Seahawks vs Pittsburgh Steelers Match Player Stats

The seahawks vs pittsburgh steelers match player stats from September 14, 2025 tell the story of a game that changed dramatically after halftime. Seattle defeated Pittsburgh 31-17 at Acrisure Stadium, using a balanced offensive attack, strong second-half execution, timely defensive plays, and a crucial special-teams touchdown to pull away. The Seahawks finished with 395 total yards compared with Pittsburgh’s 267, while both teams committed two interceptions and neither team lost a fumble. (ESPN)

For anyone looking beyond the final score, this game offers much more than a simple win-loss result. Sam Darnold threw for 295 yards and two touchdowns, Kenneth Walker III rushed for 105 yards and a touchdown, and Jaxon Smith-Njigba led Seattle with 103 receiving yards. On the Pittsburgh side, Aaron Rodgers completed 18 of 33 passes for 203 yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions, while Jaylen Warren produced 86 receiving yards and 48 rushing yards.

The numbers also explain why the game remained competitive for much of the first half before Seattle took control. Pittsburgh actually led 14-7 late in the second quarter, but Seattle scored 24 unanswered points across the second half. That second-half swing became the defining statistical feature of the matchup. (ESPN)

Seahawks vs Pittsburgh Steelers Match Player Stats

The most useful way to understand this matchup is to separate the individual numbers from the team-level story. Individual production matters, but the distribution of yards, turnovers, first downs, rushing efficiency, and situational execution explains why Seattle won by 14 points.

Category	Seattle Seahawks	Pittsburgh Steelers
Final Score	31	17
Total Yards	395	267
Passing Yards	278	195
Rushing Yards	117	72
First Downs	21	13
Third Down	6/14	5/15
Fourth Down	1/2	1/2
Total Plays	64	59
Yards Per Play	6.2	4.5
Turnovers	2	2
Possession	31:17	28:43
Sacks Allowed	2	3

These team statistics are particularly important because the turnover margin was even. Seattle did not win because Pittsburgh simply gave the ball away more often. Both offenses threw two interceptions. Instead, Seattle created a much larger advantage in total offensive production.

Seattle averaged 6.2 yards per play compared with Pittsburgh’s 4.5. The Seahawks also produced 21 first downs against 13 for the Steelers. Those differences demonstrate that Seattle consistently generated more productive plays even though its quarterback also made two costly mistakes. (ESPN)

Sam Darnold’s Passing Performance

Sam Darnold’s performance was one of the most interesting parts of the game because the final numbers look better than his first half suggested.

Darnold completed 22 of 33 passes for 295 yards, two touchdowns, and two interceptions. He was also sacked twice for a combined loss of 17 yards and finished with an 89.8 passer rating.

His completion percentage was 66.7 percent, while his average yards per attempt was 8.9. Those figures show that Seattle’s passing game was not simply built around short, conservative throws.

The two interceptions, however, were important.

Both came in the first half, and Pittsburgh converted those opportunities into points. That helped the Steelers stay in the game despite Seattle moving the ball effectively.

The major adjustment was Darnold’s response after halftime. Rather than allowing the early mistakes to dictate the remainder of the game, he continued operating the offense aggressively. He eventually connected with AJ Barner for a touchdown and made several important throws during Seattle’s second-half surge.

According to ESPN’s game recap, Darnold acknowledged that he had made a couple of poor plays in the first half but remained optimistic about Seattle’s offensive position at halftime. That ability to recover from mistakes was more important than simply looking at the interception total. (ESPN)

Darnold’s Key Numbers

• Completions: 22
• Attempts: 33
• Completion rate: 66.7%
• Passing yards: 295
• Yards per attempt: 8.9
• Touchdowns: 2
• Interceptions: 2
• Sacks: 2
• Sack yardage: 17
• Passer rating: 89.8

The broader takeaway is that Darnold delivered enough explosive production to overcome his early errors.

Aaron Rodgers’ Numbers for Pittsburgh

Aaron Rodgers had a much more difficult afternoon.

He completed 18 of 33 passes for 203 yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions. He was also sacked three times for 20 yards and finished with a 58.0 passer rating.

