bengals vs cleveland browns match player stats
The bengals vs cleveland browns match player stats provide an early look at one of the AFC North’s most interesting divisional matchups of the 2026 NFL season. Cincinnati enters the December 6 meeting with a 2-0 record, while Cleveland sits at 1-1. The Bengals have already produced 53 points across their opening two games, compared with 33 points allowed, while the Browns have scored 33 and allowed 53. Those numbers provide useful context, but they are only the starting point because this is a future matchup and the final player statistics from the game are not available yet.
The game is scheduled for Huntington Bank Field in Cleveland. The supplied matchup information lists CBS as the television network and gives December 6, 2026 as the date. The NFL’s published schedule currently lists the Week 13 meeting as Bengals at Browns on Sunday, December 6, at 1:00 PM ET.
That distinction matters when reading statistical previews. A player’s season numbers before kickoff are not the same thing as his numbers from the Bengals vs Browns game itself. For that reason, this article separates the available season production from the statistics that can only be known after the game.
bengals vs cleveland browns match player stats: matchup overview
The Bengals and Browns are both members of the AFC North, so this game carries importance beyond a single result. Divisional games often place unusual pressure on individual matchups because the teams know each other’s personnel, schemes, tendencies and strengths.
Entering this matchup, Cincinnati has the better early record at 2-0. Cleveland is 1-1.
Game information
| Category | Information |
| Matchup | Cincinnati Bengals vs. Cleveland Browns |
| Date | December 6, 2026 |
| Venue | Huntington Bank Field, Cleveland, Ohio |
| Television | CBS |
| Bengals record | 2-0 |
| Browns record | 1-1 |
| Bengals away record | 1-0 |
| Browns home record | 0-0 |
| Game spread supplied | Bengals -4.5 |
| Game total supplied | 45.5 points |
| Bengals moneyline supplied | -225 |
| Browns moneyline supplied | +185 |
The betting information is included here as part of the supplied matchup data rather than as a prediction. Betting markets describe market expectations, but they do not determine what happens on the field.
The supplied ESPN matchup information gives Cincinnati a 73.4% matchup predictor figure and Cleveland 26.4%. ESPN Pick’em data also shows 90% of selections going to Cincinnati and 10% to Cleveland. Those figures represent selections or projections, not actual game results.
For a player-statistics article, the more useful question is what individual performances could shape those team-level numbers.
Cincinnati Bengals player statistics entering the matchup
Cincinnati’s early-season statistical profile is led by Joe Burrow through the passing game and Chase Brown on the ground. Tee Higgins has also emerged as the team’s leading receiver in the supplied season data.
Joe Burrow passing statistics
Joe Burrow enters the matchup with:
| Statistic | Joe Burrow |
| Completions | 45 |
| Attempts | 66 |
| Completion rate | 68.2% |
| Passing yards | 461 |
| Passing touchdowns | 3 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
Burrow’s 45 completions on 66 attempts produce a 68.2% completion rate. His 461 passing yards are an important part of Cincinnati’s early offensive production.
The most useful way to interpret those numbers is not simply to focus on the yardage total. Burrow has combined volume with efficiency. Completing more than two-thirds of his attempts gives Cincinnati a stable passing foundation, while the three touchdown passes show that the offense has been able to convert passing opportunities into points.
His one interception is also worth monitoring. Turnovers can have an outsized effect in divisional games because possessions can become more valuable when opponents know how to limit explosive plays.
Against Cleveland, Burrow’s decision-making will therefore be just as important as his raw passing yardage. A 250-yard performance with clean possessions can be more valuable than a higher-yardage game that includes multiple turnovers.
Chase Brown rushing statistics
Chase Brown is Cincinnati’s leading rusher in the supplied season statistics.
| Statistic | Chase Brown |
| Carries | 36 |
| Rushing yards | 136 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 1 |
| Average per carry | 3.8 yards |
Brown’s 36 carries indicate that Cincinnati has given him a meaningful workload. His 136 rushing yards show consistent involvement, although the 3.8-yard average suggests that the Bengals have not simply produced explosive runs every time he touches the football.
That makes his role particularly interesting against Cleveland.
If Brown can create efficient early-down runs, Cincinnati can keep the offense in manageable situations. That can reduce pressure on Burrow and make the passing game more difficult to defend.
If Cleveland consistently stops the run on early downs, Cincinnati could be pushed toward longer passing situations. That would increase the importance of protection and Burrow’s ability to make accurate throws under pressure.
