LA Clippers vs Houston Rockets Match Player Stats
The LA Clippers vs Houston Rockets match player stats from February 11, 2026, tell the story of a competitive NBA game decided by shooting efficiency and late-game execution. The Houston Rockets defeated the Los Angeles Clippers 102-95 at Toyota Center in Houston, Texas, in front of 18,055 fans. Kevin Durant led Houston with 26 points, while Alperen Sengun added 22 points and Amen Thompson contributed 16. For the Clippers, Kawhi Leonard scored a team-high 24 points, and John Collins finished with 17. Houston’s 50% shooting from three-point range and 89% accuracy at the free-throw line proved especially important in a seven-point victory.
The final score alone does not explain the entire contest. Los Angeles collected more rebounds, assists, and steals, and committed fewer turnovers. However, Houston made eight more three-pointers, converted its free throws at a much higher rate, and finished with a superior overall field-goal percentage. Those differences show how a team can win without leading every major statistical category.
This article breaks down the final score, individual performances, starting lineups, quarter-by-quarter scoring, shooting percentages, defensive contributions, and the statistical factors that shaped the result. All game figures below are based on the supplied ESPN box-score information. Where the available data does not include a complete individual box score, the analysis avoids inventing missing statistics.
LA Clippers vs Houston Rockets Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The February 11 matchup featured two teams with different routes to offensive production. Houston relied on efficient perimeter shooting, strong scoring from its leading players, and accurate free throws. Los Angeles created additional opportunities through offensive rebounds, steals, and ball movement, but struggled to match Houston’s conversion rate from beyond the arc.
LA Clippers
Away team · Record shown: 25-28
Top scorer: Kawhi Leonard, 24 points
95
Houston Rockets
Home team · Record shown: 33-19
Top scorer: Kevin Durant, 26 points
102
Date
February 11, 2026
Venue
Toyota Center
Location
Houston, Texas
Attendance
18,055
Final Score and Team Records
| Game detail | LA Clippers | Houston Rockets |
| Final score | 95 | 102 |
| Overall record shown | 25-28 | 33-19 |
| Home/away record shown | 12-17 away | 18-6 home |
| Field-goal percentage | 41% | 46% |
| Three-point percentage | 27% | 50% |
| Free-throw percentage | 65% | 89% |
| Total rebounds | 45 | 44 |
| Assists | 24 | 19 |
| Turnovers | 11 | 16 |
Houston won by seven points, improving on the offensive end where it mattered most. The Rockets shot better from every major field-goal category listed in the supplied data, while the Clippers generated more secondary opportunities through rebounds and defensive pressure.
The records above are reproduced from the supplied game information rather than independently reconstructed standings.
Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring Breakdown
The scoring pattern shows how Houston regained control after a closely contested first half. The Clippers won the second quarter, but Houston responded after halftime and maintained its advantage through the final period.
| Quarter | LA Clippers | Houston Rockets | Quarter winner |
| First | 26 | 27 | Houston |
| Second | 26 | 24 | LA Clippers |
| Third | 20 | 27 | Houston |
| Fourth | 23 | 24 | Houston |
| Final | 95 | 102 | Houston |
Points by Quarter
Quarter-by-quarter scoring in the February matchup.
■ LA Clippers
■ Houston Rockets
First Quarter: Houston Takes a Narrow Lead
Houston opened the game with a 27-26 advantage. The one-point margin reflected a balanced start rather than a clear early separation.
The Clippers scored 26 points, keeping pace with the home team. At this stage, neither side had created a meaningful cushion, so the game remained open to changes in momentum.
For Houston, the ability to score consistently across the opening period provided a foundation for the second half. For Los Angeles, staying within one point meant there was no immediate need to abandon its offensive approach.
Second Quarter: Los Angeles Moves Ahead
The Clippers outscored Houston 26-24 in the second quarter. That two-point advantage was enough to turn the opening deficit into a narrow halftime lead.
This period matters because it demonstrates that Houston did not dominate the entire game. Los Angeles could match the Rockets’ scoring and briefly gain control of the scoreboard.
However, a two-point quarter advantage is a small margin. It offered the Clippers an opportunity to build momentum, but it did not guarantee that they could sustain that level of scoring after halftime.