His completion percentage was 54.5 percent, and his 6.2 yards per attempt was significantly lower than Darnold’s 8.9.

The difference becomes even clearer when looking at total passing production. Pittsburgh’s quarterbacks combined for 195 net passing yards, while Seattle recorded 278 passing yards in the team statistics. Pittsburgh also faced three sacks compared with two for Seattle. (ESPN)

Rodgers did produce Pittsburgh’s only offensive touchdown, connecting with former Seahawks receiver DK Metcalf for a two-yard score late in the second quarter. That touchdown gave Pittsburgh a 14-7 advantage.

But the Steelers were unable to sustain that momentum.

Rodgers’ Key Numbers

• Completions: 18
• Attempts: 33
• Completion rate: 54.5%
• Passing yards: 203
• Yards per attempt: 6.2
• Touchdowns: 1
• Interceptions: 2
• Sacks: 3
• Sack yardage: 20
• Passer rating: 58.0

Mason Rudolph also appeared for Pittsburgh and completed both of his passes for 12 yards. He finished with a 91.7 passer rating, but his limited workload means his statistics had little effect on the overall offensive picture.

Kenneth Walker III Dominates on the Ground

One of the clearest statistical differences between the teams was rushing production.

Kenneth Walker III carried the ball 13 times for 105 yards, averaging 8.1 yards per attempt. He also scored a touchdown and recorded a 20-yard long run.

That performance gave Seattle a genuine explosive element on the ground.

The Seahawks finished with 117 rushing yards on 29 attempts, averaging 4.0 yards per carry. Pittsburgh managed only 72 rushing yards on 21 attempts, averaging 3.4 yards per carry. (ESPN)

Walker was particularly important because his production prevented Pittsburgh from focusing exclusively on the passing game.

His final touchdown came with 3:41 remaining in the fourth quarter. Walker broke through for a 19-yard touchdown run that effectively ended Pittsburgh’s comeback hopes. ESPN’s recap noted that it was Walker’s first 100-yard game since the 2024 season opener against Denver. (ESPN)

Seattle’s Rushing Distribution

Player	Carries	Yards	Average	TD	Long
Kenneth Walker III	13	105	8.1	1	20
Zach Charbonnet	15	10	0.7	0	6
AJ Barner	1	2	2.0	0	2
Team	29	117	4.0	1	20

The table highlights something easy to miss. Seattle’s overall rushing efficiency was respectable, but most of the explosive production came from Walker.

Pittsburgh’s Rushing Attack

Pittsburgh’s running game was much less effective.

Jaylen Warren led the Steelers with 14 carries for 48 yards, averaging 3.4 yards per carry. Kenneth Gainwell added 20 yards on five carries, while Rodgers and Kaleb Johnson combined for four additional rushing yards.

The Steelers finished with 72 rushing yards.

That meant Pittsburgh struggled to establish a reliable ground game capable of controlling the clock or creating manageable down-and-distance situations.

Pittsburgh’s Rushing Numbers

Player	Carries	Yards	Average	TD	Long
Jaylen Warren	14	48	3.4	0	9
Kenneth Gainwell	5	20	4.0	0	13
Aaron Rodgers	1	3	3.0	0	3
Kaleb Johnson	1	1	1.0	0	1
Team	21	72	3.4	0	13

The difference between Walker’s 8.1 yards per carry and Pittsburgh’s 3.4-yard team average is one of the clearest indicators of Seattle’s offensive advantage.

Jaxon Smith-Njigba Leads Seattle Receivers

Jaxon Smith-Njigba was Seattle’s leading receiver.

He caught eight passes for 103 yards on 10 targets, averaging 12.9 yards per reception. His longest reception covered 43 yards.

That 43-yard play was particularly significant because it helped Seattle create separation late in the game.

Cooper Kupp was also heavily involved, catching seven passes for 90 yards on nine targets. Kupp averaged 12.9 yards per reception, matching Smith-Njigba’s average despite finishing 13 yards behind him.

Seattle’s receiving group combined for 22 receptions, 295 yards, and two touchdowns.

