Toronto Raptors vs Pacers Match Player Stats
The toronto raptors vs pacers match player stats from the 2026 NBA Summer League meeting tell the story of a game that was decided by execution in the final seconds. Toronto defeated Indiana 94-93 at the Thomas & Mack Center in Las Vegas after a back-and-forth contest that featured 13 lead changes and four ties. Seth Lundy led Toronto with 22 points and produced the decisive defensive play, blocking Rienk Mast’s potential game-winning attempt as time expired.
This was more than a one-point result. The box score shows two teams taking different paths to production. Toronto shot 46 percent from the field and 42 percent from three, while Indiana shot 39.4 percent overall and 25.7 percent from long range. Indiana created plenty of scoring opportunities at the line, but Toronto’s shooting efficiency and late-game defense helped decide the result.
The game also provided several useful individual performances. Lundy supplied the headline scoring performance for Toronto, while Allen Graves filled the stat sheet with scoring, rebounding, assists and steals. On Indiana’s side, Rienk Mast produced 23 points and 10 rebounds, Jalen Slawson added 21 points, and Braden Smith controlled much of the team’s playmaking with nine assists despite not scoring from the field.
Toronto Raptors vs Pacers Match Player Stats
The most useful way to understand this matchup is to look beyond the final score and examine scoring efficiency, rebounding, playmaking, turnovers and defensive events.
| Category | Toronto Raptors | Indiana Pacers |
| Final Score | 94 | 93 |
| Field Goals | 33-72 | 26-66 |
| Field Goal % | 45.8% | 39.4% |
| 3-Point Field Goals | 11-26 | 9-35 |
| 3-Point % | 42.3% | 25.7% |
| Free Throws | 11-15 | 16-23 |
| Free Throw % | 73.3% | 69.6% |
| Rebounds | 40 | 34 |
| Assists | 24 | 16 |
| Turnovers | 21 | 16 |
| Steals | 9 | 10 |
| Blocks | 5 | 5 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 13 | 13 |
| Personal Fouls | 33 | 24 |
The most obvious difference is shooting. Toronto made seven more field goals despite taking only six additional field-goal attempts. The Raptors also converted 11 of 26 three-point attempts, compared with 9 of 35 for Indiana.
That 3-point gap mattered because Indiana actually made five more free throws. The Pacers therefore had another source of scoring, but their lower percentage from the floor and especially from three made it difficult to create enough separation.
Toronto also recorded eight more assists. That is an important indicator because the Raptors were not simply relying on one scorer. Their 24 assists on 33 made field goals show that a substantial portion of their offense came through shared creation.
Official NBA game details and box score
Game Result and Context
The verified NBA record identifies the contest as a 2026 NBA Summer League game played at Thomas & Mack Center in Las Vegas. The official NBA game page lists the matchup as Monday, July 13, 2026, rather than July 14. The game ended with Toronto ahead 94-93.
That date difference is worth mentioning because some schedules can display the game according to a viewer’s local time. For readers searching from different time zones, the local broadcast date can sometimes appear different from the date used by the official competition record.
The game itself was extremely competitive.
Toronto started strongly, winning the opening quarter 26-16. Indiana answered with a 29-19 second quarter, meaning the teams entered halftime tied at 45.
The third quarter remained close. Toronto eventually carried a one-point advantage into the final period, setting up a finish in which every possession mattered.
NBA’s official recap reported 13 lead changes during the contest.
Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
First Quarter: Toronto Takes Control
Toronto opened the game with a 26-16 advantage.
The early margin came from better offensive efficiency and a more productive start from several Raptors players. Toronto’s ability to create a double-digit lead early gave the team an important cushion.
Indiana, however, did not allow the game to become one-sided.
Second Quarter: Indiana Responds
The Pacers reversed the momentum in the second period.
Indiana outscored Toronto 29-19, bringing the teams level at 45 points apiece at halftime.
This was one of the most important stretches of the game because it demonstrated Indiana’s ability to respond after falling behind.
The Pacers did not need to win every quarter. They needed to regain offensive rhythm, and the second quarter accomplished that.
Third Quarter: The Game Tightens
The third period produced another competitive exchange.
