Bengals vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats

The bengals vs baltimore ravens match player stats from November 27, 2025 tell a much deeper story than the final 32-14 score suggests. Cincinnati defeated Baltimore at M&T Bank Stadium by combining efficient quarterback play, timely scoring, defensive pressure, and excellent ball security at critical moments. Joe Burrow returned to action and threw two second-half touchdown passes, while the Bengals defense forced Baltimore into five turnovers.

For anyone studying this matchup, the box score reveals several important details. Ja’Marr Chase finished with 110 receiving yards on seven catches, Chase Brown contributed 78 rushing yards and 35 receiving yards, and Evan McPherson produced 20 points with six field goals. On Baltimore’s side, Isaiah Likely gained 95 receiving yards, Derrick Henry rushed for 60 yards and a touchdown, and Lamar Jackson passed for 246 yards but finished without a touchdown and threw one interception.

The result was also shaped by possession and third-down performance. Cincinnati ran 80 offensive plays compared with Baltimore’s 57 and held the ball for 38:46. The Bengals converted 8 of 19 third downs, while Baltimore converted only 3 of 10. Those differences help explain why Cincinnati was able to control the game despite Baltimore averaging more yards per play.

Bengals vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats

The most useful way to understand this game is to separate individual production from team-level efficiency. A player can post impressive numbers while his team struggles, and that happened in several areas during this matchup.

Cincinnati finished with 382 total yards, including 254 passing yards and 128 rushing yards. Baltimore recorded 346 total yards, with 223 passing yards and 123 rushing yards. On a basic yardage comparison, the difference was not enormous. The larger separation came from turnovers, sustained drives, third-down conversion, and scoring opportunities.

Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

The scoring pattern was unusual because Baltimore opened the game with the lead before Cincinnati gradually took control.

Quarter	Bengals	Ravens
First	3	7
Second	9	0
Third	14	7
Fourth	6	0
Final	32	14

Baltimore led 7-3 after the first quarter following Derrick Henry’s 28-yard touchdown run. Cincinnati responded with three second-quarter field goals to move ahead 12-7 at halftime.

The third quarter became the turning point. Tanner Hudson caught a 14-yard touchdown pass from Burrow, Keaton Mitchell answered with an 18-yard rushing touchdown for Baltimore, and Andrei Iosivas then caught a 29-yard touchdown from Burrow with only 15 seconds remaining in the quarter. Cincinnati entered the fourth quarter ahead 26-14.

The Bengals added two more field goals in the fourth quarter, including a 52-yard kick from McPherson, to complete the 32-14 victory.

Joe Burrow’s Return and Passing Performance

Joe Burrow’s return was one of the central storylines in the matchup.

According to the game box score, Burrow completed 24 of 46 passes for 261 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions. He was sacked once for seven yards and recorded an 83.7 passer rating. ESPN’s statistical presentation also lists a 53.9 QBR.

The raw completion percentage was 52.2%, so this was not a high-volume efficiency performance in the conventional sense. However, the context matters.

Burrow was returning after not playing since Week 2, according to the AP recap carried by ESPN. He was able to remain turnover-free and produced both of Cincinnati’s passing touchdowns after halftime.

His biggest value came from staying composed as the game progressed.

Burrow’s Key Numbers

• Completions: 24
• Attempts: 46
• Passing yards: 261
• Completion rate: 52.2%
• Passing touchdowns: 2
• Interceptions: 0
• Sacks: 1
• Sack yards lost: 7
• Pass average: 5.7 yards
• Passer rating: 83.7
• QBR: 53.9

The important distinction is between passing volume and passing impact. Burrow attempted 46 passes, but Cincinnati did not need him to throw for 350 or 400 yards. The Bengals used field goals, rushing production, and defensive takeaways to turn moderate offensive efficiency into a comfortable victory.

His touchdown passes to Hudson and Iosivas were particularly important because both arrived during the third quarter, when Cincinnati transformed a close game into a two-score advantage.

Lamar Jackson’s Passing Numbers

Lamar Jackson finished with 17 completions on 32 attempts for 246 passing yards. He averaged 7.7 yards per attempt, but he did not throw a touchdown and was intercepted once. He was also sacked three times for 23 yards. His listed passer rating was 65.4, with a 21.3 QBR.

