Timberwolves vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats
The timberwolves vs phoenix suns match player stats from March 29, 2025, tell a much deeper story than the 124-109 final score alone. Minnesota defeated Phoenix at Target Center in Minneapolis, controlling the game through four quarters and completing a 4-0 season-series sweep. The Timberwolves combined efficient shooting with a major advantage on the glass, more assists, fewer turnovers, and 12 steals to turn a competitive scoring night into a 15-point victory.
This game is especially useful for anyone studying player performance because several individual contributions shaped the result. Julius Randle led Minnesota with 25 points and 8 assists, while Rudy Gobert produced 17 points, 13 rebounds, and 4 steals. Anthony Edwards added 20 points, 4 rebounds, and 5 assists. For Phoenix, Kevin Durant scored 23 points, Collin Gillespie posted 22 points and 10 assists, and Royce O’Neale supplied 21 points off the bench.
The team numbers also reveal why Minnesota won despite Phoenix shooting 52% from the field and 49% from three-point range. Minnesota shot 53% overall and 49% from three, but its 43 rebounds, 31 assists, and 12 steals gave the Timberwolves more ways to control possessions.
Timberwolves vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The matchup took place on March 29, 2025, at Target Center in Minneapolis. Minnesota entered the game with a 42-32 record and a 22-16 home record, while Phoenix came in at 35-39 overall and 12-25 on the road.
Minnesota ultimately won 124-109.
The 15-point margin was built gradually rather than through one massive scoring burst. The Timberwolves won every quarter:
| Quarter | Phoenix Suns | Minnesota Timberwolves |
| 1st | 21 | 27 |
| 2nd | 24 | 30 |
| 3rd | 30 | 35 |
| 4th | 34 | 32 |
| Final | 109 | 124 |
Minnesota established a six-point advantage after the opening quarter. The Timberwolves then extended the lead to 12 points by halftime and reached a 17-point advantage after three quarters.
Phoenix improved offensively in the second half, particularly during the fourth quarter, but the early deficit proved too large to overcome.
The attendance was 18,978, and the game was listed for NBA TV.
For readers who want to verify broader NBA game information and league context, the official NBA website is the most appropriate primary league source.
How Minnesota Built the 124-109 Victory
A simple box-score reading might suggest that shooting efficiency decided the game. Both teams made 49% of their three-point attempts, while Minnesota shot 53% overall compared with Phoenix’s 52%.
That was not the whole story.
Minnesota created advantages in several other statistical areas.
The Timberwolves collected 43 rebounds compared with 34 for Phoenix. That nine-rebound difference mattered because it gave Minnesota more control over missed shots and helped limit Phoenix’s opportunities to generate additional possessions.
Minnesota also recorded 31 assists, three more than Phoenix’s 28. That indicates a slightly stronger level of offensive connection, with the Timberwolves creating more scoring opportunities through passing.
The biggest difference came in turnovers and steals.
Phoenix committed 16 turnovers while Minnesota committed only 11. At the same time, Minnesota recorded 12 steals compared with six for Phoenix.
That created a six-turnover swing in Minnesota’s favor and reflected a team that was more disruptive defensively while also taking better care of the basketball.
The Four Main Statistical Advantages
Minnesota’s victory can be understood through four major areas:
- Rebounding: Minnesota won the rebound battle 43-34.
- Ball security: Minnesota committed 11 turnovers compared with Phoenix’s 16.
- Defensive disruption: Minnesota recorded 12 steals compared with Phoenix’s six.
- Playmaking: Minnesota had 31 assists compared with Phoenix’s 28.
The Timberwolves also converted 85% of their free throws, making 11 of 13 attempts. Phoenix made nine of 13 for 69%.
None of these numbers alone explains the entire game. Together, however, they explain why Minnesota was able to win comfortably despite Phoenix’s efficient perimeter shooting.
Phoenix Suns Player Performance
The Phoenix side produced several strong individual performances, even though the team lost.
Kevin Durant led the Suns in scoring with 23 points. His scoring output made him the team’s leading offensive option, but Phoenix needed more overall production to compensate for Minnesota’s balance.
Collin Gillespie was particularly important because he combined scoring and playmaking. He finished with 22 points and 10 assists, giving Phoenix a double-digit assist performance from one of its key contributors.
Royce O’Neale also provided valuable scoring from the bench, producing 21 points.
That combination is significant. Phoenix had three players reach at least 21 points, yet still lost by 15. This shows that individual scoring totals do not necessarily translate directly into team success.
Kevin Durant’s 23 Points
Durant finished as Phoenix’s leading scorer with 23 points.
His scoring helped Phoenix remain competitive, especially as the Suns increased their offensive output during the second half. Phoenix scored 30 points in the third quarter and 34 in the fourth.
