Tennessee Titans vs 49ers Match Player Stats

The tennessee titans vs 49ers match player stats provide a detailed look at how Tennessee secured a 19-13 preseason victory over the San Francisco 49ers on August 14, 2026. The game featured contrasting offensive approaches, productive rushing performances, multiple quarterbacks on both sidelines, and important contributions from special teams. Although San Francisco recorded more passing yards and receptions, Tennessee created a stronger balance between its rushing attack, defensive pressure, and field-goal production.

Tennessee finished with 167 rushing yards on 31 attempts, while San Francisco managed 84 yards on 28 carries. That difference played a major role in the final result. The Titans also benefited from Joey Slye’s perfect kicking performance, as he converted all four field-goal attempts and added an extra point. San Francisco moved the ball through the air more effectively, recording 238 passing yards, but could not turn its greater passing production into enough points.

Because this was a preseason contest, the individual numbers deserve to be viewed in the context of player evaluation, quarterback development, roster competition, and team execution rather than a regular-season divisional matchup. The statistics reveal which players produced efficiently, which units controlled important areas, and where both teams had room to improve.

Tennessee Titans vs 49ers Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The August 14 matchup ended with Tennessee defeating San Francisco by six points. The Titans established their advantage through a productive ground game and reliable kicking, while the 49ers relied more heavily on their passing offense.

Final Score and Game Information

Game Detail	Tennessee Titans	San Francisco 49ers
Final score	19	13
Game result	Win	Loss
Game type	Preseason	Preseason
Game date	August 14, 2026	August 14, 2026
Venue status	Away	Home
Passing yards	112	238
Rushing yards	167	84
Total passing and rushing yards	279	322
Rushing touchdowns	1	1
Passing touchdowns	0	0
Interceptions	0	0
Field goals made	4	2

The most interesting aspect of this result is the difference between total offensive yardage and the final score. San Francisco accumulated 322 combined passing and rushing yards, compared with Tennessee’s 279. However, the 49ers did not convert their yardage advantage into a winning score.

Tennessee’s rushing production helped keep its offense productive without depending on a high-volume passing attack. The Titans also converted their scoring opportunities into field goals consistently.

Quarter-by-Quarter Score

Quarter	Tennessee Titans	San Francisco 49ers
First Quarter	7	0
Second Quarter	6	7
Third Quarter	3	3
Fourth Quarter	3	3
Final	19	13

Tennessee opened the game with seven points in the first quarter, creating an early advantage. San Francisco responded with seven points in the second quarter, but the Titans added six points to maintain their lead.

Both teams scored three points in each of the final two quarters. That consistency meant San Francisco never managed to erase the deficit.

The opening quarter was particularly important because Tennessee established an advantage before the 49ers could settle into their offensive rhythm.

Tennessee Titans Quarterback Statistics

Tennessee used four quarterbacks during the contest: Cam Ward, Will Levis, Mitchell Trubisky, and Hendon Hooker. Their combined passing production was 12 completions on 26 attempts for 112 yards, with no passing touchdowns or interceptions.

The distribution of quarterback opportunities makes this game different from a regular-season contest. Rather than depending on one player for the entire game, Tennessee evaluated several quarterbacks and gave them opportunities to operate the offense.

Tennessee Quarterback Passing Table

Player	Completions/Attempts	Passing Yards	Average	TD	INT	Rating
Cam Ward	5/12	57	4.8	0	0	56.6
Will Levis	3/8	42	5.3	0	0	55.2
Mitchell Trubisky	2/3	23	7.7	0	0	89.6
Hendon Hooker	2/3	17	5.7	0	0	81.2
Team Total	12/26	112	4.3	0	0	N/A

Cam Ward’s Passing Performance

Cam Ward completed five of 12 passes for 57 yards. He averaged 4.8 yards per attempt and finished without a passing touchdown or interception.

Ward recorded the highest passing yardage among Tennessee’s four quarterbacks. However, his completion percentage of approximately 41.7% indicates that the passing offense did not consistently connect through the air during his opportunities.

His numbers should be interpreted carefully because preseason quarterback statistics do not provide the same evaluation context as a full regular-season start. A quarterback may be working with different offensive personnel, facing defensive rotations, and receiving a limited number of opportunities.

The important statistical points from Ward’s performance were:

• 57 passing yards.
• Five completed passes.
• Twelve passing attempts.
• No interceptions.
• No passing touchdowns.
• 56.6 passer rating.

Ward also recorded one rushing attempt for two yards. This gave Tennessee another small contribution from its quarterback position, although his primary production came through passing.

Will Levis’ Passing Numbers

Will Levis completed three of eight attempts for 42 yards. He averaged 5.3 yards per attempt and recorded no touchdowns or interceptions.

His completion percentage was 37.5%, making consistency an important area to examine when evaluating this performance.

Levis also contributed four rushing attempts for 22 yards. His rushing average was 5.5 yards per carry, matching Tony Pollard’s average in the supplied statistics.

The combination of passing and rushing production gave Levis 64 total yards from scrimmage through his recorded quarterback contributions.

His performance illustrates why quarterback evaluation should include more than passing totals. Mobility, decision-making, ball security, and the ability to extend plays are also relevant when reviewing a player’s overall contribution.

Mitchell Trubisky’s Efficient Passing

Mitchell Trubisky completed two of three passes for 23 yards. His 66.7% completion rate was the highest among Tennessee’s quarterbacks in this game.

He averaged 7.7 yards per attempt and finished with an 89.6 passer rating.

Although his sample size was extremely small, his efficiency was encouraging from a statistical perspective. Three attempts are not enough to establish a reliable performance trend, but the numbers show that Tennessee received productive passing output during his limited opportunity.

