Miami Heat vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats

The miami heat vs san antonio spurs match player stats from the March 23, 2026 meeting tell a much clearer story than the final score alone. San Antonio defeated Miami 136-111 at Kaseya Center, using efficient shooting, superior rebounding, strong interior production, and a balanced scoring attack to control the game for most of the night. Victor Wembanyama led the Spurs with 26 points, 15 rebounds, and 5 blocks, while Norman Powell paced Miami with 21 points. The official NBA record confirms that San Antonio led 38-31 after the first quarter, extended the advantage to 76-58 by halftime, and carried a 108-81 lead into the fourth quarter.

For readers studying the miami heat vs san antonio spurs match player stats, the most important point is that this was not simply a game decided by one superstar. Wembanyama was the most influential individual player, but San Antonio received major contributions from Keldon Johnson, Dylan Harper, Stephon Castle, De’Aaron Fox, and several other rotation players. Miami had respectable individual scoring from Powell, Bam Adebayo, Tyler Herro, and its bench, but the Heat could not match San Antonio’s overall efficiency or physical control.

There is also a useful date clarification. Although some datasets may display March 24 because of time-zone or publication differences, the official NBA game page identifies the contest as Monday, March 23, 2026, at Kaseya Center in Miami. The game finished with San Antonio at 54-18 and Miami at 38-34 immediately after the contest.

Game Overview

San Antonio entered the matchup with a strong road record and continued that form in Miami. The Spurs finished the game shooting 48-for-101 from the field, or 48 percent, while Miami made 38 of 95 attempts, or 40 percent. San Antonio also made 15 of 43 three-point attempts, compared with Miami’s 16-for-52 performance from beyond the arc.

The free throw numbers were relatively close in volume but excellent for both teams. San Antonio converted 25 of 28 attempts for 89 percent. Miami was even more accurate, making 19 of 20 for 95 percent. That efficiency at the foul line, however, could not compensate for the Heat’s lower field-goal percentage and large rebounding deficit.

Game Details

Category	San Antonio Spurs	Miami Heat
Final Score	136	111
Q1	38	31
Q2	38	27
Q3	32	23
Q4	28	30
Field Goals	48-101	38-95
Field Goal %	48%	40%
Three-Pointers	15-43	16-52
Three-Point %	35%	31%
Free Throws	25-28	19-20
Free Throw %	89%	95%
Rebounds	62	38
Assists	33	29
Turnovers	15	12
Steals	7	11
Blocks	9	8

The official box score confirms the major statistical difference: San Antonio controlled the glass by 24 rebounds and scored 25 more points than Miami.

miami heat vs san antonio spurs match player stats: Key Leaders

The individual numbers provide an excellent explanation of how the game developed.

Victor Wembanyama

Wembanyama produced the headline performance for San Antonio with:

• 26 points
• 15 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 5 blocks
• 11-for-22 shooting
• 1-for-7 from three-point range
• 3-for-3 free throws
• Plus-19

His three-point shooting was not particularly efficient, but it did not matter because his overall offensive contribution and defensive impact were significant. He scored efficiently enough inside the arc and dominated the rebounding battle.

The five blocks are particularly important. They show that his influence extended beyond his scoring total. Miami had to account for his size and timing around the basket, while San Antonio could use his defensive presence to protect the paint.

The NBA’s official game coverage confirms the 26-point, 15-rebound, five-block performance.

Norman Powell

Norman Powell was Miami’s leading scorer with 21 points. He played 30 minutes and finished 7-for-18 from the field, 4-for-11 from three, and 3-for-4 from the free throw line.

His complete line was:

• 21 points
• 4 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 4 turnovers
• 4-for-11 from three
• 7-for-18 overall
• Minus-17

Powell gave Miami an important scoring option from the perimeter, particularly when the Heat needed points after falling behind early. His four three-pointers were tied to the team’s need for outside scoring, but his 18 attempts also demonstrate how much offensive responsibility he carried.

Stephon Castle

Castle delivered one of San Antonio’s most complete performances. He scored 19 points while adding 7 rebounds and 6 assists.

His shooting line was:

• 19 points
• 7 rebounds
• 6 assists
• 2 steals
• 4 turnovers
• 4-for-9 field goals
• 2-for-4 three-pointers
• 9-for-10 free throws
• Plus-20

The six assists were among the highest totals on the Spurs. His ability to contribute as a scorer and distributor helped San Antonio avoid becoming overly dependent on Wembanyama.

