Atlanta Hawks vs Orlando Magic Match Player Stats

The atlanta hawks vs orlando magic match player stats from October 24, 2025, tell the story of a game that changed direction several times before Atlanta closed it out with a 111-107 victory at Kia Center in Orlando. The Magic produced a strong second quarter and built a 12-point fourth-quarter advantage, but the Hawks responded with a decisive late run and finished the night with the better execution in the final minutes.

For anyone studying the game beyond the final score, the box score is especially useful because the teams won different statistical battles. Orlando collected more rebounds, while Atlanta recorded more assists and committed fewer turnovers. The Hawks also finished strongly from the free-throw line, an important factor in a four-point game.

Trae Young led Atlanta with 25 points and six assists, while Nickeil Alexander-Walker supplied 19 points. Onyeka Okongwu added 17 points, and Jalen Johnson contributed 12 points and eight rebounds. For Orlando, Franz Wagner produced a game-high 27 points, with Desmond Bane and Tristan da Silva each scoring 15. Wendell Carter Jr. led the Magic with eight rebounds, while Bane finished with five assists.

Atlanta Hawks vs Orlando Magic Match Player Stats

The most useful way to read this matchup is to separate individual production from team-level efficiency. A player can have a strong scoring night without his team winning the possession battle, while another player may have a modest point total but influence the game through rebounds, defense, ball movement, or efficient shooting.

Here is the basic statistical picture from the game:

Category	Atlanta Hawks	Orlando Magic
Final score	111	107
Field goals	41-85	37-78
Field-goal percentage	48%	47%
3-pointers	8-29	9-31
3-point percentage	28%	29%
Free throws	21-28	24-37
Free-throw percentage	75%	65%
Rebounds	40	45
Assists	26	21
Turnovers	16	22
Steals	9	7
Blocks	5	3

The numbers show how narrow the margin was. Orlando actually finished with five more rebounds and made one more three-pointer. Atlanta’s advantages came from shooting slightly better overall, moving the ball more effectively, protecting possessions better, and converting free throws at a higher rate.

That combination is important because Atlanta won by only four points.

Game Summary and Turning Points

Atlanta opened the game with a narrow 25-24 lead after the first quarter. Orlando then changed the rhythm in the second period, scoring 37 points while holding Atlanta to 26. That 11-point quarter advantage gave the Magic a 61-51 halftime lead.

The third quarter was more balanced. Atlanta scored 27 points and Orlando scored 25, leaving the Magic with a 10-point advantage heading into the fourth.

The final period completely changed the game.

Atlanta scored 33 points in the fourth quarter, while Orlando managed only 21. The Hawks erased the deficit and eventually completed a 15-0 run that transformed the contest. According to the NBA’s official recap, Young scored the final five points of that run, and he then made crucial free throws in the closing seconds.

The quarter-by-quarter scoring was:

• First quarter: Atlanta 25, Orlando 24
• Second quarter: Atlanta 26, Orlando 37
• Third quarter: Atlanta 27, Orlando 25
• Fourth quarter: Atlanta 33, Orlando 21
• Final: Atlanta 111, Orlando 107

This progression matters because the final score alone does not show how different the game looked at various stages.

Orlando had a 12-point lead early in the fourth quarter, but Atlanta’s late offensive surge completely changed the outcome. The game eventually reached 105-105 after Wendell Carter Jr. made two free throws with 54 seconds remaining. Young then helped Atlanta regain control, while Orlando was unable to generate another sustained scoring sequence.

Trae Young’s 25-Point Performance

Trae Young was the central offensive figure for Atlanta.

He finished with 25 points and six assists, making him both the Hawks’ leading scorer and their leading facilitator. His value was particularly visible late in the game rather than simply across the full 48 minutes.

The NBA recap noted that Young scored six points in the final 46 seconds. He also made four free throws in the final 21 seconds to help Atlanta secure the victory.

That late-game production is important when interpreting his 25-point total. Not all points carry the same game context. A large portion of Young’s scoring arrived when possessions had become more valuable and Orlando’s margin for error had disappeared.

His six assists also contributed to Atlanta’s 26 total assists, five more than Orlando recorded.

From a game-management perspective, Young’s performance can therefore be understood in three parts:

1. He carried the primary scoring responsibility.
2. He created opportunities for teammates through six assists.
3. He delivered important late-game scoring and free throws.

That combination made his box-score contribution much more significant than the raw 25-point figure suggests.