Seattle Receiving Leaders

Player	Receptions	Yards	Average	Targets	Long
Jaxon Smith-Njigba	8	103	12.9	10	43
Cooper Kupp	7	90	12.9	9	17
Tory Horton	2	32	16.0	4	21
Elijah Arroyo	2	31	15.5	3	24
AJ Barner	2	26	13.0	3	19
Kenneth Walker III	1	13	13.0	1	13

The distribution is important. Seattle did not rely on one receiver for nearly all its passing production. Smith-Njigba and Kupp accounted for 193 receiving yards combined, but other players contributed 102 additional yards.

That variety made Seattle’s offense harder to contain.

Jaylen Warren Provides Pittsburgh’s Biggest Receiving Threat

Jaylen Warren was Pittsburgh’s leading receiver with four receptions for 86 yards.

His 21.5 yards per reception was the highest average among Pittsburgh’s regular contributors.

His biggest play covered 65 yards, demonstrating how quickly Pittsburgh could generate a major gain when the opportunity appeared.

However, one explosive reception did not translate into consistent offensive production.

Warren also led Pittsburgh with 48 rushing yards, meaning he was involved in multiple phases of the offense.

Pat Freiermuth added three catches for 31 yards, while Jonnu Smith caught four passes for 27 yards.

DK Metcalf caught three passes for 20 yards and scored Pittsburgh’s only offensive touchdown. His numbers were modest against his former team. (ESPN)

Pittsburgh Receiving Leaders

Player	Receptions	Yards	Average	Targets
Jaylen Warren	4	86	21.5	4
Pat Freiermuth	3	31	10.3	4
Jonnu Smith	4	27	6.8	4
Calvin Austin III	1	22	22.0	4
DK Metcalf	3	20	6.7	6
Kenneth Gainwell	3	16	5.3	5

Defensive Player Stats

The defensive numbers provide another explanation for Seattle’s victory.

Ernest Jones IV led the Seahawks with 10 tackles, including eight solo tackles. Byron Murphy II recorded 1.5 sacks, while Seattle finished with three team sacks.

Seattle’s defense also recorded two interceptions.

Coby Bryant intercepted one pass and returned it 28 yards. Derion Kendrick added another interception.

Pittsburgh also intercepted Darnold twice.

Nick Herbig recorded one interception and returned it 41 yards, while Jalen Ramsey had another interception with a two-yard return.

Seattle Defensive Leaders

Player	Tackles	Solo	Sacks	TFL	Pass Defenses
Ernest Jones IV	10	8	0	0	0
Byron Murphy II	7	5	1.5	0	0
Coby Bryant	4	2	0	0	0
Derion Kendrick	1	0	0	0	1

Seattle’s team defense finished with 63 tackles, 40 solo tackles, three sacks, two tackles for loss, five pass defenses, and eight quarterback hits.

Payton Wilson Leads Pittsburgh’s Defense

Payton Wilson was Pittsburgh’s defensive leader.

He finished with 10 tackles, eight solo tackles, one sack, one tackle for loss, and one quarterback hit.

Pittsburgh’s defense recorded 72 total tackles, 47 solo tackles, two sacks, six tackles for loss, six pass defenses, and eight quarterback hits.

On paper, Pittsburgh’s defense produced more total tackles and tackles for loss than Seattle.

But those numbers need context.

Seattle’s offense generated 395 yards, while Pittsburgh produced only 267. A high tackle total does not necessarily mean a defense controlled the game. In this case, Pittsburgh’s defense spent considerable time responding to successful Seattle plays.

That is an important distinction when evaluating defensive statistics.

The Turnover Battle Was Even

One of the most interesting aspects of the game is that neither team won the turnover margin.

Seattle threw two interceptions.

Pittsburgh also threw two interceptions.

Neither team lost a fumble.

That means the final 31-17 score cannot be explained by turnover differential.

Instead, Seattle’s advantage came from what it did after the turnovers.

The Seahawks were able to overcome Darnold’s two first-half interceptions and still generate 395 total yards.

Pittsburgh could not overcome its offensive inefficiency.

This is a valuable lesson when analyzing NFL player statistics. Turnovers matter enormously, but the turnover count should always be examined alongside total yards, first downs, third-down efficiency, rushing success, explosive plays, and scoring drives.