Hendon Hooker’s Contribution

Hendon Hooker completed two of three passes for 17 yards. He averaged 5.7 yards per attempt and posted an 81.2 passer rating.

Hooker also recorded three rushing attempts for minus-two yards. His rushing results reduced his overall ground-game efficiency, and he finished with no passing touchdowns or interceptions.

One important detail is that Hooker recorded two fumbles but recovered both. That means his recorded fumbles did not result in a lost possession.

For a quarterback, ball security remains an important evaluation category even when the team retains possession. Coaches generally consider how a player handles pressure, protects the football, and responds to difficult situations.

San Francisco 49ers Quarterback Statistics

San Francisco recorded substantially more passing production than Tennessee. The 49ers completed 28 of 44 passes for 238 yards.

Adrian Martinez and Kurtis Rourke shared the quarterback workload. Neither threw a touchdown or interception, but both contributed to the team’s passing volume.

49ers Quarterback Passing Table

Player	Completions/Attempts	Passing Yards	Average	TD	INT	Rating
Adrian Martinez	16/30	159	5.3	0	0	68.6
Kurtis Rourke	12/14	101	7.2	0	0	96.7
Team Total	28/44	238	5.4	0	0	N/A

Adrian Martinez’s Passing Production

Adrian Martinez completed 16 of 30 attempts for 159 yards. He averaged 5.3 yards per attempt and recorded a 68.6 passer rating.

He led all quarterbacks in the game in passing yardage and completions.

Martinez also added 18 rushing yards on two attempts. His 9.0-yard rushing average was the highest among the listed 49ers players with multiple rushing attempts.

His combined passing and rushing contribution reached 177 yards. That figure demonstrates how much of San Francisco’s offensive production came through its quarterback position.

However, passing volume alone does not guarantee scoring success. The 49ers finished without a passing touchdown, and their 13 total points were not enough to overcome Tennessee.

Kurtis Rourke’s Efficient Performance

Kurtis Rourke delivered the most efficient passing performance among the quarterbacks listed in the box score.

He completed 12 of 14 passes for 101 yards, producing an 85.7% completion rate. His average was 7.2 yards per attempt, and he finished with a 96.7 passer rating.

Rourke’s statistics were particularly impressive because he combined a high completion percentage with a strong passing average.

He also contributed 14 rushing yards on three attempts.

His passing performance suggests that San Francisco had opportunities to move the football efficiently through the air. However, those completions did not produce a passing touchdown.

It is important not to overstate what a limited preseason sample proves. Rourke’s completion rate was excellent in this appearance, but a larger sample would be needed to judge consistency against different defensive looks.

Quarterback Comparison

The quarterback comparison reveals an important difference between the two offenses.

San Francisco produced 126 more passing yards than Tennessee. The 49ers also completed 16 more passes.

However, Tennessee’s rushing offense was considerably stronger. This allowed the Titans to maintain offensive balance despite having fewer passing yards.

The quarterback statistics also show that Rourke was the most accurate passer in the game, while Martinez led the quarterback group in passing yardage.

For Tennessee, Ward led in passing yards, while Trubisky had the highest passer rating among the team’s quarterbacks.

Tennessee Titans Rushing Statistics

Tennessee’s ground game was one of the biggest reasons the team finished with a victory. The Titans recorded 31 rushing attempts for 167 yards, averaging 5.4 yards per carry.

They also scored one rushing touchdown.

The 167-yard total was almost double San Francisco’s 84 rushing yards. This difference gave Tennessee an advantage in its ability to move the football without relying entirely on quarterback passing production.

Titans Rushing Box Score

Player	Carries	Rushing Yards	Average	Longest Run	TD
Julius Chestnut	5	47	9.4	34	0
Tyjae Spears	4	35	8.8	25	0
Nicholas Singleton	8	31	3.9	8	0
Tony Pollard	4	22	5.5	12	1
Will Levis	4	22	5.5	8	0
Michael Carter	2	10	5.0	6	0
Cam Ward	1	2	2.0	2	0
Hendon Hooker	3	-2	-0.7	Not listed	0
Team Total	31	167	5.4	34	1

Julius Chestnut Leads Tennessee’s Rushing Attack

Julius Chestnut produced the highest rushing yardage among Tennessee’s players. He recorded five carries for 47 yards, averaging 9.4 yards per attempt.

His longest run covered 34 yards.

Chestnut’s average was particularly impressive because it exceeded the team’s overall rushing average by four yards per carry.

He did not score a touchdown, but his explosive running helped Tennessee generate valuable offensive yardage.

His performance demonstrates how a running back can influence an offense without receiving a large number of carries. Five attempts were enough for Chestnut to become the team’s leading rusher.

Tyjae Spears Provides Explosive Runs

Tyjae Spears finished with four carries for 35 yards. He averaged 8.8 yards per carry and recorded a longest run of 25 yards.

His efficiency was another important part of Tennessee’s rushing production.

Spears gained nearly nine yards every time he carried the ball on average. That figure suggests he was particularly productive when given opportunities to attack the defense.

He also contributed one reception for four yards, bringing his recorded total offensive yardage to 39.

Nicholas Singleton’s Rushing Contribution

Nicholas Singleton recorded eight carries for 31 yards, averaging 3.9 yards per carry.

Although his average was lower than Chestnut’s and Spears’, he received the highest number of rushing attempts among Tennessee’s listed players.

His eight carries provided the Titans with another option in the backfield and helped distribute the workload.

Singleton did not score a rushing touchdown, and his longest attempt covered eight yards.

Tony Pollard Scores Tennessee’s Rushing Touchdown

Tony Pollard recorded four carries for 22 yards and averaged 5.5 yards per attempt.

