New York Giants vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats
The new york giants vs philadelphia eagles match player stats from October 26, 2025, tell the story of a divisional matchup in which Philadelphia’s offensive balance and explosive rushing attack proved too much for New York. The Eagles secured a convincing 38-20 victory in Week 8, combining four touchdown passes from Jalen Hurts with a remarkable 150-yard rushing performance from Saquon Barkley. Philadelphia also received an outstanding contribution from Tank Bigsby, who added 104 rushing yards on just nine carries.
For the Giants, rookie quarterback Jaxson Dart completed 14 of 24 passes for 193 yards and one touchdown without throwing an interception. New York showed some promising individual performances, but its inability to establish a consistent rushing attack created a major disadvantage. The Giants finished with only 68 rushing yards, compared with Philadelphia’s impressive 276.
This statistical breakdown examines the quarterbacks, running backs, wide receivers, defensive performances, special teams, scoring progression, and most important differences between the two teams. It also explains what the numbers reveal about the outcome rather than simply listing individual performances.
New York Giants vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The Philadelphia Eagles hosted the New York Giants at Lincoln Financial Field on October 26, 2025, for a Week 8 NFC East divisional contest.
Philadelphia entered the matchup with a 5-2 record, while New York was looking to improve its 2-5 standing. The final result strengthened Philadelphia’s position in the division and left the Giants with another difficult road defeat.
FINAL SCORE
New York Giants Scores, Stats and Highlights – ESPN
New York Giants
20
Philadelphia Eagles Scores, Stats and Highlights – ESPN
Philadelphia Eagles
38
Philadelphia Eagles won
October 26, 2025 | NFL Week 8 | Final
Match Information
| Category | Details |
| Competition | National Football League |
| Season | 2025 |
| Week | Week 8 |
| Matchup | New York Giants vs Philadelphia Eagles |
| Date | October 26, 2025 |
| Venue | Lincoln Financial Field |
| Away Team | New York Giants |
| Home Team | Philadelphia Eagles |
| Final Score | Giants 20, Eagles 38 |
| Winning Team | Philadelphia Eagles |
| Losing Team | New York Giants |
| Giants Record After Game | 2-6 |
| Eagles Record After Game | 6-2 |
| Game ID | 401772867 |
| Game Status | Final |
Philadelphia’s 18-point victory was built on offensive production across multiple areas. The Eagles did not depend entirely on their passing game. Instead, they combined efficient quarterback play, explosive running, and productive receiving performances.
New York managed to produce 20 points, but its offense struggled to maintain the same level of consistency.
Quarter-by-Quarter Score
The scoring progression shows how Philadelphia gradually created separation and maintained control during the second half.
| Quarter | New York Giants | Philadelphia Eagles |
| First Quarter | 7 | 7 |
| Second Quarter | 3 | 14 |
| Third Quarter | 3 | 3 |
| Fourth Quarter | 7 | 14 |
| Final Score | 20 | 38 |
The opening quarter was competitive, with both teams scoring seven points. However, Philadelphia produced 14 points in the second quarter and established a significant advantage before halftime.
Both teams managed only three points in the third quarter. Philadelphia then finished strongly with another 14 points in the final period, while New York scored seven.
The fourth-quarter performance demonstrated Philadelphia’s ability to keep producing points rather than allowing the Giants to build momentum.
Complete Team Statistics: Giants vs Eagles
Before examining individual players, it is important to understand the overall team performance.
The biggest statistical difference was rushing production. Philadelphia generated 276 rushing yards, while New York finished with only 68.
| Team Statistic | Giants | Eagles |
| Final Points | 20 | 38 |
| Passing Yards | 193 | 179 |
| Rushing Attempts | 21 | 33 |
| Rushing Yards | 68 | 276 |
| Yards Per Carry | 3.2 | 8.4 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 1 | 4 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 1 | 1 |
| Receptions | 14 | 15 |
| Receiving Yards | 193 | 179 |
| Yards Per Reception | 13.8 | 11.9 |
| Sacks Allowed | 5 | 4 |
| Defensive Sacks | 4 | 5 |
| Tackles for Loss | 3 | 7 |
| Passes Defended | 4 | 4 |
| Quarterback Hits | 5 | 6 |
| Fumbles | 0 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
One particularly interesting detail is that New York actually recorded more passing yards than Philadelphia. However, the Eagles scored more efficiently through the air and created much greater production on the ground.
This is an important distinction when evaluating football statistics. Total passing yards alone cannot explain offensive success. Touchdowns, rushing efficiency, explosive plays, and the ability to sustain drives also matter.
Philadelphia’s 8.4 yards per rushing attempt was especially impressive. That figure indicates that the Eagles consistently generated substantial yardage whenever they carried the football.
Jalen Hurts vs Jaxson Dart: Quarterback Stats
The quarterback matchup was one of the most important parts of this game. Both Jalen Hurts and Jaxson Dart avoided interceptions, but Hurts was considerably more effective at turning passing opportunities into touchdowns.
