New York Jets vs New England Patriots Match Player Stats
The new york jets vs new england patriots match player stats from the November 14, 2025 matchup tell a much clearer story than the final score alone. New England defeated New York 27-14 at Gillette Stadium, improving to 9-2 while the Jets fell to 2-8. The Patriots produced 336 total yards compared with 245 for New York, while the Jets actually ran for 140 yards at 5.0 yards per carry. The biggest statistical separation came through the passing game, where Drake Maye completed 25 of 34 attempts for 281 yards and one touchdown, while Justin Fields completed 15 of 26 for 116 yards and one touchdown. (ESPN)
This game is particularly interesting because the numbers do not point to a simple one-sided performance in every area. New York ran the ball effectively and averaged more yards per carry than New England. However, the Patriots generated substantially more through the air, converted that production into three touchdowns, and controlled the game well enough to protect their lead.
For readers studying player performance, this matchup provides a useful example of why individual statistics need context. A quarterback can contribute heavily as a runner while struggling to create consistent passing production. A running back can score multiple touchdowns without producing a huge rushing average. A receiver can lead his team in yardage without scoring. Those details matter when evaluating what actually happened on the field.
New York Jets vs New England Patriots Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The Patriots won 27-14 after the Jets opened the game with a touchdown drive. New York led 7-0 following a 5-yard rushing touchdown by Fields, but New England answered with two second-quarter rushing touchdowns from TreVeyon Henderson.
The Patriots then extended the advantage in the third quarter when Henderson caught a touchdown pass from Maye. New York responded with a 22-yard touchdown reception by John Metchie III, but New England finished the game with two fourth-quarter field goals from Andy Borregales. (ESPN)
Final Score
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| New York Jets | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 14 |
| New England Patriots | 0 | 14 | 7 | 6 | 27 |
The scoring pattern is important. New York scored in the first and third quarters but was held scoreless in the second and fourth. New England, meanwhile, responded immediately after falling behind and continued adding points after halftime.
Team Statistical Comparison
| Category | New York Jets | New England Patriots |
| Total yards | 245 | 336 |
| Passing yards | 105 | 271 |
| Rushing yards | 140 | 65 |
| Passing attempts | 27 | 34 |
| Completions | 15 | 25 |
| Rushing attempts | 28 | 27 |
| Yards per rushing attempt | 5.0 | 2.4 |
| Total plays | 57 | 62 |
| Yards per play | 4.3 | 5.4 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 0 |
| Sacks allowed | 2 | 1 |
| Third-down conversions | 6/12 | 8/14 |
| Fourth-down conversions | 1/1 | 0/1 |
| Time of possession | 28:04 | 31:56 |
The contrast is striking. New York gained 75 more rushing yards than New England, but the Patriots gained 166 more passing yards. That passing difference more than offset the Jets’ advantage on the ground.
New England also ran 62 offensive plays compared with 57 for New York. More importantly, the Patriots averaged 5.4 yards per play, compared with 4.3 for the Jets.
Justin Fields Player Performance
Justin Fields was central to the Jets’ offensive production. He completed 15 of 26 passes for 116 yards, one touchdown and no interceptions. His passing average was 4.5 yards per attempt, and his listed passer rating was 81.6.
Fields also led New York in rushing.
He carried the ball 11 times for 67 yards and a touchdown, averaging 6.1 yards per carry. His longest run was 14 yards.
Justin Fields Passing
| Statistic | Result |
| Completions | 15 |
| Attempts | 26 |
| Completion rate | 57.7% |
| Passing yards | 116 |
| Yards per attempt | 4.5 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Sack yards lost | 11 |
| QBR | 61.9 |
| Passer rating | 81.6 |
Fields’ passing numbers show the central challenge New York faced. He avoided interceptions, but the Jets did not generate enough explosive passing yardage.
His 116 passing yards represented less than half of Maye’s total. That created a difficult offensive balance. New York’s rushing attack was productive, but the offense needed more passing efficiency to keep pace with a Patriots offense that consistently moved the ball through the air.
