Los angeles sparks vs seattle storm match player stats
The los angeles sparks vs seattle storm match player stats from August 31, 2026, reveal how the Los Angeles Sparks secured an impressive 90-74 victory over the Seattle Storm at Climate Pledge Arena in Seattle, Washington. The Sparks built their advantage early, scoring 25 points in the opening quarter and extending their lead with another strong offensive performance in the second. Nneka Ogwumike led Los Angeles with 23 points and 12 rebounds, while Rae Burrell added 22 points. For Seattle, Flau’jae Johnson finished with 19 points, and Dominique Malonga recorded an outstanding double-double with 17 points and 15 rebounds. Despite Seattle collecting three more rebounds than Los Angeles, the Sparks dominated the shooting categories and controlled the most important stretches of the game.
The final score reflected a significant difference in offensive efficiency. Los Angeles converted 44% of its field-goal attempts and 39% of its three-pointers, while Seattle managed just 34% shooting from the field and 18% from beyond the arc. Both teams committed 16 turnovers, meaning ball security alone did not explain the result. Instead, the Sparks created separation through accurate shooting, strong individual performances, and an excellent start.
This breakdown examines the complete player statistics, team shooting numbers, quarter-by-quarter scoring, leading performers, and tactical factors behind the result.
Match Overview: Los Angeles Sparks vs Seattle Storm
The August 31 meeting brought together two WNBA teams looking to finish their season schedules with a positive performance. Seattle entered the contest at home, but Los Angeles produced a much stronger offensive display.
The Sparks established control during the opening quarter and maintained their advantage throughout the game. Seattle improved slightly after halftime, but its shooting struggles made a comeback difficult.
Here are the main details from the matchup.
| Match Information | Details |
| Competition | Women’s National Basketball Association |
| Match | Los Angeles Sparks vs Seattle Storm |
| Date | August 31, 2026 |
| Game Time | 2:00 AM |
| Venue | Climate Pledge Arena |
| Location | Seattle, Washington |
| Attendance | 14,200 |
| Final Score | Sparks 90, Storm 74 |
| Winning Team | Los Angeles Sparks |
| Winning Margin | 16 points |
| Game ID | 401857187 |
| Season Series | Sparks lead 2-1 |
| Officials | Angelica Suffren, Marcy Williams, Genesis Perrymond |
| Where to Watch | WNBA League Pass, KOMO-TV |
Los Angeles scored 90 points while Seattle finished with 74. The 16-point difference was primarily created during the first half, when the Sparks established a comfortable advantage.
The attendance of 14,200 also showed strong support for the home team at Climate Pledge Arena. However, home-court advantage was not enough to overcome Seattle’s offensive difficulties.
Why the Result Was Important
The victory gave Los Angeles a 2-1 advantage in the supplied season-series results.
The previous meetings had produced different outcomes:
- June 11, 2026: Los Angeles Sparks defeated Seattle Storm 88-83.
- July 7, 2026: Seattle Storm defeated Los Angeles Sparks 82-64.
- August 31, 2026: Los Angeles Sparks defeated Seattle Storm 90-74.
These results show that the teams had experienced different levels of success against each other during the season.
Seattle had previously demonstrated that it could defeat Los Angeles convincingly. However, the August meeting highlighted the Sparks’ ability to adjust offensively and produce a more efficient performance.
Los Angeles Sparks vs Seattle Storm Match Player Stats
The individual statistics provide a clearer understanding of how the game developed.
Los Angeles received significant contributions from Nneka Ogwumike and Rae Burrell. Ogwumike combined scoring with rebounding, while Burrell delivered another important offensive performance.
Seattle also had productive individual players. Flau’jae Johnson led the Storm in scoring, and Dominique Malonga controlled the glass with 15 rebounds.
The following tables provide the complete player statistics from the supplied match data.