De’Aaron Fox

Fox finished with 14 points, 3 rebounds, and 6 assists. He shot 5-for-13 from the field and 1-for-4 from three.

The scoring total was not spectacular, but his six assists were important because San Antonio had multiple players capable of finishing possessions. Fox’s role was therefore not limited to creating his own shot.

His plus-24 was also the highest among the listed San Antonio starters, reflecting how effectively the Spurs performed during his minutes.

Keldon Johnson

Keldon Johnson was one of the most productive players off the San Antonio bench. He scored 21 points in 24 minutes, shooting 7-for-14 from the field and 3-for-6 from three.

He also contributed:

• 6 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 3 offensive rebounds
• 3 three-pointers
• Plus-12

His scoring gave San Antonio another reliable offensive option when the starting group rotated.

Dylan Harper

Harper also scored 21 points, doing so in only 25 minutes. He shot 9-for-14 from the field and added 6 assists.

That efficiency stands out. Harper’s 9-for-14 shooting translated into a 64.3 percent field-goal rate, making his 21-point performance one of the most efficient scoring contributions of the game.

Complete San Antonio Spurs Player Statistics

The following table presents the principal box-score numbers from the official game record.

Player	MIN	PTS	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	+/-
Julian Champagnie	22	3	1-4	0-3	1-1	5	0	0	0	0	+22
Victor Wembanyama	26	26	11-22	1-7	3-3	15	4	0	5	2	+19
De’Aaron Fox	29	14	5-13	1-4	3-3	3	6	1	0	3	+24
Devin Vassell	21	6	2-6	1-4	1-1	2	4	1	0	0	+12
Stephon Castle	23	19	4-9	2-4	9-10	7	6	2	0	4	+20
Harrison Barnes	22	13	4-8	4-7	1-2	3	1	2	0	0	+12
Kelly Olynyk	3	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	1	-5
Lindy Waters III	3	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	-5
Keldon Johnson	24	21	7-14	3-6	4-4	6	1	0	0	1	+12
Carter Bryant	18	6	3-6	0-3	0-0	8	3	0	1	3	+4
Bismack Biyombo	3	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	-5
Luke Kornet	19	5	1-4	0-0	3-4	8	1	0	1	0	+12
Jordan McLaughlin	3	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	1	-5
Dylan Harper	25	21	9-14	3-5	0-0	4	6	0	2	1	+8

San Antonio’s official team totals were 136 points, 48-for-101 shooting, 15-for-43 from three, 25-for-28 at the free throw line, 62 rebounds, 33 assists, 15 turnovers, 7 steals, and 9 blocks.

Miami Heat Player Performance

Miami’s individual statistics show a team that had several productive scorers but struggled to turn those contributions into efficient overall offense.

Norman Powell Leads the Heat

Powell’s 21 points made him Miami’s highest scorer. His four made three-pointers were also valuable because San Antonio’s interior size made perimeter scoring especially important.

However, his 7-for-18 shooting shows the challenge Miami faced. He generated points, but the Spurs made it difficult to sustain efficient possessions.

Bam Adebayo

Adebayo scored 18 points in 29 minutes. He shot 5-for-17 from the field, 2-for-10 from three, and made all six of his free throws.

His final line included:

• 18 points
• 3 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 1 steal
• 6-for-6 free throws
• Minus-26

The three-point volume is notable. Adebayo attempted 10 shots from behind the arc, which was a significant part of Miami’s offensive approach in this matchup.

Tyler Herro

Herro also scored 18 points. He was considerably more efficient from the field, making 6 of 11 attempts and 2 of 6 from three.

His final numbers included:

• 18 points
• 5 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 1 block
• 6-for-11 field goals
• 2-for-6 three-pointers
• 4-for-4 free throws
• Minus-19

Herro’s scoring efficiency was useful, but Miami needed more overall production because San Antonio consistently created high-quality scoring opportunities.

Jaime Jaquez Jr.

Jaquez Jr. was particularly useful as a playmaker. He finished with 8 points and 6 assists in 19 minutes.

His six assists matched the highest individual assist total on Miami. He also contributed two rebounds and one block.

Kel’el Ware

Ware recorded 7 points and 7 rebounds in 22 minutes. He also blocked two shots.

The seven rebounds were the highest individual total for Miami, but they were far below Wembanyama’s 15-rebound performance.