Justin Fields as a Rusher
Fields’ rushing performance was considerably stronger.
He averaged 6.1 yards per carry and scored New York’s first touchdown on a 5-yard run. His 67 rushing yards were nearly as many as New England’s entire team rushing output.
That creates an important distinction when reviewing his performance. His overall offensive contribution cannot be judged solely through his passing statistics. He accounted for 183 combined passing and rushing yards before considering the effect of sacks.
At the same time, relying heavily on a quarterback’s rushing ability carries a physical cost. New York needed Fields to function as both its passer and its most productive rushing quarterback on a night when the passing game struggled to generate consistent yardage.
Drake Maye Player Performance
Drake Maye delivered the stronger passing performance of the two starting quarterbacks.
He completed 25 of 34 passes for 281 yards and one touchdown without throwing an interception. His 8.3 yards per attempt was significantly higher than Fields’ 4.5.
His listed QBR was 83.7 and his passer rating was 107.6.
Drake Maye Passing Breakdown
| Statistic | Result |
| Completions | 25 |
| Attempts | 34 |
| Completion rate | 73.5% |
| Passing yards | 281 |
| Yards per attempt | 8.3 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Sack yards lost | 10 |
| QBR | 83.7 |
| Passer rating | 107.6 |
The difference in completion rate was substantial. Maye completed 73.5% of his attempts, while Fields completed 57.7%.
Maye also generated 165 more passing yards than Fields despite attempting only eight more passes.
That combination of volume and efficiency was a major factor in New England’s offensive advantage.
Why Maye’s Passing Numbers Mattered
The Patriots did not need Maye to throw multiple touchdowns to control the game. One passing touchdown was enough because the offense also received two rushing touchdowns from Henderson and three field goals from Borregales.
Maye’s value came from consistently moving the offense and connecting with multiple targets.
The Patriots completed passes to five different players who recorded at least three receptions. That distribution prevented the Jets from relying on a single receiver matchup to slow the passing game.
TreVeyon Henderson Was the Game’s Biggest Scoring Factor
TreVeyon Henderson produced one of the most important statistical performances in the matchup.
He rushed 19 times for 62 yards and two touchdowns. He also caught five passes for 31 yards and another touchdown.
That gave Henderson three total touchdowns.
His rushing average was only 3.3 yards per carry, so this was not a case of overwhelming rushing efficiency. Instead, his value came from volume, scoring production and his contribution as a receiver.
The Patriots were able to use Henderson in multiple phases of the offense. That flexibility made his statistical impact much greater than his rushing average alone suggests.
Henderson’s Complete Offensive Line
| Category | Result |
| Rushing attempts | 19 |
| Rushing yards | 62 |
| Rushing average | 3.3 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 2 |
| Long rush | 9 yards |
| Receptions | 5 |
| Receiving yards | 31 |
| Receiving average | 6.2 |
| Receiving touchdowns | 1 |
| Total touchdowns | 3 |
The three-touchdown contribution was decisive because New England’s other skill-position players did not need to score touchdowns themselves.
Stefon Diggs Led the Patriots in Receiving
Stefon Diggs was Maye’s leading receiver.
He finished with nine receptions for 105 yards on 11 targets. His average was 11.7 yards per reception, and his longest reception went for 22 yards.
The volume stands out.
Diggs accounted for 11 of Maye’s 34 passing attempts, meaning he was involved in roughly one-third of the quarterback’s attempts. He also accounted for more than one-third of New England’s receiving yards.
Patriots Receiving Leaders
| Player | Rec | Yards | Avg | TD | Targets |
| Stefon Diggs | 9 | 105 | 11.7 | 0 | 11 |
| Mack Hollins | 4 | 64 | 16.0 | 0 | 5 |
| Hunter Henry | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 0 | 6 |
| DeMario Douglas | 3 | 36 | 12.0 | 0 | 3 |
| TreVeyon Henderson | 5 | 31 | 6.2 | 1 | 5 |
Mack Hollins provided the second-biggest receiving yardage total with 64 yards on four catches. His 16.0 yards per reception was the highest average among the Patriots’ regular receivers in this game.