Third Quarter: The Rockets Change the Direction
Houston won the third quarter 27-20, producing the most important scoring difference of the game.
The seven-point quarter advantage erased the Clippers’ earlier progress and gave Houston a stronger position entering the fourth. This was the clearest statistical turning point in the supplied scoring breakdown.
The difference was not simply that Houston scored more. Los Angeles also produced its lowest-scoring quarter, falling to 20 points. When one team increases its output while the opponent’s scoring drops, the scoreboard can shift quickly without requiring a dramatic individual scoring run.
Fourth Quarter: Houston Protects Its Lead
The Rockets scored 24 points in the final quarter, while the Clippers added 23. Houston therefore extended its advantage by one point and secured the 102-95 result.
Los Angeles continued scoring, but it did not make up the deficit created in the third quarter. Houston’s fourth-quarter output was enough to preserve the lead.
The key lesson from the quarter-by-quarter results is straightforward: the Clippers remained competitive for much of the contest, but Houston’s third-quarter performance created a gap that the visitors could not recover.
Complete Player Stats: LA Clippers vs Houston Rockets
Individual statistics provide a more detailed view of how the two teams produced their points and contributed in other areas.
The following tables use the individual figures available in the supplied game data and the corresponding ESPN box score. They include points, shooting, rebounds, assists, turnovers, steals, blocks, and plus-minus where available.
LA Clippers Player Stats
| Player | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | STL | BLK | +/- |
| Kawhi Leonard | 24 | 7-19 | 2-7 | 8-9 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -16 |
| John Collins | 17 | 8-14 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -11 |
| Derrick Jones Jr. | 6 | 2-7 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -7 |
| Brook Lopez | 7 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -8 |
| Kris Dunn | 6 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 0 | -9 |
| Jordan Miller | 9 | 2-5 | 2-4 | 3-6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -5 |
| Bennedict Mathurin | 9 | 4-13 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | +4 |
| Yanic Konan Niederhauser | 3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -7 |
| TyTy Washington Jr. | 3 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +8 |
| Dalano Banton | 4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +8 |
| Isaiah Jackson | 5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +8 |
| Kobe Sanders | 2 | 1-9 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | -8 |
| Cam Christie | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +8 |
Abbreviations: PTS = points, FG = field goals made-attempted, 3PT = three-pointers made-attempted, FT = free throws made-attempted, REB = rebounds, AST = assists, STL = steals, BLK = blocks, +/- = plus-minus. Players listed as DNP in the source box score are omitted from this table.
Houston Rockets Player Stats
| Player | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | STL | BLK | +/- |
| Kevin Durant | 26 | 8-22 | 3-7 | 7-7 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | +3 |
| Alperen Sengun | 22 | 9-14 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | +9 |
| Amen Thompson | 16 | 6-10 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +9 |
| Jabari Smith Jr. | 13 | 4-11 | 2-3 | 3-3 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 1 | +13 |
| Tari Eason | 6 | 2-10 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Reed Sheppard | 16 | 6-10 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | -5 |
| Dorian Finney-Smith | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +11 |
| Clint Capela | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -5 |
The available source lists the remaining Houston bench players as DNP, meaning they did not play. The table reflects the player lines reproduced in the ESPN box score.
What the Player Tables Reveal
Three individual performances stand out for different reasons.
- Kevin Durant’s 26 points: Durant led Houston in scoring and made all seven of his free throws. His five turnovers show that the performance was not flawless, but his scoring remained central to the Rockets’ result.
- Alperen Sengun’s 22 points: Sengun shot 9-for-14 from the field, added seven rebounds, and recorded five assists. His efficient scoring and playmaking helped Houston generate offense without relying entirely on perimeter shots.
- Kawhi Leonard’s 24 points: Leonard led the Clippers, collected eight rebounds, and made eight of nine free throws. He provided a major share of the team’s scoring, although his 7-for-19 field-goal line shows the difficulty of converting attempts consistently.
Reed Sheppard also deserves attention. His 16 points included four three-pointers on six attempts, making him an important source of perimeter production alongside Durant and Sengun.