Those numbers illustrate why passing yardage alone does not explain the outcome.

Jackson’s 7.7 yards per attempt was actually higher than Burrow’s 5.7. Baltimore also generated several substantial gains through the passing game. Isaiah Likely had a 43-yard reception, while Derrick Henry produced a 44-yard catch.

The problem was converting those opportunities into points while avoiding negative plays.

Baltimore’s lone passing interception came early in the fourth quarter. Jackson was attempting to find Mark Andrews near the Cincinnati 8-yard line when Demetrius Knight Jr. intercepted the pass and returned it 39 yards. The Ravens had driven deep into Cincinnati territory, but the turnover ended the scoring opportunity.

That sequence was especially damaging because Baltimore was already trailing 26-14.

Ja’Marr Chase Leads Cincinnati’s Receiving Attack

Ja’Marr Chase was the leading Cincinnati receiver and one of the most productive players in the game.

He finished with seven receptions for 110 yards on 14 targets. His average was 15.7 yards per reception, and his longest reception went for 43 yards.

The 14 targets are important because they show how frequently Cincinnati looked toward its primary receiving threat.

Chase did not score a touchdown, but his influence extended beyond the scoring column. His ability to create first downs and gain significant yardage helped Cincinnati sustain drives. He also remained involved throughout the game rather than producing one isolated big play.

The Bengals repeatedly used Chase as a chain-moving option, and his 110 receiving yards accounted for a large portion of Cincinnati’s passing production.

Chase’s Receiving Profile

Category	Stat
Receptions	7
Targets	14
Receiving yards	110
Average	15.7
Touchdowns	0
Long reception	43 yards

The 14 targets compared with seven catches also show that Baltimore’s defense did not make Chase completely unavailable. Instead, the Bengals continued going to him even when some targets were incomplete.

That willingness to keep using Chase helped open opportunities for other players later in the game.

Chase Brown Provides Balance

Chase Brown was another important contributor for Cincinnati.

He carried the ball 15 times for 78 yards, averaging 5.2 yards per carry. His longest run went for 18 yards. He also caught seven passes for 35 yards on seven targets.

That produced 113 yards from scrimmage before accounting for any other contributions.

Brown’s rushing average was particularly useful because Cincinnati did not dominate Baltimore on a per-carry basis across the entire game. The Bengals finished with 128 rushing yards on 33 attempts, or 3.9 yards per attempt.

Brown therefore provided several efficient runs that helped keep Cincinnati’s offense functional without requiring Burrow to carry every possession through the air.

His receiving involvement also gave Burrow a dependable short-area option.

Samaje Perine Adds More Rushing Volume

Samaje Perine received 14 carries for 39 yards, averaging 2.8 yards per carry.

His numbers were not as efficient as Brown’s, but his workload mattered. Cincinnati finished with 33 rushing attempts, compared with only 22 for Baltimore. That difference helped the Bengals control the clock and maintain possession.

Perine also caught two passes for 15 yards.

His contribution was therefore more about workload and game management than explosive production.

Baltimore’s Derrick Henry Remains a Major Factor

Derrick Henry opened Baltimore’s scoring with a 28-yard touchdown run.

He finished with 10 rushing attempts for 60 yards, averaging 6.0 yards per carry. His longest run was the 28-yard touchdown. He also caught one pass for 44 yards.

That 44-yard reception was one of Baltimore’s most significant passing plays. Henry therefore contributed 104 yards from scrimmage through rushing and receiving.

The issue for Baltimore was usage volume. Henry had only 10 rushing attempts while the Ravens had 22 total rushing attempts.

Baltimore averaged 5.6 yards per rushing attempt, which was actually higher than Cincinnati’s 3.9.

That makes the final result more interesting. Cincinnati did not win because it completely shut down Baltimore’s running game. Instead, the Bengals benefited from controlling possessions, forcing turnovers, and limiting Baltimore’s ability to turn offensive production into points.

