The knicks vs charlotte hornets match player stats from March 27, 2026, tell the story of an impressive Charlotte performance against a strong New York team. The Charlotte Hornets defeated the New York Knicks 114-103 at Spectrum Center in Charlotte, North Carolina. Although both teams shot efficiently from the field, Charlotte created a significant advantage through rebounding, three-point shooting, and second-chance opportunities. Kon Knueppel led the Hornets with 26 points, 11 rebounds, and 8 assists, while Jalen Brunson recorded an equally impressive 26 points and 13 assists for New York. The 11-point victory demonstrated how controlling possessions and winning the rebounding battle can make the difference, even when an opponent has an efficient shooting performance.

The matchup featured several outstanding individual performances, including contributions from LaMelo Ball, Brandon Miller, Josh Hart, and OG Anunoby. Charlotte finished with 43 rebounds compared with New York’s 24, while also making 16 three-pointers. These numbers explain why the Hornets managed to secure the victory despite committing more turnovers than the Knicks.

This breakdown examines the final score, individual player performances, team statistics, quarter-by-quarter scoring, tactical differences, and the most important lessons from the game.

Knicks vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats: Complete Game Breakdown

Game Overview: Hornets Defeat Knicks 114-103

The Charlotte Hornets delivered an impressive performance against the New York Knicks on March 27, 2026. Playing at Spectrum Center, Charlotte protected its home court with a 114-103 victory.

The result was particularly interesting because New York entered the matchup with a stronger overall record. The Knicks had won 48 games and lost 26, while Charlotte entered with a 39-34 record.

However, the difference in team records did not determine the outcome. Charlotte played with better control of the glass and found more opportunities from beyond the three-point line.

Here are the essential details from the matchup:

Game Information	Details
Matchup	New York Knicks vs Charlotte Hornets
Date	March 27, 2026
Competition	NBA Regular Season
Venue	Spectrum Center
Location	Charlotte, North Carolina
Final Score	Hornets 114, Knicks 103
Winning Team	Charlotte Hornets
Winning Margin	11 points
Knicks Record	48-26
Hornets Record	39-34
Attendance	19,625
Game ID	401810918

Charlotte scored 38 points in the opening quarter and continued its offensive production throughout the first three periods. New York remained competitive, but the Hornets created enough separation to protect their lead.

The most important statistical difference was rebounding. Charlotte collected 43 total rebounds, while New York managed only 24. That 19-rebound gap gave the Hornets additional possessions and made it difficult for the Knicks to control the game’s rhythm.

Knicks vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats

Individual performances played a major role in deciding the result. Both teams had players capable of creating offense, but Charlotte received a more balanced combination of scoring, rebounding, and playmaking from its leading performers.

New York Knicks Player Statistics

Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists	Steals
Jalen Brunson	26	2	13	Not specified
OG Anunoby	17	3	2	Not specified
Josh Hart	16	7	4	5
Mikal Bridges	14	0	2	Not specified
Karl-Anthony Towns	13	3	2	Not specified

Individual statistics are based on the supplied game data. Unlisted defensive statistics have not been assumed.

Jalen Brunson: 26 Points and 13 Assists

Jalen Brunson was New York’s leading offensive player. He finished with 26 points and 13 assists, showing his ability to contribute as both a scorer and a playmaker.

His 13 assists were particularly important because they demonstrated how much of the Knicks’ offense depended on his decision-making.

Brunson can create scoring opportunities in several ways:

• Attacking defenders with the dribble.
• Finding teammates after drawing defensive attention.
• Creating space for mid-range jump shots.
• Controlling offensive possessions during important moments.
• Finding opportunities in transition and half-court situations.

His scoring output matched Kon Knueppel’s 26 points, but the two players contributed differently. Brunson concentrated heavily on creating opportunities for his teammates, while Knueppel combined scoring with significant rebounding production.

Brunson’s performance was not enough to overcome Charlotte’s advantage in other areas. New York needed more collective rebounding support to turn his offensive production into a winning result.