His most important contribution was the rushing touchdown.

Pollard’s touchdown gave Tennessee a direct scoring contribution from its ground attack. He also produced one reception for 13 yards.

Combining his rushing and receiving statistics gives him 35 total yards from scrimmage.

Although his workload was limited, his touchdown was an important part of Tennessee’s scoring production.

Other Titans Rushing Contributions

Will Levis added 22 rushing yards on four attempts, averaging 5.5 yards per carry.

Michael Carter gained 10 yards on two attempts. Cam Ward contributed two yards on one carry, while Hendon Hooker finished with minus-two yards on three attempts.

The distribution shows that Tennessee used several players to move the football on the ground.

This approach was particularly valuable in a preseason environment, where teams often evaluate multiple players and different offensive combinations.

San Francisco 49ers Rushing Statistics

San Francisco recorded 28 rushing attempts for 84 yards, averaging 3.0 yards per carry.

The 49ers scored one rushing touchdown, but their overall ground production was significantly lower than Tennessee’s.

Their 84 rushing yards were 83 fewer than the Titans’ total.

49ers Rushing Box Score

Player	Carries	Rushing Yards	Average	Longest Run	TD
Sincere McCormick	10	38	3.8	7	0
Adrian Martinez	2	18	9.0	10	0
Khalil Herbert	6	18	3.0	8	0
Kurtis Rourke	3	14	4.7	6	0
Zamir White	2	1	0.5	2	0
Patrick Taylor Jr.	5	-5	-1.0	1	1
Team Total	28	84	3.0	10	1

Sincere McCormick Leads the 49ers in Rushing Yards

Sincere McCormick led San Francisco with 38 rushing yards on 10 attempts.

He averaged 3.8 yards per carry and recorded a longest run of seven yards.

McCormick received the largest rushing workload among the 49ers’ listed players. His 10 attempts accounted for more than one-third of the team’s total carries.

However, his average remained below Tennessee’s team rushing average.

This difference highlights the challenge San Francisco faced when trying to establish a consistent ground attack.

Adrian Martinez Adds Quarterback Mobility

Adrian Martinez gained 18 rushing yards on two attempts, averaging 9.0 yards per carry.

His rushing efficiency was one of the strongest individual numbers in the 49ers’ ground statistics.

Martinez’s ability to contribute through both passing and rushing gave San Francisco another offensive dimension.

He finished with 159 passing yards and 18 rushing yards, making him one of the team’s most productive offensive players.

Khalil Herbert’s All-Around Contribution

Khalil Herbert recorded six carries for 18 rushing yards.

He averaged 3.0 yards per carry and also contributed two receptions for 35 receiving yards.

His receiving average was 17.5 yards per catch, making his passing-game contribution considerably more productive than his rushing output.

Herbert therefore finished with 53 combined rushing and receiving yards.

His performance is a useful example of why evaluating a running back requires looking beyond rushing totals. A player can contribute meaningfully as a receiver even when the ground game is less productive.

Patrick Taylor Jr. Scores Despite Negative Rushing Yardage

Patrick Taylor Jr. recorded five rushing attempts for minus-five yards.

His average was minus-one yard per carry, but he still recorded one rushing touchdown.

This unusual statistical combination shows why touchdowns and yardage should be considered separately.

A player can score from a short-distance situation without producing a positive rushing average. Taylor’s recorded longest run was one yard, and the box score credits him with a rushing touchdown.

He also recorded two receptions for 13 yards.

Rushing Comparison: Which Team Had the Advantage?

Category	Titans	49ers
Rushing attempts	31	28
Rushing yards	167	84
Yards per carry	5.4	3.0
Rushing touchdowns	1	1
Difference in rushing yards	+83	-83

Tennessee clearly controlled this statistical category.

The Titans gained 83 more rushing yards despite attempting only three additional carries.

Their 5.4-yard average was also significantly better than San Francisco’s 3.0-yard average.

This was one of the clearest statistical advantages in the entire matchup.

Tennessee Titans Receiving Statistics

Tennessee recorded 12 receptions for 139 yards, averaging 11.6 yards per catch.

No Titans receiver recorded a touchdown.

The receiving statistics show that Tennessee distributed its limited passing production among several players. No individual receiver dominated the box score, but multiple players contributed meaningful gains.

Titans Receiving Box Score

Player	Receptions	Receiving Yards	Average	Longest Reception	TD
Wan’Dale Robinson	2	19	9.5	12	0
Calvin Ridley	1	18	18.0	18	0
David Martin-Robinson	1	17	17.0	17	0
Chimere Dike	1	17	17.0	17	0
Gunnar Helm	1	16	16.0	16	0
Xavier Restrepo	2	16	8.0	10	0
Michael Carter	1	13	13.0	13	0
Bryce Oliver	1	12	12.0	12	0
Courtney Jackson	1	7	7.0	7	0
Tyjae Spears	1	4	4.0	4	0
Team Total	12	139	11.6	18	0

Wan’Dale Robinson’s Receiving Contribution

Wan’Dale Robinson finished with two receptions for 19 yards.

He averaged 9.5 yards per catch and recorded a longest reception of 12 yards.

His two catches tied for the highest reception total among Tennessee’s listed receivers.

While his yardage was not especially high, he provided a contribution in a passing offense that recorded only 112 team passing yards.

Calvin Ridley Creates a Downfield Gain

Calvin Ridley recorded one reception for 18 yards.

His average was 18.0 yards per catch, and that reception was also the longest listed for Tennessee.

The result demonstrates his ability to generate meaningful yardage on a limited number of opportunities.