Keaton Mitchell Provides a Spark

Keaton Mitchell delivered one of Baltimore’s most explosive individual plays.

He carried the ball twice for 19 yards and scored an 18-yard touchdown. He also caught two passes for 12 yards and returned three kickoffs for 91 yards.

His 30.3-yard kickoff return average was excellent and gave Baltimore valuable field-position potential.

However, his offensive rushing workload was limited to only two carries.

His 18-yard touchdown run showed how quickly he could change a possession, but Baltimore needed more sustained production elsewhere.

Isaiah Likely Leads Baltimore’s Receiving Numbers

Isaiah Likely finished with five receptions for 95 yards on six targets. His average was 19.0 yards per reception, with a long reception of 43 yards.

Among Baltimore’s receivers, Likely produced the most yardage.

His numbers also demonstrate that Baltimore was capable of producing explosive passing plays. The Ravens finished with 246 passing yards in the player-level statistics provided, while the team passing total after sack yardage was 223 yards.

That distinction is useful when reading football statistics. Individual passing totals and official team passing totals can differ because team passing statistics account for sack yardage.

Mark Andrews Contributes 47 Receiving Yards

Mark Andrews caught four passes for 47 yards on six targets.

He became particularly important during Baltimore’s fourth-quarter attempt to generate a comeback. Jackson connected with Andrews several times during the late drive, including completions of 14 and 8 yards.

However, the drive ultimately ended in a turnover when Jackson’s pass intended for Andrews was intercepted.

That illustrates how a player can contribute meaningful yardage without the possession producing points.

Bengals Defense Changes the Game

The defensive statistics provide one of the clearest explanations for Cincinnati’s victory.

The Bengals recorded:

• 56 total tackles
• 32 solo tackles
• 2 sacks
• 2 tackles for loss
• 6 passes defended
• 5 quarterback hits
• 1 interception

Joseph Ossai recorded both of Cincinnati’s sacks, while Jordan Battle led the team with 10 tackles, including six solo tackles.

The most important number, however, was Baltimore’s five turnovers.

Baltimore lost four fumbles and threw one interception. Cincinnati lost only one fumble and threw no interceptions. ESPN’s team statistics show the turnover difference as 1 for Cincinnati versus 5 for Baltimore.

A four-turnover advantage is enormous.

Baltimore’s Turnovers Become the Defining Statistic

The final score can make the game appear one-sided from start to finish, but the underlying numbers were more competitive.

Baltimore produced 346 total yards and averaged 6.1 yards per play. Cincinnati produced 382 yards at 4.8 yards per play.

So why did Cincinnati win by 18 points?

Turnovers are a major part of the answer.

The Ravens repeatedly gave Cincinnati additional possessions, while the Bengals protected the football much better.

Baltimore’s four lost fumbles were particularly damaging because fumbles can erase otherwise productive drives. The interception thrown by Jackson in the fourth quarter was also costly because it occurred deep in Cincinnati territory.

This is one of the clearest lessons from the game: offensive efficiency cannot always compensate for poor possession security.

Evan McPherson Scores 20 Points

Evan McPherson had a perfect night on field goals.

He made all six attempts, including a 52-yard field goal, and converted both extra-point attempts. That gave him 20 total points.

His field goals were not simply statistical padding.

Cincinnati scored three field goals in the second quarter, which allowed the Bengals to turn a 7-3 deficit into a 12-7 halftime lead.

The 52-yard field goal in the fourth quarter extended Cincinnati’s advantage from 26-14 to 29-14.

He then added a 41-yard field goal to reach 32 points.

This performance shows the value of finishing drives even when an offense does not consistently reach the end zone.

Third-Down Efficiency Gives Cincinnati Control

Third down was another major difference.

Cincinnati converted 8 of 19 third-down attempts, while Baltimore converted only 3 of 10.

The Bengals therefore sustained more possessions and kept their offense on the field.

This helped produce 80 offensive plays compared with 57 for Baltimore.

That is a difference of 23 plays.

When one team runs 80 plays and the other runs 57, the advantage in opportunities becomes substantial. Cincinnati had more chances to accumulate yardage, attempt field goals, and force Baltimore’s defense to remain on the field.