OG Anunoby: 17 Points

OG Anunoby contributed 17 points for the Knicks. His scoring helped New York maintain offensive pressure against Charlotte.

Anunoby is valuable because he can contribute without requiring every possession to be designed around him. His ability to score through different offensive situations gives the Knicks another option alongside Brunson.

His 17-point performance was a useful contribution, but New York needed additional production and better possession control to challenge Charlotte more consistently.

Josh Hart: 16 Points, 7 Rebounds, 4 Assists, and 5 Steals

Josh Hart delivered one of the most complete performances for New York.

He recorded:

• 16 points.
• 7 rebounds.
• 4 assists.
• 5 steals.

His five steals were especially impressive. They represented the highest individual steals total among the listed Knicks players.

Hart’s defensive activity gave New York opportunities to disrupt Charlotte’s offensive possessions. His rebounding and passing also helped the Knicks move the ball and create scoring chances.

However, his individual effort could not solve the larger team rebounding problem.

This is an important distinction when evaluating basketball performances. A player can contribute across multiple categories without necessarily changing the final result. Hart was active defensively, but Charlotte still finished with a substantial advantage in total rebounds.

Mikal Bridges: 14 Points

Mikal Bridges scored 14 points for New York.

His contribution provided additional scoring support around Brunson and Anunoby. Bridges is generally an important part of a team’s perimeter offense because he can operate without dominating the ball.

His performance helped the Knicks maintain a competitive scoring total. However, the team needed greater production in the possession battle to keep pace with Charlotte.

Karl-Anthony Towns: 13 Points

Karl-Anthony Towns finished with 13 points, along with 3 rebounds and 2 assists.

His offensive versatility normally gives New York an important advantage. Towns can score around the basket, stretch the floor, and create difficult matchups for opposing frontcourt defenders.

However, his three recorded rebounds were not enough to help New York compete with Charlotte’s overall rebounding production.

The contrast between Towns’ individual numbers and Charlotte’s collective rebounding total illustrates one of the most important aspects of this game.

New York needed more production on the glass from its frontcourt players.

Charlotte Hornets Player Statistics

The Hornets received excellent contributions from their starting lineup. Their leading players combined efficient scoring with rebounding and passing, allowing Charlotte to create offensive opportunities throughout the game.

Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists	Steals
Kon Knueppel	26	11	8	Not specified
LaMelo Ball	22	5	6	Not specified
Brandon Miller	21	8	3	Not specified
Miles Bridges	17	5	3	Not specified
Moussa Diabate	2	5	3	4

Kon Knueppel: 26 Points, 11 Rebounds, and 8 Assists

Kon Knueppel delivered the standout all-around performance for Charlotte.

He finished with 26 points, 11 rebounds, and 8 assists. His contribution was important because he influenced several areas of the game instead of relying exclusively on scoring.

Knueppel’s performance included three major elements.

Scoring production

His 26 points made him Charlotte’s leading scorer. Matching Brunson’s scoring output also demonstrated his ability to produce against a competitive opponent.

Rebounding contribution

Knueppel collected 11 rebounds, the highest individual total among the listed players from either team.

His rebounding helped Charlotte maintain possession and limit opportunities for New York.

Playmaking

His eight assists showed that he also created opportunities for teammates.

Combining 26 points with 11 rebounds and 8 assists is a valuable contribution because it allows a team to receive production from multiple offensive responsibilities in one player.

Knueppel’s performance was arguably the most complete individual display of the night.

LaMelo Ball: 22 Points, 5 Rebounds, and 6 Assists

LaMelo Ball scored 22 points and added 5 rebounds and 6 assists.

His performance provided Charlotte with another major offensive option. Ball’s ability to create shots and distribute the basketball helped the Hornets maintain their offensive rhythm.

His six assists were particularly useful because Charlotte had several players capable of finishing scoring opportunities.

Ball’s contribution also reduced the pressure on Knueppel to handle every important possession.

