Chicago Bears vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats
The chicago bears vs las vegas raiders match player stats from the 2025 NFL Week 4 meeting reveal a game that was much closer than the final numbers might initially suggest. Chicago escaped Allegiant Stadium with a 25-24 victory, but Las Vegas produced the more explosive rushing attack, gained more total yards, and led for most of the afternoon. The Bears ultimately won because they were more efficient on third down, protected the football better, made more of their scoring opportunities, and delivered the decisive defensive play when the Raiders were in position to win.
The official gamebook lists the game as September 28, 2025, at Allegiant Stadium. Chicago improved to 2-2, while Las Vegas fell to 1-3. The Bears scored 3 points in the first quarter, 6 in the second, 7 in the third and 9 in the fourth. The Raiders scored 7, 7, 7 and 3 across the four quarters. (NFL)
What makes this matchup particularly interesting is the contrast between the two offenses. Las Vegas rushed for 240 yards on 31 carries, averaging 7.7 yards per attempt. Chicago managed only 69 rushing yards on 26 attempts, averaging 2.7 yards. Yet Chicago still won.
That difference tells only part of the story.
Caleb Williams produced 212 passing yards and a touchdown, while Geno Smith threw for 117 yards, two touchdowns and three interceptions. D’Andre Swift scored the game-winning touchdown late in the fourth quarter, while Ashton Jeanty was the game’s most explosive individual runner with 138 rushing yards and a 64-yard touchdown run.
The result was a useful reminder that football games are not decided by one statistical category. Turnovers, third-down efficiency, red-zone execution, field goals and late-game situational football all mattered.
chicago bears vs las vegas raiders match player stats
The most important numbers from the matchup are summarized below.
| Category | Chicago Bears | Las Vegas Raiders |
| Final Score | 25 | 24 |
| Total Yards | 271 | 357 |
| Passing Yards | 202 net | 117 |
| Rushing Yards | 69 | 240 |
| Offensive Plays | 64 | 52 |
| First Downs | 16 | 17 |
| Third Down | 7/16 | 2/8 |
| Fourth Down | 1/1 | 0/1 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 4 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 3 |
| Field Goals | 4/4 | 1/2 |
| Time of Possession | 33:10 | 26:50 |
| Red-Zone Efficiency | 1/4 | 2/3 |
The official NFL gamebook confirms that Las Vegas produced 357 total yards compared with Chicago’s 271. The Raiders also dominated on the ground, but Chicago had a major advantage in passing efficiency and third-down conversion rate. (NFL)
That combination is the foundation for understanding this game.
Game Overview and Final Score
Chicago won 25-24 after trailing 24-19 late in the fourth quarter.
The Raiders appeared to have the advantage for much of the game. They scored first, built a 14-6 lead by halftime and responded to Chicago’s third-quarter touchdown with another score of their own. The Bears did not take their first lead until D’Andre Swift’s two-yard touchdown run with 1:34 remaining.
The scoring progression was:
- First quarter: Bears 3, Raiders 7
- Second quarter: Bears 6, Raiders 7
- Third quarter: Bears 7, Raiders 7
- Fourth quarter: Bears 9, Raiders 3
Chicago’s scoring was unusually dependent on field goals. Cairo Santos converted four field-goal attempts, including kicks from 52 and 51 yards. Those points became extremely important because the Bears struggled to consistently finish drives with touchdowns.
Las Vegas, meanwhile, scored three touchdowns but missed a late field goal that would have won the game.
The decisive sequence came after Chicago drove 69 yards on 11 plays. Swift finished the possession with a two-yard touchdown run. The Bears attempted a two-point conversion, but Caleb Williams’ pass to Rome Odunze was incomplete. Chicago therefore led 25-24 rather than 27-24. (ESPN)
That decision left the Raiders with an opportunity to answer.
They could not convert it.
Caleb Williams Player Stats
Caleb Williams completed 22 of 37 passes for 212 yards, with one touchdown and one interception. He averaged 5.7 yards per passing attempt and finished with a 73.3 passer rating.
His official passing line was:
| Statistic | Caleb Williams |
| Completions | 22 |
| Attempts | 37 |
| Completion Rate | 59.5% |
| Passing Yards | 212 |
| Yards per Attempt | 5.7 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 10 |
| QBR | 47.0 |
| Passer Rating | 73.3 |
Williams did not produce a spectacular statistical performance, but his fourth-quarter execution was critical.
The quarterback had to overcome a Las Vegas defense led by Maxx Crosby, while also dealing with a running game that generated only 69 yards. That meant Chicago needed Williams to make enough plays through the air to keep drives alive.
He did exactly that when it mattered most.
