Dallas Wings vs Las Vegas Aces Match Player Stats

The dallas wings vs las vegas aces match player stats from the June 26, 2026 matchup tell a much richer story than the final score alone. The Las Vegas Aces defeated the Dallas Wings 99-84 at Michelob ULTRA Arena, but the game was shaped by several specific factors: A’ja Wilson’s 32-point performance, Las Vegas’ 35-24 rebounding edge, Dallas’ 2-of-21 shooting from three, and the Aces’ strong opening quarter. The official WNBA game record confirms the 99-84 result, the quarter-by-quarter scoring, the venue, and the attendance of 10,295. (WNBA)

For anyone researching player statistics, this matchup is particularly useful because the individual numbers explain how two teams that had already played competitive games against each other could produce such a different result. Paige Bueckers led Dallas with 25 points, while Jessica Shepard added 22 points and 14 rebounds. On the Las Vegas side, Wilson scored 32 points, Jackie Young contributed 20, and Chelsea Gray controlled the offense with 9 assists and 12 points. (WNBA)

This article breaks down the major player statistics, team numbers, shooting efficiency, rebounding battle, playmaking, season series, and the details that matter when interpreting the box score.

Table of Contents

Game Overview

The matchup took place at Michelob ULTRA Arena in Las Vegas. Dallas entered the contest with an 11-7 record and a 5-5 road mark, while Las Vegas was 13-5 overall and 5-3 at home according to the supplied game data.

The final score was:

Las Vegas Aces 99, Dallas Wings 84

The scoring progression was:

Quarter	Dallas Wings	Las Vegas Aces
1st	17	28
2nd	22	21
3rd	24	22
4th	21	28
Final	84	99

The first quarter immediately created the game’s central challenge for Dallas. Las Vegas scored 28 points while holding Dallas to 17. Dallas never fully erased that early deficit.

The official WNBA recap notes that the Aces opened with a 15-4 run and eventually led by as many as 17 points. Dallas did make a push in the third quarter, cutting the margin to four points at 53-49, but the Wings could not get closer. (WNBA)

That sequence is important when reading the box score. A 15-point final margin can look decisive, but the game did contain a meaningful period when Dallas threatened to make it a one-possession contest.

dallas wings vs las vegas aces match player stats: Top Performers

The individual statistics provide the clearest explanation of the game.

A’ja Wilson

A’ja Wilson was the game’s leading scorer with 32 points.

Her shooting line was:

12-of-21 from the field
0-of-1 from three-point range
8-of-11 from the free-throw line
32 total points

Wilson’s scoring efficiency was one of the biggest differences between the teams.

She did not need to rely heavily on three-point shooting. Instead, she generated her production through efficient interior and mid-range scoring opportunities while also getting to the free-throw line.

The official WNBA report identifies Wilson’s 32 points as the game high and notes that she helped Las Vegas avoid being swept in the season series. (WNBA)

Her performance also demonstrates why raw three-point numbers should not be viewed in isolation. Wilson attempted only one three, yet she remained the most productive scorer on the floor.

Paige Bueckers

Paige Bueckers led Dallas with 25 points.

Her shooting numbers were:

11-of-19 from the field
0-of-3 from three
3-of-3 from the free-throw line
25 points
6 assists
3 steals

Bueckers was one of the strongest individual performers for Dallas despite the loss.

She converted 11 of her 19 field-goal attempts, giving her an excellent field-goal percentage for the game. Her six assists also show that her contribution extended beyond scoring.

The three steals were particularly notable because Dallas recorded seven steals as a team.

From an analytical standpoint, Bueckers’ performance is a useful reminder that an individual can produce an excellent box score while the overall team struggles to win. Dallas received significant production from its lead guard, but the surrounding team statistics did not consistently support that scoring effort.

Jessica Shepard

Jessica Shepard produced one of the most complete stat lines for Dallas.

She recorded:

22 points
14 rebounds
8-of-11 shooting
6-of-8 free throws

Her 14 rebounds were the highest total for either team among the supplied player statistics.