For the Clippers, John Collins scored 17 points on efficient two-point shooting, while Bennedict Mathurin supplied nine points, seven rebounds, four assists, and three steals. These contributions demonstrate that Los Angeles had useful performances beyond Leonard, even though the combined team effort did not produce a win.
Kevin Durant’s Performance: Houston’s Leading Scorer
Durant finished with 26 points, six rebounds, three assists, and two steals. He made eight of his 22 field-goal attempts, connected on three of seven three-pointers, and converted all seven free throws.
His scoring line illustrates an important distinction between volume and efficiency. Durant took 22 field-goal attempts, more than any other Houston starter in the supplied table, but made only eight. His free-throw accuracy helped lift his total to 26 points despite the relatively low field-goal percentage.
Why Durant’s Free Throws Mattered
Durant’s seven-for-seven performance at the line meant Houston received seven points without needing to make another field goal. Across a close game, reliable free throws help protect a lead because the clock continues to run while the team scores from a stationary position.
The Rockets made 16 of 18 free throws as a team. Durant accounted for seven of those makes, while the rest of the lineup combined for nine. That distribution shows that Houston’s success at the line was a team contribution rather than the work of one player alone.
A Balanced Evaluation
Durant’s five turnovers are also relevant. A scoring total should not be evaluated in isolation because lost possessions can offset some offensive value. However, his 26 points and perfect free-throw shooting were significant parts of the result.
The most accurate assessment is that Durant led Houston’s scoring, contributed on defense, and converted his free throws, while also having some problems with ball security and field-goal conversion.
Alperen Sengun’s Efficient Scoring and Playmaking
Sengun scored 22 points on 9-for-14 shooting. He added seven rebounds and five assists, giving Houston a productive interior presence and a passing option capable of creating opportunities for teammates.
His field-goal percentage was approximately 64.3%, calculated from nine made shots in 14 attempts. That was substantially higher than the Clippers’ overall field-goal percentage of 40.9%.
Sengun’s Role in the Offense
A center who can score efficiently and distribute the ball creates multiple choices for an opposing defense. If defenders focus on stopping his interior scoring, he can look for teammates. If they stay attached to perimeter shooters, he can attack closer to the basket.
Sengun’s five assists support the view that his impact extended beyond scoring. They do not reveal the exact value of every possession, but they demonstrate that he helped connect Houston’s offensive actions.
Rebounding and Defensive Positioning
Sengun collected seven rebounds, while Jabari Smith Jr. led Houston with 10. The Rockets finished with 44 total rebounds, one fewer than the Clippers.
That narrow team difference makes Sengun’s contribution useful context rather than evidence of overall rebounding dominance. Houston did not win because it collected more rebounds. Its advantage came from what happened when it attempted to score.
Kawhi Leonard and the Clippers’ Offensive Effort
Leonard scored 24 points and recorded eight rebounds, three assists, and one steal. He made seven field goals from 19 attempts and converted eight of nine free throws.
His total of 24 points was the highest on the Clippers, but his shooting line highlights a challenge for the team: getting the ball to a leading scorer does not automatically produce an efficient offense.
Leonard’s Scoring Distribution
Leonard made two of seven three-point attempts. His remaining five made field goals came from inside the three-point line, and he added eight points at the free-throw line.
This distribution matters because a player can reach a strong scoring total through a combination of perimeter shots, attempts near the basket, and free throws. Leonard’s ability to draw fouls helped sustain his total even when his field-goal conversion was inconsistent.
Support From John Collins
Collins finished with 17 points and eight rebounds. He made eight of 14 field-goal attempts, a conversion rate of approximately 57.1%.
Collins was particularly effective as a field-goal scorer, but his three-point attempts did not produce a made shot. His scoring therefore complemented Leonard’s production without providing the same perimeter threat that Houston received from its shooters.
Together, Leonard and Collins scored 41 of Los Angeles’ 95 points, or approximately 43.2% of the team’s total. The Clippers received additional contributions from Mathurin, Jordan Miller, and other rotation players, but the offense did not generate enough efficient scoring to overcome Houston’s shooting.