Los Angeles Sparks Player Stats
| Player | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG |
| Nneka Ogwumike | 23 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9-17 |
| Dearica Hamby | 6 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3-7 |
| Erica Wheeler | 9 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3-4 |
| Ariel Atkins | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2-4 |
| Rae Burrell | 22 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7-18 |
| Cameron Brink | 11 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | Not specified |
| Tonie Morgan | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | Not specified |
| Chance Gray | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2-3 |
| Monique Akoa Makani | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-3 |
| Emma Cannon | DNP | Coach’s decision | ||||
| Jihyun Park | DNP | Coach’s decision | ||||
| Aaliyah Nye | DNP | Not with team |
PTS = Points, REB = Rebounds, AST = Assists, STL = Steals, BLK = Blocks, FG = Field Goals Made-Attempted, DNP = Did Not Play.
The Sparks’ statistical performance showed that their victory was not dependent on one player alone.
Ogwumike and Burrell combined for 45 points, representing half of the team’s total scoring. Cameron Brink also reached double figures, while Erica Wheeler provided efficient shooting and playmaking.
Dearica Hamby’s defensive contributions were particularly valuable. Her four steals were the highest individual total among the listed Sparks players.
Seattle Storm Player Stats
| Player | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG |
| Ezi Magbegor | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | Not specified |
| Jordan Horston | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | Not specified |
| Dominique Malonga | 17 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 8-21 |
| Flau’jae Johnson | 19 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7-18 |
| Jade Melbourne | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | Not specified |
| Katie Lou Samuelson | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | Not specified |
| Mackenzie Holmes | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not specified |
| Taylor Thierry | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not specified |
| Stefanie Dolson | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Not specified |
| Awa Fam | 0 | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | DNP status unclear |
| Zia Cooke | 14 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | Not specified |
| Taina Mair | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not specified |
| Natisha Hiedeman | DNP | Left shoulder |
Seattle’s scoring distribution was competitive at the top, but the team struggled to receive enough production from its remaining rotation.
Johnson finished with 19 points, while Malonga contributed 17 points and 15 rebounds. Zia Cooke added 14 points and three steals.
These three players accounted for 50 of Seattle’s 74 points. That means the rest of the listed Storm players combined for only 24 points.
This concentration of scoring helps explain one of Seattle’s biggest problems. When the team struggled to convert shots, it did not receive enough additional offensive production to compensate.
Nneka Ogwumike Leads the Sparks With 23 Points
Sparks leading scorer
Nneka Ogwumike delivered the strongest individual scoring performance for Los Angeles.
She finished with:
- 23 points
- 12 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 2 steals
- 9 successful field goals from 17 attempts
- 4 successful three-pointers from 7 attempts
Her performance combined offensive efficiency with strong rebounding.
Ogwumike shot approximately 52.9% from the field and 57.1% from three-point range based on the supplied numbers.
These percentages demonstrate how important her shooting was to the Sparks’ offensive success.
Scoring Efficiency Made the Difference
Scoring 23 points is valuable, but the way those points are produced matters just as much.
Ogwumike attempted 17 field goals and converted nine. She also made four three-pointers, giving Los Angeles another reliable scoring option from the perimeter.
Her outside shooting helped stretch Seattle’s defensive coverage.
When a frontcourt player can score from beyond the arc, opposing defenders must make difficult decisions. They cannot always remain close to the basket because doing so creates opportunities for open perimeter attempts.
That offensive flexibility can create additional space for teammates.
Rebounding Added Another Dimension
Ogwumike also collected 12 rebounds, completing a double-double.
Her rebounding contribution was important because Seattle actually finished with more total rebounds as a team.
Los Angeles needed its individual rebounders to compete against Seattle’s size. Ogwumike helped provide that balance.
Her 23-point, 12-rebound performance made her the most productive Sparks player in the supplied box score.
Rae Burrell Delivers 22 Points for Los Angeles
Rae Burrell was another major reason the Sparks reached 90 points.
She finished with 22 points, four rebounds, three assists, and one steal.
Her shooting statistics included:
| Category | Performance |
| Points | 22 |
| Rebounds | 4 |
| Assists | 3 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Field Goals | 7-18 |
| Free Throws | 8-8 |
Burrell’s eight successful free throws were particularly important.