Nickeil Alexander-Walker Provides Secondary Scoring

Nickeil Alexander-Walker finished with 19 points for Atlanta.

He shot 8-for-18 from the field and added four assists. His three-point shooting was inefficient, as he made only 1 of 10 attempts from beyond the arc, but his overall field-goal production still gave Atlanta another important scoring source.

The significance of Alexander-Walker’s performance becomes clearer when looking at the team context.

Atlanta did not have a particularly strong three-point night. The Hawks made only 8 of 29 attempts. That means they could not depend on perimeter efficiency to carry the offense.

Instead, they received meaningful production from two-point shooting, free throws, and multiple contributors.

Alexander-Walker’s 19 points helped keep Atlanta’s scoring distribution from becoming completely dependent on Young.

Onyeka Okongwu’s Efficient Scoring

One correction is important when reviewing the supplied player data: Onyeka Okongwu scored 17 points, not 13. The official NBA box score lists him at 5-for-10 from the field, 1-for-3 from three-point range, and 6-for-7 at the free-throw line. He also recorded four rebounds, three assists, one steal, and three blocks.

That is a meaningful performance because Okongwu combined scoring efficiency with defensive activity.

His 6-for-7 free-throw shooting was particularly useful on a night when Atlanta needed reliable points without depending on three-point shooting.

His three blocks also contributed to Atlanta’s five total blocks.

For a game decided by four points, this type of two-way contribution is easy to overlook if the analysis focuses only on the highest scorer.

Jalen Johnson’s All-Around Contribution

Jalen Johnson scored 12 points and grabbed eight rebounds.

He shot 5-for-10 from the field and was perfect from the free-throw line, going 2-for-2. He also recorded one assist and one steal.

Although his scoring total was not among Atlanta’s highest, his eight rebounds were valuable because Orlando won the overall rebounding battle 45-40.

Johnson therefore helped narrow one of Orlando’s statistical advantages.

His offensive rebounding also mattered. He recorded two offensive rebounds, giving Atlanta additional opportunities to extend possessions.

Dyson Daniels and the Rebounding Battle

Dyson Daniels was listed as Atlanta’s top rebounder with nine rebounds.

That number becomes more important when viewed against the team total. Orlando finished with 45 rebounds compared with Atlanta’s 40, so Daniels’ nine boards represented a substantial share of the Hawks’ rebounding production.

Rebounding was one area where Orlando had the statistical edge, but Atlanta still had individual contributors who helped prevent that advantage from becoming decisive.

The broader lesson from the box score is that a rebounding deficit does not automatically determine the outcome. Atlanta compensated in other areas, especially assists, turnovers, and late-game execution.

Franz Wagner Leads All Scorers

Franz Wagner was Orlando’s leading scorer and the game’s highest individual scorer with 27 points.

He was one of the main reasons the Magic were able to build their early advantage. Wagner scored 27 points while Orlando controlled long stretches of the game.

The NBA recap also identifies Wagner as Orlando’s leading scorer and notes that the Magic led by 12 early in the fourth quarter.

However, Wagner’s 27 points were not enough to secure the victory.

This is a useful example of why player statistics should always be read alongside team statistics. Orlando had the game’s highest scorer, yet Atlanta won because its overall offensive structure and late-game execution were more productive.

Desmond Bane’s Balanced Contribution

Desmond Bane finished with 15 points and five assists.

The five assists led Orlando, giving him an important role as a secondary creator. He was not simply contributing points. His passing helped Orlando distribute offensive responsibility across the lineup.

Bane’s five assists were especially relevant because Orlando finished with only 21 team assists. That means his creation represented a meaningful portion of the Magic’s total playmaking output.

The combination of scoring and passing made Bane one of Orlando’s most versatile statistical contributors.

Paolo Banchero’s Difficult Shooting Night

Paolo Banchero scored 11 points and collected six rebounds.

The scoring total was below what Orlando would normally want from one of its primary offensive players, but the bigger issue was efficiency. According to the official NBA recap, Banchero shot 4-for-15 from the field and missed all five of his three-point attempts.

That shooting performance placed additional pressure on Wagner and the rest of Orlando’s rotation.

Banchero still contributed six rebounds, so his overall statistical impact was not limited to scoring. However, the missed perimeter attempts reduced Orlando’s spacing and made it more difficult for the Magic to maintain offensive efficiency late.

Wendell Carter Jr. Controls the Glass

Wendell Carter Jr. led Orlando with eight rebounds.