Philadelphia’s quarterback completed 15 of 20 passes for 179 yards and four touchdowns. Dart completed 14 of 24 attempts for 193 yards and one touchdown.
Although Dart accumulated more passing yards, Hurts delivered a much stronger scoring performance.
Complete Quarterback Comparison
| Passing Statistic | Jaxson Dart | Jalen Hurts |
| Team | Giants | Eagles |
| Completions | 14 | 15 |
| Attempts | 24 | 20 |
| Completion Percentage | 58.3% | 75.0% |
| Passing Yards | 193 | 179 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 8.0 | 9.0 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 1 | 4 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Times Sacked | 5 | 4 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 15 | 28 |
| QBR | 59.4 | 66.2 |
| Passer Rating | 98.1 | 141.5 |
Jalen Hurts’ Performance
Jalen Hurts
141.5
Passer rating
4 passing touchdowns
Jalen Hurts delivered an efficient performance that played a central role in Philadelphia’s victory.
His 15 completions from 20 attempts produced a 75% completion rate. More importantly, he threw four touchdown passes without recording an interception.
His 179 passing yards might appear relatively modest compared with some high-volume quarterback performances. However, the number of touchdowns demonstrates how effectively Philadelphia converted its passing opportunities into points.
Three aspects of his performance deserve particular attention.
- Outstanding passing efficiency
Hurts completed three out of every four passes he attempted. His nine yards per attempt also indicated that Philadelphia generated meaningful production without requiring an unusually high number of throws.
- Excellent touchdown production
Four passing touchdowns represented the defining feature of his performance. He accounted for all four of Philadelphia’s passing scores, helping the Eagles establish their advantage.
- Ball security
Hurts finished without an interception. Avoiding turnovers was especially valuable because Philadelphia was already generating explosive plays through its running game.
Hurts was also sacked four times for a loss of 28 yards. Those sacks show that the Giants’ defense managed to create pressure, even though it could not consistently stop the Eagles’ offense.
Overall, Hurts demonstrated that quarterback effectiveness is not always determined by passing volume. His ability to finish scoring opportunities made the difference.
Jaxson Dart’s Performance
Philadelphia Eagles v New York Giants
Jaxson Dart
193
Passing yards
Zero interceptions
Jaxson Dart recorded 193 passing yards, which was 14 more than Hurts. He completed 14 of his 24 attempts and averaged eight yards per attempt.
His 98.1 passer rating was a respectable individual figure, particularly considering that he was playing against a divisional opponent with a strong offensive attack.
Dart also avoided interceptions, an important positive for the Giants.
However, his performance had some limitations.
Completion consistency: Dart completed 58.3% of his attempts. That was noticeably lower than Hurts’ 75% completion rate.
Pressure from Philadelphia: The quarterback was sacked five times for 15 yards. Those negative plays made it harder for New York to maintain offensive momentum.
Limited scoring production: Dart recorded one passing touchdown. While his yardage was reasonable, the Giants needed more successful scoring drives to keep pace with Philadelphia.
Dart also contributed as a runner, recording 17 rushing yards and one rushing touchdown on six carries.
His ability to contribute in both phases provided New York with an additional offensive option.
Who Won the Quarterback Battle?
Hurts clearly had the more productive performance in terms of scoring and passing efficiency.
Dart finished with more passing yards, but Hurts recorded:
- Three additional passing touchdowns.
- A 16.7-percentage-point advantage in completion percentage.
- A 9.0 passer rating advantage in QBR.
- A 43.4-point advantage in traditional passer rating.
The biggest difference was Hurts’ ability to turn passing attempts into touchdowns.
Dart’s numbers were not entirely disappointing, but Philadelphia received more decisive quarterback production when it mattered.
Running Back Stats: Saquon Barkley Leads Philadelphia’s Ground Attack
The running game was arguably the biggest reason Philadelphia won this matchup.
The Eagles accumulated 276 rushing yards on 33 attempts. New York managed only 68 yards on 21 attempts.
That difference of 208 rushing yards created a major advantage for the home team.
Philadelphia also had two running backs surpass 100 rushing yards, making its ground attack difficult to contain.
Saquon Barkley Player Stats
Eagles Dominate In A Statement Win Over The Giants – 97.5 The Fanatic
Saquon Barkley
150
Rushing yards
10.7 yards per carry
Saquon Barkley delivered one of the most explosive individual performances of the contest.
He finished with 14 carries for 150 yards, averaging 10.7 yards per attempt. His longest run covered 65 yards, and he recorded one rushing touchdown.
| Barkley Rushing Statistic | Performance |
| Carries | 14 |
| Rushing Yards | 150 |
| Average | 10.7 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 1 |
| Longest Run | 65 yards |
Barkley’s 65-yard run was particularly important because it demonstrated how quickly Philadelphia could turn an ordinary rushing opportunity into a major offensive gain.