Although she made seven of her 18 field-goal attempts, she converted every free throw opportunity recorded in the supplied statistics.
Her perfect free-throw shooting helped maintain Los Angeles’ scoring advantage.
Why Her Performance Mattered
The Sparks did not have to depend entirely on Ogwumike.
Burrell’s 22 points meant Seattle had another major scoring threat to defend.
This created a difficult defensive situation. Concentrating too heavily on one player could leave another with opportunities to score.
Burrell also contributed three assists, showing that her role extended beyond individual scoring.
Her ability to combine shooting, passing, and free-throw production made her one of the most important players in the contest.
Flau’jae Johnson Leads Seattle With 19 Points
Flau’jae Johnson was Seattle’s leading scorer.
She recorded:
- 19 points
- 3 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 1 steal
- 7 field goals made from 18 attempts
Johnson was one of the few Seattle players who consistently generated meaningful scoring production.
Her 19 points represented approximately 25.7% of the Storm’s total points.
That is a significant share for one player.
However, her individual performance was not enough to overcome the Sparks’ overall shooting advantage.
The Challenge of Carrying the Offensive Load
Seattle needed more players to contribute consistent scoring.
Johnson and Malonga combined for 36 points. Zia Cooke added another 14.
Although these performances were useful, the remaining offensive production was limited.
A team can remain competitive with two or three high-scoring players, but it becomes difficult to win when the supporting rotation struggles to convert opportunities.
That problem became more noticeable as Seattle attempted to reduce the deficit.
Johnson’s scoring performance was strong, but the team needed additional efficiency from its other offensive options.
Dominique Malonga Records 17 Points and 15 Rebounds
Game-high 15 rebounds
Dominique Malonga produced one of the most impressive individual performances for Seattle.
She finished with 17 points, 15 rebounds, three assists, and two blocks.
Her field-goal numbers were eight successful attempts from 21 shots.
| Statistical Category | Total |
| Points | 17 |
| Rebounds | 15 |
| Assists | 3 |
| Blocks | 2 |
| Field Goals | 8-21 |
| Field-Goal Percentage | 38.1% |
Malonga’s 15 rebounds were the highest individual rebound total in the game.
She also recorded a double-double, demonstrating her importance to Seattle’s frontcourt.
Rebounding Was a Major Strength
Seattle finished with 43 total rebounds compared with Los Angeles’ 40.
Malonga played an important role in that advantage.
Her 15 rebounds represented approximately 34.9% of Seattle’s total team rebounds.
This is an impressive individual contribution.
She also collected two blocks, adding defensive value around the basket.
However, Seattle’s rebounding advantage did not translate into a victory.
The reason becomes clearer when the other statistical categories are examined.
The Storm had more rebounds, but they struggled to convert their offensive opportunities efficiently.
Individual Production Versus Team Performance
Malonga’s performance demonstrates why individual statistics should always be considered within the context of the entire game.
Her 17 points and 15 rebounds were valuable.
Nevertheless, Seattle’s poor perimeter shooting limited the team’s ability to take advantage of its rebounding strength.
The Storm needed better shooting from outside and more consistent offensive contributions from the supporting rotation.
Quarter-by-Quarter Score Breakdown
The quarter-by-quarter numbers explain how Los Angeles established its advantage.
The Sparks dominated the opening period and maintained control during the second quarter.
Seattle improved after halftime, but the deficit had already become difficult to overcome.
| Quarter | Los Angeles Sparks | Seattle Storm |
| First Quarter | 25 | 11 |
| Second Quarter | 27 | 22 |
| Third Quarter | 18 | 19 |
| Fourth Quarter | 20 | 22 |
| Final Score | 90 | 74 |
First Quarter: Sparks Take Control
Los Angeles opened the game with 25 points, while Seattle managed just 11.
The 14-point difference immediately placed the Storm in a difficult position.
This was arguably the most important quarter of the contest.
A strong opening can influence the entire game because the trailing team must adjust its offensive approach.
Seattle entered the second quarter needing to recover from a significant deficit.