Reed Sheppard and the Rockets’ Bench Production
Reed Sheppard scored 16 points in 30 minutes, matching Amen Thompson’s total and giving Houston another double-digit scorer beyond Durant and Sengun.
Sheppard made six of 10 field-goal attempts, including four of six three-pointers. His 66.7% three-point conversion rate was especially notable because Houston attempted 28 threes as a team and made half of them.
The difference between Sheppard’s shooting and the Clippers’ team performance is significant. Los Angeles made only eight of 30 three-point attempts, while Sheppard alone made four. He therefore accounted for half of the Clippers’ total made three-pointers, despite playing for Houston.
Why Bench Scoring Matters
Bench production can influence a game in several ways:
- It allows the leading scorers to receive support without carrying every possession.
- It gives a team another perimeter threat when defenses concentrate on its main scorers.
- It can help preserve offensive output during substitutions.
- It creates more options when the opposing defense adjusts to the starting lineup.
Sheppard’s 16 points provided that additional scoring dimension. Houston’s starters accounted for 83 points, while the remaining players who appeared contributed 19. The distribution indicates that the starting group carried most of the scoring load, with Sheppard providing the most prominent bench contribution.
Los Angeles also received nine points each from Jordan Miller and Bennedict Mathurin. Their contributions helped, but the Clippers’ collective three-point output remained a major obstacle.
Shooting Efficiency: The Biggest Statistical Difference
The most revealing part of the game is the difference between Houston’s shooting percentages and those of Los Angeles.
| Shooting category | LA Clippers | Houston Rockets | Houston’s advantage |
| Field goals | 36-88 | 36-79 | 9 fewer attempts |
| Field-goal percentage | 40.9% | 45.6% | 4.7 percentage points |
| Three-pointers | 8-30 | 14-28 | 6 more makes |
| Three-point percentage | 26.7% | 50.0% | 23.3 percentage points |
| Free throws | 15-23 | 16-18 | 1 more make |
| Free-throw percentage | 65.2% | 88.9% | 23.7 percentage points |
The displayed percentages are rounded to one decimal place where useful. ESPN’s summary rounds them to whole percentages.
Houston Made Six More Three-Pointers
Houston made 14 three-pointers, compared with eight for Los Angeles. Those six additional made threes produced an 18-point difference in scoring from beyond the arc.
That gap is larger than Houston’s final seven-point margin. It does not mean every other part of the game favored Los Angeles, but it clearly identifies the largest direct scoring difference between the teams.
Houston did not need to attempt more threes. It actually attempted two fewer than the Clippers. The advantage came from making a much larger share of those attempts.
The Rockets connected on 50% of their three-point shots, while the Clippers made 26.7%. This is an example of how shot quality and conversion can outweigh raw shooting volume.
Field-Goal Accuracy Created Another Advantage
Both teams made 36 field goals, but Los Angeles needed nine more attempts to reach that total.
Houston’s 36-for-79 line produced a field-goal percentage of approximately 45.6%. The Clippers’ 36-for-88 line resulted in a percentage of about 40.9%.
That difference reflects greater conversion efficiency. It does not by itself explain every possession, because turnovers, offensive rebounds, and free throws also matter, but it supports the conclusion that Houston did more with its field-goal attempts.
Free Throws Helped Houston Close the Game
The Rockets made 16 of 18 free throws, compared with 15 of 23 for the Clippers.
Houston made one more free throw despite attempting five fewer. The Clippers’ 65.2% success rate left eight attempts unconverted, while Houston missed only two.
Free throws are especially valuable in close games because they provide points without requiring a made field goal. Houston’s strong accuracy reduced the number of scoring opportunities it wasted at the line.
The combined advantage in three-point shooting and free-throw accuracy helps explain how the Rockets won even though the Clippers finished with more rebounds, assists, and steals.
Rebounding: Why the Clippers’ Advantage Was Not Enough
Los Angeles finished with 45 rebounds, compared with Houston’s 44. The one-rebound difference is too small to describe either side as overwhelmingly dominant on the glass.
