Phoenix Mercury vs Las Vegas Aces Match Player Stats
The phoenix mercury vs las vegas aces match player stats from the 2026 regular season finale tell a much deeper story than the 100-82 final score alone. Las Vegas controlled the opening half, built a 29-point halftime advantage, and then absorbed a strong Phoenix response before closing the game with another efficient fourth quarter. The result gave the Aces a 31-13 regular-season record and completed a 3-1 season series against the Mercury.
The game was officially played on September 24, 2026, at Mortgage Matchup Center in Phoenix, with the game information appearing into September 25 in some listings because of timing. The official WNBA game page records Las Vegas as the 100-82 winner.
For readers searching for the most useful player-by-player breakdown, the important story is not simply that A’ja Wilson scored 34 points. Las Vegas received major contributions across its starting lineup and bench. Chelsea Gray created 10 assists while producing five steals, Jackie Young delivered 11 assists and seven rebounds, and Jewell Loyd added 25 points with five made three-pointers. Phoenix, meanwhile, was led by Kahleah Copper’s 18 points, while Alyssa Thomas supplied nine assists and seven rebounds.
Phoenix Mercury vs Las Vegas Aces Match Player Stats
The final numbers show a clear contrast in offensive efficiency.
| TeamFinalFG3PTFTREBASTTOSTLBLK | |||||||||
| Las Vegas Aces | 100 | 42-75, 56% | 9-19, 47% | 7-8, 88% | 33 | 27 | 13 | 12 | 5 |
| Phoenix Mercury | 82 | 31-70, 44% | 8-26, 31% | 12-15, 80% | 33 | 21 | 18 | 12 | 4 |
The first major takeaway is shooting efficiency. Las Vegas made 56% of its field-goal attempts compared with 44% for Phoenix. That 12-percentage-point difference is enormous over a full game.
The Aces also converted 47% from three-point range, while Phoenix made 31%. That combination of interior efficiency and perimeter shooting gave Las Vegas several ways to score.
Phoenix did match Las Vegas on the glass with 33 rebounds apiece and matched the Aces with 12 steals. However, the Mercury committed 18 turnovers compared with 13 for Las Vegas.
That five-turnover gap mattered because Las Vegas was able to maintain offensive pressure without giving Phoenix as many additional possessions.
The official WNBA recap also highlights how strongly Las Vegas shot during the first half, particularly in the second quarter, when the Aces built their decisive advantage.
Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
The scoring pattern explains why the game became difficult for Phoenix to recover from.
| QuarterLas VegasPhoenix | ||
| 1st | 32 | 18 |
| 2nd | 33 | 18 |
| 3rd | 12 | 24 |
| 4th | 23 | 22 |
| Final | 100 | 82 |
Las Vegas scored 65 points during the first half.
Phoenix scored only 36.
That 29-point halftime difference was effectively the defining statistical event of the game.
The Mercury did not simply stop competing after halftime. In fact, Phoenix won the third quarter 24-12 and then continued to pressure Las Vegas during the fourth.
The official Aces recap notes that Phoenix opened the third quarter with an 11-0 run, cutting into the deficit. The Mercury later reduced the margin to nine points at 87-78 in the fourth quarter before Las Vegas responded with an 11-2 closing run.
This is important when evaluating the game through player statistics. A box score can make a 100-82 victory look comfortable from beginning to end, but the game actually contained two very different phases.
The first half belonged overwhelmingly to Las Vegas.
The second half showed Phoenix’s ability to create pressure and make the Aces work for the finish.
A’ja Wilson Leads Las Vegas With 34 Points
A’ja Wilson was the central offensive figure for Las Vegas.
She finished with:
- 34 points
- 16-of-28 field goals
- 1-of-3 three-pointers
- 1-of-1 free throws
- 10 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 1 steal
- 1 turnover
- +12 plus-minus
- 35 minutes
The most striking number is her 16 made field goals.
Wilson did not need a high volume of three-point attempts to reach 34 points. Instead, she consistently created value through efficient scoring around the interior and mid-range areas.
Her 16-of-28 shooting translated to approximately 57% from the field.
That efficiency was particularly damaging because Phoenix had to account for her inside while also respecting Las Vegas shooters around the perimeter.
The official Aces recap confirms Wilson finished with 34 points and notes that she reached another major career milestone during the game.
Wilson also entered the game as one of the league’s leading scorers and finished the regular season with 6,792 career points according to the Aces’ official recap.
Why Wilson’s Efficiency Mattered
A common mistake when reading a scoring line is to focus only on points.
Wilson’s efficiency tells the more useful story.