His rebounding was part of a larger team effort that allowed the Magic to finish with a 45-40 advantage on the boards.

Carter Jr. also played an important role in the final minute. His two free throws with 54 seconds remaining tied the game at 105-105.

That sequence demonstrates why box-score categories such as rebounds and free throws should not be considered separately from game context.

A player’s contribution can appear modest in the full statistical table while still becoming extremely important during a particular stretch.

Shooting Efficiency Was Close

The teams were surprisingly close in overall field-goal percentage.

Atlanta shot 41-for-85, or roughly 48%, while Orlando shot 37-for-78, or roughly 47%. The difference was only about one percentage point.

Three-point shooting was also close.

Atlanta made 8 of 29 attempts, around 28%, while Orlando made 9 of 31, around 29%.

Neither team had an efficient night from three-point range.

The bigger difference came at the free-throw line.

Atlanta made 21 of 28 free throws for 75%. Orlando made 24 of 37 for approximately 65%.

That means Orlando attempted nine more free throws than Atlanta, yet Atlanta converted a much higher percentage of its attempts.

In a four-point game, those details matter.

Turnovers Were a Major Difference

One of the clearest statistical advantages for Atlanta was ball security.

The Hawks committed 16 turnovers.

The Magic committed 22.

That six-turnover difference gave Atlanta additional possessions and reduced Orlando’s ability to convert its rebounding advantage into sustained offensive pressure.

The official NBA game summary also shows Atlanta generating 22 points off turnovers compared with 13 for Orlando.

This is one of the strongest indicators of why the final score did not simply follow the rebounding numbers.

Orlando won the rebounding battle, but Atlanta was much better at protecting possessions and punishing Magic mistakes.

Assists Show Atlanta’s Better Ball Movement

Atlanta finished with 26 assists compared with Orlando’s 21.

That five-assist difference supports the idea that the Hawks generated a more connected offensive performance.

Young’s six assists led Atlanta, while multiple other players contributed as secondary passers. Alexander-Walker had four assists and Okongwu added three.

For Orlando, Bane’s five assists led the team.

The difference was not enormous, but it was meaningful when combined with the turnover numbers.

Atlanta produced:

• More assists
• Fewer turnovers
• More points off turnovers

Those three categories fit together. They indicate that Atlanta generally converted possessions into useful offensive actions more consistently.

The Fourth Quarter Decided the Game

The fourth quarter is the most important section of this matchup.

Orlando scored only 21 points in the final period, while Atlanta scored 33.

The difference was 12 points in a quarter of basketball.

The Magic’s shooting also deteriorated late. The NBA reported that Orlando shot 7-for-21 in the fourth quarter and missed all seven of its three-point attempts during the period.

Atlanta, meanwhile, generated the 15-0 run that erased Orlando’s 93-81 advantage.

This was not simply a case of one team getting hot while the other stopped scoring. The final quarter combined several factors:

• Atlanta increased its scoring pressure.
• Orlando struggled to convert shots.
• Atlanta capitalized on turnovers.
• Young delivered late-game scoring.
• Atlanta converted important free throws.
• Orlando could not recover after the 15-0 run.

The final four minutes therefore provide more explanatory value than the final score by itself.

Why the Rebounding Advantage Did Not Decide the Game

Orlando’s five-rebound advantage is significant, but it did not translate into enough additional scoring opportunities.

The Magic finished with 45 rebounds compared with Atlanta’s 40.

However, Atlanta produced 26 assists against Orlando’s 21 and turned the ball over six fewer times.

This is an important analytical point for readers looking at basketball statistics.

A team can lose one possession category and still win if it dominates other possession-related categories.

In this case, Atlanta’s ball security and playmaking helped offset Orlando’s rebounding advantage.

The game also shows why offensive rebounding and total rebounding should not be treated as interchangeable. Total rebounds tell you who controlled the glass overall, but they do not fully explain how efficiently those possessions were converted into points.

Why Free Throws Mattered

Atlanta’s 21-for-28 performance at the line was more efficient than Orlando’s 24-for-37.

Orlando actually attempted more free throws, but its 65% conversion rate limited the value of those opportunities.

Atlanta’s 75% rate was stronger, and Young’s late free throws were particularly important.

With the score tight in the final seconds, free throws became one of the safest ways for Atlanta to protect its lead.

This is why shooting analysis should include all three major scoring areas:

1. Field goals
2. Three-pointers
3. Free throws

Looking only at three-point percentage would miss one of the important reasons Atlanta finished ahead.