Time of Possession Favors Cincinnati

Cincinnati possessed the football for 38:46.

Baltimore had the ball for only 21:14.

The nearly 17-minute difference is significant.

Time of possession is not automatically a winning statistic, but in this game it reflected Cincinnati’s ability to sustain drives and Baltimore’s inability to maintain possessions.

The Bengals’ 80 offensive plays were another reflection of the same pattern.

Instead of relying exclusively on explosive plays, Cincinnati repeatedly extended drives and forced Baltimore to defend for longer stretches.

Cincinnati’s Two Passing Touchdowns

Cincinnati scored two passing touchdowns, both during the third quarter.

The first came when Burrow found Tanner Hudson for a 14-yard touchdown with 7:22 remaining in the quarter.

The second arrived with 15 seconds left when Burrow connected with Andrei Iosivas for a 29-yard touchdown.

Those two plays changed the complexion of the game.

Before Hudson’s touchdown, Cincinnati led only 12-7. After the Hudson score, Baltimore responded with Mitchell’s touchdown to make it 19-14.

Then Iosivas gave Cincinnati another touchdown immediately before the end of the quarter.

The Bengals entered the fourth quarter with a 12-point lead.

Andrei Iosivas Delivers a Timely Touchdown

Andrei Iosivas caught only one pass, but it was a major one.

His lone reception went for 29 yards and a touchdown. He was targeted twice.

This is a perfect example of why reception totals alone do not tell the whole story.

Iosivas had limited volume, but his one successful target produced six points and helped create the decisive fourth-quarter margin.

Tanner Hudson’s Touchdown Matters Too

Tanner Hudson also caught one pass for 14 yards, and that reception resulted in a touchdown.

Like Iosivas, Hudson did not dominate the target share. Instead, his contribution was concentrated in a critical scoring moment.

Cincinnati therefore received touchdown production from secondary receiving options while Chase served as the primary yardage producer.

That distribution made it more difficult for Baltimore to focus exclusively on stopping one player.

Bengals vs Ravens Match Player Stats: Defensive Comparison

The defensive numbers were competitive in some categories, but the turnover margin separated the teams.

Defensive Category	Bengals	Ravens
Total tackles	56	81
Solo tackles	32	44
Sacks	2	1
Tackles for loss	2	4
Passes defended	6	6
QB hits	5	7
Interceptions	1	0
Defensive TDs	0	0

Baltimore recorded more tackles because it spent significant time defending Cincinnati’s 80-play offense.

The Ravens also produced seven quarterback hits and four tackles for loss, showing that their defense was capable of creating pressure.

However, Cincinnati’s defense made the more important plays at key moments.

Jordan Battle Leads Cincinnati in Tackles

Jordan Battle finished with 10 tackles, including six solo tackles.

His activity was important because Baltimore continued to use Henry and other runners, while Jackson also contributed as a runner.

Battle’s involvement therefore reflected Cincinnati’s need to handle both conventional rushing plays and Baltimore’s quarterback-run threat.

Joseph Ossai Produces Two Sacks

Joseph Ossai recorded two sacks.

Baltimore’s offensive line allowed three sacks in total, with Jackson losing 23 yards on those plays.

Pressure was especially important because Cincinnati did not need to blitz relentlessly to create disruption.

Ossai’s two sacks helped generate negative plays and contributed to the overall defensive pressure that limited Baltimore’s ability to sustain drives.

Roquan Smith Leads Baltimore’s Tacklers

Roquan Smith recorded 11 tackles, three of them solo.

His 11 tackles were the highest individual total for either team.

The high number also reflects how often Baltimore’s defense had to respond to Cincinnati’s extended possessions.

Smith remained heavily involved, but individual tackle totals cannot erase the impact of the Ravens’ five turnovers.

The Hidden Impact of Field Position

Special teams played a meaningful supporting role.

Cincinnati’s Gary Brightwell returned three kickoffs for 59 yards, averaging 19.7 yards per return.

Baltimore generated more kick-return yardage. Keaton Mitchell had three returns for 91 yards, while Rasheen Ali had three for 71 yards. Baltimore finished with 162 kickoff-return yards at an average of 27.0 yards per return.