His 10.7 yards per carry was more than three times New York’s team average of 3.2 yards per carry.
Barkley also contributed as a receiver.
| Receiving Statistic | Performance |
| Receptions | 4 |
| Receiving Yards | 24 |
| Yards Per Reception | 6.0 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 1 |
| Longest Reception | 12 yards |
| Targets | 5 |
His receiving touchdown added another dimension to his overall contribution.
Barkley therefore finished with 174 combined rushing and receiving yards and two total touchdowns.
That combination of explosive running and receiving production made him one of the most influential players on the field.
Tank Bigsby Player Stats
New York Giants v Philadelphia Eagles
Tank Bigsby
104
Rushing yards
11.6 yards per carry
Tank Bigsby produced another excellent rushing performance for Philadelphia.
He recorded nine carries for 104 yards, averaging 11.6 yards per attempt.
| Bigsby Rushing Statistic | Performance |
| Carries | 9 |
| Rushing Yards | 104 |
| Average | 11.6 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest Run | 29 yards |
Bigsby’s performance is particularly interesting because he averaged more yards per carry than Barkley.
He did not score a rushing touchdown, but his contribution helped Philadelphia maintain its offensive efficiency throughout the game.
Having two running backs capable of generating more than 100 yards created a difficult challenge for New York’s defensive front.
The Giants could not concentrate exclusively on stopping Barkley because Bigsby was also producing explosive runs.
Together, the two running backs generated 254 rushing yards on 23 carries.
That represented the majority of Philadelphia’s rushing production.
Philadelphia’s Other Rushing Contributors
Jalen Hurts also contributed with his legs, while Will Shipley and Tanner McKee recorded smaller rushing totals.
| Eagles Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD |
| Saquon Barkley | 14 | 150 | 10.7 | 1 |
| Tank Bigsby | 9 | 104 | 11.6 | 0 |
| Jalen Hurts | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 0 |
| Will Shipley | 3 | 2 | 0.7 | 0 |
| Tanner McKee | 3 | -2 | -0.7 | 0 |
| Team Total | 33 | 276 | 8.4 | 1 |
The combined production from multiple players prevented Philadelphia’s offense from becoming predictable.
New York Giants Rushing Stats
New York’s rushing attack struggled to create the same explosive opportunities.
Tyrone Tracy Jr. led the Giants with 39 rushing yards, while Dart added 17 yards and one touchdown.
| Giants Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD |
| Tyrone Tracy Jr. | 10 | 39 | 3.9 | 0 |
| Jaxson Dart | 6 | 17 | 2.8 | 1 |
| Cam Skattebo | 3 | 12 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Devin Singletary | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Team Total | 21 | 68 | 3.2 | 1 |
Tyrone Tracy Jr.
How Giants RB Tyrone Tracy, Jr. Has Dealt With Challenging Second Season
Tyrone Tracy Jr.
39 yards
10 carries | 3.9 yards per carry
Tracy was New York’s leading rusher, finishing with 39 yards on 10 attempts.
His longest run was six yards, which illustrates the lack of explosive rushing plays from the Giants.
He also caught two passes for 14 yards, bringing his total offensive production to 53 yards.
Jaxson Dart as a Rusher
Dart’s rushing contribution was important because it gave the Giants another way to generate offense.
He recorded:
- Six rushing attempts.
- 17 rushing yards.
- 2.8 yards per carry.
- One rushing touchdown.
- An eight-yard longest run.
His rushing touchdown provided a valuable scoring contribution, although his overall rushing production was limited.
Cam Skattebo
Cam Skattebo finished with three carries for 12 yards, averaging four yards per attempt.
He also caught one pass for 18 yards and a touchdown.
Although his rushing numbers were relatively modest, his receiving touchdown was a meaningful contribution to New York’s scoring total.
Running Back Comparison
The contrast between the two teams was significant.
| Category | Giants | Eagles |
| Team Carries | 21 | 33 |
| Rushing Yards | 68 | 276 |
| Average Per Carry | 3.2 | 8.4 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 1 | 1 |
| Longest Run | 8 yards | 65 yards |
Philadelphia averaged 5.2 more yards per carry than New York.
The Eagles also recorded 12 additional rushing attempts.
These figures explain why Philadelphia had greater control of the offensive tempo and why the Giants struggled to match the Eagles’ scoring output.
Wide Receiver and Tight End Stats: Giants vs Eagles
The receiving statistics provide another interesting perspective on the matchup.
New York recorded 193 receiving yards, while Philadelphia finished with 179.
The Giants therefore had a 14-yard advantage in total receiving production.
However, Philadelphia scored four receiving touchdowns, compared with New York’s one.
This difference highlights the importance of converting receiving opportunities into points.