Hunter Henry added four receptions for 45 yards, while DeMario Douglas recorded three catches for 36 yards.
The distribution shows why Maye was able to maintain an efficient passing attack. New England did not need one player to carry every passing possession.
John Metchie III Provided New York’s Biggest Receiving Play
John Metchie III led the Jets in receiving yardage.
He caught three passes for 45 yards and scored New York’s only passing touchdown. His longest catch traveled 22 yards.
Metchie’s 15.0 yards per reception was New York’s best average among players with multiple receptions.
His touchdown came on a 22-yard pass from Fields in the third quarter, cutting New England’s lead to 21-14. (ESPN)
Jets Receiving Leaders
| Player | Rec | Yards | Avg | TD | Targets |
| John Metchie III | 3 | 45 | 15.0 | 1 | 3 |
| Mason Taylor | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 0 | 4 |
| Jeremy Ruckert | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 0 | 5 |
| Adonai Mitchell | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 | 6 |
| Breece Hall | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Isaiah Williams | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 4 |
Mason Taylor and Jeremy Ruckert each caught four passes, but neither reached 30 receiving yards.
That is an important detail. New York had reception volume, but the offense struggled to turn those completions into substantial yardage.
Breece Hall’s Rushing Contribution
Breece Hall carried 14 times for 58 yards, averaging 4.1 yards per carry.
He did not score a touchdown, and his longest run was 11 yards.
Hall was productive enough to support the Jets’ rushing attack, but Fields ultimately produced more rushing yardage despite having fewer attempts.
Jets Rushing Leaders
| Player | Carries | Yards | Avg | TD | Long |
| Justin Fields | 11 | 67 | 6.1 | 1 | 14 |
| Breece Hall | 14 | 58 | 4.1 | 0 | 11 |
| Isaiah Davis | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 0 | 7 |
| Isaiah Williams | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 |
As a team, New York averaged 5.0 yards per rushing attempt. That was more than double New England’s 2.4.
This is one of the clearest examples of why the final score cannot be explained by rushing efficiency alone.
The Jets were better on the ground statistically, but New England’s passing advantage was much larger.
New England’s Rushing Attack Was About Situational Production
The Patriots rushed for only 65 yards on 27 attempts.
That produced an average of 2.4 yards per carry, which was significantly below New York’s 5.0.
Yet New England scored two rushing touchdowns.
This is where raw averages can be misleading.
Henderson’s two rushing touchdowns were both 7-yard runs. The Patriots did not need to produce long rushing plays to turn their opportunities into points.
Their rushing attack was therefore more valuable in scoring situations than the overall yardage total might suggest.
Defensive Player Statistics and Pressure
The Jets defense recorded 66 total tackles, 37 solo tackles, one sack, four tackles for loss, three passes defended and four quarterback hits.
The Patriots defense recorded 58 total tackles, 40 solo tackles, two sacks, three tackles for loss, five passes defended and six quarterback hits.
Neither defense recorded an interception.
Defensive Comparison
| Category | Jets | Patriots |
| Total tackles | 66 | 58 |
| Solo tackles | 37 | 40 |
| Sacks | 1 | 2 |
| Tackles for loss | 4 | 3 |
| Passes defended | 3 | 5 |
| QB hits | 4 | 6 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Defensive TDs | 0 | 0 |
The Patriots generated more quarterback pressure without relying on turnovers.
That distinction matters because New York’s only turnover came from a lost fumble by Fields. Neither team intercepted a pass.
New England therefore won the turnover margin through a single lost fumble while avoiding a turnover of its own.
The Turnover Difference
Justin Fields recorded one fumble and lost it.
The Patriots had no lost fumbles and no interceptions.
The resulting turnover margin was therefore plus-one for New England.