Despite that advantage, Baltimore could not turn its field-position opportunities into enough points.

This is another reason the final score cannot be interpreted solely through yardage.

How the Game Was Actually Won

Several factors combined to produce Cincinnati’s 32-14 victory.

1. Cincinnati Won the Turnover Battle

This was the biggest difference.

Baltimore committed five turnovers compared with Cincinnati’s one.

The Bengals did not need to dominate every statistical category because they consistently received additional opportunities.

2. Cincinnati Controlled Possession

The Bengals possessed the ball for 38:46 compared with 21:14 for Baltimore.

That allowed Cincinnati to run 80 plays.

3. Cincinnati Converted More Third Downs

An 8-of-19 third-down rate was far better than Baltimore’s 3-of-10 performance.

This extended drives and helped Cincinnati control the rhythm.

4. Burrow Avoided Turnovers

Burrow threw two touchdowns and no interceptions.

Jackson threw one interception, and Baltimore also lost four fumbles.

5. McPherson Finished Drives

Cincinnati converted six field-goal attempts.

When the offense failed to finish drives with touchdowns, McPherson still turned possessions into points.

What the Player Statistics Reveal Beyond the Box Score

The most interesting aspect of this matchup is that Baltimore actually produced several strong efficiency numbers.

The Ravens averaged 6.1 yards per play compared with Cincinnati’s 4.8. Their rushing average was 5.6 yards compared with Cincinnati’s 3.9. Jackson averaged 7.7 yards per pass attempt.

Yet Cincinnati won by 18 points.

That contrast demonstrates why evaluating an NFL game requires more than looking at yards per play.

The Bengals were more successful at converting possessions into points while protecting the football.

They also sustained more drives.

The game therefore became a lesson in possession value.

Why the Box Score Can Be Misleading

A casual review might highlight Jackson’s 246 passing yards and Baltimore’s 6.1 yards per play and conclude that the Ravens moved the ball effectively.

That is true, but incomplete.

The Ravens also had:

• Five turnovers
• Only 3 successful third-down conversions
• 21:14 of possession
• No passing touchdowns
• One interception
• Four lost fumbles
• Only 14 total points

Cincinnati’s numbers were not flawless either.

The Bengals completed only 24 of 46 passes and averaged 5.7 yards per passing attempt.

But Cincinnati avoided the catastrophic mistakes that Baltimore made.

That difference ultimately shaped the result.

A Practical Way to Read NFL Match Player Stats

When analyzing a game like this, readers can use a simple five-step process.

Start With the Quarterbacks

Look at completion percentage, passing yards, touchdowns, interceptions, sacks, and yards per attempt.

Do not rely on passing yards alone.

Check Explosive Plays

Look for players with long receptions and long runs.

In this matchup, Henry, Likely, Chase, Iosivas, and Mitchell all produced significant plays.

Examine Turnovers

Turnovers often explain why the scoreboard looks different from the yardage totals.

Compare Third Downs

Third-down conversion reveals how often teams successfully extend drives.

Finish With Possession and Scoring

Time of possession, field goals, red-zone efficiency, and total points provide the final layer of context.

Using these categories together produces a much more accurate understanding than simply listing the leading players.

Cincinnati’s Offensive Distribution

Cincinnati’s offensive production was spread across several players.

Burrow provided the passing volume.

Chase provided the largest receiving output.

Brown provided the leading rushing performance while also contributing as a receiver.

Perine supplied additional carries.

Hudson and Iosivas provided the touchdown receptions.

McPherson converted six field goals.

That distribution is important because Cincinnati did not need one player to dominate every category.

Baltimore’s Offensive Distribution

Baltimore also received production from multiple players.

Henry supplied 60 rushing yards and a touchdown while adding 44 receiving yards.

Likely produced 95 receiving yards.

Andrews added 47 yards.

Mitchell scored a rushing touchdown and added kickoff-return production.

Jackson produced 246 passing yards.

The issue was not a complete absence of offensive production.

The issue was the inability to sustain it without turnovers.