The winning possession was particularly important. Chicago moved 69 yards on 11 plays, with Williams contributing through both passing and rushing. He also scrambled for useful yardage during the final drive before Swift finished the possession with the winning touchdown. (ESPN)
From an evaluation standpoint, Williams’ performance was not about volume alone. His 212 passing yards represented nearly all of Chicago’s net passing production, and his ability to direct the final drive gave the Bears the opportunity to win despite their poor rushing efficiency.
Geno Smith Player Stats
Geno Smith completed 14 of 21 passes for 117 yards, producing two touchdowns and three interceptions.
| Statistic | Geno Smith |
| Completions | 14 |
| Attempts | 21 |
| Completion Rate | 66.7% |
| Passing Yards | 117 |
| Yards per Attempt | 5.6 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 3 |
| Sacks | 0 |
| QBR | 20.4 |
| Passer Rating | 73.0 |
Smith’s passing line is one of the clearest examples of why passer rating alone cannot explain a game.
His 73.0 rating was almost identical to Williams’ 73.3, but the underlying performance was very different because Smith threw three interceptions.
The Raiders compensated for some of those mistakes with their dominant rushing attack. Smith was not required to throw frequently, and Las Vegas attempted only 21 passes.
However, the three interceptions were extremely costly because Chicago’s defense repeatedly gave its offense opportunities to recover from an inefficient offensive performance.
Smith’s two touchdown passes both went to Ashton Jeanty, giving the rookie running back an unusual dual-threat impact.
Ashton Jeanty Was the Offensive Standout
Among the chicago bears vs las vegas raiders match player stats, Ashton Jeanty’s rushing performance stands out immediately.
Jeanty carried the ball 21 times for 138 yards, averaging 6.6 yards per carry. He also produced a 64-yard rushing touchdown.
His rushing numbers were:
| Statistic | Ashton Jeanty |
| Carries | 21 |
| Rushing Yards | 138 |
| Average | 6.6 |
| Long Run | 64 yards |
| Rushing TDs | 1 |
| Receiving | 2 receptions |
| Receiving Yards | 17 |
| Receiving TDs | 2 |
Jeanty’s 64-yard touchdown run was the longest play of the game and demonstrated why the Raiders were able to create so much offensive production despite limited passing volume.
Las Vegas finished with 240 rushing yards. Jeanty alone accounted for 138, meaning he produced more than half of the Raiders’ rushing total.
He was also involved in the passing game. His two receptions produced 17 yards and two receiving touchdowns.
That gave Jeanty all three of the Raiders’ offensive touchdowns.
His overall contribution is therefore more significant than the rushing total alone suggests.
D’Andre Swift and Chicago’s Ground Game
D’Andre Swift finished with 14 carries for 38 yards and one touchdown, averaging 2.7 yards per carry.
His numbers were not especially efficient, but his final carry was the most important rushing attempt of the game.
With Chicago trailing 24-19, Swift took a handoff from the Las Vegas two-yard line and scored with 1:34 remaining.
That play transformed a struggling rushing performance into the deciding score.
Chicago’s rushing totals were:
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| D’Andre Swift | 14 | 38 | 2.7 | 1 | 13 |
| Kyle Monangai | 4 | 18 | 4.5 | 0 | 9 |
| Caleb Williams | 8 | 13 | 1.6 | 0 | 12 |
| Team | 26 | 69 | 2.7 | 1 | 13 |
The contrast with Las Vegas was striking.
The Raiders averaged 7.7 yards per rush. Chicago averaged 2.7.
Ordinarily, that kind of rushing disadvantage makes winning difficult. Chicago overcame it through passing volume, third-down execution, turnover creation and special teams kicking.
Rome Odunze Leads Chicago Receivers
Rome Odunze was Chicago’s leading receiver with four catches for 69 yards and one touchdown on eight targets.
His 27-yard touchdown reception in the third quarter was Chicago’s longest touchdown play through the air.
| Receiver | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Targets |
| Rome Odunze | 4 | 69 | 17.3 | 1 | 8 |
| Cole Kmet | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 0 | 9 |
| Olamide Zaccheaus | 5 | 41 | 8.2 | 0 | 6 |
| DJ Moore | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 0 | 5 |
| D’Andre Swift | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 0 | 6 |
| Luther Burden III | 2 | -4 | -2.0 | 0 | 2 |
Chicago completed 22 passes for 212 yards.
Odunze’s 69 yards represented almost one-third of Williams’ passing total, while Kmet added 46 yards.
The distribution also shows that Chicago did not depend exclusively on one receiver. Six players caught at least two passes.