New York Giants Receiving Leaders
Wan’Dale Robinson led New York’s receiving group with 48 yards.
| Giants Receiver | Receptions | Targets | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Wan’Dale Robinson | 3 | 4 | 48 | 16.0 | 0 | 34 |
| Devin Singletary | 1 | 1 | 28 | 28.0 | 0 | 28 |
| Darius Slayton | 2 | 5 | 26 | 13.0 | 0 | 19 |
| Daniel Bellinger | 1 | 1 | 21 | 21.0 | 0 | 21 |
| Theo Johnson | 3 | 4 | 20 | 6.7 | 0 | 12 |
| Cam Skattebo | 1 | 2 | 18 | 18.0 | 1 | 18 |
| Beaux Collins | 1 | 2 | 18 | 18.0 | 0 | 18 |
| Tyrone Tracy Jr. | 2 | 3 | 14 | 7.0 | 0 | 9 |
| Team Total | 14 | 22 | 193 | 13.8 | 1 | 34 |
Wan’Dale Robinson
Philadelphia Eagles v New York Giants
Wan’Dale Robinson
48 yards
3 receptions | 16.0 yards per catch
Robinson was New York’s leading receiver in terms of yardage.
He caught three passes for 48 yards on four targets, averaging 16 yards per reception.
His longest reception covered 34 yards.
That explosive reception demonstrated his ability to create meaningful gains, even though the Giants struggled to maintain offensive consistency.
Robinson’s performance was a positive element for New York, but the offense needed more production from its receiving group to challenge Philadelphia.
Devin Singletary
Devin Singletary recorded one reception for 28 yards on one target.
His 28-yard average was the highest among Giants receivers with a recorded reception.
He also contributed 51 yards on two kick returns.
Singletary therefore offered some value in the passing and special teams phases, although his rushing contribution was limited to two carries for zero yards.
Darius Slayton
Darius Slayton caught two passes for 26 yards on five targets.
His longest reception covered 19 yards.
While he did not produce a touchdown, his presence provided another option for Dart in the passing game.
Daniel Bellinger and Theo Johnson
Daniel Bellinger finished with one catch for 21 yards, while Theo Johnson recorded three receptions for 20 yards.
Johnson had four targets and averaged 6.7 yards per reception.
Both players contributed to the Giants’ receiving production, although neither recorded a touchdown.
Cam Skattebo’s Receiving Touchdown
Skattebo caught one pass for 18 yards and a touchdown.
That score was particularly valuable because New York needed every available scoring opportunity to remain competitive.
His contribution demonstrated that running backs can influence a game through receiving opportunities as well as traditional rushing attempts.
Philadelphia Eagles Receiving Leaders
Philadelphia’s receiving group was led by DeVonta Smith, who recorded 84 receiving yards.
Dallas Goedert delivered an especially productive scoring performance with two receiving touchdowns.
| Eagles Receiver | Receptions | Targets | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| DeVonta Smith | 6 | 9 | 84 | 14.0 | 0 | 26 |
| Jahan Dotson | 1 | 2 | 40 | 40.0 | 1 | 40 |
| Dallas Goedert | 3 | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 2 | 17 |
| Saquon Barkley | 4 | 5 | 24 | 6.0 | 1 | 12 |
| Xavier Gipson | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 |
| Team Total | 15 | 20 | 179 | 11.9 | 4 | 40 |
DeVonta Smith
New York Giants v Philadelphia Eagles
DeVonta Smith
84 yards
6 receptions | 14.0 yards per catch
Smith was Philadelphia’s leading receiver.
He caught six of nine targets for 84 yards, averaging 14 yards per reception.
His longest reception covered 26 yards.
Smith’s six receptions were the highest individual total among the listed receivers from either team.
His production helped Philadelphia maintain balance between its passing and rushing attacks.
Although he did not score a touchdown, his ability to consistently gain receiving yards made him a central part of the offense.
Jahan Dotson
Jahan Dotson had a highly efficient performance.
He caught one pass for 40 yards and a touchdown on two targets.
His 40-yard reception was the longest individual catch recorded by either team in the supplied statistics.
The impressive detail is that Dotson produced 40 yards from a single reception.
His touchdown also demonstrated Philadelphia’s ability to generate scoring plays through different receiving options rather than depending exclusively on its leading receiver.
Dallas Goedert
Highlight: Dallas Goedert catches the first Eagles TD of the season!
Dallas Goedert
2 TDs
3 receptions | 28 receiving yards
Goedert was Philadelphia’s leading receiving touchdown contributor.
He caught all three of his targets for 28 yards and two touchdowns.
His average was 9.3 yards per reception, and his longest reception covered 17 yards.
Although his yardage was lower than Smith’s, his touchdown production made his contribution particularly valuable.
This is a good example of why receiving yards should not be the only measurement used to judge a player’s impact.
A receiver who produces fewer yards but converts multiple opportunities into touchdowns can have a greater effect on the final score.