Tee Higgins receiving statistics
Tee Higgins currently leads the supplied Bengals receiving numbers.
| Statistic | Tee Higgins |
| Receptions | 8 |
| Receiving yards | 154 |
| Receiving touchdowns | 0 |
| Yards per reception | 19.3 |
Higgins has averaged 19.3 yards per reception in the supplied figures. That number immediately highlights the type of impact he can have without requiring an enormous number of catches.
Eight receptions for 154 yards means Cincinnati has generated substantial yardage when connecting with him. His lack of a receiving touchdown also tells us that yardage and scoring production have not necessarily come from the same player.
That distinction is important when evaluating player statistics. A receiver can be extremely influential without leading the team in touchdowns.
Jonathan Allen and the Bengals pass rush
Jonathan Allen leads Cincinnati with two sacks in the supplied statistics.
Sack totals are only one part of pass-rush production, but they provide a simple indicator of how frequently a defense is finishing pressure opportunities.
Two sacks from Allen give Cleveland’s offensive line another matchup to monitor. The Browns will need to protect the quarterback long enough for routes to develop, particularly if Cincinnati’s defensive front can create pressure without sending extra rushers.
Demetrius Knight Jr. and defensive involvement
Demetrius Knight Jr. leads the Bengals with 19 tackles.
A high tackle total can indicate repeated involvement in defensive plays, although tackles should never be interpreted in isolation. The location of those tackles, the number of defensive snaps and the circumstances surrounding each play all matter.
Still, 19 tackles shows that Knight has been heavily involved in Cincinnati’s early defensive production.
Cleveland Browns player statistics entering the matchup
The Browns enter the matchup with Deshaun Watson leading the supplied passing numbers. Watson is also Cleveland’s leading rusher in the available season statistics, which highlights the importance of his mobility to the offense.
Deshaun Watson passing statistics
Watson’s supplied numbers are:
| Statistic | Deshaun Watson |
| Completions | 40 |
| Attempts | 52 |
| Completion rate | 76.9% |
| Passing yards | 443 |
| Passing touchdowns | 3 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
The 76.9% completion rate stands out immediately.
Watson has completed 40 of 52 attempts for 443 yards, three touchdowns and one interception. His completion percentage is higher than Burrow’s current figure, although Burrow has attempted more passes and accumulated slightly more passing yards.
This illustrates why direct player comparisons should use several statistics instead of one number.
Burrow currently has more passing attempts and yards. Watson has the higher completion percentage. Both quarterbacks have three passing touchdowns and one interception.
The matchup will ultimately test how those efficiencies translate against the opposing defense.
Deshaun Watson rushing statistics
Watson also leads Cleveland in the supplied rushing figures.
| Statistic | Deshaun Watson |
| Carries | 13 |
| Rushing yards | 60 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 0 |
| Average per carry | 4.6 yards |
His 60 rushing yards on 13 attempts produce a 4.6-yard average.
Quarterback rushing can create problems for defenses because it adds another responsibility to the defensive front. A defense that focuses heavily on traditional running backs can leave space for quarterback scrambles.
For Cleveland, Watson’s rushing ability can therefore influence the structure of Cincinnati’s defensive plan.
Denzel Boston receiving statistics
Denzel Boston currently leads Cleveland in the supplied receiving figures.
| Statistic | Denzel Boston |
| Receptions | 7 |
| Receiving yards | 154 |
| Receiving touchdowns | 2 |
| Yards per reception | 22.0 |
Boston’s seven receptions have produced 154 yards and two touchdowns.
His 22.0 yards per reception average is particularly notable. Cleveland has therefore received explosive production from relatively limited reception volume.
The two touchdowns also make Boston’s production different from Higgins’ current statistical profile. Higgins has 154 yards without a touchdown in the supplied data, while Boston has reached the same yardage total with two scores.
That difference is an excellent example of why receiving yards alone cannot tell the complete story.
Mason Graham and the Browns pass rush
Mason Graham has two sacks in the supplied Browns defensive statistics.
Cleveland’s ability to pressure Burrow could be one of the most important defensive elements of the matchup. Cincinnati’s passing offense is built around Burrow’s accuracy and timing, but those strengths become harder to use when the quarterback is repeatedly forced to move or throw before routes fully develop.
Graham’s two sacks give the Browns an early indicator of his ability to contribute to that pressure.
Carson Schwesinger and tackle production
Carson Schwesinger leads the Browns with 20 tackles.
That total is slightly higher than Cincinnati’s leading tackle figure of 19 from Demetrius Knight Jr.
Again, tackle totals should be read alongside defensive assignments and snap counts, but the number confirms Schwesinger’s significant involvement in Cleveland’s defense.