Complete Miami Heat Player Statistics

Player	MIN	PTS	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	+/-
Andrew Wiggins	20	9	4-7	1-3	0-0	3	1	2	1	0	-18
Bam Adebayo	29	18	5-17	2-10	6-6	3	4	1	0	0	-26
Davion Mitchell	22	2	1-4	0-2	0-0	2	3	2	0	1	-10
Tyler Herro	26	18	6-11	2-6	4-4	5	2	0	1	2	-19
Pelle Larsson	23	7	2-6	0-1	3-3	1	3	2	0	2	-23
Simone Fontecchio	6	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	1	1	0	1	-1
Myron Gardner	18	9	3-7	2-6	1-1	2	0	1	2	0	+3
Keshad Johnson	3	4	1-1	0-0	2-2	1	1	0	0	0	+5
Jaime Jaquez Jr.	19	8	3-8	2-4	0-0	2	6	0	1	1	-13
Kel’el Ware	22	7	3-10	1-6	0-0	7	1	0	2	1	-3
Norman Powell	30	21	7-18	4-11	3-4	4	2	0	0	4	-17
Kasparas Jakucionis	22	8	3-6	2-3	0-0	6	5	2	1	0	-3

The official ESPN box score lists Miami at 38-for-95 overall, 16-for-52 from three, 19-for-20 from the free throw line, with 38 rebounds, 29 assists, 12 turnovers, 11 steals, and 8 blocks.

How San Antonio Took Control

The quarter-by-quarter numbers reveal that the game was essentially decided before the fourth quarter.

San Antonio scored 38 points in both the first and second quarters. Miami scored 31 in the first and only 27 in the second.

That created a halftime score of 76-58.

The third quarter continued the same pattern. San Antonio added 32 points while Miami scored 23, increasing the margin to 27 points.

Miami eventually won the fourth quarter 30-28, but the deficit was already too large to overcome.

First Quarter: San Antonio Sets the Pace

The opening quarter established the tone.

San Antonio’s 38 points demonstrated how quickly the Spurs could generate offense. Miami remained competitive with 31 points, but allowing 38 in the opening period put the Heat in a difficult position.

The early play-by-play shows Wembanyama scoring on an alley-oop from Castle, while Fox and other Spurs players contributed early scoring. Miami also produced early three-point offense, including a Bam Adebayo three-pointer.

Second Quarter: The Game Opens Up

The second quarter was the turning point.

San Antonio scored another 38 points, giving the Spurs 76 points by halftime. Miami had 58.

A 76-point first half is significant because it meant San Antonio was not simply relying on slow, methodical half-court possessions. The Spurs were creating enough efficient opportunities to maintain a very high scoring rate.

Third Quarter: San Antonio Protects the Lead

The Spurs did not allow Miami to produce a major comeback run in the third.

San Antonio scored 32 points and Miami managed 23.

At 108-81 entering the fourth, the result was effectively determined.

Fourth Quarter: Miami Gets a Better Offensive Rhythm

Miami scored 30 fourth-quarter points compared with 28 from San Antonio.

That was the only quarter in which the Heat outscored the Spurs.

It is useful context when reading the final statistics because the fourth-quarter improvement did not erase the problems created during the first three periods.

Shooting Efficiency Explains Much of the Difference

A simple field-goal percentage comparison already shows a major gap.

San Antonio shot 48 percent.

Miami shot 40 percent.

But the difference becomes more informative when three-point shooting is included.

Using effective field-goal percentage, which gives extra weight to made three-pointers, San Antonio was approximately 55.0 percent while Miami was approximately 48.4 percent.

That means the Spurs were more efficient even after accounting for the extra value of three-point shots.

San Antonio also produced 136 points on 101 field-goal attempts, while Miami scored 111 on 95 attempts.

This is one reason looking only at raw shot attempts can be misleading. The quality and value of the shots matter.

Rebounding Was One of the Biggest Statistical Gaps

San Antonio collected 62 rebounds.

Miami collected 38.

That is a 24-rebound difference.

For a single NBA game, that is a major separation.

Wembanyama alone collected 15 rebounds, while Carter Bryant and Luke Kornet each added 8 and Castle finished with 7. San Antonio therefore received contributions from multiple positions rather than relying on one player to dominate the glass.

Miami’s leading rebounder was Ware with 7.

Adebayo had only 3 rebounds despite playing 29 minutes.