The Sparks, meanwhile, had an opportunity to play with greater confidence and maintain their offensive rhythm.
Second Quarter: Los Angeles Extends Its Advantage
The Sparks continued their offensive production in the second quarter.
They scored 27 points compared with Seattle’s 22.
The five-point advantage increased Los Angeles’ halftime lead.
At the break, the score stood at:
- Los Angeles Sparks: 52
- Seattle Storm: 33
A 19-point halftime advantage gave Los Angeles considerable control.
Seattle had already allowed 52 points in the first half, making defensive adjustments essential.
Third Quarter: Seattle Shows Improvement
Seattle performed better in the third quarter.
The Storm scored 19 points, one more than Los Angeles’ 18.
This was the first period in which Seattle outscored the Sparks.
The improvement suggested that the home team was beginning to find better offensive opportunities.
However, winning a single quarter does not automatically change the outcome of a game.
Seattle still faced a substantial deficit.
Fourth Quarter: Storm Finish Stronger
Seattle continued its improved scoring in the final period.
The Storm recorded 22 points, while Los Angeles scored 20.
Although Seattle won the final two quarters, the Sparks’ first-half advantage proved decisive.
The final margin remained 16 points.
This illustrates an important basketball principle: a team can finish strongly and still lose comfortably if it gives away too many points early.
Team Statistics: Where the Sparks Had the Advantage
Team statistics reveal why Los Angeles won despite Seattle’s rebounding advantage.
The most important difference was shooting efficiency.
| Team Statistics | Los Angeles Sparks | Seattle Storm |
| Total Points | 90 | 74 |
| Field Goals | 32-73 | 28-82 |
| Field-Goal Percentage | 44% | 34% |
| Three-Pointers | 12-31 | 4-22 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 39% | 18% |
| Free Throws | 14-15 | 14-18 |
| Free-Throw Percentage | 93% | 78% |
| Total Rebounds | 40 | 43 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 5 | 14 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 35 | 29 |
| Assists | 23 | 17 |
| Turnovers | 16 | 16 |
| Steals | 12 | 11 |
| Blocks | 5 | 4 |
Percentages are reproduced from the supplied match data.
Field-Goal Percentage: Los Angeles Shoots More Efficiently
Los Angeles converted 44% of its field-goal attempts.
Seattle converted only 34%.
The 10-percentage-point difference was significant.
The Sparks attempted nine fewer field goals but made four more shots.
This demonstrates that the number of attempts is not the only factor that determines offensive success.
Shot selection and conversion efficiency are equally important.
Seattle attempted 82 field goals, compared with Los Angeles’ 73.
However, the Storm’s additional attempts did not produce enough points.
Three-Point Shooting: The Biggest Statistical Difference
The perimeter shooting numbers were particularly revealing.
Los Angeles made 12 three-pointers from 31 attempts.
Seattle converted only four from 22 attempts.
| Three-Point Comparison | Sparks | Storm |
| Made | 12 | 4 |
| Attempted | 31 | 22 |
| Percentage | 39% | 18% |
Los Angeles made eight more three-pointers.
Those additional successful shots produced a 24-point advantage in three-point scoring.
This was a major difference in a game decided by 16 points.
Seattle’s inability to consistently make outside shots reduced its offensive flexibility.
When perimeter shooting becomes unreliable, defenders can focus more attention on the paint and the players attacking the basket.
Los Angeles benefited from having more reliable perimeter production.
Free-Throw Shooting: Another Advantage for Los Angeles
Both teams made 14 free throws.
However, Los Angeles attempted 15 free throws, while Seattle attempted 18.
The Sparks converted 93% of their opportunities compared with Seattle’s 78%.
Burrell’s eight successful free throws were particularly important.
Free throws are valuable because they allow teams to score without needing to create another field-goal opportunity.
Los Angeles made the most of its chances at the line.
Rebounding: Seattle Wins the Overall Battle
Seattle collected 43 rebounds, compared with Los Angeles’ 40.
The Storm also dominated offensive rebounding:
- Seattle offensive rebounds: 14
- Los Angeles offensive rebounds: 5
This gave Seattle nine more offensive rebounds.