The problem was that Minnesota was already ahead by too much.
A 23-point performance from a leading scorer can normally keep a team in a game, but the surrounding possession battle matters. Phoenix’s 16 turnovers and 34 rebounds compared poorly with Minnesota’s 11 turnovers and 43 rebounds.
Collin Gillespie’s 22 Points and 10 Assists
Gillespie’s performance stands out because his 22 points came alongside 10 assists.
That combination shows that Phoenix was not simply relying on isolation scoring. The Suns were also generating offense through playmaking.
However, Minnesota’s defensive pressure disrupted Phoenix enough to produce 12 steals. The Suns also finished with 16 turnovers.
This is an important distinction when analyzing the game. Phoenix had strong offensive production from its leading contributors, but Minnesota consistently created more favorable possession outcomes.
Royce O’Neale’s 21 Points
O’Neale scored 21 points off the bench, making him Phoenix’s leading reserve scorer.
His contribution helped the Suns avoid an even larger scoring gap. Yet Minnesota also received meaningful bench production, with Donte DiVincenzo scoring 13 points and adding five assists.
The difference was therefore not simply that one team’s bench produced and the other team’s did not. Minnesota’s overall structure allowed contributions from multiple areas of the lineup.
Minnesota Timberwolves Player Performance
Minnesota’s scoring was led by Julius Randle, who finished with 25 points and 8 assists.
Randle’s combination of scoring and distribution was important because it gave Minnesota another offensive organizer alongside the team’s other playmakers.
Rudy Gobert delivered one of the most complete performances of the game. He recorded 17 points, 13 rebounds, and 4 steals.
Anthony Edwards added 20 points, 4 rebounds, and 5 assists.
Jaden McDaniels scored 16 points with three rebounds and one assist, while Mike Conley contributed 13 points, three rebounds, and four assists.
Donte DiVincenzo provided 13 points and five assists from the bench.
The result was a balanced statistical profile rather than a one-player performance.
Julius Randle’s 25 Points and 8 Assists
Randle was Minnesota’s leading scorer with 25 points, but his eight assists are equally important.
The assists demonstrate that his value was not limited to finishing possessions. He also helped create opportunities for teammates.
That becomes more meaningful when viewed alongside Minnesota’s 31 total assists.
The Timberwolves did not win because Randle simply scored more than everyone else. They won because their leading players contributed to several aspects of the game.
Rudy Gobert’s 17 Points, 13 Rebounds and 4 Steals
Gobert’s stat line is one of the clearest examples of how Minnesota’s physical advantages affected the game.
He recorded a double-double with 17 points and 13 rebounds. He also added four steals.
The rebounding figure directly contributed to Minnesota’s 43-34 advantage on the glass.
The four steals also formed part of Minnesota’s overall defensive disruption. The Timberwolves finished with 12 steals as a team, twice Phoenix’s total.
Gobert therefore contributed in scoring, rebounding, and defense, making his performance particularly influential.
Anthony Edwards’ 20 Points and 5 Assists
Edwards finished with 20 points, four rebounds, and five assists.
His scoring gave Minnesota another 20-point contributor, while the five assists added to the team’s overall passing production.
Minnesota’s offensive balance meant Phoenix could not focus exclusively on one scorer.
With Randle scoring 25, Edwards scoring 20, Gobert scoring 17, and McDaniels scoring 16, the Timberwolves received meaningful production from multiple starters.
Jaden McDaniels and Mike Conley
McDaniels finished with 16 points, three rebounds, and one assist.
Conley recorded 13 points, three rebounds, and four assists.
Their contributions helped Minnesota maintain offensive balance.
Conley’s four assists were especially relevant because Minnesota’s 31 total assists indicate that the team was consistently moving the ball.
Full Team Statistical Comparison
The following comparison provides the clearest statistical picture of the game:
| Category | Phoenix Suns | Minnesota Timberwolves |
| Points | 109 | 124 |
| Field Goals | 41-79 | 47-89 |
| Field Goal % | 52% | 53% |
| Three-Pointers | 18-37 | 19-39 |
| Three-Point % | 49% | 49% |
| Free Throws | 9-13 | 11-13 |
| Free Throw % | 69% | 85% |
| Rebounds | 34 | 43 |
| Assists | 28 | 31 |
| Turnovers | 16 | 11 |
| Steals | 6 | 12 |
| Blocks | 4 | 4 |
The most interesting part of this table is that shooting efficiency was almost identical.
Phoenix shot 52% from the field.
Minnesota shot 53%.
Both teams shot 49% from three-point range.
That means the final score cannot be explained simply by saying Minnesota shot much better.
Instead, Minnesota won through a broader collection of advantages.
Why the Rebounding Battle Mattered
Minnesota finished with nine more rebounds than Phoenix.
That is a meaningful difference in a game where both teams were shooting efficiently.
