Connecticut Sun vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats

Connecticut Sun vs Indiana Fever match player stats from the August 2026 meeting tell a much bigger story than the final score alone. Indiana Fever defeated the Connecticut Sun 111-91 at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis, with Caitlin Clark and Kelsey Mitchell producing 34 points apiece. Clark also added 12 assists and 5 rebounds, while Diamond Miller led Connecticut with 19 points. The official WNBA game record lists the contest as August 28, 2026 in Indianapolis, although it was published in some places on August 29. (WNBA)

The 20-point result completed a 3-0 season sweep for Indiana. The Fever had already won the first two meetings, 85-75 in June and 123-88 in July. (WNBA)

What makes this matchup especially useful for basketball analysis is the contrast in efficiency. Connecticut actually started the game better and led early, but Indiana’s second-quarter surge changed the game. The Fever finished shooting 58% from the field and 41% from three, while Connecticut shot 46% overall and 32% from outside. Indiana also committed fewer turnovers and created more defensive events through steals and blocks.

Connecticut Sun vs Indiana Fever match player stats at a glance

The most important numbers from the game are summarized below.

Category	Connecticut Sun	Indiana Fever
Final Score	91	111
Field Goals	35-76	39-67
Field Goal %	46%	58%
Three-Pointers	9-28	12-29
Three-Point %	32%	41%
Free Throws	12-13	21-32
Free Throw %	92%	66%
Rebounds	26	34
Assists	22	23
Turnovers	16	12
Steals	9	13
Blocks	1	6

Indiana’s advantage was not simply a matter of making more shots. The Fever attempted nine fewer field goals but scored 20 more points. That difference came from superior shooting efficiency, more three-point production, more free throw attempts and stronger defensive activity.

The official WNBA box score also records six lead changes and three ties, showing that the game was competitive during its opening stages before Indiana established control. (WNBA)

How the game changed quarter by quarter

The quarter-by-quarter scoring explains the final result better than the final score by itself.

Quarter	Connecticut	Indiana
First	28	19
Second	15	39
Third	23	21
Fourth	25	32
Final	91	111

Connecticut won the first quarter 28-19, giving the Sun an early nine-point advantage.

That lead did not survive the second quarter.

Indiana exploded for 39 points in the second period while Connecticut scored only 15. The Fever therefore entered halftime with a 58-43 advantage, turning a nine-point deficit into a 15-point lead in only one quarter.

The official game recap identifies a key stretch in which Indiana closed the first half with an 18-2 run. Clark and Mitchell combined for the first 12 points of that run, helping transform the contest. (WNBA)

Connecticut did attempt to respond in the third quarter. The Sun reduced the deficit to 10 points at 62-52, but Indiana answered with a 14-5 run that pushed the margin back out.

That sequence is important because it shows why the final score was not simply the result of one explosive quarter. Connecticut had opportunities to recover, but Indiana repeatedly answered those runs.

The Fever then outscored Connecticut 32-25 in the fourth quarter to close the game.

Connecticut Sun player performance

Diamond Miller leads Connecticut in scoring

Diamond Miller was Connecticut’s leading scorer with 19 points.

Her scoring was particularly important because the Sun needed reliable offensive production after Indiana’s second-quarter surge. Miller helped Connecticut establish its early rhythm and remained the team’s highest-scoring player when the game ended.

Nell Angloma was another major contributor, scoring 17 points and grabbing 7 rebounds. According to the Connecticut Sun’s official recap, the 17 points represented a new career high for Angloma. (Connecticut Sun)

Aaliyah Edwards and Hailey Van Lith each scored 12 points.

That gave Connecticut four players in double figures, which is a useful reminder that the Sun’s offensive problem was not simply a lack of scoring options. The larger issue was maintaining efficiency and defensive resistance against Indiana’s high-powered backcourt.

Aaliyah Edwards provides all-around production

Edwards led Connecticut with 7 rebounds and also recorded 4 steals.

Those four steals were especially notable because Connecticut finished with nine steals as a team. Edwards therefore accounted for nearly half of the Sun’s total steals.

Her contribution illustrates why traditional scoring numbers do not fully explain the game.

A player can contribute through rebounding, defensive pressure and possession creation even when another teammate leads the team in points.

Saniya Rivers and Raegan Beers share the assist lead

Saniya Rivers and Raegan Beers each recorded 5 assists according to the supplied game data.

That meant Connecticut generated 22 assists overall, only one fewer than Indiana’s 23.