She scored 34 points on 28 field-goal attempts while also collecting 10 rebounds and four assists. That meant Phoenix had to defend her as both a scorer and a secondary playmaker.
Her presence also helped open opportunities for teammates.
When Phoenix committed extra defensive attention toward Wilson, Las Vegas had capable perimeter players ready to punish rotations.
That balance is one reason the Aces reached 100 points.
Jewell Loyd Provides the Biggest Bench Scoring Burst
Jewell Loyd was one of the most influential players outside the starting group.
She produced:
- 25 points
- 9-of-14 field goals
- 5-of-9 three-pointers
- 2-of-3 free throws
- 2 rebounds
- 1 turnover
- 25 minutes
- +9 plus-minus
Her five three-pointers were especially important.
Loyd gave Las Vegas a perimeter scoring threat that Phoenix could not afford to ignore. Her 9-of-14 overall shooting was also extremely efficient.
The official Aces recap specifically identifies Loyd’s five made three-pointers and 25 points as a major part of the victory.
Her second-quarter impact was particularly significant. Las Vegas continued its offensive explosion while Phoenix struggled to slow down the combination of Wilson’s inside scoring and perimeter shooting.
This is a useful lesson when analyzing player stats: the highest scorer is not always the player who changes the tactical shape of a game the most.
Wilson was the primary scorer.
Loyd was a major spacing and momentum weapon.
Those roles complemented each other.
Chelsea Gray Controls the Game as a Playmaker
Chelsea Gray finished with:
- 12 points
- 5-of-10 field goals
- 1-of-4 three-pointers
- 1-of-1 free throws
- 4 rebounds
- 10 assists
- 7 turnovers
- 5 steals
- +18 plus-minus
The seven turnovers stand out and should not be ignored.
However, Gray also produced 10 assists and five steals, while helping Las Vegas finish with 27 total assists.
Her +18 plus-minus was the best among the players listed in the supplied game data.
Gray’s value was therefore multidimensional.
She created scoring opportunities, generated defensive possessions, and helped keep Phoenix under pressure.
The five steals were particularly notable. The official Aces recap confirms Gray recorded five steals and a points-assists double-double.
For analysts, Gray’s line is a good example of why one statistic rarely captures a player’s total impact.
If someone looks only at her 12 points, the performance may appear modest.
If the full line is considered, the picture changes substantially.
Jackie Young Delivers 11 Assists
Jackie Young had one of the most interesting stat lines of the night:
- 5 points
- 2-of-8 field goals
- 1-of-2 three-pointers
- 7 rebounds
- 11 assists
- 4 turnovers
- 3 steals
- +12 plus-minus
- 34 minutes
Young was not an important scorer in this particular game.
She did not need to be.
Her 11 assists were the most on the team, and the official WNBA recap confirms that she led the game in assists.
The combination of seven rebounds and 11 assists shows how much of her contribution came outside direct scoring.
This also helps explain Las Vegas’s 27 assists.
The Aces were not dependent on one creator.
Gray had 10.
Young had 11.
Wilson added four.
That distribution made it harder for Phoenix to disrupt Las Vegas by focusing defensive attention on a single ball handler.
Stephanie Talbot Provides Perfect Shooting
Stephanie Talbot quietly delivered one of the most efficient performances of the game.
She recorded:
- 14 points
- 6-of-6 field goals
- 1-of-1 three-pointers
- 1-of-1 free throws
- 4 rebounds
- 2 steals
- 1 block
- +17 plus-minus
A perfect 6-of-6 shooting performance is difficult to overlook.
Talbot also contributed defensively with two steals and a block.
Her +17 plus-minus was one of the strongest numbers on the Las Vegas side.
The official Aces recap confirms Talbot matched her season high with 14 points while shooting perfectly from the floor.
Her performance illustrates another important part of the Aces’ offensive structure.
Phoenix could not focus exclusively on Wilson.
Las Vegas had multiple players capable of producing efficient scoring without demanding large numbers of possessions.
Kalani Brown Adds Efficient Bench Production
Kalani Brown played only five minutes but scored eight points.
Her line included:
- 8 points
- 3-of-5 field goals
- 2-of-2 free throws
- 2 rebounds
- 2 blocks
- +11 plus-minus
The sample size was small, so it would be inappropriate to treat five minutes as equivalent to a full rotation role.
Still, eight points and two blocks in that limited time show how effectively Brown used her opportunities.
Her offensive efficiency also helped maintain Las Vegas’s scoring depth.
Phoenix Mercury Player Stats
Phoenix had several productive individual performances despite losing by 18 points.