Shepard’s 22 points on 8-of-11 shooting were also extremely efficient. She was one of the reasons Dallas remained competitive after falling behind early.

Her rebounding production becomes even more interesting when viewed alongside the team total. Dallas collected only 24 rebounds overall, while Shepard accounted for 14 of them.

That means Shepard was responsible for a very large portion of Dallas’ total rebounding production.

Jackie Young

Jackie Young scored 20 points for Las Vegas.

Her shooting line was:

4-of-6 from the field
2-of-3 from three
10-of-10 from the free-throw line

The perfect free-throw performance stands out.

Young scored 20 points despite making only four field goals because she converted all 10 of her free throws. That is a good example of why a player’s scoring total cannot be evaluated simply by counting field goals.

The official Aces report also credits Young with 20 points and notes her strong all-around contribution. (Las Vegas Aces)

Chelsea Gray

Chelsea Gray finished with:

12 points
9 assists
5-of-11 field goals
2-of-5 three-pointers

Her nine assists were the highest assist total listed for either team.

Gray’s role was different from Wilson’s and Young’s. Wilson provided primary scoring, Young supplied efficient scoring and free-throw production, while Gray helped organize the offense.

The official WNBA recap notes that Gray reached 2,003 career assists during the game, becoming the fourth player in WNBA history to reach at least 4,500 points and 2,000 assists. (WNBA)

That milestone adds historical context to an otherwise straightforward box-score statistic.

Complete Team Statistical Comparison

The team numbers reveal why Las Vegas won.

Statistic	Dallas Wings	Las Vegas Aces
Points	84	99
Field Goals	34-70	32-60
FG Percentage	49%	53%
3-Point Field Goals	2-21	8-18
3PT Percentage	10%	44%
Free Throws	14-16	27-33
Rebounds	24	35
Assists	18	20
Turnovers	12	15
Steals	7	5
Blocks	2	2

At first glance, one statistic may seem surprising: Dallas actually made more field goals, 34 compared with 32.

Yet Las Vegas scored 15 more points.

That difference comes from shot value and free throws.

Dallas made only two three-pointers. Las Vegas made eight. That produced an 18-point advantage in made three-point baskets before considering the additional free throws.

Las Vegas also attempted 33 free throws compared with 16 for Dallas.

Those two areas dramatically changed the scoring equation.

The Three-Point Shooting Gap

The three-point numbers are arguably the most obvious statistical separator.

Dallas:

2-of-21, 10%

Las Vegas:

8-of-18, 44%

The Wings attempted 21 three-pointers but converted only two.

That creates an important distinction between volume and efficiency. Dallas did not simply avoid three-point opportunities. The Wings took plenty of them but received very little scoring return.

Las Vegas attempted three fewer three-pointers and made six more.

That difference alone produced 18 additional points for the Aces from beyond the arc.

Dallas therefore needed to compensate elsewhere.

The Wings did shoot 49% overall, which was respectable, but the low three-point conversion rate limited the team’s ability to keep pace with Las Vegas.

The official game recap specifically highlights Dallas’ 2-of-21 three-point shooting as one of the reasons the Wings could not complete their comeback. (WNBA)

Free Throws Changed the Scoring Equation

Free throws were another major difference.

Dallas went:

14-of-16, 88%

Las Vegas went:

27-of-33, 82%

Dallas was slightly more accurate from the line, but Las Vegas attempted 17 more free throws.

That difference matters.

Las Vegas converted 27 free throws. Dallas converted 14.

The Aces therefore gained 13 more points from made free throws.

This is a classic example of why percentage alone can sometimes hide the bigger story.

Dallas had the better free-throw percentage, but Las Vegas had far more opportunities and therefore generated substantially more points from the line.

When combined with the three-point gap, the free-throw difference helps explain how Las Vegas could win despite making two fewer field goals.

Rebounding Battle

Rebounding was another important part of the game.

Dallas recorded:

24 rebounds

Las Vegas recorded:

35 rebounds

That gave the Aces an 11-rebound advantage.

The difference was especially significant because Dallas was already struggling to score consistently from outside.