When teams shoot above 50% from the field, there are fewer missed shots available to recover. Winning the rebound battle under those conditions can therefore be especially valuable because each extra rebound helps control the limited number of missed-shot opportunities.
Minnesota’s 43 rebounds also fit the broader physical profile of the game.
The Timberwolves were able to combine interior activity with efficient perimeter shooting, preventing Phoenix from turning its 49% three-point shooting into a winning advantage.
Turnovers Changed the Possession Battle
Turnovers are one of the most important statistics for understanding this matchup.
Phoenix committed 16 turnovers.
Minnesota committed 11.
That five-turnover difference meant Minnesota protected possessions more effectively.
The difference becomes even more important when combined with steals.
Minnesota recorded 12 steals while Phoenix recorded six.
The Timberwolves therefore created six more steals while also committing five fewer turnovers.
That is a strong indicator of possession control.
A team can survive a modest shooting disadvantage if it consistently creates extra possessions. In this game, Minnesota did not even need to overcome a shooting disadvantage. It combined comparable shooting efficiency with better possession management.
Minnesota’s Three-Point Shooting
Both teams were highly effective from three-point range.
Phoenix made 18 of 37 attempts for 49%.
Minnesota made 19 of 39 for 49%.
The Timberwolves therefore made one additional three-pointer.
The difference is small enough that it should not be treated as the primary explanation for the final score.
Instead, the three-point numbers show that both offenses were capable of generating efficient perimeter scoring.
Minnesota simply supplemented that efficiency with better rebounding, ball security, and defensive activity.
Free Throw Efficiency
Minnesota also held an advantage at the free-throw line.
The Timberwolves converted 11 of 13 attempts, an 85% success rate.
Phoenix made nine of 13, or 69%.
The difference was four percentage points in made free throws.
Although the total number of attempts was identical, Minnesota converted two more free throws.
That contributed to the final scoring margin and demonstrated another small but useful efficiency advantage.
The Importance of the Fourth Quarter
Phoenix actually outscored Minnesota in the fourth quarter.
The Suns scored 34 points.
The Timberwolves scored 32.
That detail is important because it shows that Phoenix did not simply collapse offensively at the end of the game.
Instead, the damage had already been done.
Minnesota entered the fourth quarter with a 17-point lead after outscoring Phoenix in each of the first three quarters.
Phoenix’s fourth-quarter improvement reduced the deficit by two points, but that was not enough to change the result.
This is one of the clearest lessons from the game. A strong closing quarter cannot always repair a slow start when the opponent consistently builds the lead over the first three periods.
Season Series: Minnesota Won 4-0
The broader matchup context also matters.
Minnesota won the season series 4-0.
That means the March 29 result was not an isolated victory in the matchup.
The Timberwolves had repeatedly found ways to defeat Phoenix during the season.
For readers analyzing team trends, a four-game sweep provides stronger evidence of matchup success than one individual game alone.
However, it is still important not to assume that every game in a season series was won for exactly the same reasons. Basketball outcomes can change based on lineups, shooting performance, injuries, rotations, and game circumstances.
The March 29 game itself provides a clear statistical profile: Minnesota combined efficient shooting with superior rebounding, fewer turnovers, more steals, and slightly better playmaking.
Starting Lineups
The Suns’ listed starters were:
- Kevin Durant
- Ryan Dunn
- Nick Richards
- Devin Booker
- Collin Gillespie
The Timberwolves’ listed starters were:
- Julius Randle
- Jaden McDaniels
- Rudy Gobert
- Mike Conley
- Anthony Edwards
These lineups provide useful context when evaluating the player statistics.
Minnesota had several starters contributing across different statistical categories. Randle provided scoring and assists. Gobert provided scoring, rebounding, and defensive production. Edwards supplied scoring and playmaking. Conley added assists and scoring, while McDaniels contributed 16 points.
Phoenix also received major contributions from its key players, but the overall team statistics favored Minnesota.
What the Player Stats Say About Each Team
The player statistics suggest that Minnesota’s victory was based on balance rather than dependence on a single star.
Randle led the team with 25 points.
Edwards added 20.
Gobert scored 17 and collected 13 rebounds.
McDaniels contributed 16.
Conley and DiVincenzo each scored 13.
That gives Minnesota six players with at least 13 points based on the supplied game data.
Phoenix’s scoring was also strong at the top. Durant scored 23, Gillespie scored 22, and O’Neale scored 21.
The difference is that Minnesota’s statistical advantages extended beyond scoring.
The Timberwolves generated 31 assists, 43 rebounds, and 12 steals.
That balance made the team difficult to beat even though Phoenix had three players reach at least 21 points.
What Went Wrong for Phoenix?
Phoenix’s offensive efficiency was not poor.