Toronto scored 25 points while Indiana scored 24, giving the Raptors a 70-69 advantage entering the fourth quarter.
A one-point margin meant that neither team’s earlier run was enough to determine the outcome.
Fourth Quarter: One Possession Decides Everything
Both teams scored 24 points in the fourth quarter.
That symmetry explains why the final margin was only one point.
Toronto eventually moved ahead 94-93, leaving Indiana with one final opportunity. Rienk Mast received the opportunity near the basket, but Seth Lundy rotated defensively and blocked the attempt as the clock expired.
It was the defining defensive moment of the game.
Seth Lundy Leads Toronto
Seth Lundy was Toronto’s leading scorer with 22 points.
He shot 8-for-13 from the field, including 4-for-7 from three-point range. He also made his only free-throw attempt. That gave him a 61.5 percent field-goal rate and a 57.1 percent three-point rate for the game.
His offensive efficiency was important, but his final defensive play made his performance even more memorable.
Lundy finished with:
- 22 points
- 8-for-13 shooting
- 4-for-7 from three
- 1 rebound
- 1 assist
- 2 steals
- 1 block
- 1 turnover
- 3 fouls
- +10 plus-minus
The plus-minus figure is also useful. Toronto outscored Indiana by 10 points during Lundy’s time on the court.
His final block was particularly significant because it directly prevented a potential Pacers game-winning basket.
NBA’s recap confirmed that Lundy scored 22 points and made the game-saving block with 2.1 seconds remaining.
Allen Graves Provides All-Around Production
Allen Graves was arguably Toronto’s most complete statistical contributor.
He recorded 13 points, five rebounds, six assists and four steals. His 26:04 of playing time gave him one of Toronto’s larger workloads, and his contributions appeared in several different areas of the box score.
Graves finished 5-for-12 from the field and 3-for-5 from three-point range.
His statistical line included:
- 13 points
- 5 rebounds
- 6 assists
- 4 steals
- 3 three-pointers
- 3 turnovers
- 6 fouls
- +15 plus-minus
The six assists were especially valuable because Toronto finished with 24 assists overall.
Graves therefore contributed to Toronto’s ball movement while also providing defensive pressure. His four steals were the most on the Raptors.
The +15 plus-minus was also Toronto’s strongest mark among the players listed in the official box score.
Jaden Bradley Adds Efficient Support
Jaden Bradley scored 15 points for Toronto.
His role was especially important late in the game. NBA’s game coverage reported that Bradley’s free throws helped Toronto move ahead during the final sequence.
Bradley also finished with five rebounds and two assists according to NBA’s game recap.
His contribution illustrates why Summer League games should not be evaluated only by the highest scorer. A player who contributes in crucial possessions can have an impact that is not fully represented by total points.
Toronto’s Other Contributors
Toronto received useful production beyond its top three scorers.
Tyreke Key scored 16 points and added three assists in 20 minutes. NBA’s coverage specifically highlighted his contribution from the bench.
The Raptors also benefited from their interior defense.
Jamarion Sharp finished with nine rebounds and three blocks, giving Toronto a strong presence around the basket.
The combination of Sharp’s rim protection and Lundy’s late block helped Toronto finish the game with five total blocks.
Indiana’s Offensive Leaders
Indiana had several strong individual performances despite the narrow defeat.
The most important statistical performance came from Rienk Mast.
Mast finished with 23 points and 10 rebounds, producing a double-double. He shot 8-for-14 from the field and 3-for-7 from three-point range.
His final line included:
- 23 points
- 10 rebounds
- 8-for-14 field goals
- 3-for-7 three-pointers
- 2-for-3 free throws
- 1 assist
- 1 block
- 1 turnover
- 2 fouls
- +4 plus-minus
Mast’s 23 points were the highest individual scoring total in the game.
Ironically, he also had the final shot opportunity.
That made the ending particularly notable. Mast had produced a strong offensive performance throughout the game, but Lundy’s final defensive play prevented him from becoming the player who decided the result.
Jalen Slawson’s Strong Performance
Jalen Slawson added 21 points for Indiana.
He also recorded eight rebounds, giving the Pacers another player capable of contributing on both ends of the floor.