However, one reception should not be treated as evidence of a complete performance. His overall contribution in this game was limited to the single recorded catch.

David Martin-Robinson and Chimere Dike

David Martin-Robinson recorded one reception for 17 yards, while Chimere Dike also finished with one reception for 17 yards.

Both players averaged 17.0 yards per catch.

Their contributions were valuable because Tennessee needed efficient gains to supplement its rushing attack.

Neither recorded a receiving touchdown.

Gunnar Helm and Xavier Restrepo

Gunnar Helm finished with one reception for 16 yards.

Xavier Restrepo recorded two receptions for 16 yards, averaging 8.0 yards per catch.

Restrepo tied Robinson for the highest number of receptions among Tennessee’s listed players.

These numbers demonstrate that the Titans used several receiving options rather than concentrating all their passing production on one target.

Other Tennessee Receiving Performances

Michael Carter recorded one reception for 13 yards, while Bryce Oliver added one catch for 12 yards.

Courtney Jackson contributed seven receiving yards, and Tyjae Spears recorded four.

Hank Beatty, Carnell Tate, and Elic Ayomanor finished without a recorded reception.

The absence of receiving production for those players should be understood in terms of the opportunities reflected in this box score. It does not independently establish their overall performance or future role.

San Francisco 49ers Receiving Statistics

San Francisco’s passing offense produced 28 receptions for 260 receiving yards.

The team averaged 9.3 yards per reception and did not record a receiving touchdown.

Compared with Tennessee, the 49ers had considerably more receiving volume.

Their 28 receptions were more than double the Titans’ 12 catches.

49ers Receiving Box Score

Player	Receptions	Receiving Yards	Average	Longest Reception	TD
De’Zhaun Stribling	7	63	9.0	32	0
Jordan Watkins	6	59	9.8	20	0
Khalil Herbert	2	35	17.5	19	0
Trenton Irwin	2	25	12.5	18	0
Malik Turner	2	23	11.5	13	0
KhaDarel Hodge	1	15	15.0	15	0
Patrick Taylor Jr.	2	13	6.5	7	0
Josiah Deguara	2	12	6.0	11	0
Will Pauling	3	8	2.7	6	0
Wesley Grimes	1	7	7.0	7	0
Team Total	28	260	9.3	32	0

De’Zhaun Stribling Leads in Receiving Yards

De’Zhaun Stribling led all listed receivers in the game with 63 receiving yards.

He recorded seven receptions on the way to a 9.0-yard average.

His longest reception covered 32 yards, which was also the longest individual reception recorded by either team.

Stribling’s seven catches represented a major portion of San Francisco’s receiving production.

His performance was especially important because the 49ers needed reliable passing-game contributions to compensate for their less productive rushing attack.

Jordan Watkins Delivers Another Productive Performance

Jordan Watkins finished with six receptions for 59 yards.

He averaged 9.8 yards per catch and recorded a longest reception of 20 yards.

Watkins ranked second among San Francisco’s listed receivers in both receptions and receiving yardage.

Together, Stribling and Watkins produced 122 receiving yards on 13 catches.

That combined production represented a substantial share of the 49ers’ total receiving output.

Khalil Herbert’s Receiving Efficiency

Khalil Herbert caught two passes for 35 yards.

His 17.5-yard average was the highest among San Francisco’s players with multiple receptions.

His longest reception covered 19 yards.

When combined with his 18 rushing yards, Herbert accumulated 53 yards from scrimmage.

This dual contribution made him one of the more versatile offensive contributors in the matchup.

Trenton Irwin and Malik Turner

Trenton Irwin recorded two receptions for 25 yards, averaging 12.5 yards per catch.

Malik Turner also caught two passes, finishing with 23 yards and an 11.5-yard average.

Both players provided useful depth to the passing offense.

Their contributions helped San Francisco distribute the football across multiple targets.

Other 49ers Receiving Contributors

KhaDarel Hodge recorded one reception for 15 yards.

Patrick Taylor Jr. added two catches for 13 yards, while Josiah Deguara recorded two receptions for 12 yards.

Will Pauling finished with three catches for eight yards. Wesley Grimes contributed one reception for seven yards.

Brayden Willis and Sincere McCormick did not record receiving catches.

Receiving Comparison

Category	Titans	49ers
Receptions	12	28
Receiving yards	139	260
Average per reception	11.6	9.3
Receiving touchdowns	0	0
Longest reception	18	32

San Francisco had the advantage in total receptions and receiving yards.

Tennessee, however, averaged more yards per catch.

This difference is important because it shows that the Titans generated more receiving yardage per completed catch, even though the 49ers produced significantly more overall passing-game volume.

Tennessee Titans Defensive Player Statistics

Tennessee’s defense played an important role in protecting the lead. The Titans recorded 88 total tackles, including 43 solo tackles, two sacks, seven tackles for loss, one pass defended, and five quarterback hits.

Although San Francisco accumulated more passing yards, Tennessee’s defensive unit produced pressure and limited the 49ers to 13 points.

Titans Defensive Box Score

Player	Total Tackles	Solo Tackles	Sacks	TFL	QB Hits
Cor’Dale Flott	5	4	0	0	0
Derrick Canteen	5	3	0	0	0
Nazeeh Johnson	5	2	0	0	0
James Williams Sr.	5	2	0	0	0
Jerrick Reed II	5	2	0	0	0
Oluwafemi Oladejo	5	2	0	2	1
Mani Powell	4	1	0.5	0	1
Cody Barton	3	2	0	1	0
Cedric Gray	3	2	0	0	0
Keldric Faulk	3	2	0	0	1
Jalyn Holmes	3	1	1	1	0
Team Total	88	43	2	7	5

Cor’Dale Flott’s Defensive Contribution

Cor’Dale Flott recorded five total tackles, including four solo tackles.