Kahleah Copper led the Mercury with 18 points.
Alyssa Thomas controlled much of the team’s playmaking.
Natasha Mack supplied defensive production.
Shay Ciezki provided useful bench scoring.
The problem was that Phoenix could not combine those contributions with enough overall shooting efficiency during the first half.
Kahleah Copper Leads Phoenix in Scoring
Copper finished with:
- 18 points
- 7-of-15 field goals
- 2-of-7 three-pointers
- 2-of-2 free throws
- 6 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 4 turnovers
- 3 steals
- -8 plus-minus
- 31 minutes
She was the only Phoenix player to reach 18 points.
Her 7-of-15 shooting represented a 46.7% field-goal rate, which was respectable.
The issue was the surrounding offensive efficiency.
Phoenix needed more consistent production across the lineup to overcome the early deficit.
Copper also contributed three steals, showing that her impact was not restricted to scoring.
Alyssa Thomas Creates 9 Assists
Thomas produced a fascinating all-around line:
- 6 points
- 3-of-8 field goals
- 7 rebounds
- 9 assists
- 3 turnovers
- 1 steal
- 26 minutes
- -12 plus-minus
Her nine assists were a team high.
She also tied Natasha Mack for the team lead in rebounds with seven.
This was therefore not a poor statistical performance simply because Thomas scored six points.
Her job in this game was broader.
She created opportunities for teammates, competed on the glass, and helped Phoenix generate offense during its second-half comeback.
The challenge was that Phoenix needed more direct scoring from its primary creators while chasing a large deficit.
Natasha Mack Produces a Defensive Stat Line
Mack recorded:
- 12 points
- 6-of-11 field goals
- 7 rebounds
- 1 assist
- 3 turnovers
- 4 steals
- 4 blocks
- -15 plus-minus
- 26 minutes
The four steals and four blocks are especially notable.
That is eight combined steals and blocks from one player.
Mack also shot 6-of-11 from the field, giving Phoenix efficient interior scoring.
Her -15 plus-minus should not be interpreted as a complete evaluation of her individual performance.
Plus-minus reflects the team’s scoring margin while the player is on the court, not simply what that individual player did.
That distinction matters when reading player statistics responsibly.
Noemie Brochant Provides Two-Way Contributions
Brochant played 30 minutes and recorded:
- 9 points
- 4-of-8 field goals
- 1-of-4 three-pointers
- 3 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 3 turnovers
- 2 steals
- -5 plus-minus
She contributed in several areas without becoming a high-volume scorer.
Her three assists and two steals were useful, while four made field goals gave Phoenix some additional efficiency.
The problem was that Phoenix needed more total offensive output from the group around Copper and Thomas.
Shay Ciezki Gives Phoenix a Bench Scoring Lift
Ciezki finished with 13 points in 19 minutes.
Her numbers included:
- 13 points
- 4-of-9 field goals
- 1-of-3 three-pointers
- 4-of-4 free throws
- 1 assist
- 0 turnovers
- 0 steals
- 0 blocks
- -12 plus-minus
The zero turnovers are an important detail.
Ciezki did not waste possessions through giveaways and converted every free throw she attempted.
Her 13 points also made her Phoenix’s second-highest scorer.
Yet the Mercury needed that kind of production earlier and more consistently to prevent the Aces from building such a large first-half lead.
Phoenix’s Bench Had Useful Contributions
The Mercury bench also received scoring from several players:
- Maddy Westbeld: 7 points
- Marta Suarez: 6 points
- Lexi Held: 5 points
- Valeriane Ayayi: 3 points
- Shay Ciezki: 13 points
That group supplied 34 points in the supplied box-score data.
This matters because the loss was not caused by a complete absence of bench scoring.
Instead, the bigger problem was the overall shooting gap and the first-half deficit.
Phoenix shot 44% overall compared with 56% for Las Vegas.
The Biggest Statistical Difference Was Shooting
The simplest explanation for the final score is shooting efficiency.
Las Vegas:
42-of-75 = 56%
Phoenix:
31-of-70 = 44%
Las Vegas attempted only five more field goals but made 11 more.
That is a major difference.
The Aces also converted nine of 19 three-point attempts.
Phoenix made eight of 26.
So the difference was not simply three-point volume.
Las Vegas also converted a much higher percentage of its attempts from deep.
The combination of efficient two-point scoring and strong perimeter shooting created a difficult defensive equation for Phoenix.
Turnovers Gave Las Vegas Extra Opportunities
Phoenix committed 18 turnovers.
Las Vegas committed 13.