The similarity in assist totals is significant. It suggests that the largest difference was not simply Connecticut failing to pass the ball effectively. Instead, Indiana converted its opportunities at a much higher rate.

Connecticut made 35 of 76 field-goal attempts.

Indiana made 39 of only 67.

That is the efficiency gap that stands out most clearly.

Indiana Fever player performance

Caitlin Clark records 34 points and 12 assists

Caitlin Clark produced one of the game’s most complete individual performances.

She finished with:

• 34 points
• 12 assists
• 5 rebounds
• 3 steals
• 6 made three-pointers

The official Fever highlight page confirms the 34-point, 12-assist and 5-rebound line.

Clark’s 12 assists are particularly important when evaluating her performance because her influence extended beyond scoring.

She was simultaneously the Fever’s leading facilitator and one of its two 34-point scorers.

That combination put considerable pressure on Connecticut’s defense. If defenders focused heavily on Clark’s scoring opportunities, she could create shots for teammates. If they helped too aggressively, Indiana had other perimeter scoring available.

Clark’s six made three-pointers also helped stretch the defense.

Kelsey Mitchell matches Clark with 34 points

Kelsey Mitchell also scored 34 points, giving Indiana two players with the same scoring total.

Mitchell added 4 assists and made four three-pointers.

The official WNBA recap notes that Clark and Mitchell each reached 34 points and that their combined performance extended a single-season record for the Fever duo reaching 30 or more points in the same game. (WNBA)

Mitchell’s scoring consistency was another major factor.

The official recap also reported that she entered the game with a long streak of 20-point performances and extended that streak to 24 consecutive games. (WNBA)

For Connecticut, this created a difficult defensive problem.

Stopping Clark alone was not enough.

Stopping Mitchell alone was not enough.

Indiana had two guards capable of generating major scoring totals, and both delivered in the same game.

Makayla Timpson controls the glass

Makayla Timpson led Indiana with 8 rebounds.

Indiana finished with 34 rebounds compared with Connecticut’s 26, a difference of eight.

That advantage mattered because additional possessions can become especially valuable when a team is already shooting efficiently.

Timpson also recorded 2 blocks, helping Indiana finish with six team blocks.

Aliyah Boston anchors the interior defense

Aliyah Boston finished with 3 blocks, tying her for the team lead in that category.

Her defensive presence was part of Indiana’s six-block total.

Boston also contributed offensively, scoring 14 points, according to the official recap. (WNBA)

Her role gave Indiana another layer beyond the Clark-Mitchell backcourt combination.

The Fever could attack from outside while also using their interior players to defend the paint and contest shots.

Shooting efficiency explains the 20-point difference

One of the most useful lessons from the Connecticut Sun vs Indiana Fever match player stats is that shooting percentage can tell a very different story from shot volume.

Connecticut attempted 76 field goals.

Indiana attempted only 67.

Yet Indiana scored 20 more points.

That happened because Indiana made 39 shots, compared with Connecticut’s 35, while shooting 58% overall.

Connecticut shot 46%.

The nine-percentage-point difference in field-goal accuracy is substantial.

Indiana also made 12 three-pointers compared with Connecticut’s nine.

The three-point difference was only three makes, but those additional makes were valuable because they produced nine extra points from long range alone.

The Fever shot 41% from three-point range.

Connecticut shot 32%.

Free throws tell another part of the story

Connecticut actually had the better free-throw percentage.

The Sun converted 12 of 13, or 92%.

Indiana converted 21 of 32, or 66%.

At first glance, that might look like a weakness for Indiana.

But percentage is only one part of free-throw analysis.

Indiana attempted 32 free throws.

Connecticut attempted only 13.

So even with a lower conversion rate, Indiana made nine more free throws.

That produced another meaningful scoring advantage.

This is a good example of why a single percentage should not be interpreted without considering volume.

Turnovers and defensive pressure

Indiana committed 12 turnovers compared with Connecticut’s 16.

The four-turnover difference gave the Fever another possession advantage.

The defensive numbers were even more striking.

Indiana recorded 13 steals and 6 blocks.

Connecticut recorded 9 steals and 1 block.

That means Indiana finished with 19 combined steals and blocks, while Connecticut recorded 10.

The difference does not automatically mean every defensive play directly became a basket, but it shows that Indiana created more disruptive defensive events.

The WNBA’s official game summary also records Indiana with 18 fast-break points compared with 12 for Connecticut. (WNBA)

That connection matters.