Bengals vs Browns quarterback comparison
One of the clearest statistical storylines is the comparison between Burrow and Watson.
| Statistic | Joe Burrow | Deshaun Watson |
| Completions | 45 | 40 |
| Attempts | 66 | 52 |
| Completion rate | 68.2% | 76.9% |
| Passing yards | 461 | 443 |
| Passing TDs | 3 | 3 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 1 |
The numbers are relatively close in several categories.
Burrow has 18 more passing yards despite making 14 more attempts. Watson has a significantly higher completion percentage. Both quarterbacks have three touchdown passes and one interception.
The most useful takeaway is that neither quarterback can be evaluated solely through one statistic.
Burrow’s larger passing volume suggests Cincinnati has relied more heavily on his arm. Watson’s higher completion rate suggests Cleveland has been efficient with the attempts recorded in the supplied data.
The eventual game statistics will show whether those patterns continue when the quarterbacks face each other’s defenses.
Rushing matchup and offensive balance
The rushing comparison also reveals different offensive profiles.
Brown has 136 rushing yards on 36 carries, while Watson has 60 yards on 13 carries.
Brown’s role is more traditional because his production comes from a running back workload. Watson’s rushing production comes from the quarterback position and therefore carries a different tactical meaning.
For Cincinnati, establishing Brown could help control the defensive front and reduce the number of obvious passing situations.
For Cleveland, Watson’s mobility gives the offense another method of extending plays when conventional rushing lanes are limited.
The key statistic to watch after the game will be not only total rushing yards, but also efficiency on early downs and rushing attempts that produce first downs.
Receiving comparison: Higgins vs Boston
The receiving numbers offer one of the more interesting statistical contrasts.
| Statistic | Tee Higgins | Denzel Boston |
| Receptions | 8 | 7 |
| Receiving yards | 154 | 154 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Yards per reception | 19.3 | 22.0 |
Both players have exactly 154 receiving yards in the supplied data.
Boston has done so on one fewer reception and has two touchdowns. Higgins has one more reception but no receiving touchdown.
The figures suggest that both players have produced explosive plays, although Boston’s production has translated into more scoring plays.
For Cincinnati, getting Higgins involved can create opportunities across the field. For Cleveland, Boston’s ability to create explosive gains gives the offense a potential big-play element.
The defensive objective for both teams will be to limit explosive completions while avoiding excessive attention to one receiver that opens opportunities elsewhere.
Defensive statistics that could shape the game
Offensive statistics usually receive the most attention, but the defensive numbers may provide an important explanation for how this matchup develops.
Cincinnati defensive leaders
The supplied Bengals defensive leaders include:
- Jonathan Allen: 2 sacks
- Demetrius Knight Jr.: 19 tackles
Cincinnati also has eight total defensive sacks in the supplied team statistics and a +3 turnover differential.
That turnover differential is significant because Cincinnati has generated three more turnovers than it has surrendered according to the supplied data.
The Bengals have also recorded zero interceptions in the supplied team statistics, which means their turnover advantage has come through other defensive plays.
Cleveland defensive leaders
Cleveland’s supplied defensive leaders include:
- Mason Graham: 2 sacks
- Carson Schwesinger: 20 tackles
The Browns have four total defensive sacks and one interception in the supplied figures.
Their turnover differential is -1.
The difference between the teams is therefore not simply about the number of tackles or individual sacks. Cincinnati has the stronger early turnover profile in the supplied statistics.
Recent form entering the matchup
The supplied recent-game data gives Cincinnati five consecutive listed wins:
| Bengals recent result | Outcome |
| vs Houston | W 20-6 |
| vs Tampa Bay | W 33-27 |
| at Philadelphia | W 30-13 |
| vs Chicago | W 27-9 |
| vs Detroit | W 16-14 |
The Browns’ listed recent results are more mixed:
| Browns recent result | Outcome |
| at Tampa Bay | W 23-19 |
| at Jacksonville | L 10-34 |
| vs New England | W 37-13 |
| vs Buffalo | L 7-31 |
| at Chicago | L 10-34 |
These results should be treated as supplied historical context rather than a guarantee of what will happen on December 6.
Cincinnati’s listed results show an ability to win both close games and more comfortable contests. The 16-14 result against Detroit was decided by only two points, while the 30-13 result against Philadelphia produced a much larger margin.
Cleveland’s results show a similar range, including a 37-13 win over New England but also losses by 24 points against Jacksonville and 24 points against Chicago.
The contrast suggests that game-to-game performance has varied, making individual matchup statistics particularly useful.
Why the offensive line could matter
Quarterback statistics often receive the most attention, but the offensive line can determine whether those numbers are possible.