In fact, shooting 52% from the field and 49% from three is highly productive.
The bigger issue was that the Suns did not translate that efficiency into enough overall possessions and defensive disruption.
Sixteen turnovers gave Minnesota additional opportunities.
The nine-rebound deficit limited Phoenix’s ability to control the glass.
The six-steal gap showed that Minnesota created more defensive pressure.
Phoenix also allowed Minnesota to shoot 53% from the field and 49% from three.
So while the Suns were efficient offensively, they did not create enough defensive resistance or possession advantages to offset Minnesota’s production.
What Minnesota Did Better
Minnesota’s performance was strong because almost every major category moved in the same direction.
The Timberwolves:
- Scored 124 points.
- Shot 53% from the field.
- Shot 49% from three.
- Made 85% of their free throws.
- Collected 43 rebounds.
- Recorded 31 assists.
- Committed only 11 turnovers.
- Produced 12 steals.
- Won by 15 points.
This is a well-rounded winning profile.
There was no single statistical category that completely explains the game. Instead, Minnesota repeatedly won smaller battles.
Those smaller advantages accumulated into a large final margin.
How to Read These Stats Correctly
When researching timberwolves vs phoenix suns match player stats, it is tempting to focus only on the leading scorers.
That approach misses much of what determines a basketball game.
A better method is to examine the game in layers.
First, look at the final score.
Second, compare shooting efficiency.
Third, evaluate rebounds and turnovers.
Fourth, examine assists, steals, and free throws.
Finally, connect individual performances to team statistics.
Using that approach, the March 29 game becomes much easier to understand.
Kevin Durant’s 23 points were significant.
Randle’s 25 points were significant.
Gillespie’s 22 points and 10 assists were significant.
Gobert’s 17 points, 13 rebounds, and four steals were significant.
But the final outcome was created by the combined statistical profile of the teams.
Key Takeaways From the Match
Several conclusions stand out from the data.
1. Shooting Was Not the Main Difference
Both teams shot nearly identically from three-point range.
Phoenix shot 49%.
Minnesota also shot 49%.
Overall field-goal shooting was similarly close.
2. Minnesota Controlled the Glass
The Timberwolves won the rebounding battle 43-34.
That nine-rebound advantage helped them control possessions.
3. Minnesota Protected the Ball Better
The Timberwolves committed 11 turnovers compared with Phoenix’s 16.
That five-turnover difference mattered.
4. Minnesota Created More Defensive Pressure
The Timberwolves recorded 12 steals.
Phoenix recorded six.
That six-steal difference was one of the clearest defensive advantages in the box score.
5. Minnesota Had More Balanced Production
Randle, Edwards, Gobert, McDaniels, Conley, and DiVincenzo all made meaningful contributions.
Phoenix received excellent scoring from Durant, Gillespie, and O’Neale, but the broader statistical balance favored Minnesota.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who led the Timberwolves in scoring against the Suns?
Julius Randle led Minnesota with 25 points. He also recorded eight assists.
Who was Phoenix’s leading scorer?
Kevin Durant led Phoenix with 23 points.
What was the final score of the Timberwolves vs Suns game?
Minnesota defeated Phoenix 124-109 on March 29, 2025, at Target Center.
How many points did Anthony Edwards score?
Anthony Edwards scored 20 points. He also recorded four rebounds and five assists.
How did Rudy Gobert perform against Phoenix?
Rudy Gobert finished with 17 points, 13 rebounds, and four steals.
Who won the 2025 season series?
Minnesota won the season series 4-0 according to the supplied game data.
Conclusion
The March 29, 2025 matchup provides a strong example of why basketball analysis should go beyond the scoring column. Minnesota defeated Phoenix 124-109, but the 15-point victory was supported by several connected advantages.
The Timberwolves shot 53% from the field and 49% from three, while Phoenix shot 52% and 49%, respectively. The shooting gap was therefore small. Minnesota separated itself through other areas, particularly rebounding, turnovers, steals, assists, and free-throw efficiency.
Julius Randle led Minnesota with 25 points and eight assists. Anthony Edwards contributed 20 points and five assists. Rudy Gobert produced 17 points, 13 rebounds, and four steals. Jaden McDaniels scored 16, while Mike Conley and Donte DiVincenzo each scored 13.
Phoenix received 23 points from Kevin Durant, 22 points and 10 assists from Collin Gillespie, and 21 points from Royce O’Neale. Those performances demonstrate that Phoenix had plenty of individual offensive production, but the team could not overcome Minnesota’s possession advantages.
Ultimately, the timberwolves vs phoenix suns match player stats show a game where balance mattered more than one dominant statistical category. Minnesota controlled the glass, protected the basketball, generated more steals, passed effectively, and converted its free throws at a higher rate. Those details explain the final result far better than the scoring totals alone.