Defensive Contributions Beyond Scoring

Atlanta recorded nine steals and five blocks.

Orlando recorded seven steals and three blocks.

That gives the Hawks a 14-10 combined advantage in steals plus blocks.

Individual defensive contributions were also visible in the box score. Okongwu recorded three blocks and one steal, while Daniels and Johnson each contributed a steal.

These numbers do not capture every defensive action, but they help explain Atlanta’s ability to create extra opportunities.

Defensive statistics should always be treated carefully because steals and blocks represent only a small portion of defensive impact. Still, in this game they support the broader picture of Atlanta creating more disruptive possessions.

Bench Production and Rotation Context

The box score also reveals how the two teams distributed minutes and responsibilities.

Atlanta’s available rotation included Mouhamed Gueye, Asa Newell, N’Faly Dante, Luke Kennard, Keaton Wallace, Vit Krejci, Jacob Toppin, and Caleb Houstan.

Orlando’s bench included Jonathan Isaac, Tristan da Silva, Goga Bitadze, Tyus Jones, Anthony Black, Jett Howard, Noah Penda, and Jase Richardson.

The official NBA recap also noted that Atlanta was without Zaccharie Risacher because of an ankle injury suffered in the opener and Kristaps Porzingis because he was ill.

That context matters when interpreting the rotations.

A box score tells you what happened with the available players. It does not necessarily describe what either team’s ideal rotation would have looked like under full availability.

What the Game Says About Atlanta

Atlanta’s statistical profile in this matchup was built around balance rather than dominance in one category.

The Hawks did not win the rebounding battle.

They did not win the three-point percentage battle by a meaningful margin.

They did not attempt more free throws.

Instead, Atlanta combined several smaller advantages:

• Better overall field-goal percentage
• More assists
• Fewer turnovers
• More steals
• More blocks
• Better free-throw accuracy
• A much stronger fourth quarter

That is a useful model for analyzing close NBA games.

The winning team does not always lead in the most visually obvious category. Sometimes the result comes from several smaller advantages that compound over 48 minutes.

What the Game Says About Orlando

Orlando showed enough offensive quality to build a substantial lead.

Wagner scored 27 points, Bane added 15, and da Silva also scored 15. The Magic also won the rebounding battle and attempted more free throws.

The problem was maintaining those advantages when Atlanta increased its pressure late.

The fourth-quarter shooting decline was particularly costly.

Orlando had opportunities to protect its lead, but the combination of missed shots and turnovers opened the door for Atlanta.

The six-turnover disadvantage is especially relevant because Atlanta converted those extra opportunities into 22 points off turnovers.

How to Read the Box Score Correctly

For readers researching atlanta hawks vs orlando magic match player stats, it is useful to follow a consistent process instead of immediately searching for the highest scorer.

Start with the final score and quarter breakdown.

Then examine:

1. Scoring leaders

Identify the highest-volume scorers, but check their efficiency as well.

2. Shooting

Compare field-goal percentage, three-point percentage, and free-throw percentage.

3. Possessions

Look at rebounds and turnovers together.

4. Playmaking

Compare team assists and individual assist totals.

5. Defensive activity

Review steals and blocks, then use game context to understand them.

6. Late-game performance

For close games, the fourth quarter can explain the result better than the full-game averages.

This approach provides a much more complete understanding than simply copying a list of points, rebounds, and assists.

Key Statistical Takeaways

Several conclusions stand out from this matchup.

Trae Young was decisive late.
He finished with 25 points and six assists and produced crucial scoring during the closing sequence.

Franz Wagner was the game’s leading scorer.
His 27 points gave Orlando a strong primary scoring option, but the Magic could not turn that production into a win.

Atlanta protected the ball better.
The Hawks committed 16 turnovers compared with Orlando’s 22.

Atlanta created more assists.
The Hawks recorded 26 assists versus 21 for Orlando.

Orlando controlled the boards.
The Magic finished with 45 rebounds compared with Atlanta’s 40.

Free-throw accuracy favored Atlanta.
The Hawks converted 75% of their attempts, compared with 65% for Orlando.

The fourth quarter was decisive.
Atlanta outscored Orlando 33-21 in the final period.

Three-point shooting was not a major strength for either team.
Atlanta shot approximately 28% from three, while Orlando shot approximately 29%.

These facts explain the result more clearly than the final 111-107 score alone.