The combination of Ball’s 22 points and Knueppel’s 26 points gave Charlotte 48 points from two of its leading offensive players.

That production created a strong foundation for the team’s victory.

Brandon Miller: 21 Points and 8 Rebounds

Brandon Miller recorded 21 points, 8 rebounds, and 3 assists.

His scoring was another important factor in Charlotte’s offensive success.

Miller gave the Hornets a reliable perimeter scoring option. His 21 points also meant that Charlotte had three players scoring at least 20 points.

His eight rebounds added value beyond scoring. Rebounding from perimeter players is important because it helps teams finish defensive possessions and begin transition attacks.

Miller’s contribution was a strong example of how Charlotte’s offense benefited from several players producing at a high level.

Miles Bridges: 17 Points, 5 Rebounds, and 3 Assists

Miles Bridges finished with 17 points, 5 rebounds, and 3 assists.

His scoring provided additional support around Charlotte’s leading players.

He also recorded the team’s best listed plus-minus figure at +12. This means Charlotte outscored New York by 12 points during his time on the floor.

Plus-minus should not be treated as a complete measure of individual performance because it reflects team results while a player is on the court. However, it offers another useful perspective when considered alongside his scoring and rebounding contributions.

Bridges played an important part in Charlotte’s balanced offensive performance.

Moussa Diabate: Defensive Impact

Moussa Diabate finished with:

• 2 points.
• 5 rebounds.
• 3 assists.
• 4 steals.

His scoring total was modest, but his defensive contribution was significant.

Four steals gave him the highest individual steals total among the listed Hornets players.

His defensive activity helped Charlotte create additional opportunities and disrupt New York’s offensive flow.

Diabate’s performance demonstrates why points alone cannot describe a player’s impact. Rebounding, passing, defensive pressure, and possession recovery can all influence a basketball game.

Knicks and Hornets Team Statistics Comparison

The team statistics explain the outcome more clearly than the final score alone.

Statistical Category	New York Knicks	Charlotte Hornets
Points	103	114
Field Goals	42-82	41-78
Field Goal Percentage	51%	53%
Three-Pointers	11-29	16-41
Three-Point Percentage	38%	39%
Free Throws	8-9	16-20
Free Throw Percentage	89%	80%
Total Rebounds	24	43
Offensive Rebounds	5	12
Defensive Rebounds	19	31
Assists	26	28
Turnovers	10	16
Steals	8	5
Blocks	2	4
Personal Fouls	21	19

Several statistical categories deserve closer attention.

Rebounding: Charlotte’s Biggest Advantage

Charlotte collected 43 rebounds compared with New York’s 24.

This 19-rebound difference was one of the most important reasons the Hornets won.

Rebounding influences basketball games in two major ways.

First, defensive rebounds end an opponent’s possession. When a team secures the ball after a missed shot, it prevents the opposition from getting another immediate scoring opportunity.

Second, offensive rebounds create additional chances to score.

Charlotte collected 12 offensive rebounds, while New York recorded only 5.

That seven-rebound difference gave the Hornets more opportunities to attack the basket and extend possessions.

The Knicks shot a slightly better percentage from the free-throw line, but Charlotte’s possession advantage helped compensate for that difference.

Three-Point Shooting: More Scoring From Beyond the Arc

Charlotte made 16 three-pointers on 41 attempts.

New York made 11 on 29 attempts.

Both teams shot at a similar percentage:

• Charlotte: 39%.
• New York: 38%.

The difference was the number of successful attempts.

Charlotte made five more three-pointers than New York. Those additional makes were worth 15 points.

This was a major scoring advantage.

The Hornets also attempted 12 more three-pointers, suggesting that their offense generated more opportunities from beyond the arc.

New York was efficient from long range, but Charlotte produced more total perimeter scoring.

Field Goal Efficiency

The Knicks made 42 of 82 field-goal attempts, recording approximately 51%.

Charlotte made 41 of 78 attempts, recording approximately 53%.