Burrow’s passing efficiency depends on protection that allows him to work through progressions. Watson’s passing efficiency similarly depends on having enough time to identify coverage and deliver the football accurately.
The two defenses have already produced pressure statistics, with Cincinnati at eight total sacks and Cleveland at four in the supplied data.
That creates an obvious area to monitor.
If Cincinnati’s pass rush reaches Watson consistently, Cleveland may have to rely more heavily on quick throws and quarterback mobility.
If Cleveland’s pass rush reaches Burrow, the Bengals could face more difficult passing situations and fewer opportunities for their receivers to work deep downfield.
Injuries and availability
The supplied injury information lists several players whose availability could affect the final matchup.
Bengals injury information
The supplied data lists:
- B.J. Hill: Questionable, Achilles
- Brian Parker II: IR-R, undisclosed
- Ja’Sir Taylor: IR-R, undisclosed
Questionable designations should not automatically be treated as confirmed absences. Player availability can change before kickoff.
Hill’s status is particularly relevant because defensive line availability can affect Cincinnati’s ability to generate interior pressure and maintain depth across the front.
Browns injury information
The supplied Browns information lists:
- Teven Jenkins: Questionable, back
- Dylan Sampson: IR, knee
- Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah: PUP-R, neck
- Dillon Gabriel: IR-R, back
- Kendrick Green: IR, undisclosed
These designations should also be interpreted as status information rather than definitive statements about who will or will not play.
In a statistical preview, injuries matter because the absence of one starter can change snap distribution and create larger roles for other players.
AFC North standings context
The supplied standings show:
| Team | Record | Winning percentage | Points For | Points Against |
| Cincinnati Bengals | 2-0 | 1.000 | 53 | 33 |
| Baltimore Ravens | 1-1 | .500 | 58 | 47 |
| Cleveland Browns | 1-1 | .500 | 33 | 53 |
| Pittsburgh Steelers | 1-1 | .500 | 23 | 33 |
At this stage of the season, the standings are based on a very small number of games.
That means a single divisional result can significantly change the picture. Cincinnati enters with a perfect record in the supplied standings, while Cleveland has split its opening two games.
The matchup therefore has importance for both teams, although the meaning of the standings will naturally change as the season progresses.
What the numbers suggest about each offense
The supplied statistics point toward different strengths.
Cincinnati’s statistical profile
Cincinnati’s key offensive indicators include:
- 461 passing yards from Burrow
- 136 rushing yards from Brown
- 154 receiving yards from Higgins
- Three passing touchdowns from Burrow
- One rushing touchdown from Brown
The Bengals have production across multiple areas rather than relying entirely on one player.
Burrow provides the passing volume. Brown provides the rushing workload. Higgins provides explosive receiving production.
That balance can make defensive planning more complicated.
Cleveland’s statistical profile
Cleveland’s leading figures include:
- 443 passing yards from Watson
- 60 rushing yards from Watson
- 154 receiving yards from Boston
- Three passing touchdowns from Watson
- Two receiving touchdowns from Boston
Boston’s two touchdowns are especially important because they account for a large portion of the Browns’ highlighted scoring production.
Watson’s rushing also gives Cleveland a dimension that Cincinnati must account for when defending passing situations.
How to read the final player statistics after the game
Once the Bengals and Browns actually play, readers looking for bengals vs cleveland browns match player stats should avoid focusing only on the final score.
A useful post-game statistical review should include at least five categories.
1. Passing efficiency
Look at:
- Completions and attempts
- Passing yards
- Touchdowns
- Interceptions
- Completion percentage
- Sacks and sack yardage
- Quarterback rushing
These figures explain both volume and efficiency.
2. Rushing efficiency
Check:
- Carries
- Rushing yards
- Yards per carry
- Rushing touchdowns
- Longest run
- First downs
A running back with 100 yards on 30 carries had a very different statistical performance from one who gained 100 yards on 15 carries.
3. Receiving production
Important measures include:
- Targets
- Receptions
- Receiving yards
- Touchdowns
- Yards per reception
- Longest reception
- First downs
Targets are particularly useful because they show how often the offense attempted to involve a receiver.
4. Defensive production
Look at:
- Total tackles
- Solo tackles
- Sacks
- Interceptions
- Forced fumbles
- Fumble recoveries
- Passes defended
These statistics can explain why an offense struggled even when the final score does not immediately reveal the reason.
5. Team efficiency
Finally, check:
- Total yards
- Passing yards
- Rushing yards
- Third-down conversion
- Red-zone efficiency
- Turnovers
- Time of possession
- Penalties
Team-level statistics provide context for individual performances.
Bengals vs Browns statistical storylines to monitor
Several player-based storylines deserve attention when the game arrives.