That difference of five possessions may seem modest in isolation, but it becomes more meaningful when combined with the Aces’ shooting efficiency.
The official WNBA game summary lists 18 Phoenix turnovers and 13 for Las Vegas.
Phoenix also opened the game with severe ball-security problems. The Aces’ official recap reports that the Mercury committed 10 turnovers during the first quarter, which Las Vegas converted into 12 points.
That sequence helped establish the game’s direction.
When a team is already struggling to shoot efficiently, giving an opponent extra possessions can quickly turn a competitive matchup into a large deficit.
Rebounding Was Not the Problem
Both teams finished with 33 rebounds.
That is one of the most useful details in the box score because it rules out one obvious explanation.
Phoenix did not lose because Las Vegas dominated the glass.
The rebounding battle was even.
Instead, the biggest differences came from:
- Field-goal percentage
- Three-point percentage
- Turnovers
- First-half scoring
- Assist creation
That distinction is valuable for anyone studying the matchup.
A simple box-score headline might focus on the 18-point final margin.
A deeper analysis shows the margin was created primarily through efficiency and early-game execution rather than rebounding dominance.
The Assist Battle Favored Las Vegas
Las Vegas recorded 27 assists.
Phoenix recorded 21.
The six-assist difference reflects the Aces’ broader offensive distribution.
Gray had 10 assists.
Young had 11.
Those two players alone accounted for 21 Las Vegas assists.
That means the Aces had two primary creators generating high-level playmaking simultaneously.
Phoenix’s nine assists from Thomas were excellent, but the Mercury did not receive the same volume of secondary playmaking from the rest of the lineup.
Defensive Playmaking Was Surprisingly Even
Both teams recorded 12 steals.
That means Phoenix was capable of creating defensive events.
Mack had four steals.
Copper had three.
Las Vegas received five from Gray, three from Young, and two from Talbot.
The difference was not the number of steals.
It was what happened after the defensive possessions and how consistently each team converted opportunities into efficient offense.
Las Vegas also finished with five blocks compared with four for Phoenix.
Why the First Half Decided the Game
The 65-36 halftime score deserves special attention.
Las Vegas did not merely shoot slightly better.
The Aces created a massive offensive advantage over two quarters.
The official recap reports that Las Vegas opened the game with a 14-0 run and forced seven Phoenix turnovers during the early stretch.
The second quarter continued the same pattern.
Las Vegas shot 65% from the field in the period and 66.7% from three-point range, according to the Aces’ official game recap.
Phoenix improved after halftime, but overcoming a 29-point deficit requires an almost perfect sequence of possessions.
The Mercury came close to making the game interesting late.
They simply had too much ground to recover.
Phoenix’s Second-Half Response
The third quarter was a different game.
Phoenix scored 24 points.
Las Vegas scored 12.
The Mercury also opened the period with an 11-0 run.
That response demonstrated that the final score should not be interpreted as evidence that Phoenix was completely outmatched for all 40 minutes.
The Mercury adjusted effectively after halftime.
Their challenge was maintaining that level of pressure while also preventing Las Vegas from finding its scoring rhythm again.
The fourth quarter became much closer, with Phoenix scoring 22 and Las Vegas scoring 23.
But Las Vegas regained control late.
The Aces closed the game on an 11-2 run, according to their official recap.
Season Series: Las Vegas Wins 3-1
The four-game season series finished 3-1 in favor of Las Vegas.
| GameResult | |
| Game 1 | Phoenix 66, Las Vegas 99 |
| Game 2 | Las Vegas 86, Phoenix 76 |
| Game 3 | Phoenix 58, Las Vegas 106 |
| Game 4 | Las Vegas 100, Phoenix 82 |
The season series provides useful context.
Las Vegas won the first matchup by 33 points.
The Aces then won the second by 10.
They followed that with a 48-point victory.
The regular-season finale ended with an 18-point Las Vegas win.
Across the four meetings, the Aces repeatedly demonstrated an ability to generate high-scoring performances against Phoenix.
The official WNBA game page confirms the 100-82 result and identifies the matchup as the September 24 regular-season finale.
What the Player Stats Reveal About Both Teams
The individual numbers reveal different team identities.
Las Vegas relied on multiple creators
The Aces did not need one player to create everything.
Wilson provided elite scoring and rebounding.
Gray and Young created opportunities.
Loyd supplied perimeter scoring.
Talbot delivered highly efficient shooting.
That distribution explains why Las Vegas reached 100 points while still having only one player above 30.
Phoenix relied more heavily on individual creation
Copper led Phoenix with 18.