New York actually made one more field goal.

However, Charlotte attempted four fewer shots and achieved a higher overall field-goal percentage.

This shows that the Hornets were slightly more efficient with their overall shooting opportunities.

The difference was not enormous, but it contributed to Charlotte’s offensive advantage.

Free-Throw Performance

New York made 8 of 9 free throws, producing an 89% conversion rate.

Charlotte made 16 of 20, recording an 80% conversion rate.

The Knicks were more accurate from the free-throw line.

However, Charlotte attempted 11 more free throws and made eight more.

This gave the Hornets an additional eight points from the line.

The comparison highlights an important basketball principle: shooting percentage does not tell the entire story. The number of attempts matters just as much when comparing total scoring production.

Turnovers and Ball Security

New York committed 10 turnovers, while Charlotte committed 16.

This was one of the few statistical categories in which the Knicks had a clear advantage.

The six-turnover difference suggests that New York protected possession more effectively.

However, Charlotte still won because its advantages in rebounding, three-point production, and free-throw scoring were substantial.

The Hornets were not perfect in ball security, but they generated enough additional scoring opportunities to overcome their turnovers.

Assists and Team Playmaking

Charlotte recorded 28 assists, compared with New York’s 26.

The difference was relatively small.

Both teams demonstrated the ability to create scoring opportunities through passing.

Knueppel recorded eight assists, while Brunson led New York with 13.

These individual numbers show that the Knicks relied heavily on Brunson’s playmaking, whereas Charlotte distributed its assist production differently.

Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring Breakdown

The scoring progression reveals when Charlotte established control and how New York attempted to respond.

Quarter	New York Knicks	Charlotte Hornets
First Quarter	36	38
Second Quarter	19	27
Third Quarter	21	29
Fourth Quarter	27	20
Final Score	103	114

First Quarter: Charlotte Starts Strong

Charlotte opened the game with 38 points, while New York scored 36.

The two-point difference indicated that both offenses were productive from the beginning.

The Knicks remained close because they scored 36 points themselves.

However, Charlotte established an early advantage through its offensive execution.

The opening period also created the foundation for a competitive game in which New York had to respond rather than dictate the scoring pace.

Second Quarter: Hornets Extend Their Lead

The second quarter was a significant period for Charlotte.

The Hornets scored 27 points, while the Knicks managed only 19.

That eight-point quarter advantage increased Charlotte’s overall lead.

By halftime, the scoring totals were:

• Charlotte: 65 points.
• New York: 55 points.

The Hornets entered the break with a 10-point advantage.

This period was important because it gave Charlotte some breathing room and placed additional pressure on New York.

Third Quarter: Charlotte Maintains Control

Charlotte continued its strong performance in the third quarter.

The Hornets scored 29 points, compared with New York’s 21.

That eight-point difference increased the overall margin.

At the end of the third quarter, the combined scores were:

• Charlotte: 94 points.
• New York: 76 points.

Charlotte had built an 18-point advantage.

The Hornets’ ability to maintain offensive production after halftime was a major reason they remained in control.

Fourth Quarter: Knicks Attempt a Comeback

New York responded with its strongest quarter in the second half.

The Knicks scored 27 points, while Charlotte recorded 20.

This gave New York a seven-point advantage in the final period.

However, the comeback effort was not enough to erase the earlier deficit.

Charlotte had created too much separation during the second and third quarters.

The Hornets eventually secured the 114-103 victory.

Why Did the Charlotte Hornets Beat the New York Knicks?

The result was not simply about which team had the better leading scorer.

Both teams had a player who finished with 26 points. The difference came from the supporting statistics and how effectively each team used its possessions.

1. Charlotte Controlled the Rebounding Battle

The 43-24 rebounding difference was the clearest statistical explanation for the result.

Charlotte secured more missed shots and limited New York’s opportunities to extend possessions.

The offensive rebounding advantage was equally important.

By collecting 12 offensive rebounds, the Hornets created additional scoring chances that were unavailable to the Knicks.