Saquon Barkley as a Receiver
Barkley also caught four passes for 24 yards and a receiving touchdown.
His receiving contribution complemented his outstanding rushing performance.
Combining his rushing and receiving numbers gives him 174 yards from scrimmage and two total touchdowns.
Xavier Gipson
Xavier Gipson recorded one reception for three yards.
He also returned one punt for 17 yards, giving Philadelphia an additional contribution in the special teams department.
Receiving Comparison
| Receiving Category | Giants | Eagles |
| Receptions | 14 | 15 |
| Targets | 22 | 20 |
| Receiving Yards | 193 | 179 |
| Yards Per Reception | 13.8 | 11.9 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 1 | 4 |
| Longest Reception | 34 yards | 40 yards |
New York averaged more yards per reception, but Philadelphia produced more total touchdowns.
The Eagles’ receiving group was especially effective in the red zone and during important scoring opportunities.
This difference was more significant than the relatively small gap in receiving yardage.
Defensive Player and Team Stats
The defensive statistics show that both teams recorded pressure and disrupted offensive plays.
Philadelphia finished with five sacks, while New York recorded four.
The Eagles also produced seven tackles for loss, compared with three from the Giants.
These numbers suggest that Philadelphia was more effective at creating negative plays, particularly against the running game.
Team Defensive Comparison
| Defensive Statistic | Giants | Eagles |
| Total Tackles | 61 | 49 |
| Solo Tackles | 33 | 35 |
| Sacks | 4 | 5 |
| Tackles for Loss | 3 | 7 |
| Passes Defended | 4 | 4 |
| Quarterback Hits | 5 | 6 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
Philadelphia Eagles Defense
Philadelphia recorded 49 total tackles and 35 solo tackles.
Its five sacks were particularly important because they created negative plays and forced the Giants into difficult passing situations.
The Eagles also registered:
- Seven tackles for loss.
- Four passes defended.
- Six quarterback hits.
- Zero interceptions.
- Zero defensive touchdowns.
The seven tackles for loss were a significant achievement.
They indicate that Philadelphia’s defense was effective at stopping offensive plays behind the line of scrimmage.
The defensive unit also recorded more sacks and quarterback hits than New York.
Although the Eagles did not force an interception, their pressure helped restrict the Giants’ offensive effectiveness.
New York Giants Defense
New York’s defense finished with 61 total tackles, 33 solo tackles, and four sacks.
The Giants also recorded three tackles for loss and four passes defended.
Their defensive performance included:
- 61 total tackles.
- 33 solo tackles.
- Four sacks.
- Three tackles for loss.
- Four passes defended.
- Five quarterback hits.
- Zero interceptions.
- Zero defensive touchdowns.
The Giants actually recorded 12 more total tackles than Philadelphia.
However, total tackles do not automatically indicate defensive superiority.
A team that spends more time defending can naturally accumulate additional tackles.
Philadelphia’s lower tackle total should be considered alongside its stronger offensive control and greater rushing production.
New York’s defense managed to pressure Hurts four times, but it struggled to stop Philadelphia’s running backs from generating explosive plays.
Defensive Pressure and Its Impact
The most important defensive difference was Philadelphia’s ability to create tackles for loss.
The Eagles recorded seven, more than twice New York’s total of three.
This helped Philadelphia disrupt the Giants’ offensive rhythm.
The Giants also struggled to contain Barkley and Bigsby, allowing the Eagles to maintain a productive rushing attack.
Defensive pressure matters, but it must be supported by effective run defense and consistent tackling.
Philadelphia performed better in those areas.
Special Teams Stats: Kickers, Punters and Returners
Special teams did not receive as much attention as the offensive performances, but the statistics provide additional information about how both teams handled field position and scoring opportunities.
Both kickers recorded eight total points, although their scoring contributions came from different combinations of field goals and extra points.
Kicking Statistics
| Kicker | Team | Field Goals | FG Percentage | Longest FG | Extra Points | Total Points |
| Graham Gano | Giants | 2/2 | 100% | 47 yards | 2/2 | 8 |
| Jake Elliott | Eagles | 1/2 | 50% | 40 yards | 5/5 | 8 |
Graham Gano
New York Giants v Philadelphia Eagles
Graham Gano
8 points
2/2 field goals | 2/2 extra points
Gano delivered an accurate kicking performance.
He converted both field-goal attempts and both extra-point attempts.
His longest successful field goal covered 47 yards.
A 100% field-goal success rate was a positive result for the Giants, particularly in a game where the offense struggled to generate consistent touchdowns.
Jake Elliott
Philadelphia Eagles v Buffalo Bills – NFL 2025
Jake Elliott
8 points
1/2 field goals | 5/5 extra points
Elliott finished with eight points.
He converted one of two field-goal attempts and successfully made all five extra-point attempts.
His longest successful field goal was 40 yards.