Thomas produced nine assists.
Mack supplied 12 points along with four steals and four blocks.
Ciezki added 13.
Those are useful contributions, but Phoenix lacked the same level of simultaneous high-efficiency scoring from multiple positions.
Efficiency separated the teams
This is ultimately the cleanest conclusion from the data.
Las Vegas shot 56%.
Phoenix shot 44%.
Las Vegas made 47% of its threes.
Phoenix made 31%.
Las Vegas also turned the ball over five fewer times.
When those numbers are combined, the 18-point final margin becomes easier to understand.
How to Read These Stats Correctly
Player statistics are most useful when several categories are viewed together.
For example, Wilson’s 34 points immediately stand out.
But her 16-of-28 shooting explains how those points were generated.
Gray’s 12 points look ordinary until the 10 assists and five steals are added.
Young’s five points may seem insignificant until her 11 assists and seven rebounds are considered.
Mack’s 12 points become more interesting when four steals and four blocks are included.
This is why a complete box-score analysis should not focus only on points.
Useful categories include:
- Points
- Field-goal attempts
- Field-goal percentage
- Three-point shooting
- Free throws
- Rebounds
- Assists
- Turnovers
- Steals
- Blocks
- Plus-minus
- Minutes
The relationship between these numbers often explains the game better than any single statistic.
A Note About the Game Date
There is a small date-format issue worth clarifying for readers.
Some supplied data identifies the matchup as September 25, 2026, while the official WNBA game page identifies it as Thursday, September 24, 2026. The WNBA game information shows the game at 10:00 PM ET on September 24, while the page’s game information also displays September 25 in the local timing context.
For accuracy, this article treats September 24, 2026 as the official game date because that is how the WNBA identifies the matchup.
The result itself is consistent across the official sources: Las Vegas defeated Phoenix 100-82.
Why the 100-82 Result Matters
This was not simply another regular-season victory.
It was Las Vegas’s seventh consecutive win and its regular-season finale. The Aces finished 31-13, while Phoenix ended the regular season 16-28.
The result also completed a 3-1 season series in favor of Las Vegas.
For Phoenix, the second-half comeback showed that the team could change the game’s rhythm.
For Las Vegas, the bigger takeaway was the ability to withstand that comeback and execute late.
That combination of early offensive efficiency and late-game composure is visible directly in the quarter scores.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the Phoenix Mercury vs Las Vegas Aces game?
A’ja Wilson led all scorers with 34 points for Las Vegas. Jewell Loyd added 25 points, while Kahleah Copper led Phoenix with 18.
Who led the game in assists?
Jackie Young led the game with 11 assists for Las Vegas. Chelsea Gray recorded 10 assists, while Phoenix’s Alyssa Thomas finished with nine.
Who led Phoenix in scoring?
Kahleah Copper was Phoenix’s leading scorer with 18 points on 7-of-15 shooting.
How many rebounds did each team have?
Both Las Vegas and Phoenix finished with 33 rebounds.
What was the final score?
The Las Vegas Aces defeated the Phoenix Mercury 100-82.
Who won the 2026 season series?
Las Vegas won the season series 3-1, taking three of the four regular-season meetings.
Conclusion
The phoenix mercury vs las vegas aces match player stats show that the 100-82 result was driven by several connected factors rather than one isolated performance.
A’ja Wilson’s 34 points provided the headline contribution, but Las Vegas received meaningful production throughout the rotation. Jewell Loyd scored 25 points with five three-pointers, Chelsea Gray created 10 assists and five steals, Jackie Young delivered 11 assists and seven rebounds, and Stephanie Talbot scored 14 points without missing a field goal.
Phoenix also produced notable individual numbers. Kahleah Copper led the team with 18 points, Alyssa Thomas recorded nine assists and seven rebounds, Natasha Mack posted 12 points with four steals and four blocks, and Shay Ciezki added 13 points from the bench.
The team statistics provide the clearest explanation. Las Vegas shot 56% from the field and 47% from three-point range, compared with 44% and 31% for Phoenix. The Aces also committed five fewer turnovers and finished with six more assists.
Most importantly, Las Vegas established a 65-36 halftime advantage. Phoenix responded by winning the third quarter 24-12 and making the fourth quarter competitive, but the early deficit proved too large to overcome.
The final meeting therefore finished with Las Vegas completing a 3-1 season-series victory and ending the regular season at 31-13.
For readers studying the matchup, the key lesson is to look beyond the leading scorer. The complete statistical picture shows how shooting efficiency, ball security, playmaking, and timely contributions from multiple players combined to produce the final result.