2. More Successful Three-Point Attempts

Charlotte made 16 three-pointers, compared with New York’s 11.

The five additional three-point makes accounted for a 15-point advantage in perimeter scoring.

Even though both teams had nearly identical three-point percentages, Charlotte generated more successful attempts.

This made its offensive attack more difficult to contain.

3. Multiple Hornets Players Scored Efficiently

Charlotte had three players score at least 20 points:

• Kon Knueppel: 26 points.
• LaMelo Ball: 22 points.
• Brandon Miller: 21 points.

Miles Bridges added another 17 points.

This balance meant the Hornets did not have to rely on one player to produce their offense.

New York also received useful scoring from several starters, but Charlotte’s leading four players combined for 86 points.

That collective contribution was important.

4. Charlotte Created More Free-Throw Opportunities

The Hornets attempted 20 free throws and made 16.

The Knicks attempted only 9 and made 8.

Although New York had the better conversion percentage, Charlotte’s additional attempts generated eight more points.

Those points helped build and maintain the lead.

5. The Hornets Won the First Three Quarters

Charlotte outscored New York in each of the first three quarters.

The combined difference across those periods was 18 points.

Although the Knicks won the fourth quarter, the earlier scoring gap proved too difficult to overcome.

This was a good example of why strong starts and consistent middle quarters matter in professional basketball.

Bench Contributions and Supporting Players

Starting players usually receive most of the attention, but bench production can also influence the result.

The supplied statistics identify different leading bench scorers for both teams.

Team	Leading Bench Scorer	Points
New York Knicks	Jordan Clarkson	8
Charlotte Hornets	Coby White	17

Knicks Bench Performance

Jordan Clarkson led the Knicks’ bench with 8 points.

The available data also lists Mohamed Diawara, Mitchell Robinson, Jose Alvarado, Tyler Kolek, Jeremy Sochan, Pacome Dadiet, and Ariel Hukporti among New York’s bench players.

Mitchell Robinson recorded the team’s best plus-minus figure at +8.

Although his listed bench scoring was not the highest, this figure indicates that New York outscored Charlotte during his minutes on the floor.

It is useful to evaluate bench players through more than points alone.

Rebounding, defense, screening, and lineup combinations can all affect a team’s performance.

Hornets Bench Performance

Coby White led Charlotte’s bench with 17 points.

That was nine more points than the Knicks’ leading bench scorer.

The supplied lineup information also includes Grant Williams, Ryan Kalkbrenner, Josh Green, Sion James, Xavier Tillman, Pat Connaughton, and Tre Mann.

The difference in leading bench scoring gave Charlotte another useful advantage.

However, bench points should be considered alongside minutes played, shooting efficiency, and lineup responsibilities. Without complete individual box-score details for every reserve, it would be inaccurate to draw stronger conclusions about every player’s contribution.

Plus-Minus Analysis

Plus-minus measures the difference between a team’s scoring and its opponent’s scoring while a particular player is on the court.

It is a useful supporting statistic, although it does not independently measure individual quality.

The supplied data identifies the following leaders:

Team	Player	Plus-Minus
New York Knicks	Mitchell Robinson	+8
Charlotte Hornets	Miles Bridges	+12

Miles Bridges recorded Charlotte’s best listed plus-minus figure at +12.

Mitchell Robinson led New York at +8.

Both figures were positive, meaning their respective teams outscored their opponents during their playing time.

These numbers should not be interpreted as proof that one player was individually better. Plus-minus can be influenced by teammates, opponents, substitutions, and game situations.

Nevertheless, it adds another layer to the statistical comparison.

Shooting Efficiency and Offensive Strategy

One interesting aspect of this matchup was that New York made more total field goals but still lost by 11 points.

The Knicks converted 42 field goals, compared with Charlotte’s 41.

At first glance, that might suggest New York had the more productive shooting performance.

However, the scoring breakdown reveals why that conclusion would be incomplete.