NBA’s official coverage described Slawson as having another productive Summer League performance.
His 21 points were only two behind Mast, meaning Indiana had two players capable of carrying much of the scoring burden.
That balance helped Indiana recover from Toronto’s strong first quarter.
Braden Smith’s Unusual Box Score
Braden Smith produced one of the most interesting statistical lines in the game.
He did not score from the field, going 0-for-7 overall and 0-for-4 from three-point range. However, he recorded nine assists.
That is an important reminder that scoring is only one part of offensive impact.
Smith’s nine assists were the highest assist total for either team.
Even without scoring, he helped create opportunities for teammates and was heavily involved in Indiana’s offensive organization.
This is exactly why a box score should be read as a collection of connected statistics rather than as a simple scoring leaderboard.
Gabe McGlothan Provides Efficient Scoring
Gabe McGlothan scored 16 points for Indiana.
His efficiency stands out.
He shot 3-for-4 from the field, including 2-for-2 from three-point range, and went 4-for-5 at the free-throw line.
That gave him 75 percent shooting from the field and 100 percent shooting from three.
He also collected six rebounds and two steals.
Although his total of 16 points was below Mast and Slawson, his efficiency was among Indiana’s strongest individual offensive contributions.
Team Shooting Explains Much of the Result
The simplest explanation for Toronto’s win is shooting efficiency.
Toronto made 33 of 72 field-goal attempts.
Indiana made 26 of 66.
That means Toronto converted approximately 45.8 percent of its field goals while Indiana finished at 39.4 percent.
The difference becomes even clearer from three-point range.
Toronto:
- 11-for-26
- 42.3 percent
Indiana:
- 9-for-35
- 25.7 percent
Indiana actually attempted nine more three-point shots.
That aggressive perimeter volume can be useful when the shots fall, but on this occasion the Pacers did not convert enough of those attempts.
Toronto therefore gained a major efficiency advantage without needing a large difference in total attempts.
Free Throws Kept Indiana Close
Indiana’s free-throw shooting helped compensate for its lower field-goal percentage.
The Pacers attempted 23 free throws and made 16.
Toronto attempted only 15 and made 11.
That gave Indiana a five-point advantage in made free throws.
Without that advantage, the scoring gap could have been larger.
This is one of the more important details in the box score because it shows that the game was not simply decided by one statistical category.
Toronto was better from the floor, particularly from three-point range, while Indiana generated more free-throw scoring.
Rebounding Battle
Toronto finished with 40 rebounds compared with 34 for Indiana.
The Raptors also matched Indiana with 13 offensive rebounds.
That is significant because neither team dominated the offensive glass.
Toronto’s six-rebound overall advantage came from defensive rebounding, where the Raptors collected 27 compared with Indiana’s 21.
Those additional defensive rebounds helped Toronto finish possessions and reduce Indiana’s opportunities for second-chance scoring.
Jamarion Sharp led Toronto with nine rebounds.
Mast led Indiana with 10.
The individual battle between Sharp and Mast therefore represented an important interior matchup within the larger game.
Assists and Ball Movement
Toronto finished with 24 assists.
Indiana had 16.
The eight-assist difference is substantial in a one-point game.
Toronto’s higher assist total suggests that its offense generated more assisted scoring opportunities and shared creation.
Indiana still received excellent playmaking from Smith, who had nine assists by himself.
However, Toronto had more distributed creation across the lineup.
That distinction matters.
One player producing a high assist total can be extremely valuable, but a team with multiple players contributing to ball movement can create a more balanced offensive structure.
Turnovers Tell Another Part of the Story
Toronto committed 21 turnovers.
Indiana committed 16.
On the surface, this was an area where Indiana had the advantage.
Five fewer turnovers gave the Pacers additional possessions and helped them remain competitive despite their lower shooting percentage.
This also demonstrates why Toronto’s victory was not a flawless performance.
The Raptors gave away possessions but compensated through better shooting, rebounding and assist production.
In a future matchup, reducing those turnovers would be an obvious area for improvement.
Defensive Statistics
Both teams recorded five blocks.
Indiana had 10 steals compared with Toronto’s nine.