Extra possessions and second-chance opportunities become more valuable when a team is having difficulty generating efficient offense.

Jessica Shepard did her part with 14 rebounds, but Dallas did not receive enough collective rebounding production to match Las Vegas.

The official game report confirms the 35-24 rebounding advantage for the Aces. (WNBA)

Dallas Wings Offensive Analysis

Dallas finished with 84 points.

The Wings shot 34-of-70 from the field, which translates to roughly 49%.

That percentage was not disastrous.

In fact, it shows that Dallas was capable of scoring efficiently on many two-point attempts.

The problem was the composition of the offense.

A team can shoot nearly 50% overall and still lose by double digits if it:

Shoots poorly from three.
Gets fewer free-throw opportunities.
Loses the rebounding battle.
Gives the opponent efficient scoring opportunities.

Dallas experienced all four issues to varying degrees.

Bueckers and Shepard provided efficient individual scoring, but the overall offensive profile was less balanced than Las Vegas’.

The Wings finished with 18 assists, indicating meaningful ball movement, but their 2-of-21 three-point shooting prevented that offense from translating into enough points.

Las Vegas Aces Offensive Analysis

Las Vegas scored 99 points while shooting 32-of-60 from the field.

That is approximately 53% shooting.

The Aces also made 8-of-18 three-pointers and 27-of-33 free throws.

The combination produced a much more efficient scoring profile.

Wilson was the primary scoring engine, while Young provided another 20 points and Gray created opportunities for teammates.

The Aces also received 13 points from Cheyenne Parker-Tyus and 10 points from Kierstan Bell according to the official team report. (Las Vegas Aces)

That secondary production mattered because Dallas could not focus entirely on Wilson.

If one player scores 32 points but receives little help, a defense can potentially force the rest of the roster to win the game.

Las Vegas did not have that problem.

Playmaking Comparison

Dallas finished with 18 assists.

Las Vegas recorded 20.

The difference was only two assists, so the game was not decided simply by passing volume.

However, the individual distribution is worth examining.

Bueckers had six assists for Dallas.

Gray had nine for Las Vegas.

That means Gray accounted for nearly half of Las Vegas’ team assists.

Her ability to create shots for teammates was especially valuable alongside Wilson and Young.

A nine-assist performance also illustrates why assist totals should be interpreted within the context of offensive roles. A primary scorer may dominate the ball differently from a point guard whose job is to create opportunities.

Turnovers and Defensive Plays

Dallas had 12 turnovers.

Las Vegas had 15.

This is one category where Dallas had the numerical advantage.

The Wings committed three fewer turnovers while also recording seven steals compared with five for Las Vegas.

Both teams finished with two blocks.

Therefore, the final result cannot reasonably be explained by turnovers or blocks alone.

Dallas actually protected the ball somewhat better.

The bigger differences appeared in shooting, rebounding, and free-throw opportunities.

This is an important lesson when analyzing dallas wings vs las vegas aces match player stats: not every box-score category points toward the winning team.

Some categories favored Dallas.

The overall combination of categories favored Las Vegas.

First Quarter Set the Tone

The opening quarter was critical.

Las Vegas scored 28 points.

Dallas scored 17.

That created an 11-point deficit after only 10 minutes.

According to the official recap, Las Vegas opened with a 15-4 run. (WNBA)

Dallas then spent much of the game trying to recover.

The Wings improved offensively in the second quarter, scoring 22 points while limiting Las Vegas to 21.

They also won the third quarter 24-22.

That means Dallas actually outscored Las Vegas during the second and third quarters combined.

Yet the early deficit remained costly.

The fourth quarter then swung back toward Las Vegas, with the Aces scoring 28 points compared with Dallas’ 21.

The game therefore followed a clear pattern:

Las Vegas dominated the opening period.
Dallas stabilized in the middle two quarters.
Las Vegas closed strongly in the fourth.

The Third-Quarter Comeback Attempt

One of the most interesting moments came early in the third quarter.

Dallas had fallen behind significantly but managed to reduce the deficit to four points at 53-49.