Charlotte made five additional three-pointers and eight additional free throws.

The Hornets therefore generated more points without needing to make more total field goals.

This is an important lesson when analyzing NBA box scores.

Different types of successful shots have different scoring values.

A made two-point field goal contributes two points, while a successful three-pointer contributes three. Free throws can also increase the total without counting as field goals.

Charlotte’s combination of perimeter shooting and free-throw opportunities helped it produce 114 points.

New York’s offense was efficient, but Charlotte found more ways to increase its scoring total.

Defensive Performance: Steals, Blocks, and Possession Pressure

The defensive statistics provide another interesting comparison.

Defensive Category	Knicks	Hornets
Steals	8	5
Blocks	2	4
Turnovers Committed	10	16
Personal Fouls	21	19

New York recorded more steals, while Charlotte produced more blocks.

The Knicks collected eight steals compared with Charlotte’s five.

Josh Hart led New York with five steals, while Moussa Diabate led Charlotte with four.

This suggests that both teams had players capable of disrupting opposing possessions.

Charlotte also recorded four blocks, twice New York’s total of two.

The Hornets’ defensive contribution was therefore more noticeable around the basket, while the Knicks generated more recorded steals.

The turnover figures also matter.

New York committed six fewer turnovers, giving it an advantage in ball security.

However, defensive success is not measured by steals and blocks alone.

Rebounding is also an essential part of defense. A team must finish possessions by securing the ball after an opponent misses.

Charlotte’s 43 rebounds show how effectively the Hornets controlled that part of the game.

Head-to-Head Context and Season Series

The March 27 matchup was part of the 2025-26 NBA regular season.

The supplied season-series information lists the following results:

Game	Result
November 27	Knicks 129-101 Hornets
December 4	Knicks 119-104 Hornets
March 27	Hornets 114-103 Knicks

Based on these three listed meetings, New York held a 2-1 advantage.

The earlier games were particularly strong performances from the Knicks.

They won the November meeting by 28 points and the December meeting by 15 points.

Charlotte’s March victory demonstrated a different competitive outcome.

The Hornets managed to reverse the previous pattern by controlling the glass and producing more three-point baskets.

It is important to distinguish this particular game from the overall season series. One victory does not automatically establish that a team dominated the entire matchup.

The available figures show that New York won two of the first three listed meetings, while Charlotte secured the March 27 contest.

What the Game Reveals About Both Teams

The statistical comparison offers several useful observations about the strengths and weaknesses displayed by both teams.

What New York Did Well

The Knicks demonstrated several positive qualities.

Efficient shooting: New York converted 51% of its field-goal attempts and 38% from three-point range.

Ball security: The team committed only 10 turnovers.

Playmaking: Brunson recorded 13 assists, helping the offense generate scoring opportunities.

Defensive activity: New York collected eight steals, with Hart responsible for five.

These strengths explain why the Knicks remained capable of producing points even against a Charlotte team that controlled the game.

What New York Needed to Improve

The most obvious weakness was rebounding.

A 19-rebound disadvantage is difficult to overcome, particularly when the opposing team also makes more three-pointers.

The Knicks also needed more production from their frontcourt on the glass.

Towns recorded three rebounds, while the team collected only five offensive rebounds overall.

Those numbers indicate an area that required attention in this particular matchup.

What Charlotte Did Well

The Hornets showed several important strengths.

Rebounding: Charlotte won the total rebounding battle 43-24.

Perimeter scoring: The team made 16 three-pointers.

Balanced offense: Four leading players scored at least 17 points.

Free-throw production: Charlotte made 16 free throws.

Playmaking: The team recorded 28 assists.

The combination of these contributions gave Charlotte a reliable offensive foundation.

What Charlotte Needed to Improve

Despite winning, the Hornets committed 16 turnovers.

That was six more than New York.

Against a team capable of converting turnovers into fast-break opportunities, this issue could become more costly.

Charlotte also converted 80% of its free throws, leaving room for improvement.