His four solo stops were the highest among the listed Tennessee defenders.

Solo tackles are useful when evaluating defensive involvement because they show situations in which a defender brought down an opponent without assistance from another tackler.

Flott’s performance helped Tennessee maintain defensive activity throughout the contest.

Oluwafemi Oladejo Creates Backfield Pressure

Oluwafemi Oladejo finished with five tackles, two tackles for loss, and one quarterback hit.

His two tackles for loss were particularly important because they represented plays in which the offense was stopped behind the line of scrimmage.

These plays can disrupt offensive rhythm, reduce rushing efficiency, and create more difficult down-and-distance situations.

Oladejo’s quarterback hit also showed that his contribution extended beyond stopping running plays.

Jalyn Holmes Records a Sack

Jalyn Holmes recorded three total tackles, one solo tackle, one sack, and one tackle for loss.

His sack was a significant defensive contribution because it helped Tennessee create pressure against the San Francisco passing offense.

A sack can have an impact beyond the immediate loss of yardage. It can force an offense into a difficult third-down situation and affect the quarterback’s timing on later plays.

Mani Powell’s Pressure Contribution

Mani Powell finished with four tackles, one solo tackle, half a sack, and one quarterback hit.

His pressure contribution helped Tennessee reach its team total of two sacks.

Powell’s performance also illustrates why quarterback hits and sacks should be evaluated separately. A quarterback hit represents pressure that reaches the passer, while a sack requires the quarterback to be brought down behind the line of scrimmage.

Other Titans Defensive Contributors

Derrick Canteen, Nazeeh Johnson, James Williams Sr., and Jerrick Reed II each recorded five tackles.

Cody Barton contributed three tackles and one tackle for loss, while Cedric Gray recorded three tackles.

Keldric Faulk added three tackles and one quarterback hit.

The overall distribution indicates that Tennessee received contributions from several defensive positions instead of relying on one player to produce the entire defensive performance.

San Francisco 49ers Defensive Player Statistics

San Francisco recorded 56 total tackles, including 30 solo tackles.

The defense also produced three sacks, four tackles for loss, four passes defended, and six quarterback hits.

The 49ers actually recorded more sacks and quarterback hits than Tennessee. However, their defensive pressure did not translate into enough offensive support to secure the victory.

49ers Defensive Box Score

Player	Total Tackles	Solo Tackles	Sacks	TFL	QB Hits
Nick Martin	8	3	0	0	0
Tatum Bethune	6	2	1	1	1
Sebastian Valdez	5	4	0	1	0
Gracen Halton	4	2	0	1	0
Larry Worth III	3	2	0.5	0	1
James Thompson Jr.	3	0	0.5	0	1
Ogbo Okoronkwo	2	1	1	1	1
Team Total	56	30	3	4	6

Nick Martin Leads San Francisco in Tackles

Nick Martin recorded eight total tackles, the highest individual tackle total among the listed players from either team.

He finished with three solo tackles.

His eight stops made him one of the most active defenders in the game.

A high tackle total can indicate consistent involvement in defensive plays, although it should not be interpreted in isolation. The location of tackles, yards allowed, and defensive assignments also matter.

Tatum Bethune Records a Sack

Tatum Bethune finished with six tackles, two solo tackles, one sack, one tackle for loss, and one quarterback hit.

His performance was one of the most productive individual defensive contributions for San Francisco.

Bethune demonstrated involvement in both run defense and pass rushing.

Recording a sack and a tackle for loss gives a defender opportunities to disrupt two different aspects of an opposing offense.

Sebastian Valdez and Gracen Halton

Sebastian Valdez recorded five tackles, including four solo tackles and one tackle for loss.

Gracen Halton finished with four tackles, two solo tackles, and one tackle for loss.

Both players contributed to the 49ers’ defensive effort against Tennessee’s rushing attack.

Despite their involvement, the Titans still averaged 5.4 yards per carry.

This highlights the difficulty San Francisco faced in consistently stopping Tennessee’s running backs.

Ogbo Okoronkwo’s Pass-Rushing Impact

Ogbo Okoronkwo recorded two tackles, one solo tackle, one sack, one tackle for loss, and one quarterback hit.

His statistics were productive considering his limited tackle total.

A defender’s impact cannot always be measured through total tackles. Pressure, sacks, tackles behind the line, and forced changes to offensive decisions can all contribute to defensive value.

Okoronkwo’s one sack represented an important part of San Francisco’s three-sack performance.

49ers Defensive Depth

Larry Worth III recorded three tackles, half a sack, and one quarterback hit.

James Thompson Jr. also finished with three tackles, half a sack, and one quarterback hit.

Their contributions helped San Francisco record more quarterback pressure events than Tennessee.

The defensive statistics show that the 49ers were capable of creating pressure, but Tennessee still found ways to move the ball effectively through its running game.

Defensive Comparison: Titans vs 49ers

Defensive Category	Titans	49ers
Total tackles	88	56
Solo tackles	43	30
Sacks	2	3
Tackles for loss	7	4
Passes defended	1	4
Quarterback hits	5	6
Interceptions	0	0

The defensive comparison shows that both teams had different strengths.

Tennessee recorded more total tackles and tackles for loss.

San Francisco finished with more sacks, passes defended, and quarterback hits.

Neither defense recorded an interception.

The Titans’ seven tackles for loss were particularly valuable in disrupting offensive plays. Meanwhile, San Francisco’s six quarterback hits showed that its pass rush was able to create pressure even though the team ultimately lost.

Special Teams Statistics

Special teams played a decisive role in the final result.