The difference in steals was therefore minimal.
The more important defensive statistic came at the end of the game.
Lundy’s block stopped Indiana’s final attempt and preserved Toronto’s one-point lead.
This is a perfect example of why raw defensive totals cannot always describe the most important defensive play.
One block at the right moment can matter more to the final result than several routine defensive events earlier in the game.
Why Toronto Won
The 94-93 result can be explained through several connected factors.
Better Overall Shooting
Toronto’s 45.8 percent field-goal rate was significantly better than Indiana’s 39.4 percent.
Strong Three-Point Efficiency
Toronto converted 42.3 percent of its three-point attempts, while Indiana made only 25.7 percent.
More Assists
Toronto recorded 24 assists against Indiana’s 16.
Better Defensive Rebounding
Toronto finished with 27 defensive rebounds compared with Indiana’s 21.
Timely Late-Game Defense
Lundy’s final block prevented Indiana from converting its last possession.
No single statistic completely explains the game, but these factors together provide a clear picture of how Toronto survived the one-point finish.
Why Indiana Stayed in the Game
Indiana had several strengths that kept the contest close.
The Pacers responded strongly after falling behind 26-16 in the first quarter.
They scored 29 points in the second period.
They also won the turnover battle, committed five fewer turnovers and attempted eight more free throws.
Mast and Slawson combined for 44 points.
Smith added nine assists.
Those contributions gave Indiana enough offensive production to stay within one possession despite the shooting disadvantage.
The Importance of the Final Possession
The final possession deserves special attention because it shows how a close Summer League game can turn on communication and defensive positioning.
Indiana had the opportunity to win or tie the game after Toronto took a 94-93 lead.
Smith became involved in the final action and found Mast near the basket.
Mast attempted the potential winning shot.
Lundy rotated into the play and blocked it as the clock expired. NBA’s official report described the block as coming with 2.1 seconds remaining.
The result was therefore determined not by a final made jumper but by a defensive recovery.
For readers analyzing player statistics, this is an important distinction. Traditional box-score numbers tell you who scored, rebounded and passed, but play-by-play context explains when those actions mattered most.
What the Game Says About Player Evaluation
Summer League statistics need to be interpreted carefully.
A high scoring total can be useful, but it does not automatically indicate the most complete performance.
For example, Mast led all players with 23 points and recorded 10 rebounds.
Lundy scored 22 points and delivered the decisive block.
Graves had only 13 points but added six assists and four steals.
Smith did not score from the field but produced nine assists.
Each performance tells a different story.
A useful player evaluation should therefore consider:
- Scoring volume
- Shooting efficiency
- Playmaking
- Rebounding
- Defensive activity
- Turnovers
- Game situation
- On-court impact
This broader approach is especially valuable when studying young players in Summer League.
Key Statistical Takeaways
The most important numbers from the matchup are easy to summarize.
Toronto Raptors
- 94 points
- 33-for-72 shooting
- 11-for-26 from three
- 40 rebounds
- 24 assists
- 21 turnovers
- 9 steals
- 5 blocks
- Seth Lundy: 22 points
- Allen Graves: 13 points, 6 assists, 4 steals
- Jamarion Sharp: 9 rebounds, 3 blocks
- Jaden Bradley: 15 points
Indiana Pacers
- 93 points
- 26-for-66 shooting
- 9-for-35 from three
- 34 rebounds
- 16 assists
- 16 turnovers
- 10 steals
- 5 blocks
- Rienk Mast: 23 points, 10 rebounds
- Jalen Slawson: 21 points, 8 rebounds
- Gabe McGlothan: 16 points
- Braden Smith: 9 assists
These numbers provide a concise statistical picture of the game.
What Readers Should Look For in Similar Matchups
When researching toronto raptors vs pacers match player stats, looking only at points can hide much of the story.
A better approach is to compare several categories together.
Start with scoring efficiency.
Then examine three-point shooting.
Next, look at assists and turnovers to understand offensive organization.
After that, review offensive and defensive rebounding.
Finally, identify the players who produced key defensive actions.
This approach makes it easier to distinguish between a player who simply accumulated statistics and a player who affected several parts of the game.