Although his field-goal percentage was lower than Gano’s, his five successful extra points reflected Philadelphia’s greater touchdown production.
The two kickers finished with the same number of total points despite having different kicking records.
Punting Statistics
| Punter | Team | Punts | Total Yards | Average | Longest Punt | Inside 20 |
| Jamie Gillan | Giants | 4 | 194 | 48.5 | 58 yards | 1 |
| Braden Mann | Eagles | 1 | 57 | 57.0 | 57 yards | 0 |
Jamie Gillan punted four times for 194 yards, averaging 48.5 yards per punt.
Braden Mann recorded one punt for 57 yards, averaging 57 yards.
The difference in punt attempts reflects the different offensive situations experienced by the two teams.
Philadelphia’s ability to produce scoring drives limited its need to punt.
Kick Return Statistics
| Returner | Team | Returns | Yards | Average | Longest |
| Gunner Olszewski | Giants | 3 | 94 | 31.3 | 33 |
| Devin Singletary | Giants | 2 | 51 | 25.5 | 31 |
| Will Shipley | Eagles | 3 | 99 | 33.0 | 41 |
Philadelphia’s Will Shipley recorded 99 yards on three kick returns.
His average of 33 yards per return was particularly impressive.
Gunner Olszewski led the Giants with 94 yards on three returns, averaging 31.3 yards.
Singletary added 51 yards on two returns.
The Eagles finished with 99 team kick-return yards, compared with New York’s 145.
Although New York produced more total return yards, Philadelphia had the higher average among its team return attempts.
Punt Return Statistics
Philadelphia’s Xavier Gipson recorded one punt return for 17 yards.
The Giants did not record a punt return in the supplied game statistics.
Neither team scored a special teams touchdown.
Overall, special teams provided useful field-position contributions, but the decisive difference came from Philadelphia’s offensive production.
Key Moments That Defined the Giants vs Eagles Result
The final score was 38-20, but several statistical details explain how Philadelphia created such a comfortable advantage.
Rather than looking only at the final result, examining the major performance differences helps explain why the Eagles were successful.
1. Philadelphia’s Explosive Rushing Production
The most important statistical advantage was the difference in rushing yards.
Philadelphia recorded 276 rushing yards, while New York managed only 68.
That 208-yard difference was enormous.
Barkley’s 150 yards and Bigsby’s 104 yards gave Philadelphia two highly productive rushing options.
New York did not have an equivalent individual performance.
Tracy led the Giants with 39 yards, which was considerably lower than either of Philadelphia’s leading running backs.
The Eagles’ ability to generate long runs also increased their offensive efficiency.
Barkley’s 65-yard run was particularly important because explosive plays can change field position and scoring opportunities in a single moment.
2. Jalen Hurts Converted Passing Opportunities Into Touchdowns
Hurts threw four touchdown passes without an interception.
His 179 passing yards were lower than Dart’s 193, but his scoring production was much greater.
The difference demonstrates why quarterback evaluation should consider more than passing yardage.
A quarterback can accumulate substantial yardage without producing enough touchdowns to win a game.
Hurts was particularly effective at converting opportunities into points.
3. Dallas Goedert Provided Important Red-Zone Production
Goedert caught three passes for 28 yards and two touchdowns.
His performance was one of the most important receiving contributions for Philadelphia.
He did not need a large number of targets to influence the result.
All three of his targets resulted in receptions, and two became touchdowns.
That level of scoring efficiency helped Philadelphia maximize its passing opportunities.
4. The Giants Could Not Establish a Consistent Ground Game
New York finished with 68 rushing yards and averaged just 3.2 yards per carry.
This limited the team’s ability to create balance between passing and rushing.
When an offense cannot consistently run the football, it may become easier for the opposing defense to anticipate passing situations.
Philadelphia recorded five sacks and seven tackles for loss.
Those defensive numbers demonstrate how effectively the Eagles disrupted New York’s offensive rhythm.
5. Philadelphia Maintained Its Scoring Momentum
The quarter-by-quarter score also tells an important story.
Philadelphia scored 14 points in the second quarter and another 14 in the fourth.
New York managed only three points in each of those quarters before scoring seven in the final period.
The Eagles were able to produce scoring bursts at important stages of the game.
That consistency made it difficult for New York to reduce the deficit.
Three Statistical Lessons From the Game
The matchup provides several useful lessons for anyone analyzing NFL player performances.
Passing Yards Do Not Tell the Whole Story
Dart finished with more passing yards than Hurts.
However, Hurts recorded four passing touchdowns compared with Dart’s one.
This demonstrates why passing efficiency, touchdown production, and turnovers should be considered alongside total yardage.
Explosive Rushing Plays Can Change a Game
Philadelphia’s rushing attack was responsible for the biggest statistical advantage.
Barkley and Bigsby combined for 254 rushing yards.
