because it prevents the final score from being incorrectly attributed to free throws.
The largest statistical separation came from shooting efficiency and ball security.
Oklahoma City Won the Turnover Battle
Portland committed 17 turnovers.
Oklahoma City committed 11.
That is a six-turnover difference.
The Thunder also generated 12 steals compared with Portland’s six.
Those numbers work together.
Oklahoma City created more defensive events while giving the ball away less frequently.
Portland’s 17 turnovers were especially costly because the team was already struggling to convert shots.
When inefficient shooting is combined with additional lost possessions, the margin can expand quickly.
Assists Showed a Major Difference in Ball Movement
Oklahoma City finished with 25 assists.
Portland had 15.
That is a 10-assist advantage.
Jaylin Williams alone produced 11 assists, meaning he accounted for nearly half of Oklahoma City’s total assists.
Isaiah Joe added six.
Together, those two players produced 17 assists.
Portland’s assist leader, Simons, had five.
The distribution shows that Oklahoma City’s offense was not dependent on a single traditional high-volume scorer creating every possession.
Instead, multiple players contributed to the creation process.
Rebounding Favored Portland
Portland’s 53 rebounds were actually 10 more than Oklahoma City’s 43.
That makes the final result more interesting.
The Trail Blazers had advantages in total rebounding and second-chance opportunities.
Portland produced 10 second-chance points compared with Oklahoma City’s four.
Yet those extra possessions did not overcome the Thunder’s advantages elsewhere.
This is an important reminder when reading NBA box scores: winning one major statistical category does not guarantee winning the game.
Fast-Break Production Favored Oklahoma City
The Thunder scored 16 fast-break points.
Portland scored eight.
That was another eight-point advantage for Oklahoma City.
Fast-break scoring generally reflects what happens after defensive stops, turnovers, or opportunities to attack before the defense becomes fully organized.
Oklahoma City’s 12 steals likely contributed to its ability to generate transition opportunities.
Points in the Paint Were Relatively Close
The teams were much closer in points in the paint.
Portland scored 46.
Oklahoma City scored 48.
That means the Thunder did not win simply by attacking the rim while Portland stayed outside.
Instead, the major separation came from the overall shooting percentage, three-point efficiency, turnovers, assists, and defensive activity.
This distinction matters for anyone using the game as a statistical case study.
Why Oklahoma City Won Without Its Usual Headliners
One of the most interesting elements of this matchup was the Thunder’s availability situation.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander was listed as resting.
Jalen Williams was listed out with a right wrist sprain.
Chet Holmgren was out with a right lower-leg contusion.
Luguentz Dort was also unavailable because of right patellofemoral soreness.
Isaiah Hartenstein was out because of a nasal injury.
Several other players were also unavailable.
Despite those absences, Oklahoma City produced 107 points.
That makes the performances of Wiggins, Jaylin Williams, Caruso, Dieng, and Joe particularly significant.
The Thunder did not simply survive without their regular stars. They received substantial production from players who were asked to take on larger roles.
The Jaylin Williams Stat Line Deserves Special Attention
A normal box-score review might focus on Wiggins because he scored 30.
A deeper review points toward Jaylin Williams as one of the most unusual contributors.
His 10-11-11 line means he recorded a triple-double.
But the value of the performance extends beyond the three categories used to define a triple-double.
He also recorded three steals and two blocks.
That means his statistical impact covered scoring, rebounding, playmaking, and defensive events.
His 11 assists are particularly notable for a center listed in the starting lineup.
The performance also helped explain Oklahoma City’s 25 assists.
What Portland Could Not Overcome
Portland had several positive statistical elements.
The Trail Blazers:
- Won the rebounding battle
- Scored 46 points in the paint
- Made 15 of 18 free throws
- Had 10 second-chance points
- Received 22 points from Henderson
- Received 19 points from Sharpe
But several problems offset those strengths.
The most important were:
- 34.7 percent field-goal shooting
- 18.6 percent three-point shooting
- 17 turnovers
- 15 assists
- Six fewer steals than Oklahoma City
- Four fewer blocks than Oklahoma City
The overall result was therefore consistent with the statistical profile of the game.
What the Box Score Says About Team Offense
A useful way to interpret this game is to separate individual scoring from offensive structure.
Oklahoma City had five starters who combined for 82 points.
The Thunder also had strong supporting contributions from Caruso, Dillon Jones, and other reserves.
Portland had Henderson’s 22 points and Sharpe’s 19, but the team struggled to maintain consistent efficiency across the lineup.
Grant scored only four points on 2-of-10 shooting.
Camara scored seven on 2-of-13 shooting.
Clingan scored eight.
Those performances placed more pressure on Henderson, Sharpe, and Simons.
Player Stats That Matter Most From the Game
For a quick statistical reference, these are the most important individual numbers:
Oklahoma City
Aaron Wiggins: 30 points, 5 rebounds, 3 assists
Alex Caruso: 17 points, 3 steals, 6-of-8 shooting
Ousmane Dieng: 16 points, 6-of-10 shooting, 4-of-6 from three
Isaiah Joe: 16 points, 6 assists
Jaylin Williams: 10 points, 11 rebounds, 11 assists, 3 steals, 2 blocks
Portland
Scoot Henderson: 22 points, 4 rebounds, 3 assists
Shaedon Sharpe: 19 points, 3 rebounds, 2 assists
Anfernee Simons: 14 points, 5 rebounds, 5 assists
Donovan Clingan: 8 points, 12 rebounds, 1 block
Toumani Camara: 7 points, 10 rebounds, 2 assists
These numbers come directly from the official NBA scorer’s report.