Steals can create transition opportunities.

Blocks can prevent scoring chances.

Defensive pressure can also force hurried possessions and poor shot selection.

Indiana combined those elements effectively.

Why Connecticut’s strong opening did not last

The most interesting tactical feature of the game was Connecticut’s opening.

The Sun scored 28 points in the first quarter, while Indiana scored only 19.

That is not the start expected from a team that would eventually lose by 20.

Connecticut’s early success shows that the matchup itself was not predetermined by the opening possessions.

The problem was maintaining that level of effectiveness.

Indiana’s second-quarter response was decisive.

The Fever scored 39 points in the period, more than twice Connecticut’s 15.

That 24-point second-quarter difference was larger than the final 20-point margin.

In other words, the entire game essentially swung during that one period.

For anyone studying the Connecticut Sun vs Indiana Fever match player stats, this is one of the most important details to remember.

The final score does not fully communicate how dramatically the second quarter changed the game’s direction.

Indiana’s backcourt combination created the central matchup problem

Clark and Mitchell combining for 68 points was the clearest statistical feature of the contest.

Together they accounted for more than 60% of Indiana’s 111 points.

Their production also came in different ways.

Clark supplied scoring, three-point shooting, playmaking and steals.

Mitchell supplied high-volume scoring and additional perimeter shooting.

This creates a difficult defensive balance.

A defense can attempt to crowd one scorer, but doing so can leave another scorer open.

Indiana’s 23 assists also demonstrate that the offensive system was not dependent entirely on isolation scoring.

The ball moved effectively enough for the Fever to generate high-quality opportunities while their primary scorers remained aggressive.

The season series was one-sided

The 2026 season series ended with Indiana winning all three meetings.

Game 1

Indiana defeated Connecticut 85-75 in the June meeting.

The official WNBA record lists the game on June 13, 2026 at Mohegan Sun Arena. Clark scored 25 points, while Kelsey Mitchell added 19 and Aliyah Boston recorded 13 points and 11 rebounds. (WNBA)

Game 2

Indiana then produced a much larger victory, defeating Connecticut 123-88 in July.

The 35-point margin was the biggest result of the three meetings. (WNBA)

Game 3

The final meeting ended with Indiana winning 111-91.

The 20-point victory completed the season sweep. (WNBA)

Across the three games, Indiana therefore won by margins of 10, 35 and 20 points.

That pattern shows that the Fever consistently controlled the season matchup, although the individual games developed differently.

What the matchup says about both teams

The statistics reveal several broader basketball themes.

Connecticut had enough offensive contributors

Connecticut was not completely shut down.

Four players reached double figures, and the Sun scored 91 points.

Miller led the team with 19, while Angloma added 17.

The team also finished with 22 assists.

Those numbers indicate that Connecticut was capable of generating offense.

The challenge was sustaining it against Indiana’s defensive pressure.

Indiana combined efficiency with volume scoring

Indiana’s 58% field-goal shooting is the clearest team statistic.

But the Fever also created enough attempts from the free-throw line and three-point range to maximize scoring opportunities.

The combination was difficult for Connecticut to overcome.

Defensive disruption mattered

Indiana’s 13 steals and six blocks created a substantial defensive footprint.

The Fever also held a 34-26 advantage on the boards.

Those numbers helped Indiana control both ends of the floor.

A closer look at the possession battle

A useful way to analyze basketball beyond points is to examine what happened to possessions.

Connecticut:

• 76 field-goal attempts
• 13 free-throw attempts
• 16 turnovers
• 26 rebounds

Indiana:

• 67 field-goal attempts
• 32 free-throw attempts
• 12 turnovers
• 34 rebounds

The numbers show an interesting contrast.

Connecticut attempted more field goals, but Indiana created more free-throw opportunities and committed fewer turnovers.

Indiana also collected eight more rebounds.

That combination helped offset its nine-fewer field-goal attempts.

This is why simply counting shots can be misleading.

The more useful question is how efficiently each possession was converted into points.

Indiana’s 111 points from 67 field-goal attempts demonstrate that the Fever were exceptionally efficient with their offensive opportunities.

Why the 58% shooting number matters

Shooting 58% from the field over a full WNBA game is a major offensive indicator.

Indiana did not need to rely on a massive shot advantage.

Instead, the Fever generated points by converting a high percentage of their opportunities.

This is especially important against a team that can produce 91 points.