That was the point at which the game appeared capable of becoming a much tighter finish.

However, Dallas could not sustain the momentum.

The Wings’ three-point shooting remained a major obstacle.

With only two made threes on the night, Dallas had limited scoring flexibility when the Aces’ defense tightened.

The official WNBA account confirms that Dallas never got closer than that four-point margin after the comeback attempt. (WNBA)

Season Series Context

The June 26 game was the third meeting between Dallas and Las Vegas in the 2026 season series.

According to the supplied data, Dallas won the season series 2-1.

The three games were:

Date	Result
May 29	Las Vegas 95, Dallas 87
June 16	Dallas 96, Las Vegas 66
June 26	Las Vegas 99, Dallas 84

The June 16 meeting was especially notable because Dallas won by 30 points.

The Wings scored 96 points while holding Las Vegas to 66.

The official WNBA game record confirms that Dallas won that June 15 game 96-66, with Arike Ogunbowale scoring 22 points and making five three-pointers. (WNBA)

The third meeting therefore looked very different.

That contrast is useful for anyone studying team matchup statistics.

A season series is not necessarily a single repeated game. Lineups, shooting, defensive execution, venue, and game flow can all produce dramatically different statistical results.

Why the Three Games Looked So Different

The three meetings illustrate the importance of game-specific analysis.

In the second meeting, Dallas won by 30.

In the third meeting, Las Vegas won by 15.

That is a 45-point swing in margin between the two most recent meetings.

The June 26 game was particularly different because Las Vegas converted 8-of-18 from three, while Dallas made only 2-of-21.

The second meeting also featured a major Dallas scoring performance from Arike Ogunbowale, who scored 22 and made five threes. (WNBA)

This is why a responsible statistical article should not simply copy season averages and assume they describe every matchup.

The individual game box score provides a much clearer picture of what actually happened on that date.

What the Player Stats Reveal

Several useful conclusions emerge from the numbers.

1. Wilson was the primary scoring difference

Wilson’s 32 points were seven more than Bueckers’ 25 and 10 more than Shepard’s 22.

Her scoring came efficiently from the field and free-throw line.

2. Shepard was highly efficient

Shepard made 8-of-11 shots while adding 14 rebounds.

Her individual performance was one of Dallas’ strongest statistical contributions.

3. Bueckers contributed in multiple areas

Bueckers did not only score 25 points.

She also recorded six assists and three steals.

Her overall statistical impact extended beyond scoring.

4. Gray controlled the passing game

Gray’s nine assists were the highest total listed for the matchup.

Her 12 points also gave Las Vegas scoring support.

5. Young maximized free throws

Young scored 20 points while shooting 4-of-6 from the field and 10-of-10 from the free-throw line.

That is a highly unusual scoring distribution and an important part of the Aces’ offensive efficiency.

Shooting Efficiency Matters More Than Raw Field Goals

One of the easiest mistakes in basketball analysis is to look only at field goals made.

Dallas made 34 field goals.

Las Vegas made 32.

Yet Las Vegas won by 15.

Why?

Because the Aces extracted more value from their possessions.

They made:

Six more three-pointers.
Thirteen more free throws.
Three fewer field goals but more total points.

This illustrates why a complete analysis needs at least three shooting categories:

field goals + three-pointers + free throws

Looking at only one of those numbers can produce an incomplete picture.

What the Rebounding Numbers Say

The 35-24 rebounding difference is also significant.

Shepard personally collected 14 rebounds, but Dallas still finished 11 rebounds behind the Aces.

That suggests the rebounding issue was broader than one matchup.

Las Vegas had multiple contributors on the glass.

NaLyssa Smith led the Aces with 11 rebounds according to the supplied data.

The Aces therefore had two important sources of production:

Wilson supplied 32 points.
Smith supplied 11 rebounds.
Gray supplied nine assists.
Young supplied 20 points.

That balance made the Aces difficult to beat despite Dallas producing several strong individual performances.

Attendance and Game Environment

The game drew 10,295 fans at Michelob ULTRA Arena.