Burrow’s accuracy against Cleveland’s pressure
Burrow’s 68.2% completion rate is strong, but Cleveland’s ability to pressure him could affect that efficiency.
The important question is whether the Browns can create pressure without sacrificing coverage elsewhere.
Watson’s mobility
Watson’s 4.6 yards per rushing attempt provides Cleveland with another method of moving the chains.
Cincinnati’s defensive front will need to account for the quarterback as a runner, particularly on broken plays.
Higgins and Boston
Both receivers have 154 yards in the supplied statistics, but their production has been different.
Higgins has eight catches and no touchdowns. Boston has seven catches and two touchdowns.
The game could therefore reveal whether either player can continue that explosive production against a divisional opponent.
Brown’s workload
Brown has 36 carries for 136 yards.
His workload could become especially important if Cincinnati wants to control possession and reduce the number of high-pressure passing situations facing Burrow.
Turnovers
Cincinnati’s +3 turnover differential compared with Cleveland’s -1 is another statistic worth monitoring.
Turnovers can change the statistical shape of a game quickly. A team may lose the yardage battle and still win if it repeatedly creates short fields through takeaways.
What would make the final statistics meaningful?
Raw numbers need context.
For example, 300 passing yards can look impressive, but if those yards require 50 attempts and produce only one touchdown, the performance is different from 300 yards on 30 attempts with three touchdowns.
The same principle applies to rushing.
A running back gaining 120 yards on 25 attempts has produced a different efficiency level than a back gaining 120 yards on 35 attempts.
Receiving statistics require similar care.
A receiver with 100 yards on five catches has created more yards per reception than a receiver with 100 yards on 12 catches.
That is why a strong player-statistics article should present the numbers and explain what they mean.
Important data distinction for this matchup
Because the Bengals and Browns game is scheduled for December 6, 2026, the available statistics are currently season-to-date figures rather than final game statistics.
This distinction is important for readers searching for player stats.
The supplied data shows what the leading players have produced entering the matchup. It does not provide the eventual box score from the Bengals-Browns game.
Once the game is complete, the final article should replace or supplement these preview figures with the actual player-by-player box score.
That final version should include passing, rushing, receiving and defensive statistics for both teams, along with the final score and team totals.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the Bengals vs Browns match player stats?
The current available figures are pre-game season statistics. Joe Burrow leads Cincinnati with 461 passing yards, Chase Brown leads the Bengals with 136 rushing yards, and Tee Higgins has 154 receiving yards. For Cleveland, Deshaun Watson has 443 passing yards, 60 rushing yards and Denzel Boston has 154 receiving yards.
Who leads the Bengals in passing?
Joe Burrow leads Cincinnati with 45 completions on 66 attempts for 461 yards, three touchdowns and one interception in the supplied season data.
Who leads the Browns in passing?
Deshaun Watson leads Cleveland with 40 completions on 52 attempts for 443 yards, three touchdowns and one interception.
Who is Cincinnati’s leading rusher?
Chase Brown leads the Bengals with 36 carries for 136 yards and one touchdown.
Who is Cleveland’s leading receiver?
Denzel Boston leads the Browns with seven receptions for 154 yards and two touchdowns in the supplied statistics.
When is Bengals vs Browns?
The matchup is scheduled for December 6, 2026, at Huntington Bank Field in Cleveland. The NFL schedule currently lists a 1:00 PM ET kickoff on CBS.
Conclusion
The bengals vs cleveland browns match player stats currently show two teams with several productive individual players heading into their AFC North meeting.
Joe Burrow has completed 68.2% of his passes for 461 yards and three touchdowns. Chase Brown has carried 36 times for 136 yards and one touchdown, while Tee Higgins has produced 154 receiving yards on eight receptions.
Cleveland’s statistical leaders tell a different but equally detailed story. Deshaun Watson has completed 76.9% of his passes for 443 yards and three touchdowns. He has also added 60 rushing yards. Denzel Boston has 154 receiving yards and two touchdowns on seven receptions.
The defensive numbers also deserve attention. Jonathan Allen and Mason Graham have two sacks apiece, while Demetrius Knight Jr. and Carson Schwesinger lead their respective teams in tackles with 19 and 20.
The most important point is that these are season-to-date figures before the December 6 meeting. They should not be confused with the final statistics from the game itself. Once the matchup is played, the final box score will provide the definitive comparison of quarterback efficiency, rushing production, receiving output, defensive impact and team-level performance.
For readers studying the matchup before kickoff, the current numbers provide a useful baseline. They identify the players carrying the largest statistical workloads and highlight the areas most likely to influence the eventual box score.
One Comment