Player Stat Snapshot

Atlanta Hawks

Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists
Trae Young	25	Not listed among team leaders	6
Nickeil Alexander-Walker	19	1	4
Onyeka Okongwu	17	4	3
Jalen Johnson	12	8	1
Dyson Daniels	Not among top scorers	9	Not listed among team leaders
Mouhamed Gueye	13	Not specified in supplied summary	Not specified

The official box score confirms Alexander-Walker’s 19 points, Johnson’s 12 points and eight rebounds, and Okongwu’s 17 points.

Orlando Magic

Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists
Franz Wagner	27	Not listed among team leaders	Not listed among team leaders
Desmond Bane	15	Not specified in supplied summary	5
Tristan da Silva	15	Not specified in supplied summary	Not specified
Paolo Banchero	11	6	Not specified
Wendell Carter Jr.	Not among top scorers	8	Not specified
Jalen Suggs	11	Not specified in supplied summary	Not specified

The NBA’s official game information identifies Wagner as Orlando’s leading scorer, Carter Jr. as the top rebounder, and Bane as the top assist provider.

Official Game Details

The game was played at Kia Center in Orlando, Florida, with an announced attendance of 18,004.

The officials were Ed Malloy, Danielle Scott, and John Butler. The official NBA game record identifies the matchup as Atlanta at Orlando on Friday, October 24, 2025.

The game was the opening matchup of the season series, with Atlanta taking a 1-0 lead after the 111-107 victory.

For readers comparing databases, it is worth noting that some pages or search results may display October 25 because the NBA’s video recap was dated October 25. The actual game record lists October 24.

Final Statistical Perspective

The atlanta hawks vs orlando magic match player stats show a game where individual scoring leaders did not tell the entire story.

Franz Wagner scored 27 points and led all players in scoring, but Atlanta received a more balanced combination of scoring, passing, defensive activity, and late-game execution.

Trae Young’s 25 points and six assists were especially important because his production increased when the game was at its most competitive. Alexander-Walker’s 19 points and Okongwu’s 17 points provided additional scoring support, while Johnson and Daniels helped on the glass.

For Orlando, Wagner’s 27 points were supported by 15 points from both Bane and da Silva. Bane’s five assists and Carter Jr.’s eight rebounds highlighted the Magic’s secondary contributions.

The team comparison explains the final result even better.

Orlando won the rebounding battle 45-40 and made nine three-pointers compared with Atlanta’s eight. But Atlanta shot slightly better overall, had five more assists, committed six fewer turnovers, produced more points off turnovers, and performed much better in the fourth quarter.

The final quarter ultimately separated the teams.

Atlanta entered the period trailing and left it with a four-point victory. That transformation is the defining feature of this matchup and the main reason the box score deserves to be studied beyond the headline scoring totals.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who was the top scorer in the Atlanta Hawks vs Orlando Magic game?

Franz Wagner led all scorers with 27 points for Orlando. Trae Young led Atlanta with 25 points.

What was the final score?

Atlanta defeated Orlando 111-107 at Kia Center.

How many points did Trae Young score?

Trae Young scored 25 points and recorded six assists. He also made several important late-game free throws.

Who led the Magic in rebounds?

Wendell Carter Jr. led Orlando with eight rebounds.

Which team had more rebounds?

Orlando had the rebounding advantage, collecting 45 rebounds compared with Atlanta’s 40.

When was the game played?

The official NBA game record lists the game as Friday, October 24, 2025. Some NBA video content was published on October 25, which can cause a date discrepancy in search results.

Conclusion

The atlanta hawks vs orlando magic match player stats provide a detailed picture of how Atlanta turned a difficult road game into a 111-107 victory.

Franz Wagner’s 27 points made him the leading scorer, while Trae Young’s 25 points and six assists gave Atlanta its primary offensive engine. Alexander-Walker added 19 points, Okongwu scored 17, and Johnson contributed eight rebounds alongside his 12 points.

The team statistics are equally important. Orlando won the rebounding battle, but Atlanta produced more assists and committed fewer turnovers. The Hawks also converted free throws at a higher rate and generated more points from Orlando’s turnovers.

Most importantly, Atlanta dominated the fourth quarter 33-21 after Orlando had established a significant lead. Young’s late scoring, combined with Atlanta’s ability to capitalize on Orlando’s mistakes, shaped the final result.

For anyone studying this matchup, the clearest lesson is that the final score is only the starting point. The combination of player efficiency, possession control, playmaking, defensive activity, and fourth-quarter execution explains why Atlanta left Orlando with the win.