The official WNBA game information confirms the attendance figure and venue. (WNBA)

For historical game records, details such as attendance and venue are useful because they establish the exact context in which the statistical performance occurred.

A box score without a date, venue, or opponent context is less useful for long-term comparison.

How to Read This Box Score Correctly

If you are using these statistics for fantasy analysis, sports writing, historical research, or matchup analysis, start with the basic hierarchy below.

Step 1: Confirm the final score

Las Vegas won 99-84.

Step 2: Identify the primary scorers

Wilson led Las Vegas with 32.

Bueckers led Dallas with 25.

Step 3: Check efficiency

Wilson: 12-of-21.

Bueckers: 11-of-19.

Shepard: 8-of-11.

Young: 4-of-6.

Step 4: Examine three-point shooting

Dallas: 2-of-21.

Las Vegas: 8-of-18.

Step 5: Check free throws

Dallas: 14-of-16.

Las Vegas: 27-of-33.

Step 6: Check rebounds

Dallas: 24.

Las Vegas: 35.

Step 7: Review playmaking

Dallas: 18 assists.

Las Vegas: 20 assists.

Gray: 9 assists.

Step 8: Put everything into game context

The first-quarter deficit and fourth-quarter finish explain why the final score became 99-84.

Useful Visuals for a Sports Statistics Article

For a published version of this article, an original visual can make the statistics easier to understand without adding unnecessary text.

A useful chart would compare:

Team points
Field-goal percentage
Three-point percentage
Free-throw percentage
Rebounds
Assists
Turnovers

A second visual could compare the leading players using points, rebounds, assists, and shooting percentage.

A quarter-by-quarter bar chart would also clearly show how the 28-17 first quarter and 28-21 fourth quarter helped Las Vegas create and maintain its winning margin.

These visuals should be generated from the verified game data rather than copied from another website.

Authoritative Source

For readers who want to verify the official game record, player statistics, scoring progression, and game information, the official WNBA game page is the most relevant primary source. official WNBA game record

FAQs

Who scored the most points in the Dallas Wings vs Las Vegas Aces game?

A’ja Wilson led all players with 32 points for the Las Vegas Aces.

How many points did Paige Bueckers score?

Paige Bueckers scored 25 points for the Dallas Wings. She also recorded six assists and three steals.

How many rebounds did Jessica Shepard have?

Jessica Shepard recorded 14 rebounds for Dallas while scoring 22 points.

How many assists did Chelsea Gray have?

Chelsea Gray recorded nine assists and 12 points for Las Vegas.

What was the final score?

The Las Vegas Aces defeated the Dallas Wings 99-84.

Which team shot better from three-point range?

Las Vegas shot 8-of-18 from three-point range, or about 44%. Dallas shot 2-of-21, or 10%.

Conclusion

The dallas wings vs las vegas aces match player stats from June 26, 2026 show how several statistical categories can interact to determine a game’s result.

A’ja Wilson’s 32 points were the headline performance, while Jackie Young added 20 points and Chelsea Gray delivered nine assists. For Dallas, Paige Bueckers scored 25 points with six assists and three steals, while Jessica Shepard produced 22 points and 14 rebounds.

The team statistics provide even more context.

Dallas shot 49% overall, but made only two of 21 three-point attempts. Las Vegas shot 53% overall and made eight of 18 from beyond the arc. The Aces also converted 27 free throws compared with 14 for Dallas and won the rebounding battle 35-24.

The quarter-by-quarter numbers explain the game’s rhythm. Las Vegas established an 11-point advantage in the opening quarter, Dallas fought back during the middle periods, and the Aces closed the game with a 28-point fourth quarter.

The matchup also has useful season-series context. Dallas had already beaten Las Vegas earlier in the month by 30 points, making this 99-84 Aces victory an example of how dramatically the statistical profile of a matchup can change from one meeting to another.

For readers studying player performance, the biggest lesson is to look beyond the final score. Points identify the headline performers, but shooting efficiency, three-point production, free throws, rebounds, assists, turnovers, and game flow explain how the result actually developed.