Connecticut’s offense was good enough to score, but Indiana’s offense was more efficient.

That distinction explains why the game became a 20-point result rather than a close contest.

The attendance and venue context

The game was played at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis, with an announced attendance of 17,274.

The official WNBA game record confirms the venue, attendance and officiating crew of Charles Watson, Isaac Barnett and Kelly Broomfield. (WNBA)

The home environment also formed part of Indiana’s season profile.

The Fever entered the game with a 26-14 overall record and 14-6 home record, while Connecticut was 10-29 overall and 3-16 on the road, based on the supplied game data.

Those records provide useful context, but they should not replace the actual game statistics.

The matchup itself still had to be played, and Connecticut demonstrated that by jumping ahead in the opening quarter.

What readers should look for when comparing player stats

When evaluating a box score like this one, focusing only on the highest scorer can hide important information.

A stronger analysis should examine:

1. Scoring efficiency: Who converted the highest percentage of shots?
2. Three-point shooting: Which team created and converted more perimeter opportunities?
3. Free-throw volume: Which team got to the line more often?
4. Rebounding: Did one team generate extra possessions?
5. Turnovers: Which team protected the ball?
6. Assists: Were points created individually or through team offense?
7. Defensive plays: Which players generated steals and blocks?
8. Quarter splits: When did the game’s momentum actually change?

Using those categories produces a much clearer understanding of the matchup than simply reading the final score.

The biggest statistical takeaways

The most important points from the Connecticut Sun vs Indiana Fever match player stats can be condensed into several observations.

First, Indiana’s shooting efficiency was decisive.

The Fever shot 58% from the field and 41% from three.

Second, Clark and Mitchell provided extraordinary scoring balance.

Both finished with 34 points.

Third, Clark added major playmaking value.

Her 12 assists meant she influenced the game even beyond her 34 points.

Fourth, Indiana won the possession-related categories that mattered.

The Fever had more rebounds, fewer turnovers, more steals and more blocks.

Fifth, Connecticut’s first-quarter success was not enough.

The 28-19 opening advantage disappeared during a 39-point second quarter by Indiana.

Sixth, the season series followed a consistent pattern.

Indiana won all three meetings in 2026, with the final matchup ending 111-91. (WNBA)

Frequently Asked Questions

Who led the Connecticut Sun in scoring against the Indiana Fever?

Diamond Miller led Connecticut with 19 points. Nell Angloma followed with 17 points and seven rebounds.

Who led the Indiana Fever in scoring?

Caitlin Clark and Kelsey Mitchell tied for the team lead with 34 points each. Clark also recorded 12 assists and five rebounds.

What was the final score between Connecticut and Indiana?

The Indiana Fever defeated the Connecticut Sun 111-91.

How many assists did Caitlin Clark have?

Caitlin Clark recorded 12 assists in the game, along with 34 points and five rebounds.

How many rebounds did Makayla Timpson have?

Makayla Timpson led Indiana with eight rebounds.

Did Indiana win the 2026 season series?

Yes. Indiana won all three meetings against Connecticut during the 2026 regular season, with victories of 85-75, 123-88 and 111-91. (WNBA)

Conclusion

The Connecticut Sun vs Indiana Fever match player stats from the final 2026 meeting show a game decided by efficiency, defensive disruption and a dominant Indiana backcourt.

Connecticut started strongly, scoring 28 points in the first quarter, but Indiana responded with a 39-point second quarter. From there, the Fever maintained control and eventually secured a 111-91 victory.

Caitlin Clark and Kelsey Mitchell were the headline performers with 34 points apiece. Clark added 12 assists and five rebounds, while Mitchell contributed four assists. Makayla Timpson led Indiana in rebounding with eight, and Aliyah Boston helped protect the interior with three blocks.

For Connecticut, Diamond Miller led the scoring with 19 points, while Nell Angloma contributed 17 points and seven rebounds. Aaliyah Edwards added seven rebounds and four steals, giving the Sun valuable defensive production.

The team statistics explain the larger picture. Indiana shot 58% from the field compared with Connecticut’s 46%, made 12 three-pointers compared with nine, committed four fewer turnovers, collected eight more rebounds and generated significantly more steals and blocks.

The three-game season series therefore ended with Indiana holding a 3-0 advantage. The individual games were different in their flow, but the statistical pattern remained clear: Indiana consistently found ways to turn efficient offense and defensive pressure into separation.

Official game reference: WNBA official game summary and box score