That difference suggests the Storm had opportunities to generate additional possessions.
However, those opportunities did not result in enough points.
The Sparks collected more defensive rebounds, 35 compared with Seattle’s 29.
Their ability to finish defensive possessions helped limit the impact of Seattle’s offensive rebounding advantage.
Assists: Better Ball Movement From Los Angeles
Los Angeles recorded 23 assists.
Seattle finished with 17.
The six-assist difference indicates that the Sparks generated more assisted scoring opportunities.
Erica Wheeler and Tonie Morgan each recorded four assists for Los Angeles.
Nneka Ogwumike and Rae Burrell also contributed three assists apiece.
For Seattle, Jade Melbourne and Stefanie Dolson each recorded three assists, while Dominique Malonga added another three.
The overall numbers suggest that Los Angeles had a more productive passing performance.
Turnovers: Both Teams Finish Even
Both teams committed 16 turnovers.
This means turnover totals do not provide a clear explanation for the final result.
Neither side held a statistical advantage in this category.
Instead, the difference came from what happened when the teams successfully created shooting opportunities.
Los Angeles converted its attempts at a much higher rate.
How the Sparks Won Despite Losing the Rebounding Battle
One of the most interesting aspects of this matchup is that Seattle won the overall rebounding battle but still lost by 16 points.
At first glance, this may appear surprising.
Rebounding is an important part of basketball because it determines which team controls missed shots.
Offensive rebounds can create second-chance opportunities, while defensive rebounds help teams end opposing possessions.
However, rebounding alone cannot guarantee victory.
The Sparks demonstrated that efficient shooting can outweigh a modest rebounding disadvantage.
Consider these numbers:
- Seattle collected three more total rebounds.
- Seattle collected nine more offensive rebounds.
- Los Angeles made four more field goals.
- Los Angeles made eight more three-pointers.
- Los Angeles shot 10 percentage points better from the field.
The Sparks converted their offensive opportunities more effectively.
Seattle’s offensive rebounds created additional chances, but the Storm struggled to turn those chances into successful shots.
This is an important distinction when analyzing basketball statistics.
A team can dominate one statistical category without controlling the overall result.
The more useful approach is to examine how different categories work together.
The Importance of Los Angeles’ Bench Contributions
A team’s success is not determined only by its leading scorers.
Supporting players can influence the outcome through defense, passing, rebounding, and efficient shooting.
The supplied statistics show several useful contributions from the Sparks’ rotation.
Cameron Brink Adds 11 Points
Cameron Brink finished with 11 points, six rebounds, two assists, one steal, and two blocks.
Her two blocks were the highest individual total among the listed Sparks players.
Her contribution was important because it provided Los Angeles with another double-digit scorer.
She also helped defensively around the basket.
A player who can contribute on both ends of the floor gives a team additional flexibility.
Erica Wheeler Provides Efficient Offense
Erica Wheeler scored nine points and recorded four assists.
She made three of her four field-goal attempts, including three of four from three-point range.
Her perimeter shooting was particularly efficient.
Wheeler also shared the team lead in assists with Tonie Morgan.
Her performance demonstrated the value of combining scoring efficiency with playmaking.
Dearica Hamby Contributes Defensively
Hamby recorded six points and 11 rebounds.
She also collected four steals.
Although her scoring total was lower than those of Ogwumike and Burrell, her defensive production was significant.
Four steals can disrupt an opponent’s offensive rhythm and create additional possessions.
Her 11 rebounds also helped Los Angeles compete against Seattle’s stronger overall rebounding performance.
Seattle’s Supporting Rotation Needed More Scoring
Seattle’s leading players performed reasonably well, but the supporting rotation struggled to produce consistent offense.
The Storm scored 74 points overall.
Johnson, Malonga, and Cooke combined for 50.
This left only 24 points for the remaining listed players.
Several players finished with fewer than five points, while others did not score.
Zia Cooke Provides an Important Contribution
Zia Cooke finished with:
- 14 points
- 4 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 3 steals
- 1 block
Her three steals matched the highest individual total for Seattle.