Season Series Context
Oklahoma City completed a 4-0 season-series sweep of Portland in the 2024-25 regular season.
The March 7 matchup was the fourth meeting between the teams that season.
The final result therefore continued Oklahoma City’s control of the season series.
However, season-series results should be interpreted in context because individual games can involve different player availability, rotations, rest decisions, injuries, and circumstances.
This particular matchup was strongly affected by absences on the Oklahoma City side, making the performances of its secondary players especially relevant.
How to Read These Player Stats Correctly
If you are reviewing the oklahoma city thunder vs portland trail blazers match player stats for fantasy analysis, historical research, basketball writing, or general game study, avoid focusing on points alone.
A better process is:
- Check the minutes played.
- Review field-goal attempts.
- Compare three-point efficiency.
- Examine assists and turnovers.
- Look at offensive and defensive rebounding.
- Review steals and blocks.
- Consider player availability.
- Compare team-level efficiency.
- Study quarter-by-quarter performance.
- Check whether a player’s role was affected by missing teammates.
This approach gives much more context than simply identifying the top scorer.
Important Statistical Correction About Deni Avdija
The provided data includes Deni Avdija as Portland’s second-highest scorer with 22 points.
That information should not be published as part of the final article.
The official NBA scorer’s report lists Avdija as DND, meaning he did not play because of a left quad contusion.
Scoot Henderson scored 22 points and was therefore Portland’s highest scorer, followed by Shaedon Sharpe with 19. This distinction is important for accuracy.
Why the 107-89 Score Can Be Misleading Without Context
A casual reader may see an 18-point victory and assume the game was controlled from start to finish.
The quarter scores show something more nuanced.
Oklahoma City built a 18-point halftime lead.
Portland then won the third quarter by 11 points.
That means the Trail Blazers did make a meaningful adjustment after halftime.
The Thunder responded in the fourth quarter by winning that period 27-16.
The game therefore had three distinct phases:
Early control: Oklahoma City established the advantage.
Third-quarter response: Portland reduced the deficit.
Fourth-quarter separation: Oklahoma City restored control and finished strongly.
That sequence provides a better understanding of the final margin than the final score alone.
Overall Statistical Picture
The complete statistical profile can be summarized through five major differences.
First, Oklahoma City shot 46.4 percent compared with Portland’s 34.7 percent.
Second, Oklahoma City made 14 three-pointers while Portland made only eight.
Third, the Thunder had 25 assists compared with 15 for Portland.
Fourth, Oklahoma City committed six fewer turnovers.
Fifth, the Thunder produced 12 steals and eight blocks.
Portland’s biggest statistical advantage was rebounding.
That advantage was not enough to compensate for the Thunder’s efficiency and ball-security advantages.
FAQs
Who led the Thunder in scoring against the Trail Blazers?
Aaron Wiggins led Oklahoma City with 30 points. He shot 13-of-26 from the field and also recorded five rebounds and three assists.
Who led Portland in scoring against Oklahoma City?
Scoot Henderson led Portland with 22 points. He shot 8-of-15 from the field, including 2-of-5 from three-point range.
How many points did Shaedon Sharpe score?
Shaedon Sharpe scored 19 points. He made 7-of-14 field-goal attempts and 2-of-7 three-point attempts.
How many rebounds did Donovan Clingan have?
Donovan Clingan recorded 12 rebounds, including four offensive rebounds and eight defensive rebounds.
Did Jaylin Williams record a triple-double?
Yes. Jaylin Williams finished with 10 points, 11 rebounds, and 11 assists. He also added three steals and two blocks.
What was the final score between Oklahoma City and Portland?
The Oklahoma City Thunder defeated the Portland Trail Blazers 107-89 on March 7, 2025, at Paycom Center in Oklahoma City.
Conclusion
The oklahoma city thunder vs portland trail blazers match player stats provide a strong example of why a complete box-score analysis goes beyond identifying the highest scorer.
Aaron Wiggins supplied the headline scoring performance with 30 points, while Jaylin Williams delivered an exceptionally broad statistical contribution with 10 points, 11 rebounds, 11 assists, three steals, and two blocks. Alex Caruso, Ousmane Dieng, and Isaiah Joe also gave Oklahoma City efficient secondary production.
For Portland, Scoot Henderson led the team with 22 points, Shaedon Sharpe added 19, Anfernee Simons contributed 14 points and five assists, and Donovan Clingan controlled the glass with 12 rebounds.
The biggest team-level difference was efficiency. Oklahoma City shot 46.4 percent from the field and 36.8 percent from three-point range, while Portland shot 34.7 percent overall and 18.6 percent from three. The Thunder also produced 25 assists, 12 steals, and only 11 turnovers.
Portland’s 53 rebounds were a genuine advantage, but the rebounding edge could not offset the shooting, playmaking, and defensive differences. The 107-89 final score therefore reflects a game in which Oklahoma City converted its possessions more effectively and received contributions across multiple statistical categories.