Special Teams Changed the Game

George Holani delivered one of the most memorable plays of the afternoon.

Early in the fourth quarter, Jason Myers kicked off after Seattle had taken a 17-14 lead with a 54-yard field goal.

The kickoff bounced near Pittsburgh’s goal line. Kaleb Johnson appeared to believe the ball was going out of bounds and moved away from it.

Holani continued toward the ball, recovered it in the end zone, and scored a touchdown.

The play pushed Seattle’s lead from 17-14 to 24-14.

ESPN reported that Seattle had specifically reviewed a similar situation during the week, which made Holani’s awareness particularly valuable. (ESPN)

Kick Return Numbers

Seattle’s George Holani recorded five kick returns for 133 yards, averaging 26.6 yards per return with a 32-yard long.

Pittsburgh’s Kaleb Johnson returned three kicks for 58 yards, while Kenneth Gainwell added one return for 20 yards.

That special-teams touchdown was not merely an unusual scoring play. It changed the game’s leverage at a critical point.

Kicking Comparison

Jason Myers finished 1-for-2 on field goals and made all four extra-point attempts. His successful field goal covered 54 yards, and he scored six points.

Chris Boswell was perfect on field goals, going 3-for-3 with a long of 48 yards. He scored nine points.

Interestingly, Boswell’s perfect field-goal performance did not translate into a Pittsburgh victory because Seattle created more touchdowns.

This illustrates an important scoring principle. Field-goal consistency can keep a team competitive, but touchdowns provide greater scoring upside.

Punting Statistics

Seattle punter Michael Dickson recorded four punts for 175 yards, averaging 43.8 yards per punt with a long of 52 yards.

Pittsburgh punter Corliss Waitman recorded four punts for 221 yards, averaging 55.3 yards per punt with a 64-yard long.

Pittsburgh therefore had the stronger raw punting average.

However, punting statistics should not be evaluated in isolation. The ultimate question is whether field position generated by those punts translated into offensive opportunities.

In this game, Seattle’s offense repeatedly produced enough yardage to limit its reliance on the punting game.

Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

The scoring pattern provides one of the clearest summaries of how the game developed.

Quarter	Seattle	Pittsburgh
First	7	6
Second	0	8
Third	7	0
Fourth	17	3
Total	31	17

Seattle opened the scoring with a 21-yard touchdown pass from Darnold to Tory Horton.

Pittsburgh answered with two Chris Boswell field goals before taking a 14-7 lead late in the second quarter when Rodgers connected with Metcalf for a two-yard touchdown.

Seattle entered halftime trailing by seven.

The third quarter changed the direction of the game.

Darnold found AJ Barner for a seven-yard touchdown to tie the score at 14-14.

Seattle then took the lead with Myers’ 54-yard field goal early in the fourth quarter.

Holani’s kickoff recovery touchdown increased the lead to 24-14.

Pittsburgh answered with another Boswell field goal to make it 24-17.

Walker then delivered the final blow with a 19-yard touchdown run.

Seattle won the fourth quarter 17-3.

Why Seattle Won

The final score becomes easier to understand when several statistics are considered together.

1. Seattle Won the Total Yardage Battle

Seattle produced 395 yards.

Pittsburgh produced 267.

The 128-yard difference is substantial.

Seattle’s offense generated more consistent production throughout the game and finished with 21 first downs compared with Pittsburgh’s 13. (ESPN)

2. Seattle’s Running Game Was More Explosive

Walker averaged 8.1 yards per carry.

Pittsburgh’s team average was only 3.4.

That gave Seattle an additional way to attack the defense and helped prevent Pittsburgh from simply concentrating on Darnold.

3. Seattle Recovered From Turnovers

Darnold’s two interceptions could easily have become the defining story.

Instead, Seattle’s offense responded.

The Seahawks continued producing explosive plays and scored 24 points after halftime.

4. Pittsburgh Could Not Maintain Offensive Efficiency

Rodgers completed 54.5 percent of his passes and threw two interceptions.

Pittsburgh also averaged only 4.5 yards per offensive play.

The Steelers produced just 13 first downs.

5. Seattle Made the Critical Special-Teams Play

Holani’s kickoff recovery touchdown gave Seattle a 10-point lead.