Cooke also became the Storm’s third-leading scorer.
Her contribution helped Seattle remain competitive, particularly as the team improved during the second half.
However, Seattle needed additional scoring from its other rotation players.
Ezi Magbegor Contributes on Defense
Ezi Magbegor recorded nine points, five rebounds, three steals, and one block.
Her defensive statistics were useful.
Three steals showed her ability to disrupt opposing possessions.
However, Seattle’s overall offensive efficiency remained a major concern.
The Storm needed more successful field-goal attempts to take advantage of its rebounding opportunities.
Defensive Performance and Turnover Analysis
Although shooting efficiency was the biggest difference, defensive production also deserves attention.
Los Angeles recorded 12 steals and five blocks.
Seattle finished with 11 steals and four blocks.
The Sparks therefore held a slight advantage in both categories.
Steals Helped Los Angeles Create Opportunities
Dearica Hamby recorded four steals, while Nneka Ogwumike and several other players contributed additional defensive plays.
Steals can be particularly valuable because they end an opposing possession immediately.
They can also create fast-break opportunities before the opposing defense has time to organize.
Los Angeles finished with one more steal than Seattle.
While this was not an enormous difference, it contributed to the overall defensive performance.
Blocks Provided Additional Rim Protection
Los Angeles recorded five blocks compared with Seattle’s four.
Cameron Brink contributed two blocks.
For Seattle, Dominique Malonga recorded two blocks, while Ezi Magbegor added one.
These numbers suggest that both teams had players capable of protecting the basket.
However, the Sparks’ slightly higher block total and stronger shooting performance gave them the overall advantage.
Equal Turnovers Did Not Mean Equal Efficiency
Both teams committed 16 turnovers.
This is worth highlighting because turnovers are often used to explain why a team loses.
In this matchup, the turnover numbers were identical.
The more significant difference was shooting conversion.
Seattle created opportunities but failed to turn enough of them into successful shots.
Los Angeles was more effective at converting its chances.
Head-to-Head Comparison: Sparks vs Storm
The August 31 result was the third supplied meeting between these teams during the 2026 season.
Their earlier matchups produced contrasting results.
| Date | Winner | Final Score |
| June 11, 2026 | Los Angeles Sparks | 88-83 |
| July 7, 2026 | Seattle Storm | 82-64 |
| August 31, 2026 | Los Angeles Sparks | 90-74 |
Los Angeles won two of the three listed games.
The results also demonstrate how significantly the teams’ performances changed between meetings.
June 11: A Competitive Sparks Victory
The Sparks won the June meeting 88-83.
The five-point margin suggests a more competitive game than the August contest.
Los Angeles ultimately secured the victory, but Seattle remained within striking distance.
July 7: Seattle Responds
Seattle won the second listed meeting 82-64.
The 18-point margin showed that the Storm could also control the matchup.
Los Angeles struggled to produce enough offense in that game.
August 31: Los Angeles Regains Control
The Sparks responded with a 90-74 victory.
Their 90 points represented the highest scoring total among the three supplied meetings.
The result also gave Los Angeles a 2-1 advantage in the season series.
The comparison suggests that the August performance was a strong offensive response after the July defeat.
What the Player Statistics Reveal About Both Teams
Statistics become more useful when they are interpreted rather than simply listed.
The individual performances and team numbers reveal several important lessons from this matchup.
1. Multiple Scoring Options Made Los Angeles Difficult to Defend
Ogwumike scored 23 points, Burrell added 22, and Brink contributed 11.
Three players reached double figures.
Wheeler, Hamby, Gray, and Akoa Makani also provided additional scoring.
This distribution meant Seattle had to account for several offensive threats.
A defense that focuses too heavily on one scorer can leave other players with open opportunities.
2. Seattle Needed Better Three-Point Production
Seattle made only four three-pointers.
Los Angeles made 12.
That eight-shot difference was one of the clearest statistical explanations for the final margin.
The Storm needed more reliable perimeter shooting to create additional scoring opportunities.