One turnover does not explain a 13-point margin by itself, but it contributed to the Patriots’ ability to protect their advantage.
When an offense is already gaining 7.7 yards per pass attempt and has a turnover advantage, the opposing team has less room for error.
Special Teams Statistics
Special teams did not produce a touchdown in this matchup, but there were several useful differences.
Nick Folk converted both of his extra-point attempts for New York and finished with two points. He did not attempt a field goal.
Andy Borregales converted three extra points and made two of three field-goal attempts for New England. His longest field goal was 44 yards, and he scored nine points.
Kicking Comparison
| Player | FG | FG % | XP | Points | Long FG |
| Nick Folk | 0/0 | N/A | 2/2 | 2 | N/A |
| Andy Borregales | 2/3 | 66.7% | 3/3 | 9 | 44 |
Borregales’ two fourth-quarter field goals were particularly important because they extended the Patriots’ lead from seven points to 13 points.
That changed the late-game situation for New York. Instead of needing one touchdown to tie the game, the Jets needed two scoring possessions.
Punting and Field Position
Austin McNamara punted five times for 227 yards, averaging 45.4 yards per punt. His longest punt traveled 64 yards, and two punts landed inside the 20-yard line.
Bryce Baringer punted three times for 153 yards for New England, averaging 51.0 yards. His longest punt was 56 yards, with two inside the 20.
Punting Comparison
| Player | Punts | Yards | Average | Inside 20 | Long |
| Austin McNamara | 5 | 227 | 45.4 | 2 | 64 |
| Bryce Baringer | 3 | 153 | 51.0 | 2 | 56 |
Baringer had the better average, while McNamara had the longer individual punt.
The Patriots also punted two fewer times, which fits the broader offensive picture. New England sustained more drives and produced 23 first downs compared with 15 for New York.
First Downs and Offensive Efficiency
The Patriots finished with 23 first downs, while the Jets had 15.
New England recorded 16 first downs through passing and four through rushing. Three came through penalties.
New York recorded five passing first downs and 10 rushing first downs.
That breakdown is revealing.
New York’s offense generated twice as many rushing first downs as New England, but the Patriots produced more than three times as many passing first downs.
The Patriots converted 8 of 14 third-down attempts, a 57.1% rate.
New York converted 6 of 12, exactly 50%.
Neither number is poor, but New England created more opportunities through its overall offensive production.
Red Zone Performance
New York reached the red zone twice and scored once, giving it a 1-for-2 red-zone touchdown rate.
New England reached the red zone five times and scored touchdowns on three of those trips.
That difference helped explain the final score.
The Patriots generated more red-zone opportunities and converted more of them into touchdowns. Even though Borregales added field goals later, New England’s ability to finish drives gave the offense a reliable scoring foundation.
Time of Possession
New England controlled the ball for 31:56.
New York had possession for 28:04.
The difference was 3:52.
That is not an enormous time-of-possession gap, but it reflects the Patriots’ ability to sustain drives. New England ran 62 plays, five more than the Jets.
More importantly, the Patriots turned those additional opportunities into 336 total yards.
What the Numbers Reveal About the Game
The most useful way to understand this matchup is to separate it into three statistical battles.
1. New York Won the Rushing Efficiency Battle
The Jets gained 140 rushing yards on 28 attempts.
The Patriots gained 65 yards on 27 attempts.
New York averaged 5.0 yards per carry compared with New England’s 2.4.
That is a clear advantage for the Jets.
2. New England Won the Passing Battle
The Patriots produced 271 passing yards.
The Jets produced 105.
Maye averaged 8.3 yards per attempt. Fields averaged 4.5.
New England also completed 25 passes compared with 15 for New York.
This was the largest statistical difference in the game.
3. New England Won the Scoring Efficiency Battle
The Patriots scored 27 points from 336 total yards.
The Jets scored 14 from 245 total yards.
New England also scored three touchdowns and two field goals. New York scored two touchdowns.