The distribution, however, reveals a useful detail.
| Rebounding category | LA Clippers | Houston Rockets |
| Total rebounds | 45 | 44 |
| Offensive rebounds | 17 | 10 |
| Defensive rebounds | 28 | 34 |
The Clippers collected seven more offensive rebounds, while Houston secured six more defensive rebounds.
Offensive Rebounds Created Extra Chances
An offensive rebound gives a team another opportunity to score after a missed shot. Los Angeles’ 17 offensive rebounds indicate that it repeatedly recovered its own misses.
Those extra possessions can be valuable, particularly when a team is struggling to make shots. They can also put pressure on the opposing defense by forcing players to contest multiple attempts during a single possession.
However, an offensive rebound does not automatically result in points. A team must still convert the subsequent shot, draw a foul, or create another productive opportunity.
In this game, the Clippers’ offensive rebounding did not overcome their shooting deficit. Their 45 total rebounds were a positive statistic, but the team still finished seven points behind.
Houston Controlled More Defensive Rebounds
Houston collected 34 defensive rebounds, six more than Los Angeles. Defensive rebounds usually end the opponent’s immediate scoring possession and allow the defending team to transition into offense.
That advantage helped offset the Clippers’ offensive-rebounding edge. The overall totals were nearly identical because Los Angeles collected more rebounds at the offensive end while Houston gathered more at the defensive end.
The broader lesson is that total rebounds should not be read in isolation. Offensive and defensive rebounds have different purposes, and their value depends on what happens next.
Assists, Turnovers, and Ball Security
The Clippers recorded 24 assists, compared with 19 for Houston. Los Angeles also committed only 11 turnovers, while Houston committed 16.
These figures favor the Clippers and reveal that the Rockets’ victory did not result from superior ball security or a higher assist total.
| Ball-handling statistic | LA Clippers | Houston Rockets |
| Assists | 24 | 19 |
| Turnovers | 11 | 16 |
| Steals | 11 | 7 |
| Blocks | 5 | 5 |
The Clippers Moved the Ball More Often
Los Angeles recorded five more assists than Houston. Assists generally indicate that a made field goal followed a pass that met the statistical definition of an assist.
The total suggests that the Clippers created a number of scoring opportunities through passing. It does not mean that every assisted basket was easy or that the team necessarily generated better shots overall.
Houston’s lower assist total also does not prove that its offense was less effective. The Rockets converted a much higher percentage of their attempts, including their three-pointers.
Turnovers Gave Los Angeles a Potential Advantage
Houston’s 16 turnovers compared with Los Angeles’ 11 meant the Rockets lost five more possessions through turnovers.
In a game decided by seven points, that difference is meaningful. Fewer turnovers usually give a team more chances to attempt a shot, although the final value depends on the timing and circumstances of each possession.
Los Angeles also recorded 11 steals, four more than Houston. Kris Dunn led the Clippers with four steals, and Mathurin added three.
Those numbers suggest that the Clippers generated defensive pressure and forced mistakes. However, their shooting efficiency was not strong enough to turn that advantage into a victory.
Why Better Ball Security Did Not Guarantee a Win
A basketball game is decided by points, not by which team records the most assists or commits the fewest turnovers.
Los Angeles protected the ball more effectively and created more assisted baskets, but Houston converted its opportunities at a higher rate. The Rockets’ perimeter accuracy and free-throw shooting outweighed the Clippers’ advantage in these possession-related statistics.
This distinction is useful when evaluating future games. A team can win the possession battle but lose the scoring battle if its shooting percentage is substantially lower.
Defensive Contributions and Individual Matchups
Defense cannot be evaluated using steals and blocks alone. Positioning, contesting shots, forcing difficult attempts, and preventing clean looks all affect the outcome, even when they do not appear directly in the box score.
The available statistics nevertheless identify several players who contributed through defensive actions.
Kris Dunn’s Pressure on the Ball
Dunn recorded four steals and seven assists. His four steals were the highest individual total listed for either team.
That combination is notable because it reflects contributions at both ends of the court. Steals can disrupt an opponent’s possession, while assists help teammates convert offensive opportunities.
Dunn also finished with six points. His scoring was limited compared with Leonard and Collins, but his defensive activity and playmaking gave Los Angeles value beyond points.