3. Rebounding Alone Could Not Offset Shooting Problems
Seattle won the total rebounding battle.
Malonga’s 15 rebounds were particularly impressive.
However, the Storm did not convert enough possessions into points.
This shows why rebounding statistics should always be analyzed alongside field-goal and three-point percentages.
4. The First Half Determined the Result
Los Angeles scored 52 first-half points.
Seattle scored 33.
The Sparks established a 19-point advantage before halftime.
Seattle improved in the final two quarters, but the early deficit was too large to overcome.
5. Defensive Contributions Came From Several Players
Hamby recorded four steals, while Magbegor and Cooke each recorded three for Seattle.
Brink and Malonga each contributed two blocks.
These performances show that defensive impact was spread across multiple players.
How to Read WNBA Player Statistics Correctly
For readers who regularly follow basketball, understanding individual statistics makes match analysis more meaningful.
The box score includes several categories, and each one measures a different part of a player’s performance.
Points (PTS)
Points represent the total number of points a player scores.
They can come from:
- Two-point field goals
- Three-point field goals
- Free throws
In this matchup, Ogwumike led all listed Sparks players with 23 points.
Johnson led Seattle with 19.
Rebounds (REB)
Rebounds measure how many missed shots a player collects.
There are two main categories:
- Offensive rebounds: Recovered missed shots by the player’s own team.
- Defensive rebounds: Recovered missed shots by the opposing team.
Malonga led the game with 15 rebounds.
Her performance was particularly valuable because Seattle finished with more total rebounds.
Assists (AST)
An assist is awarded when a pass directly leads to a teammate’s successful field goal.
Assists help measure how effectively players create scoring opportunities for others.
Los Angeles recorded 23 team assists.
Seattle recorded 17.
Steals (STL)
Steals occur when a defensive player legally takes possession of the basketball from the opposing team.
They can interrupt offensive possessions and create transition opportunities.
Hamby’s four steals were the highest individual total for Los Angeles.
Blocks (BLK)
Blocks occur when a defender legally deflects or stops an opponent’s shot attempt.
They are an important measure of defensive activity near the basket.
Brink and Malonga each recorded two blocks.
Field-Goal Percentage
Field-goal percentage measures the percentage of field-goal attempts a team or player successfully converts.
The calculation is:
[
FG%=\frac{\text{Field Goals Made}}{\text{Field Goals Attempted}}\times100
]
For example, Ogwumike made nine of 17 attempts.
[
FG%=\frac{9}{17}\times100=52.9%
]
This helps readers understand shooting efficiency rather than relying only on points scored.
Three-Point Percentage
Three-point percentage measures how frequently a player or team converts shots from beyond the three-point line.
Los Angeles converted 39% of its attempts.
Seattle converted 18%.
This difference was a major factor in the final outcome.
Plus/Minus
Plus/minus measures the difference between a team’s points scored and points allowed while a particular player is on the court.
For example, if a team scores 20 points and allows 15 while a player is playing, that player’s plus/minus is +5.
A positive figure indicates that the team outscored its opponent during that player’s playing time.
A negative figure indicates the opposite.
Plus/minus should not be used alone to judge a player’s performance because it is influenced by teammates, opponents, substitutions, and game situations.
What This Match Means for the Los Angeles Sparks
The victory demonstrated the importance of offensive balance and shooting efficiency.
Los Angeles scored 90 points against a Seattle team that had previously defeated it during the season.
The Sparks received excellent production from their leading scorers.
Ogwumike’s 23 points and Burrell’s 22 points provided a strong offensive foundation.
Brink’s 11 points added another double-digit contribution.
The team’s 39% three-point shooting also showed that its perimeter offense was effective.
However, there were areas that deserved attention.
The Sparks committed 16 turnovers and collected only five offensive rebounds.
Although they won comfortably, improving those areas could make their offensive possessions more productive.
Their defensive rebounding was also important because it helped limit Seattle’s ability to benefit fully from its offensive boards.
What This Match Means for the Seattle Storm
Seattle’s performance contained some positive individual statistics, particularly from Johnson and Malonga.