The rebounding difference matters because extra possessions can compensate for shooting inefficiency. In this game, San Antonio had both the possession advantage created by rebounding and the shooting efficiency needed to convert those opportunities into a large lead.

Interior Scoring and Paint Pressure

San Antonio also generated 60 points in the paint compared with Miami’s 40, according to the NBA’s game summary.

That statistic fits the broader story.

Wembanyama’s size created interior opportunities, while San Antonio’s overall ball movement helped generate chances around the basket.

Miami, meanwhile, had to rely more heavily on perimeter attempts. The Heat attempted 52 three-pointers, nine more than San Antonio.

Three-point shooting can change a game quickly, but Miami converted only 16 of those 52 attempts.

That 31 percent rate was not enough to offset the Spurs’ interior scoring.

Ball Movement and Playmaking

San Antonio finished with 33 assists.

Miami had 29.

The four-assist difference is not enormous by itself, but the distribution is meaningful.

Fox had 6 assists.

Castle had 6.

Wembanyama added 4.

Vassell added 4.

That gave San Antonio multiple creators.

Miami’s six-assist leader was Jaquez Jr., while Adebayo had 4 and several other players contributed three or fewer.

The Spurs therefore had a broader distribution of playmaking responsibility.

This matters because a team with several capable creators is harder to disrupt. If one player is denied, another can initiate the next possession.

Turnovers and Steals

Miami actually had fewer turnovers.

The Heat committed 12 turnovers compared with 15 for San Antonio.

Miami also recorded 11 steals compared with 7 for the Spurs.

Those numbers might appear to favor the Heat, but they were not enough to compensate for the shooting and rebounding differences.

This is an important lesson when analyzing a box score. A team does not need to win every statistical category to dominate a game.

San Antonio lost the turnover battle by three but won the rebound battle by 24 and the scoring battle by 25.

The larger advantages outweighed the smaller disadvantage.

Plus-Minus Context

Plus-minus can be useful, but it should not be treated as an isolated measure of individual performance.

For San Antonio, Fox posted +24, Champagnie +22, Castle +20, Wembanyama +19, and several bench players were also positive.

For Miami, Gardner was +3 and Keshad Johnson was +5 in limited minutes, while several core players finished substantially negative.

Adebayo finished at -26.

The figure does not mean Adebayo personally caused a 26-point loss. Plus-minus measures the team’s point differential while a player is on the court.

The official ESPN box score explicitly defines plus-minus as the team’s net points while the player is on the court.

Starters and Lineups

San Antonio started:

1. Julian Champagnie
2. Victor Wembanyama
3. De’Aaron Fox
4. Devin Vassell
5. Stephon Castle

Miami started:

1. Andrew Wiggins
2. Bam Adebayo
3. Davion Mitchell
4. Tyler Herro
5. Pelle Larsson

These starting groups are confirmed by the ESPN box score.

The important tactical difference was that San Antonio received significant scoring from its bench.

Keldon Johnson scored 21.

Dylan Harper scored 21.

Harrison Barnes scored 13.

That trio alone provided 55 points.

Miami’s bench also contributed, particularly Powell’s 21 points, but the overall scoring distribution was less favorable.

Bench Production

Bench scoring is often overlooked when people search for individual player statistics.

In this matchup, it was central to the result.

San Antonio’s bench included multiple players capable of producing points without requiring Wembanyama or Fox to carry every possession.

Johnson was 7-for-14 from the field.

Harper was 9-for-14.

Barnes was 4-for-8 and made four three-pointers.

This combination gave San Antonio a reliable second wave of offense.

Miami’s bench had Powell’s 21 points as its biggest contribution. Gardner added 9, Jaquez Jr. scored 8, Jakucionis scored 8, and Ware scored 7.

Miami therefore had useful reserve production, but San Antonio’s bench scoring was more explosive.

Three-Point Shooting Comparison

Miami actually made one more three-pointer than San Antonio.

Heat: 16 made three-pointers.

Spurs: 15 made three-pointers.

Yet San Antonio still won comfortably.

Why?

The difference was efficiency and interior scoring.

San Antonio attempted 43 threes and made 15, producing a 35 percent rate.

Miami attempted 52 and made 16, producing a 31 percent rate.

The Heat took nine more three-point attempts but made only one additional shot.

That means the additional volume did not create an advantage.

This is an important analytical point for readers evaluating the game through shooting statistics. More three-point attempts do not automatically mean better offense. Efficiency, shot quality, offensive rebounds, free throws, and interior scoring all affect the final result.