Common Mistakes When Reading Player Stats
Mistake 1: Treating Points as the Only Important Statistic
A 20-point performance can come with poor efficiency or limited contributions elsewhere.
Mistake 2: Ignoring Shooting Percentage
Two players can score the same number of points while using very different numbers of attempts.
Mistake 3: Ignoring Assists
A player with modest scoring numbers may still be responsible for creating many successful possessions.
Mistake 4: Ignoring Defensive Events
Steals and blocks do not capture every defensive contribution, but they can provide useful evidence when combined with game context.
Mistake 5: Ignoring Game Situation
A late defensive stop can have a different importance from a routine play early in the second quarter.
The Raptors-Pacers game demonstrates all five of these points.
A Deeper Look at Shooting Efficiency
Toronto’s 11-for-26 three-point shooting deserves special attention.
The Raptors made 42.3 percent from three while Indiana made only 25.7 percent.
The difference was 16.6 percentage points.
That is a substantial shooting gap.
Indiana attempted more threes, but volume did not translate into enough made shots.
This is a useful lesson when interpreting box scores. More attempts do not necessarily mean better offensive execution.
Efficiency must be considered alongside volume.
A Deeper Look at Playmaking
Toronto’s 24 assists were spread across its offensive structure.
Indiana’s 16 assists were lower overall, but Smith’s nine assists represented more than half of the Pacers’ total.
This creates an interesting contrast.
Toronto received broader distribution of playmaking.
Indiana relied more heavily on one primary creator for assist production.
Neither structure is automatically good or bad. The important question is whether the resulting possessions generate efficient scoring opportunities.
In this game, Toronto converted its opportunities at a higher rate.
A Deeper Look at Defensive Impact
The closing sequence makes Toronto’s defensive performance particularly memorable.
The Raptors did not dominate steals.
They did not dominate blocks.
They also committed more turnovers than Indiana.
Yet they produced the most important defensive action of the night.
Lundy’s block stopped the final shot and directly preserved the victory.
This is why statistical analysis should combine numbers with game context.
A box score can tell you that Lundy had one block.
The play-by-play tells you why that one block mattered so much.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Raptors and Pacers?
The Toronto Raptors defeated the Indiana Pacers 94-93 in the 2026 NBA Summer League in Las Vegas.
Who led the Raptors in scoring?
Seth Lundy led Toronto with 22 points. He also made the game-saving block on Indiana’s final possession.
Who led the Pacers in scoring?
Rienk Mast led Indiana with 23 points and also recorded 10 rebounds for a double-double.
How many assists did Braden Smith have?
Braden Smith recorded nine assists despite going 0-for-7 from the field and 0-for-4 from three-point range.
Which team shot better from three-point range?
Toronto shot 42.3 percent from three-point range, compared with 25.7 percent for Indiana.
Where was the Raptors vs Pacers Summer League game played?
The game was played at Thomas & Mack Center in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Conclusion
The toronto raptors vs pacers match player stats from the 2026 Summer League matchup reveal a game that was much closer than the shooting percentages might suggest.
Toronto won 94-93 because it combined better field-goal efficiency, stronger three-point shooting, more assists and a crucial final defensive play.
Seth Lundy led the Raptors with 22 points and ended the contest with the decisive block. Allen Graves supplied a balanced performance with 13 points, five rebounds, six assists and four steals. Jaden Bradley contributed 15 points, while Jamarion Sharp provided nine rebounds and three blocks.
Indiana’s best statistical performances came from Rienk Mast and Jalen Slawson. Mast scored 23 points and grabbed 10 rebounds, while Slawson scored 21 points and added eight rebounds. Gabe McGlothan added an efficient 16 points, and Braden Smith produced nine assists despite being held scoreless from the field.
The team statistics explain the narrow result. Toronto shot 45.8 percent overall and 42.3 percent from three, compared with Indiana’s 39.4 percent overall and 25.7 percent from three. Indiana countered with more free throws and fewer turnovers, but those advantages were not enough to overcome Toronto’s shooting efficiency.
Most importantly, the final possession showed how a single defensive action can decide a tightly contested game. The statistical record gives the numbers, while the play-by-play explains the significance behind them.