The Patriots therefore converted their offensive production into more points.
A Closer Look at Offensive Balance
New York’s offense was more dependent on rushing.
The Jets produced 140 rushing yards compared with 105 passing yards. Their 245 total yards were therefore relatively balanced between the two phases, but rushing was clearly the stronger component.
New England’s profile was almost the opposite.
The Patriots produced 271 passing yards and only 65 rushing yards.
That means New England generated roughly 81% of its offensive yardage through the passing game before considering the small effect of sack yardage in the team totals.
This difference helps explain why Maye’s performance was so important.
The Patriots did not need their running game to produce large yardage totals because their passing game created enough offensive momentum.
What Happened to New York’s Passing Game?
The Jets completed 15 of 27 passes for 105 team passing yards.
One major issue was efficiency.
The team averaged only 4.3 yards per pass attempt before accounting for the distribution shown in the passing table. Fields completed 15 passes, but many of those completions did not create substantial yardage.
The Jets also allowed two sacks for 11 yards.
New York’s passing game produced only five passing first downs, which is another indication that the offense struggled to consistently move the chains through the air.
The absence of interceptions was a positive. Fields did not give New England an interception opportunity that turned into a defensive takeaway.
However, avoiding turnovers is not enough when the opposing quarterback is producing 281 yards at a much higher efficiency level.
Why the Receiver Numbers Matter
The receiving statistics also highlight the difference in offensive structure.
New York had 15 receptions spread across its listed receivers.
Metchie led the team with 45 yards, while Taylor and Ruckert each caught four passes.
New England had 25 receptions.
Diggs alone caught nine passes for 105 yards. Hollins added 64, Henry 45, Douglas 36 and Henderson 31.
The Patriots therefore had considerably more receiving volume and more yardage distribution.
This forced the Jets defense to defend several credible receiving options rather than concentrating solely on one player.
The Role of the Lost Fumble
Fields’ lost fumble was the only New York turnover recorded in the game.
New England did not lose a fumble and threw no interceptions.
That produced a 1-0 turnover advantage for the Patriots.
The turnover did not lead to a defensive touchdown, but turnovers still affect field position, possession opportunities and offensive rhythm.
When paired with New England’s passing advantage, the turnover margin gave the Patriots another statistical edge.
Player-by-Player Takeaways
Justin Fields
Fields contributed through both passing and rushing. His 67 rushing yards and touchdown were valuable, but the passing offense produced only 116 yards through him.
Breece Hall
Hall supplied 58 rushing yards on 14 attempts and added two receptions. He provided steady ground production but did not score.
John Metchie III
Metchie was the Jets’ leading receiver by yardage and scored the team’s only receiving touchdown.
Mason Taylor
Taylor recorded four receptions for 30 yards and provided reliable short-area receiving volume.
Jeremy Ruckert
Ruckert also caught four passes, finishing with 23 yards.
Drake Maye
Maye completed 25 of 34 passes for 281 yards, one touchdown and no interceptions. His 107.6 passer rating reflected the efficiency of the Patriots passing attack.
TreVeyon Henderson
Henderson scored three touchdowns, with two rushing scores and one receiving score. His scoring production was the defining individual statistic of the matchup.
Stefon Diggs
Diggs led all receivers with 105 yards and nine catches.
Andy Borregales
Borregales added nine points, including two fourth-quarter field goals.
The Most Important Numbers to Remember
If you are reviewing the game quickly, these are the numbers that provide the clearest snapshot:
- 27-14: New England’s final margin.
- 336-245: Patriots advantage in total yards.
- 271-105: Patriots advantage in passing yards.
- 140-65: Jets advantage in rushing yards.
- 25-15: Patriots advantage in completions.
- 281-116: Maye’s passing yards compared with Fields’ total.
- 62: Henderson’s rushing yards.
- 105: Diggs’ receiving yards.
- 3: Henderson’s total touchdowns.
- 1-0: New England’s turnover advantage.