Derrick Jones Jr. and Rim Protection
Jones recorded two blocks, matching Yanic Konan Niederhauser’s total for the Clippers. Blocks can stop an attempt directly, discourage opponents from attacking the basket, or change the angle of a shot.
Houston also received defensive contributions across its rotation. Jabari Smith Jr., Amen Thompson, Dorian Finney-Smith, Clint Capela, and Sheppard each recorded one block in the available figures.
The Rockets’ five total blocks matched the Clippers’ five, so neither side held an advantage in that category.
Houston’s Defensive Rebounding and Shot Results
Houston’s 34 defensive rebounds helped end Clippers possessions, particularly after missed attempts. Although Los Angeles recovered more offensive rebounds, the Rockets’ overall defensive-rebounding total remained higher.
The defensive picture is therefore mixed. Los Angeles created more steals and offensive rebounds, while Houston finished with more defensive rebounds and made better use of its offensive possessions.
That balance explains why the game cannot be understood through one defensive statistic alone.
Team Statistics Comparison: What Decided the Game?
The combined team statistics show that Houston’s victory came from efficient scoring rather than winning every statistical category.
| Team statistic | LA Clippers | Houston Rockets |
| Points | 95 | 102 |
| Field goals made | 36 | 36 |
| Field goals attempted | 88 | 79 |
| Three-pointers made | 8 | 14 |
| Three-pointers attempted | 30 | 28 |
| Free throws made | 15 | 16 |
| Free throws attempted | 23 | 18 |
| Total rebounds | 45 | 44 |
| Assists | 24 | 19 |
| Turnovers | 11 | 16 |
| Steals | 11 | 7 |
| Blocks | 5 | 5 |
| Offensive rebounds | 17 | 10 |
| Defensive rebounds | 28 | 34 |
| Personal fouls | 18 | 15 |
Three Numbers That Explain the Result
- The 18-point gap in three-point scoring. Houston made 14 threes for 42 points, while Los Angeles made eight for 24 points. That created an 18-point difference from beyond the arc.
- The five-turnover disadvantage. Houston committed five more turnovers, giving Los Angeles a potential opportunity to gain ground through extra possessions. The Clippers did not convert that advantage into enough additional points.
- The free-throw percentage gap. Houston converted 88.9% of its free throws, compared with 65.2% for the Clippers. The Rockets’ accuracy helped protect their lead.
These numbers are more useful together than separately. Three-point shooting created Houston’s largest scoring advantage, free throws added reliable points, and Los Angeles’ superior ball security kept the game competitive.
What the Matchup Teaches About NBA Performance Analysis
A useful game analysis separates the final result from the processes that produced it. The Rockets won, but that does not mean every aspect of their performance was better.
This game provides several lessons for readers evaluating NBA statistics.
1. Shooting Percentage Must Be Read With Shot Volume
A high shooting percentage is useful, but it needs context. Houston made the same number of total field goals as Los Angeles while attempting nine fewer shots.
That difference indicates better conversion efficiency. The Rockets did not need a larger number of field-goal attempts to reach their scoring total.
At the same time, shooting percentages can vary considerably from game to game. Houston’s 50% three-point shooting was a major factor in this particular result, but one game does not prove that the team will maintain the same percentage in future contests.
2. Scoring Totals Do Not Capture Every Contribution
Leonard led the Clippers with 24 points, but Dunn’s seven assists and four steals were also important contributions. Mathurin added nine points, seven rebounds, four assists, and three steals.
For Houston, Sengun’s five assists and Smith’s 10 rebounds helped support the team’s leading scorers.
A player evaluation that considers only points can overlook playmaking, defense, and rebounding. Conversely, a strong supporting-stat line does not automatically mean a player was more effective overall. Context and efficiency remain important.
3. A Team Can Lose While Winning Several Categories
The Clippers finished with more rebounds, assists, and steals, and fewer turnovers. They also matched Houston in field goals made and blocks.
Yet Houston scored seven more points.
This is a reminder that box-score categories do not have equal direct effects on the scoreboard. Made shots and free throws produce points immediately, while rebounds and steals create opportunities that must still be converted.