Their combined performance helped Philadelphia maintain offensive balance and create scoring opportunities.
Touchdown Efficiency Matters More Than Raw Receiving Yardage
New York finished with 193 receiving yards, while Philadelphia recorded 179.
Despite having fewer receiving yards, the Eagles scored four receiving touchdowns.
This demonstrates that receiving production must be evaluated through both yardage and scoring impact.
Giants vs Eagles: Most Important Player Performances
The following comparison highlights the players whose statistical contributions were particularly important.
| Player | Team | Key Performance |
| Jalen Hurts | Eagles | 179 passing yards, 4 passing TDs |
| Saquon Barkley | Eagles | 150 rushing yards, 1 rushing TD |
| Tank Bigsby | Eagles | 104 rushing yards |
| DeVonta Smith | Eagles | 84 receiving yards |
| Dallas Goedert | Eagles | 28 receiving yards, 2 receiving TDs |
| Jahan Dotson | Eagles | 40 receiving yards, 1 receiving TD |
| Jaxson Dart | Giants | 193 passing yards, 1 passing TD |
| Tyrone Tracy Jr. | Giants | 39 rushing yards |
| Wan’Dale Robinson | Giants | 48 receiving yards |
| Cam Skattebo | Giants | 18 receiving yards, 1 receiving TD |
| Graham Gano | Giants | 2 successful field goals |
Who Was the Most Valuable Offensive Player?
Jalen Hurts has a strong statistical case because of his four touchdown passes and 141.5 passer rating.
However, Saquon Barkley’s 150 rushing yards and two total touchdowns also make him a major candidate.
Their contributions were different but complementary.
Hurts provided the passing efficiency, while Barkley delivered explosive rushing production.
Together, they helped Philadelphia create an offense that New York struggled to contain.
Which Giants Player Had the Strongest Performance?
Jaxson Dart produced 193 passing yards, one passing touchdown, and one rushing touchdown without throwing an interception.
His individual performance was encouraging in several respects.
Wan’Dale Robinson also deserves recognition for leading New York with 48 receiving yards.
Graham Gano delivered a perfect field-goal performance, converting both attempts.
However, the Giants needed more collective offensive production to challenge Philadelphia.
What the Statistics Reveal About Both Teams
The result provides a useful picture of the strengths and weaknesses demonstrated by each team in this particular matchup.
Philadelphia Eagles: Offensive Balance and Explosiveness
Philadelphia’s most important strength was its ability to produce through multiple offensive options.
The Eagles did not rely on one player to carry the entire offense.
Instead, their production came from:
- Hurts’ four passing touchdowns.
- Barkley’s 150 rushing yards.
- Bigsby’s 104 rushing yards.
- Smith’s 84 receiving yards.
- Goedert’s two receiving touchdowns.
- Dotson’s 40-yard touchdown reception.
This distribution made the Eagles difficult to defend.
If New York focused on the passing game, Philadelphia had productive running backs capable of exploiting defensive gaps.
If the Giants concentrated on stopping Barkley, Bigsby provided another rushing threat.
Philadelphia also demonstrated strong scoring efficiency by converting its receiving production into four touchdowns.
New York Giants: Individual Positives but Limited Team Production
The Giants had several positive individual performances.
Dart avoided interceptions and recorded more passing yards than Hurts.
Robinson produced 48 receiving yards, while Gano converted every field-goal attempt.
Skattebo also contributed a receiving touchdown.
However, these performances were not enough to overcome the rushing disadvantage.
New York’s biggest challenge was the lack of consistent offensive production across the entire team.
The 68 rushing yards were especially limiting.
The Giants also allowed Philadelphia to record seven tackles for loss and five sacks on defense.
Those numbers highlight the areas that made this matchup difficult for New York.
Why the 18-Point Difference Matters
Philadelphia won by 18 points, but the most revealing statistic was not the final score.
It was the 208-yard difference in rushing production.
The Eagles generated significantly more ground yardage, scored four passing touchdowns, and maintained a stronger overall offensive rhythm.
New York’s passing yardage advantage could not compensate for its inability to establish an effective running game.
This is why a complete evaluation of the box score provides a more accurate explanation of the result than looking at one statistic in isolation.
How to Read NFL Match Player Statistics Correctly
For readers who regularly follow NFL box scores, understanding the difference between individual and team statistics can make game analysis much more useful.
Here are some of the most important measurements from this matchup.
Completion Percentage
Completion percentage measures how many attempted passes a quarterback completes.
The formula is:
CompletionPercentage=CompletionsAttempts100
Hurts completed 75% of his passes, while Dart completed approximately 58.3%.
This provides a useful measurement of passing accuracy and completion consistency.
However, it does not independently measure the difficulty or value of each completed pass.
Yards Per Attempt
Yards per attempt measures the average passing yardage generated by each attempted pass.
Hurts averaged 9.0 yards per attempt, while Dart averaged 8.0.