Together, these figures explain the game much better than the final score alone.
How to Read These Player Stats Correctly
A common mistake when reviewing an NFL box score is to focus only on the player with the most yards.
That approach would miss several important details from this game.
Fields was New York’s leading rusher but not its leading passer by efficiency.
Henderson did not have a spectacular rushing average, but he scored three touchdowns.
Diggs led the Patriots in receiving, but Maye’s effectiveness came from spreading the ball among several players.
Borregales did not kick a huge number of field goals, but his fourth-quarter conversions helped turn a seven-point game into a two-score game.
The broader lesson is that player statistics work best when read alongside team statistics.
Final Assessment of the Statistical Story
The new york jets vs new england patriots match player stats show two offenses succeeding in very different ways.
New York’s strongest area was rushing. Fields and Hall combined for 125 rushing yards, and the team finished with 140. The Jets averaged 5.0 yards per rushing attempt and produced 10 rushing first downs.
New England’s strongest area was passing. Maye threw for 281 yards, Diggs topped 100 receiving yards, and the Patriots finished with 271 team passing yards.
The Patriots also converted more third downs, created more first downs, gained more total yards and avoided turnovers.
New York’s 14 points came from two touchdowns, while New England’s 27 points came from three touchdowns and two field goals.
The game therefore illustrates a familiar NFL principle: winning one statistical phase does not guarantee overall success. The Jets were considerably more productive on the ground, but New England’s passing efficiency, scoring execution, turnover advantage and sustained drives produced the decisive difference.
For readers comparing individual performances, Maye’s 281 passing yards and 107.6 passer rating stand out on the quarterback side, while Henderson’s three touchdowns and Diggs’ 105 receiving yards define the Patriots’ skill-position production. For New York, Fields’ 67 rushing yards and touchdown, along with Metchie’s 45 receiving yards and touchdown, were the most notable individual contributions.
The final score of 27-14 accurately reflects the broader statistical picture. New England did not dominate every category, but it controlled the categories that produced the most offensive yardage and scoring opportunities.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Jets vs Patriots game on November 14, 2025?
The New England Patriots defeated the New York Jets 27-14. New England entered the game with a 9-2 record, while New York was 2-8.
How many passing yards did Justin Fields have?
Justin Fields completed 15 of 26 passes for 116 yards, one touchdown and no interceptions.
How many passing yards did Drake Maye have?
Drake Maye completed 25 of 34 passes for 281 yards, one touchdown and no interceptions.
Who led the game in receiving yards?
Stefon Diggs led all players with 105 receiving yards on nine receptions and 11 targets.
How many touchdowns did TreVeyon Henderson score?
TreVeyon Henderson scored three touchdowns. He had two rushing touchdowns and one receiving touchdown.
Which team had more rushing yards?
The New York Jets had more rushing yards, finishing with 140 compared with 65 for the New England Patriots.
Conclusion
The new york jets vs new england patriots match player stats provide a detailed explanation for New England’s 27-14 victory.
The Jets ran the ball effectively, producing 140 rushing yards at 5.0 yards per carry. Fields was an important part of that success, rushing for 67 yards and a touchdown, while Hall added 58 yards.
New England answered with a much stronger passing performance. Maye completed 25 of 34 passes for 281 yards and a touchdown. Diggs caught nine passes for 105 yards, while several other receivers contributed meaningful production.
Henderson was the game’s most important scoring player. His 62 rushing yards, 31 receiving yards and three touchdowns gave the Patriots a reliable scoring presence across multiple phases of the offense.
The defensive numbers also favored New England in several important areas. The Patriots recorded two sacks and six quarterback hits, avoided turnovers and forced the Jets to operate with less offensive efficiency.
Ultimately, the statistics show that this was not simply a game where one team dominated every category. New York had the stronger rushing numbers, while New England had the much stronger passing numbers. The Patriots combined that passing advantage with better third-down conversion, more first downs, more total yards, a positive turnover margin and stronger red-zone production.