Tennessee received an outstanding performance from Joey Slye, who converted all four field-goal attempts. San Francisco’s Eddy Pineiro converted two of three attempts.

The difference between the two kickers was important in a game decided by six points.

Titans Kicking Statistics

Kicker	Field Goals	Field-Goal Percentage	Longest FG	Extra Points	Total Points
Joey Slye	4/4	100%	58 yards	1/1	13

Joey Slye was one of Tennessee’s most important contributors.

He converted all four field-goal attempts and made his only extra-point attempt.

His longest successful field goal covered 58 yards.

Slye finished with 13 points, which represented a substantial portion of Tennessee’s 19-point total.

His perfect field-goal performance gave the Titans reliable scoring whenever their offense reached a position to attempt a kick.

49ers Kicking Statistics

Kicker	Field Goals	Field-Goal Percentage	Longest FG	Extra Points	Total Points
Eddy Pineiro	2/3	66.7%	52 yards	1/1	7

Eddy Pineiro converted two of three field-goal attempts.

He made his extra-point attempt and finished with seven points.

His longest successful field goal covered 52 yards.

The missed field-goal opportunity meant San Francisco did not receive the same consistency from its kicking unit as Tennessee.

Field-Goal Comparison

Category	Joey Slye	Eddy Pineiro
Attempts	4	3
Successful kicks	4	2
Missed kicks	0	1
Accuracy	100%	66.7%
Longest successful kick	58 yards	52 yards
Total points	13	7

Slye produced six more points than Pineiro.

That six-point difference is equal to the final margin of victory.

Although the entire result cannot be attributed to kicking, Tennessee’s perfect conversion rate was a major advantage.

Kick Return and Punt Return Statistics

Return production is another important part of evaluating special teams.

Returns can provide an offense with better starting field position, reducing the distance needed to reach scoring territory.

Titans Kick Returns

Player	Returns	Return Yards	Average	Longest Return
Michael Carter	1	30	30.0	30
Courtney Jackson	1	23	23.0	23
Team Total	2	53	26.5	30

Tennessee recorded two kick returns for 53 yards.

Michael Carter produced a 30-yard return, while Courtney Jackson added 23 yards.

The team averaged 26.5 yards per return.

49ers Kick Returns

Player	Returns	Return Yards	Average	Longest Return
Will Pauling	3	69	23.0	28
Sincere McCormick	1	27	27.0	27
Team Total	4	96	24.0	28

San Francisco recorded four kick returns for 96 yards.

Will Pauling led the team with 69 return yards on three attempts.

Sincere McCormick added 27 yards on one return.

Although San Francisco produced more total return yards, Tennessee had a slightly better average per return.

Punt Return Statistics

Team	Returner	Returns	Return Yards	Average
Titans	Courtney Jackson	1	0	0.0
49ers	Will Pauling	3	14	4.7
49ers	Jordan Watkins	1	4	4.0
49ers Total		4	18	4.5

The Titans recorded one punt return for no yardage.

San Francisco recorded four punt returns for 18 yards.

Will Pauling handled three of those returns, while Jordan Watkins recorded the other.

The return statistics show that the 49ers had more opportunities in this category, although neither team produced a major punt-return gain.

Tennessee Titans and 49ers Punting Statistics

Punting can influence field position and force an opposing offense to cover a longer distance.

Both teams used their punters during the contest.

Punting Comparison

Statistic	Tommy Townsend (Titans)	Corliss Waitman (49ers)
Punts	5	4
Total punt yards	244	175
Average	48.8	43.8
Touchbacks	0	0
Inside the 20	2	3
Longest punt	58	58

Tommy Townsend averaged 48.8 yards per punt and finished with 244 total punt yards.

He recorded two punts inside the opponent’s 20-yard line.

Corliss Waitman averaged 43.8 yards per punt and recorded 175 total punt yards.

Waitman placed three punts inside the 20-yard line, one more than Townsend.

Both punters recorded a longest punt of 58 yards, and neither had a touchback.

Townsend had the advantage in average distance, while Waitman produced more punts inside the 20-yard line.

This distinction matters because punting is not simply about maximizing distance. Placement can force an opponent to start a possession deep in its own territory.

Turnovers and Ball Security

Turnovers are often among the most important factors in football results.

A lost fumble or interception can give an opposing offense an immediate scoring opportunity.

Neither team recorded an interception in this matchup, and neither lost a fumble.

Titans Fumble Statistics

Player	Total Fumbles	Fumbles Lost	Recovered
Hendon Hooker	2	0	2
Courtney Jackson	1	0	1
Team Total	3	0	3

Tennessee recorded three total fumbles, but all three were recovered.

Hendon Hooker was responsible for two, recovering both.

Courtney Jackson recorded one fumble and also recovered it.

The Titans therefore avoided giving San Francisco possession through a lost fumble.

49ers Fumble Statistics

Player	Total Fumbles	Fumbles Lost	Recovered
Drake Nugent	1	0	0
Adrian Martinez	0	0	1
Team Total	1	0	1

San Francisco recorded one fumble and did not lose possession through it.

The box score lists Drake Nugent with one fumble and Adrian Martinez with one recovery.

Turnover Comparison

Category	Titans	49ers
Total fumbles	3	1
Fumbles lost	0	0
Interceptions thrown	0	0
Interceptions recorded by defense	0	0

Neither team lost a fumble or threw an interception.

Therefore, the result was not determined by a conventional turnover advantage.

Instead, rushing efficiency, scoring consistency, and the ability to convert offensive opportunities were more significant statistical differences.

Why Tennessee Won the Game

The 19-13 final result becomes easier to understand when the major statistical categories are compared together.