The result was positive, but reducing turnovers and improving free-throw accuracy would help make a similar performance more efficient.

How to Read NBA Player Statistics Correctly

A box score provides a useful overview of a game, but understanding the numbers requires more than looking at the leading scorer.

Here are several important principles for evaluating individual and team performances.

Points Do Not Tell the Whole Story

A player who scores 25 points may have a strong offensive game, but scoring alone does not measure their total contribution.

Rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, and turnovers also matter.

Knueppel’s performance is a good example.

His 26 points were impressive, but his 11 rebounds and 8 assists made his contribution more complete.

Rebounds Show Possession Control

Rebounding statistics help explain how many opportunities a team creates or prevents.

Offensive rebounds are especially valuable because they allow a team to continue attacking after a missed shot.

Charlotte’s 12 offensive rebounds were an important advantage in this game.

Assists Show Offensive Creation

Assists provide information about how effectively players create scoring opportunities for teammates.

Brunson’s 13 assists showed his importance to New York’s offensive structure.

Knueppel’s eight assists demonstrated that he was also an important creator for Charlotte.

Shooting Percentages Need Context

A high shooting percentage does not automatically mean a team scored more points.

The number of attempts and the value of each successful shot must also be considered.

New York made more total field goals, but Charlotte scored more three-pointers and free throws.

That distinction explains much of the final scoring difference.

Plus-Minus Requires Careful Interpretation

Plus-minus can provide useful information about lineup performance.

However, it should not be used as the only measure of a player’s contribution.

A player can record a positive figure because of strong team performance, even if their personal statistics are modest.

For a complete evaluation, compare plus-minus with individual production and the player’s role.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Knicks vs Charlotte Hornets game on March 27, 2026?

The Charlotte Hornets defeated the New York Knicks 114-103 on March 27, 2026, at Spectrum Center in Charlotte, North Carolina.

2. Who was the leading scorer in the game?

Kon Knueppel and Jalen Brunson were tied as the leading scorers, with 26 points each. Knueppel represented Charlotte, while Brunson led New York.

3. What were Kon Knueppel’s statistics against the Knicks?

Kon Knueppel recorded 26 points, 11 rebounds, and 8 assists. He delivered one of the most complete performances of the matchup.

4. How many points and assists did Jalen Brunson record?

Jalen Brunson finished with 26 points and 13 assists. He was New York’s leading scorer and assist provider.

5. Which team had more rebounds?

The Charlotte Hornets collected 43 rebounds, while the New York Knicks recorded 24. Charlotte also won the offensive rebounding battle 12-5.

6. Why did the Hornets win despite committing more turnovers?

Charlotte compensated for its 16 turnovers by collecting more rebounds, making more three-pointers, and attempting more free throws. The Hornets made 16 three-pointers compared with New York’s 11 and secured a 114-103 victory.

Conclusion

The March 27, 2026, matchup between the New York Knicks and Charlotte Hornets demonstrated how team balance and possession control can determine an NBA result.

Charlotte secured a convincing 114-103 victory through better rebounding, stronger three-point production, and contributions from several offensive players.

Kon Knueppel led the Hornets with 26 points, 11 rebounds, and 8 assists. LaMelo Ball added 22 points, while Brandon Miller contributed 21. Miles Bridges also delivered 17 points and five rebounds.

For New York, Jalen Brunson recorded 26 points and 13 assists. OG Anunoby scored 17 points, Josh Hart added 16 points and five steals, and Mikal Bridges finished with 14 points.

The most significant difference was rebounding. Charlotte collected 19 more rebounds than New York, including seven additional offensive rebounds. The Hornets also made five more three-pointers and eight more free throws.

Although the Knicks protected the basketball more effectively and recorded more steals, Charlotte’s advantages in scoring opportunities proved decisive.

Ultimately, this game showed that efficient shooting, strong rebounding, and balanced contributions can be more important than individual scoring totals alone. The statistical evidence explains how Charlotte controlled the matchup and earned an important regular-season victory.