That play turned a close fourth-quarter game into one where Pittsburgh had to chase the scoreboard.

Second-Half Adjustment Was the Difference

The most important analytical point from this game is not that Seattle played perfectly.

It did not.

Seattle threw two interceptions.

Jason Myers missed one field-goal attempt.

The Seahawks also had several opportunities that did not immediately produce points.

What Seattle did better was respond to mistakes.

The offense became more productive after halftime, the defense created timely turnovers, and special teams generated an unexpected touchdown.

ESPN’s game recap described Seattle’s second-half performance as a 24-3 scoring advantage over Pittsburgh. (ESPN)

That is the clearest numerical summary of the game.

What the Player Stats Tell Us About Each Team

The individual statistics provide useful clues about team identity.

Seattle demonstrated a balanced offense.

Darnold threw for 295 yards.

Walker rushed for 105.

Smith-Njigba and Kupp combined for 193 receiving yards.

That means Seattle had meaningful production through the air and on the ground.

Pittsburgh was more dependent on individual explosive moments.

Warren produced 86 receiving yards, including a 65-yard catch.

But Pittsburgh did not consistently turn those moments into sustained drives.

The Steelers also relied heavily on field goals. Boswell made three, while Pittsburgh scored only one offensive touchdown.

Most Important Individual Performances

Sam Darnold

Darnold finished with 295 passing yards and two touchdowns. His two interceptions prevent the performance from being described as flawless, but his second-half response was a major factor in Seattle’s victory.

Kenneth Walker III

Walker was arguably Seattle’s most efficient offensive player. His 105 rushing yards on 13 carries represented an exceptional 8.1 yards per attempt.

Jaxon Smith-Njigba

Smith-Njigba led Seattle with eight receptions and 103 yards. His 43-yard long reception provided an important explosive contribution.

Cooper Kupp

Kupp added seven receptions for 90 yards. His 9 targets demonstrate that Seattle used him as a major part of the passing attack.

Jaylen Warren

Warren was Pittsburgh’s most productive offensive weapon outside of Rodgers. He rushed for 48 yards and caught four passes for 86 yards.

Ernest Jones IV

Jones led Seattle with 10 tackles and eight solo tackles.

Payton Wilson

Wilson matched Jones’ 10 total tackles and added a sack and a tackle for loss for Pittsburgh.

George Holani

Holani’s numbers go beyond five kickoff returns for 133 yards. His recovery touchdown was arguably the game’s biggest special-teams moment.

A Closer Look at Offensive Efficiency

A box score becomes much more useful when efficiency is included.

Seattle converted six of 14 third downs, or 42.9 percent.

Pittsburgh converted five of 15, or 33.3 percent.

The difference may appear small, but third-down conversion affects possession, field position, fatigue, and scoring opportunities.

Seattle also ran 64 offensive plays compared with Pittsburgh’s 59.

More importantly, those plays were more productive.

Seattle averaged 6.2 yards per play.

Pittsburgh averaged 4.5.

That 1.7-yard difference on every play is significant over an entire game.

Red-Zone Performance

Seattle entered the red zone three times and scored touchdowns on two of those trips.

Pittsburgh reached the red zone twice and scored a touchdown once.

That means Seattle converted two-thirds of its red-zone opportunities into touchdowns.

Pittsburgh converted half.

Again, the difference was not enormous in isolation, but it contributed to Seattle’s ability to create a larger scoring margin.

What Should Be Taken From This Game?

The biggest lesson from the statistics is that a final score alone does not tell the complete story.

Seattle won 31-17, but the game was much closer before halftime.

Pittsburgh led 14-7.

Both teams had two interceptions.

Pittsburgh’s kicker made all three of his field goals.

The Steelers also had the better punting average.

Yet Seattle still won comfortably because it dominated the larger offensive efficiency categories.

The Seahawks gained 128 more total yards, produced eight more first downs, averaged 1.7 more yards per play, and scored 24 second-half points.

Those numbers provide a much stronger explanation for the result than simply pointing to the final score.

How to Read These Player Stats Correctly

If you are using this box score for fantasy football research, betting analysis, historical comparisons, or player evaluation, avoid focusing on only one category.