San Francisco had more passing yards, more receptions, and more combined offensive yardage. Tennessee, however, had a more productive rushing attack and a perfect field-goal performance.

Several factors explain the Titans’ advantage.

1. Tennessee Controlled the Ground Game

The Titans gained 167 rushing yards, compared with San Francisco’s 84.

That 83-yard difference was one of the largest statistical advantages in the matchup.

Tennessee averaged 5.4 yards per carry, while San Francisco averaged 3.0.

The Titans also had productive contributions from several running backs.

Chestnut and Spears combined for 82 rushing yards on nine attempts. Pollard added the team’s rushing touchdown.

This distribution allowed Tennessee to create offensive production without requiring one player to handle the entire workload.

2. Joey Slye Delivered Consistent Scoring

Joey Slye converted all four field-goal attempts.

His perfect performance produced 12 points from field goals, along with one extra point.

In a six-point game, reliable kicking was especially important.

San Francisco’s kicker missed one of three field-goal attempts, making the difference in kicking production even more noticeable.

3. Tennessee Produced More Tackles for Loss

The Titans recorded seven tackles for loss, compared with four for San Francisco.

Tackles for loss can interrupt offensive momentum by creating longer passing situations or reducing rushing gains.

Oladejo and Holmes were among Tennessee’s contributors in this category.

Their defensive activity helped prevent San Francisco from converting all its offensive opportunities into points.

4. San Francisco Did Not Turn Passing Volume Into Touchdowns

The 49ers completed 28 passes for 238 passing yards.

Their receivers recorded 260 yards according to the supplied receiving table.

However, the team finished without a passing touchdown.

That was a major limitation because the passing offense was responsible for a large portion of the team’s yardage.

Martinez and Rourke moved the ball through the air, but neither recorded a touchdown pass.

5. Tennessee Protected Its Lead

Tennessee scored in every quarter.

Its seven-point opening quarter established the advantage, and its three points in each of the final two quarters helped preserve the lead.

San Francisco also scored in the final two quarters, but the 49ers never produced enough points to take control.

The Titans’ ability to keep adding points made it difficult for the home team to complete a comeback.

Complete Team Statistics Comparison

The following table brings together the major numbers from the supplied box score.

Statistical Category	Tennessee	San Francisco
Final score	19	13
Passing completions	12	28
Passing attempts	26	44
Passing yards	112	238
Passing touchdowns	0	0
Interceptions thrown	0	0
Rushing attempts	31	28
Rushing yards	167	84
Rushing average	5.4	3.0
Rushing touchdowns	1	1
Receiving receptions	12	28
Receiving yards	139	260
Receiving touchdowns	0	0
Total tackles	88	56
Solo tackles	43	30
Sacks	2	3
Tackles for loss	7	4
Quarterback hits	5	6
Passes defended	1	4
Interceptions	0	0
Field goals made	4	2
Kick returns	2	4
Punt returns	1	4
Fumbles lost	0	0

Important statistical note: The supplied team passing and receiving totals do not match exactly. Tennessee’s passing total is listed as 112 yards, while its receiving total is 139 yards. San Francisco’s passing total is 238 yards, while its receiving total is 260 yards. These differences should be checked against the original ESPN play-by-play and official box score before publishing the figures as reconciled totals. The tables above preserve the supplied figures rather than silently changing them.

Key Players Who Influenced the Final Result

Several players stood out because of their statistical contributions. Their performances help explain how Tennessee won despite San Francisco producing more passing yards.

Player	Team	Key Performance
Julius Chestnut	Titans	47 rushing yards, 9.4 average
Tyjae Spears	Titans	35 rushing yards, 8.8 average
Tony Pollard	Titans	22 rushing yards, 1 TD
Cam Ward	Titans	57 passing yards
Joey Slye	Titans	4/4 field goals
Adrian Martinez	49ers	159 passing yards
Kurtis Rourke	49ers	101 passing yards, 96.7 rating
De’Zhaun Stribling	49ers	63 receiving yards
Jordan Watkins	49ers	59 receiving yards
Nick Martin	49ers	8 total tackles
Tatum Bethune	49ers	6 tackles, 1 sack

Most Productive Offensive Player for Tennessee

Julius Chestnut was Tennessee’s leading rusher with 47 yards on five attempts.

His 9.4-yard average was the best rushing average among the Titans’ listed players with multiple attempts. His 34-yard longest run also demonstrated his ability to produce an explosive play.

Most Productive Quarterback

Adrian Martinez led all quarterbacks in passing yards with 159.

However, Kurtis Rourke had the highest passer rating at 96.7 and completed 85.7% of his passes.

These two performances demonstrate the difference between passing volume and passing efficiency.

Most Productive Receiver

De’Zhaun Stribling led the game in receiving yards with 63 on seven receptions.

His longest reception was 32 yards, making him an important contributor to San Francisco’s passing production.

Most Important Special Teams Player

Joey Slye was particularly influential.

His four successful field goals and one extra point produced 13 points. His perfect kicking performance helped Tennessee maintain its advantage throughout the contest.

What the Player Statistics Reveal About Both Teams

The numbers provide more information than simply identifying the winning team.

They also reveal the different offensive approaches and areas that each team demonstrated during the preseason matchup.

Tennessee’s Offensive Balance

Tennessee produced 167 rushing yards and 112 passing yards according to the supplied team totals.

The Titans did not need a high-volume passing performance to generate offensive production.

Their running backs provided consistent yardage, and the kicking unit converted scoring opportunities.

This balance was especially valuable in a game where the passing offense did not produce a touchdown.

San Francisco’s Passing Dependence

San Francisco recorded 238 passing yards and 84 rushing yards.