However, the team struggled to produce efficient offense.
The Storm made only 28 of 82 field-goal attempts.
Their three-point shooting was even more concerning.
Four successful attempts from beyond the arc were not enough to keep pace with Los Angeles.
The Storm also needed more scoring from the supporting rotation.
Johnson, Malonga, and Cooke provided 50 points combined, but the remaining players did not contribute enough to close the gap.
On the positive side, Seattle collected 43 rebounds and 14 offensive rebounds.
Those numbers demonstrate that the team competed physically and created additional opportunities.
The challenge was converting those opportunities into points.
Improved shot selection, perimeter accuracy, and offensive execution would be important areas to address when evaluating this performance.
Where to Find the Official Match Box Score
Readers who want to examine the complete statistical record can consult the supplied ESPN match page.
The box score contains the player-by-player statistical breakdown and the team’s overall performance.
You can find the match record here:
ESPN Los Angeles Sparks vs Seattle Storm Box Score
The gamecast and recap pages are also available through ESPN:
These pages can help readers compare the supplied statistics with the original game record.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Los Angeles Sparks vs Seattle Storm game on August 31, 2026?
The Los Angeles Sparks defeated the Seattle Storm 90-74 on August 31, 2026, at Climate Pledge Arena in Seattle. Los Angeles won by 16 points after establishing a significant first-half advantage.
2. Who was the leading scorer for the Los Angeles Sparks?
Nneka Ogwumike was the leading scorer for Los Angeles with 23 points. She also recorded 12 rebounds, three assists, and two steals, completing a double-double.
3. Who scored the most points for the Seattle Storm?
Flau’jae Johnson led Seattle with 19 points. She also contributed three rebounds, two assists, and one steal during the matchup.
4. Which player recorded the most rebounds in the game?
Dominique Malonga recorded the highest individual rebound total with 15 rebounds. She also scored 17 points, provided three assists, and recorded two blocks for Seattle.
5. How many three-pointers did the Sparks and Storm make?
The Los Angeles Sparks made 12 three-pointers from 31 attempts, while the Seattle Storm converted four from 22 attempts. Los Angeles finished with a 39% three-point percentage compared with Seattle’s 18%.
6. What was the biggest difference between the two teams?
The biggest statistical difference was shooting efficiency. Los Angeles shot 44% from the field and 39% from three-point range, while Seattle shot 34% from the field and 18% from beyond the arc. This offensive advantage helped the Sparks secure their 90-74 victory.
Conclusion
The August 31, 2026, meeting between the Los Angeles Sparks and Seattle Storm produced a convincing 90-74 victory for Los Angeles. The Sparks established control in the first quarter and carried a 19-point advantage into halftime. Although Seattle improved its scoring during the second half, the early deficit proved too difficult to overcome.
Nneka Ogwumike was the standout performer for Los Angeles, finishing with 23 points and 12 rebounds. Rae Burrell added 22 points, while Cameron Brink contributed 11 points and two blocks. For Seattle, Flau’jae Johnson led the scoring with 19 points, and Dominique Malonga recorded an impressive 17-point, 15-rebound double-double.
The team statistics explain the final result. Seattle collected more total rebounds and offensive rebounds, but Los Angeles was considerably more efficient from the field. The Sparks made 12 three-pointers compared with Seattle’s four and finished with a 10-percentage-point advantage in overall field-goal shooting.
The los angeles sparks vs seattle storm match player stats also demonstrate how important balanced scoring, perimeter accuracy, and first-half execution can be in professional basketball. While Seattle showed improvement after halftime, Los Angeles’ early offensive performance and contributions from multiple players ultimately determined the outcome.
The final result gave the Sparks a 2-1 advantage in the supplied 2026 season-series record and highlighted the importance of shooting efficiency over simply winning individual statistical categories.
Data accuracy note: This article uses the statistics supplied in the match data. The source material contains some potential player-row alignment and team-record inconsistencies. Individual figures have therefore been presented as supplied and should be checked against the original official box score before publication if complete statistical verification is required.