Free Throw Efficiency

Miami had the better free throw percentage.

The Heat shot 95 percent, making 19 of 20.

San Antonio shot 89 percent, making 25 of 28.

Miami’s 95 percent mark was excellent.

However, San Antonio attempted eight more free throws and made six more.

Therefore, the Spurs received a small but meaningful scoring advantage from the foul line despite having the lower percentage.

This is another example of why both volume and efficiency should be considered together.

Season Series

San Antonio completed a 2-0 season-series sweep over Miami.

The first meeting ended with the Spurs winning 107-101 on October 31, 2025.

The second meeting ended 136-111 on March 23, 2026.

ESPN’s matchup record confirms the 2-0 season-series result and lists the two final scores.

The two games were different in margin, but the season-series result was the same.

What the Player Stats Reveal About Both Teams

The most useful way to read this box score is to look for relationships between statistics rather than focusing on one headline number.

San Antonio’s victory was supported by several connected advantages:

• Better overall field-goal percentage
• Better three-point percentage
• 24 more rebounds
• 7 more blocks
• 4 more assists
• 20 more points in the paint
• Six more made free throws
• Multiple high-efficiency scorers
• Strong bench production

Miami did have some statistical positives:

• More steals
• Fewer turnovers
• Higher free throw percentage
• One more made three-pointer

Those advantages were not large enough to offset the areas where San Antonio created separation.

Why Wembanyama’s 26 Points Matter

A 26-point game is impressive, but the broader line is what makes Wembanyama’s performance significant.

He produced 26 points, 15 rebounds, 4 assists, and 5 blocks.

That is a five-category contribution involving scoring, rebounding, passing, and rim protection.

He also shot 50 percent from the field.

The one area where his shooting was less effective was from three-point range, where he went 1-for-7.

Still, San Antonio did not need him to be a high-volume three-point shooter because the team had other perimeter options.

That balance allowed Wembanyama to impact the game through several different avenues.

Why Miami’s Scoring Was Not Enough

Miami had three players with 18 or more points:

• Norman Powell: 21
• Bam Adebayo: 18
• Tyler Herro: 18

That sounds like a solid scoring foundation.

The problem was the efficiency and lack of complementary production relative to San Antonio.

Miami’s top three scorers combined for 57 points.

San Antonio’s Wembanyama, Johnson, and Harper combined for 68.

That 11-point difference among those three players was significant.

The larger issue was that San Antonio continued receiving scoring from other players as well.

A Deeper Look at Shot Selection

Miami attempted 95 field goals and 52 of those came from three-point range.

That means approximately 55 percent of Miami’s field-goal attempts were three-point attempts.

San Antonio attempted 101 shots and 43 came from three.

That is approximately 43 percent.

The Spurs therefore had a more balanced distribution between perimeter and interior attempts.

The numbers do not automatically prove that one shot profile is always superior. Basketball strategy depends on personnel, spacing, opponent defense, and game situation.

In this specific matchup, however, San Antonio’s balance worked particularly well because the Spurs converted their interior opportunities efficiently while still making 15 threes.

Defensive Impact

The defensive numbers also deserve attention.

San Antonio recorded 9 blocks.

Miami recorded 8.

Wembanyama had 5 of San Antonio’s blocks by himself.

Carter Bryant and Luke Kornet added one each, while other Spurs contributed to the team’s defensive pressure.

Miami received two blocks each from Myron Gardner and Kel’el Ware, with additional blocks from Wiggins, Herro, and Jaquez Jr.

The Heat’s 11 steals were actually higher than San Antonio’s 7.

That indicates Miami created defensive activity, but the Spurs’ combination of size, rebounding, and shot-making allowed them to remain in control.

Game Attendance and Setting

The contest was played at Kaseya Center in Miami, Florida, with an announced attendance of 19,784.

The officiating crew was Marc Davis, CJ Washington, and Aaron Smith.

The home setting did not translate into a Miami advantage on the scoreboard. San Antonio built a 27-point lead by the end of the third quarter and eventually won by 25.

Previous Meeting and What Changed

The first matchup of the season ended 107-101 in favor of San Antonio.

The second meeting was much more one-sided.

The Spurs improved their scoring output from 107 to 136 points, a 29-point increase.

Miami scored 101 in the first meeting and 111 in the second, an improvement of 10 points.

The major change was therefore not simply Miami scoring less. San Antonio’s offensive production increased dramatically.