Its quarterbacks completed 28 passes, while the receivers combined for 260 receiving yards according to the supplied receiving statistics.

The passing game generated substantial yardage, but the offense struggled to convert that production into touchdowns.

This distinction is important when assessing offensive performance. A team can move the football effectively between the 20-yard lines but still struggle to finish drives.

Defensive Pressure Did Not Guarantee Victory

San Francisco recorded three sacks and six quarterback hits.

Those numbers were better than Tennessee’s two sacks and five quarterback hits.

However, the Titans won the game.

This shows why defensive pressure statistics should be considered alongside rushing efficiency, offensive scoring, and special teams production.

A defense can generate pressure without necessarily controlling the overall outcome.

Special Teams Made a Noticeable Difference

Tennessee converted all four field goals.

San Francisco converted two of three.

The six-point difference in total kicking points matched the final margin.

That makes field-goal accuracy one of the most important statistical factors when reviewing the result.

How to Evaluate Preseason Player Statistics Correctly

Preseason statistics require a slightly different approach from regular-season numbers.

A regular-season box score often reflects a more established starting lineup and a competitive game plan. Preseason contests can involve multiple quarterback rotations, different offensive combinations, and opportunities for players competing for roster positions.

There are several ways to interpret these numbers more accurately.

1. Consider the Number of Opportunities

A player who records 30 rushing yards on five attempts has a different statistical profile from someone who records 30 yards on 15 attempts.

Both players have the same total yardage, but their efficiency is different.

This is why carries, receptions, and passing attempts should always appear alongside total yards.

2. Avoid Overvaluing Small Samples

Trubisky completed two of three passes, while Hooker completed two of three.

Their completion percentages were relatively high, but each player attempted only three passes.

That is not enough information to establish long-term passing consistency.

Similarly, one reception for 18 yards does not provide a complete picture of a receiver’s performance.

3. Evaluate Players Within Their Roles

A running back, quarterback, receiver, and defensive lineman have different responsibilities.

A quarterback should be evaluated through passing efficiency, ball security, touchdowns, and decision-making.

A running back should be assessed through rushing average, total production, receiving involvement, and scoring.

A defender should be judged through tackles, tackles for loss, sacks, quarterback pressure, and coverage contributions.

Comparing all players using only total yards or total tackles would produce an incomplete evaluation.

4. Separate Individual Production From Team Results

San Francisco had more passing yards, but Tennessee won.

That does not mean every San Francisco offensive player performed poorly or every Tennessee player performed exceptionally.

Individual performance and team success are connected, but they are not identical.

A useful statistical analysis examines both.

Source and Statistical Accuracy

The figures in this article are based on the supplied ESPN NFL box-score data for game ID 401874392.

For the original game record, see the ESPN Tennessee Titans vs San Francisco 49ers box score.

A few distinctions are important when using these numbers:

• Passing yards and receiving yards are reproduced as separately supplied team totals.
• Individual player statistics are presented as listed in the supplied data.
• No interceptions were recorded by either team.
• Neither team lost a fumble.
• The game is identified as a preseason contest, not a regular-season game.
• No unsupported player quotes, injury reports, or coaching statements have been added.

The passing and receiving yardage discrepancies noted earlier should be reconciled against the original play-by-play record before treating the team totals as a fully consistent statistical dataset.

This approach helps keep the analysis transparent and prevents assumptions from being presented as verified facts.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Tennessee Titans vs San Francisco 49ers game on August 14, 2026?

The Tennessee Titans defeated the San Francisco 49ers by a final score of 19-13 in their preseason matchup on August 14, 2026.

2. How many passing yards did the Titans and 49ers record?

According to the supplied box score, Tennessee recorded 112 passing yards, while San Francisco finished with 238 passing yards.

3. Who was the leading rusher in the game?

Julius Chestnut led the Titans with 47 rushing yards on five carries. His average was 9.4 yards per attempt, and his longest run covered 34 yards.

4. Who recorded the most passing yards?

Adrian Martinez led all quarterbacks with 159 passing yards for San Francisco. He completed 16 of 30 attempts without a touchdown or interception.

5. Which receiver recorded the most receiving yards?

De’Zhaun Stribling led the listed receivers with 63 yards on seven receptions. His longest catch covered 32 yards.

6. How did Joey Slye perform against the 49ers?

Joey Slye converted all four field-goal attempts and his only extra-point attempt. His longest successful field goal was 58 yards, and he scored 13 points for Tennessee.

Conclusion

The Tennessee Titans secured a 19-13 preseason victory over the San Francisco 49ers on August 14, 2026. The result reflected the importance of offensive balance, rushing efficiency, defensive activity, and reliable special teams.

Tennessee’s biggest advantage came from its ground game. The Titans recorded 167 rushing yards at an average of 5.4 yards per carry, significantly outperforming San Francisco’s 84 yards at 3.0 yards per carry.

Julius Chestnut led the rushing attack with 47 yards, while Tyjae Spears added 35. Tony Pollard contributed a rushing touchdown, and Joey Slye delivered a perfect four-for-four field-goal performance.

San Francisco had its own productive performers. Adrian Martinez led the quarterbacks with 159 passing yards, Kurtis Rourke posted a 96.7 passer rating, and De’Zhaun Stribling topped the receiving chart with 63 yards.

Defensively, Tennessee recorded seven tackles for loss, while San Francisco produced three sacks. Neither team recorded an interception or lost a fumble.

Ultimately, the tennessee titans vs 49ers match player stats show that greater passing production does not automatically produce a victory. Tennessee’s more effective rushing attack and dependable kicking helped create the difference in a closely contested preseason game.