Red-Zone Context

Cincinnati went 1-for-6 in the red zone according to ESPN’s team statistics. Baltimore went 1-for-2.

That is one of the most revealing numbers in the entire game.

Cincinnati scored 32 points despite converting only one of six red-zone opportunities into touchdowns.

The reason was McPherson’s perfect six-for-six field-goal performance.

Baltimore, meanwhile, had fewer red-zone opportunities and did not generate enough points from the possessions it controlled.

This shows how kicking can materially change the scoreboard when an offense struggles to finish drives.

The Importance of Ball Security

Cincinnati had three team fumbles but lost only one.

Baltimore had four team fumbles and lost all four.

That difference directly contributed to Cincinnati receiving more opportunities.

Ball security is often treated as a supporting statistic, but in this matchup it was central to the result.

The Bengals did not need to create a perfect offensive performance.

They simply needed to capitalize on Baltimore’s mistakes while limiting their own.

Final Statistical Takeaway

The bengals vs baltimore ravens match player stats show a game in which raw offensive efficiency and final scoring were not perfectly aligned.

Baltimore generated 346 total yards and averaged 6.1 yards per play. Cincinnati generated 382 yards while averaging 4.8 yards per play. Yet Cincinnati scored 32 points and Baltimore scored only 14.

The difference came from possession control, third-down execution, turnover margin, and Cincinnati’s ability to convert opportunities into points.

Burrow’s return was significant, but his value was not simply measured by his 261 passing yards.

Chase’s 110 receiving yards provided the explosive receiving production.

Brown’s 78 rushing yards helped balance the offense.

McPherson’s six field goals supplied 20 points.

Ossai’s two sacks added defensive pressure.

Battle’s 10 tackles represented consistent defensive involvement.

On Baltimore’s side, Henry and Likely produced strong individual numbers, while Mitchell delivered explosive special-teams and rushing plays. But the five turnovers prevented those contributions from translating into a competitive final score.

For readers researching this game, ESPN’s official game box score provides the underlying statistical record for the matchup.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Bengals vs Ravens game on November 27, 2025?

The Cincinnati Bengals defeated the Baltimore Ravens 32-14 at M&T Bank Stadium. Cincinnati trailed 7-3 after the first quarter but took a 12-7 halftime lead and pulled away in the second half.

How did Joe Burrow perform against the Ravens?

Joe Burrow completed 24 of 46 passes for 261 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions. He was sacked once for seven yards and finished with an 83.7 passer rating.

How many yards did Ja’Marr Chase have?

Ja’Marr Chase recorded seven receptions for 110 yards on 14 targets. His longest reception was 43 yards, and he did not score a touchdown.

How did Lamar Jackson perform in the game?

Lamar Jackson completed 17 of 32 passes for 246 yards, with no passing touchdowns and one interception. He was sacked three times for 23 yards and finished with a 65.4 passer rating.

How many turnovers did the Ravens have?

Baltimore committed five turnovers, including four lost fumbles and one interception. Cincinnati committed one turnover.

Who scored the most points for Cincinnati?

Evan McPherson scored 20 points by making all six of his field-goal attempts and both extra-point attempts. His longest field goal was 52 yards.

Conclusion

The bengals vs baltimore ravens match player stats from November 27, 2025 provide a detailed picture of how Cincinnati turned a competitive statistical matchup into a 32-14 victory.

Joe Burrow returned with two touchdown passes and no interceptions. Ja’Marr Chase produced 110 receiving yards, Chase Brown added 78 rushing yards, and Evan McPherson converted all six of his field-goal attempts.

Baltimore had its own productive performances. Derrick Henry delivered 104 yards from scrimmage and a rushing touchdown, Isaiah Likely recorded 95 receiving yards, and Keaton Mitchell added an explosive rushing touchdown along with strong kickoff-return production.

The decisive difference was not simply total yardage. Cincinnati controlled possession, ran 80 plays, converted 8 of 19 third downs, and held the ball for nearly 39 minutes. Most importantly, the Bengals committed only one turnover while Baltimore committed five.

Those numbers explain why Cincinnati could win comfortably despite Baltimore averaging more yards per play and producing several explosive offensive plays.