That is important when evaluating the season series because the second result should not be reduced to a statement about Miami’s offense. San Antonio’s ability to generate 136 points was a major part of the outcome.

What Fans Looking at Player Stats Should Focus On

For anyone researching this matchup, the most useful statistics are not always the obvious ones.

Start with these five areas:

1. Shooting efficiency

Look at field-goal percentage and three-point percentage together.

2. Rebounding

A 24-rebound difference is impossible to ignore.

3. Paint scoring

San Antonio’s 60 points in the paint compared with Miami’s 40 showed how effectively the Spurs used their size and interior opportunities.

4. Bench production

Johnson and Harper each scored 21, giving San Antonio substantial secondary scoring.

5. Individual all-around contributions

Wembanyama’s 26 points and 15 rebounds only tell part of his story. His five blocks and four assists also mattered.

Statistical Takeaways

The key numbers from this matchup can be summarized as follows:

• Final score: San Antonio 136, Miami 111
• Wembanyama: 26 points, 15 rebounds, 5 blocks
• Powell: 21 points
• Johnson: 21 points
• Harper: 21 points
• Castle: 19 points, 7 rebounds, 6 assists
• Adebayo: 18 points
• Herro: 18 points
• Spurs rebounds: 62
• Heat rebounds: 38
• Spurs field goal percentage: 48 percent
• Heat field goal percentage: 40 percent
• Spurs three-point percentage: 35 percent
• Heat three-point percentage: 31 percent
• Spurs assists: 33
• Heat assists: 29
• Spurs blocks: 9
• Heat blocks: 8
• Spurs steals: 7
• Heat steals: 11
• Season series: San Antonio 2-0

These figures come from the official game record and ESPN’s box score.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who led the Spurs in scoring against the Heat?

Victor Wembanyama led San Antonio with 26 points. He also recorded 15 rebounds, 4 assists, and 5 blocks.

Who led the Heat in scoring?

Norman Powell led Miami with 21 points. He shot 7-for-18 from the field and made four three-pointers.

What was the final score between the Spurs and Heat?

San Antonio defeated Miami 136-111 at Kaseya Center. The Spurs led 76-58 at halftime and 108-81 after three quarters.

How many rebounds did Wembanyama have?

Victor Wembanyama collected 15 rebounds, the highest total by any player in the game.

How did the Spurs win the rebounding battle?

San Antonio finished with 62 rebounds compared with Miami’s 38, creating a 24-rebound advantage. Wembanyama led the Spurs with 15, while Castle had 7 and several other San Antonio players contributed multiple rebounds.

Did San Antonio win the season series?

Yes. San Antonio finished the 2025-26 regular-season series against Miami with a 2-0 record, winning 107-101 in the first meeting and 136-111 in the second.

Conclusion

The miami heat vs san antonio spurs match player stats from March 23, 2026 show a game decided by several connected statistical factors rather than one isolated performance.

Victor Wembanyama’s 26-point, 15-rebound, five-block performance was the headline contribution. His interior presence affected both ends of the floor, while his rebounding helped San Antonio establish a substantial possession advantage.

The Spurs also received 21 points each from Keldon Johnson and Dylan Harper, 19 points from Stephon Castle, and 14 points with six assists from De’Aaron Fox. That distribution made San Antonio’s offense difficult to contain.

Miami had productive individual performances of its own. Norman Powell scored 21, while Bam Adebayo and Tyler Herro each scored 18. The Heat also finished with more steals and fewer turnovers than San Antonio.

However, the largest statistical differences were elsewhere. San Antonio shot 48 percent compared with Miami’s 40 percent, controlled the glass 62-38, scored 60 points in the paint compared with 40, and received significantly more interior and bench production.

The quarter-by-quarter progression reinforces that conclusion. San Antonio scored 38 points in both of the first two quarters, took a 76-58 halftime advantage, and extended the margin to 27 points after three quarters. Miami’s 30-28 fourth-quarter advantage came after the game had already been largely decided.

The season series also ended 2-0 in favor of San Antonio. The first game was a six-point Spurs victory, while the second meeting produced a much larger 25-point margin.

For readers analyzing individual performances, the most useful approach is to combine points with shooting efficiency, rebounding, assists, defensive statistics, turnovers, and plus-minus context. A single scoring number rarely explains an NBA game completely. This matchup is a strong example of how a team can dominate through collective efficiency and depth even when the opposing team has several players reaching double figures.