4. Quarter-Level Analysis Reveals Momentum Changes
The Clippers won the second quarter, but Houston’s seven-point third-quarter advantage changed the game.
Looking only at the final score would hide that shift. Breaking the game into quarters helps explain when a lead was gained, lost, or protected.
For readers comparing several games, quarter-by-quarter results can also reveal whether a team consistently starts slowly, improves after halftime, or struggles to close tight contests. However, broader patterns require multiple games rather than conclusions drawn from one result.
Season Series Context
The supplied matchup summary lists three results around this game:
| Listed game | Result |
| December 12 | Houston Rockets 115, LA Clippers 113 |
| December 24 | LA Clippers 128, Houston Rockets 108 |
| February matchup | Houston Rockets 102, LA Clippers 95 |
According to those three results, Houston led the listed series 2-1 after the February game.
The supplied material also includes a fourth listing of Houston 102, LA Clippers 105, dated February 12. That listing conflicts with the separate February game details, and the official ESPN schedule identifies another game on February 11 in US local time. It should therefore be treated as a separate, unresolved entry rather than combined with the February 10 US game without verification.
The distinction matters because a reliable season-series summary must keep each game’s date and score matched to the correct event. The three-result table above is based on the supplied sequence and should not be taken as an independently verified complete season series.
Where to Verify the Official Box Score
For readers who want to check individual minutes, shooting attempts, rebounds, assists, turnovers, steals, blocks, and plus-minus, the most useful reference is the official ESPN box score for the Clippers vs Rockets game.
The official record is preferable to a secondary summary when a player has a disputed statistic or when a full lineup needs to be checked. It also helps distinguish players who appeared in the game from those listed as DNP, meaning they did not play.
A good statistical review should compare the final score with the team totals and individual lines. If a source presents a player total that does not match the team total, the discrepancy should be investigated rather than repeated without qualification.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the LA Clippers vs Houston Rockets game?
The Houston Rockets defeated the LA Clippers 102-95 in the February 2026 matchup at Toyota Center in Houston.
2. Who scored the most points for the Houston Rockets?
Kevin Durant led Houston with 26 points. Alperen Sengun scored 22, while Amen Thompson and Reed Sheppard each contributed 16.
3. Who was the Clippers’ leading scorer?
Kawhi Leonard led Los Angeles with 24 points and added eight rebounds and three assists. John Collins was the team’s second-leading scorer with 17 points.
4. Which team shot better from three-point range?
Houston shot 50% from three-point range, making 14 of 28 attempts. Los Angeles made eight of 30 attempts, shooting approximately 26.7%.
5. Did the Clippers have more rebounds than the Rockets?
Yes. Los Angeles collected 45 rebounds, while Houston finished with 44. The Clippers also had more offensive rebounds, but Houston recorded more defensive rebounds.
6. Why did Houston win despite committing more turnovers?
Houston converted its field-goal attempts more efficiently, made six more three-pointers, and shot 88.9% from the free-throw line. Those scoring advantages outweighed Los Angeles’ edges in assists, steals, rebounds, and turnovers.
Conclusion
The February 2026 meeting between the LA Clippers and Houston Rockets demonstrated how shooting efficiency can decide a competitive NBA game. Houston won 102-95 behind Kevin Durant’s 26 points, Alperen Sengun’s efficient 22-point performance, and important perimeter scoring from Reed Sheppard and Amen Thompson.
The Clippers received strong individual contributions from Kawhi Leonard and John Collins and finished ahead in total rebounds, assists, and steals. Their 17 offensive rebounds and lower turnover total showed that they created opportunities, but a 26.7% three-point percentage and 65.2% free-throw percentage limited their ability to turn those opportunities into points.
Houston’s 50% three-point shooting, 88.9% free-throw accuracy, and stronger overall field-goal percentage were the clearest statistical differences. The seven-point final margin was smaller than the Rockets’ 18-point advantage in scoring from three-point range, underscoring the importance of efficient perimeter shooting.
For anyone studying NBA box scores, the central lesson is to look beyond the final score and individual point totals. Shooting efficiency, possession management, rebounding distribution, and quarter-by-quarter performance together provide a more complete explanation of how a game was won.