A higher number can indicate that a quarterback is generating more passing yardage from each opportunity.
It should still be considered alongside completion percentage, touchdowns, interceptions, and sacks.
Yards Per Carry
Yards per carry measures rushing efficiency.
The calculation is:
YardsPerCarry=RushingYardsCarries
Philadelphia averaged 8.4 yards per carry as a team.
New York averaged 3.2.
The difference was one of the strongest indicators of Philadelphia’s offensive superiority.
Passer Rating
Passer rating is a traditional NFL passing metric based on completions, passing yards, touchdowns, and interceptions.
Hurts recorded a 141.5 rating, compared with Dart’s 98.1.
The figures show a clear advantage for Hurts in this game.
Passer rating is not the same as ESPN’s QBR, and the two should not be treated as interchangeable measurements.
Quarterback Rating (QBR)
QBR is ESPN’s quarterback performance metric.
It considers a broader range of quarterback contributions and game situations than traditional passer rating.
In this matchup:
- Jalen Hurts recorded a 66.2 QBR.
- Jaxson Dart recorded a 59.4 QBR.
Hurts held the advantage in both QBR and traditional passer rating.
Tackles for Loss
A tackle for loss occurs when a defensive player stops an offensive player behind the line of scrimmage.
Philadelphia recorded seven tackles for loss, while New York recorded three.
This statistic is particularly useful when evaluating defensive disruption.
A defense that consistently creates tackles for loss can make it harder for an offense to establish successful running plays and manageable passing situations.
Official Box Score and Match Data
For readers who want to verify individual performances, scoring information, and team statistics, the original ESPN game record provides the complete box-score reference.
The game ID is 401772867.
The following official game resources are useful:
- ESPN official box score for Giants vs Eagles
- Game date: October 26, 2025.
- Competition: NFL Week 8.
- Final result: Philadelphia Eagles 38, New York Giants 20.
The box score is particularly useful for checking player participation, passing production, rushing attempts, receiving statistics, and defensive contributions.
For statistical accuracy, individual player figures should be distinguished from team totals. A quarterback’s passing yards, for example, should not be added to team rushing yards when calculating rushing production.
Likewise, rushing touchdowns and receiving touchdowns represent different statistical categories.
This distinction helps prevent errors when comparing individual performances or calculating total offensive production.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What was the final score of the New York Giants vs Philadelphia Eagles game on October 26, 2025?
The Philadelphia Eagles defeated the New York Giants 38-20 in their Week 8 NFL matchup on October 26, 2025. Philadelphia scored 14 points in both the second and fourth quarters to secure the victory.
2. How many passing touchdowns did Jalen Hurts record against the Giants?
Jalen Hurts threw four touchdown passes against New York. He completed 15 of 20 attempts for 179 yards, recorded zero interceptions, and finished with a 141.5 passer rating.
3. How many rushing yards did Saquon Barkley have against the New York Giants?
Saquon Barkley recorded 150 rushing yards on 14 carries, averaging 10.7 yards per carry. He also scored one rushing touchdown and added 24 receiving yards and a receiving touchdown.
4. How did Jaxson Dart perform against the Philadelphia Eagles?
Jaxson Dart completed 14 of 24 passes for 193 yards and one passing touchdown without an interception. He also rushed for 17 yards and one touchdown on six carries.
5. Which team had more rushing yards in the Giants vs Eagles game?
The Philadelphia Eagles dominated the rushing statistics with 276 yards on 33 carries. The Giants managed only 68 yards on 21 carries. Philadelphia averaged 8.4 yards per carry, compared with New York’s 3.2.
6. Who was Philadelphia’s leading receiver against the Giants?
DeVonta Smith led the Eagles with six receptions for 84 yards on nine targets. Dallas Goedert was Philadelphia’s leading receiving touchdown scorer with two touchdowns on three receptions.
Conclusion
The October 26, 2025, matchup between the New York Giants and Philadelphia Eagles demonstrated the importance of offensive balance, rushing efficiency, and touchdown production in the NFL.
Philadelphia earned its 38-20 victory through a combination of efficient quarterback play and an explosive rushing attack. Jalen Hurts completed 15 of 20 passes for 179 yards and four touchdowns, while Saquon Barkley recorded 150 rushing yards and two total touchdowns. Tank Bigsby added another 104 rushing yards, giving the Eagles an outstanding performance on the ground.
New York had some encouraging individual performances. Jaxson Dart threw for 193 yards without an interception, Wan’Dale Robinson led the Giants in receiving yards, and Graham Gano converted both field-goal attempts.
However, the Giants struggled to establish their running game and finished with just 68 rushing yards. Philadelphia’s 276 rushing yards created the biggest statistical difference between the teams.
The complete player statistics show that the Eagles were more effective at converting offensive opportunities into touchdowns. Their superior rushing production, efficient passing, and defensive pressure ultimately determined the result.