For quarterbacks, examine:

• Completion percentage
• Passing yards
• Touchdowns
• Interceptions
• Yards per attempt
• Sacks
• Passer rating
• Game situation

For running backs, consider:

• Carries
• Rushing yards
• Yards per carry
• Long runs
• Touchdowns
• Receiving contribution

For receivers, examine:

• Targets
• Receptions
• Receiving yards
• Yards per reception
• Long receptions
• Touchdowns

For defenders, consider:

• Total tackles
• Solo tackles
• Sacks
• Tackles for loss
• Quarterback hits
• Pass defenses
• Interceptions

This broader approach prevents a single impressive number from creating a misleading picture.

Seahawks vs Steelers Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways

The major statistical conclusions from the game are straightforward.

Seattle won because it generated more consistent offense and executed better in the second half.

Sam Darnold’s 295 passing yards gave Seattle a strong aerial foundation.

Kenneth Walker III’s 105 rushing yards supplied explosive ground production.

Jaxon Smith-Njigba and Cooper Kupp combined for 193 receiving yards.

Ernest Jones IV led Seattle’s defense with 10 tackles.

Coby Bryant and Derion Kendrick each intercepted Rodgers.

George Holani created the game’s unusual turning point with a kickoff recovery touchdown.

For Pittsburgh, Rodgers finished with 203 passing yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions.

Jaylen Warren produced 48 rushing yards and 86 receiving yards.

Payton Wilson recorded 10 tackles, one sack, and one tackle for loss.

Chris Boswell made all three field-goal attempts.

The final result was therefore a combination of Seattle’s offensive consistency, Pittsburgh’s struggles with efficiency, and several decisive plays in the second half.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Seahawks vs Steelers game on September 14, 2025?

The Seattle Seahawks defeated the Pittsburgh Steelers 31-17 at Acrisure Stadium.

How many passing yards did Sam Darnold have against Pittsburgh?

Sam Darnold completed 22 of 33 passes for 295 yards, two touchdowns, and two interceptions.

How many rushing yards did Kenneth Walker III record?

Kenneth Walker III rushed 13 times for 105 yards, averaging 8.1 yards per carry, and scored one touchdown.

How did Aaron Rodgers perform against Seattle?

Rodgers completed 18 of 33 passes for 203 yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions. He was sacked three times and finished with a 58.0 passer rating.

Who led Seattle in receiving?

Jaxon Smith-Njigba led Seattle with eight receptions for 103 yards on 10 targets.

Who led Pittsburgh in receiving?

Jaylen Warren led Pittsburgh with four receptions for 86 yards, including a 65-yard reception.

Conclusion

The seahawks vs pittsburgh steelers match player stats reveal a game that was decided less by the turnover margin and more by sustained offensive efficiency and second-half execution.

Seattle finished with 395 total yards, 21 first downs, 117 rushing yards, and 278 passing yards. Pittsburgh produced 267 total yards, 13 first downs, 72 rushing yards, and 195 passing yards.

Darnold’s 295 passing yards and Walker’s 105 rushing yards gave Seattle a strong offensive combination. Smith-Njigba and Kupp added consistent receiving production, while Seattle’s defense created two interceptions and three sacks.

Pittsburgh had individual bright spots. Warren produced 86 receiving yards, Wilson recorded 10 tackles and a sack, and Boswell converted all three field-goal attempts. But those contributions were not enough to overcome the team’s lower offensive efficiency.

The decisive stretch came after halftime. Seattle erased a seven-point deficit, scored 24 points in the final two quarters, and used a combination of offensive production, defensive pressure, and special-teams awareness to secure a 31-17 road victory.

For anyone studying this matchup, the most valuable numbers are not limited to passing yards or touchdowns. The deeper story appears in the 395-to-267 total-yard advantage, the 21-to-13 first-down difference, Seattle’s 6.2 yards per play compared with Pittsburgh’s 4.5, and the 24-3 second-half scoring margin.

Those statistics explain why Seattle left Pittsburgh with the victory even though both teams finished with two interceptions.

Primary statistical source: ESPN box score for Seahawks vs. Steelers