Brock Bowers Leads the Raiders’ Receiving Group
Brock Bowers caught five passes for 46 yards on six targets.
Although he did not score a touchdown, he was the Raiders’ most productive receiver by receptions and yardage.
| Receiver | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Targets |
| Brock Bowers | 5 | 46 | 9.2 | 0 | 6 |
| Jakobi Meyers | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 0 | 7 |
| Ashton Jeanty | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 2 | 2 |
| Tre Tucker | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 0 | 2 |
| Raheem Mostert | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dont’e Thornton Jr. | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
The Raiders completed only 14 passes, so the passing game was relatively concentrated.
Bowers and Meyers combined for nine receptions and 76 yards, accounting for a large portion of the team’s 117 receiving yards.
Jeanty’s two touchdown receptions, however, were the plays that translated passing opportunities into points.
Turnovers Changed the Game
The most important statistical difference between the teams was turnovers.
Chicago intercepted Geno Smith three times.
Kevin Byard recorded two interceptions and returned them for 47 yards combined. Tyrique Stevenson added another interception with a three-yard return.
Las Vegas recorded one interception, with Maxx Crosby picking off Williams and returning it 19 yards.
The turnover totals were:
| Team | Interceptions | Fumbles Lost | Total Turnovers |
| Chicago | 1 thrown | 0 | 1 |
| Las Vegas | 3 thrown | 1 | 4 |
That created a plus-three turnover advantage for Chicago.
The Bears also recovered three fumbles according to the individual box-score data, while Las Vegas lost one fumble by Jeanty.
This was arguably the clearest reason Chicago could survive the massive rushing-yardage deficit.
A team can overcome inefficient rushing when it wins the turnover battle by three.
It becomes much harder for the opponent to turn offensive production into points when possessions end in interceptions.
Kevin Byard’s Two Interceptions
Kevin Byard was one of the most influential defensive players for Chicago.
He recorded:
- 2 interceptions
- 47 interception return yards
- 7 total tackles
- 5 solo tackles
- 1 tackle for loss
- 2 passes defended
The two interceptions helped prevent Las Vegas from turning its offensive yardage advantage into a larger lead.
This is an important distinction when interpreting defensive statistics. A defense does not necessarily need to dominate every snap to be effective. Creating turnovers at critical moments can be more valuable than accumulating sacks or tackles without changing possession.
Chicago recorded zero sacks, yet its defense still produced three interceptions.
That tells us the Bears’ defensive success came primarily from coverage and takeaway opportunities rather than consistent pressure on Smith.
Maxx Crosby’s Defensive Contribution
Maxx Crosby remained one of the most disruptive defenders on the field for Las Vegas.
His statistical line included:
- 5 total tackles
- 5 solo tackles
- 1 sack
- 3 tackles for loss
- 3 passes defended
- 1 quarterback hit
- 1 interception
- 19 interception return yards
Crosby’s interception was especially notable because he was not simply producing pressure. He also created a turnover in coverage.
Las Vegas finished with one sack overall, while Chicago recorded none.
Despite that, the Raiders did not win.
The defensive statistics demonstrate another important lesson from this matchup: individual defensive impact can be substantial without guaranteeing a victory if the offense commits four turnovers.
Third Down Was a Major Advantage for Chicago
One of the less obvious but most important chicago bears vs las vegas raiders match player stats is third-down efficiency.
Chicago converted 7 of 16 third downs, or 43.8%.
Las Vegas converted only 2 of 8, or 25%.
That is a significant difference.
Chicago also converted its only fourth-down attempt, while Las Vegas went 0-for-1.
The Bears therefore extended drives more consistently despite producing far fewer rushing yards.
Third-down performance helps explain why Chicago ran 64 offensive plays compared with only 52 for Las Vegas.
That is a 12-play difference.
More plays gave Chicago more opportunities to accumulate passing yards, draw penalties, reach scoring range and control the clock.
Time of Possession Favored Chicago
The Bears held the ball for 33:10, while the Raiders possessed it for 26:50.
That six-minute-plus advantage matters because Las Vegas was extremely efficient when it ran the ball.
The Raiders averaged 6.9 yards per offensive play, compared with Chicago’s 4.2.
Yet Chicago’s ability to sustain possessions limited the number of opportunities available to the Raiders.
This is one of the most interesting statistical contradictions of the game.
Las Vegas was more explosive.
Chicago was more persistent.
The Bears ran 64 plays. The Raiders ran only 52.
That difference helped Chicago overcome a significant per-play disadvantage.
Red-Zone Efficiency
Red-zone execution also played a role.
Chicago went 1-for-4 in the red zone, a 25% success rate.
Las Vegas went 2-for-3, converting 67% of its red-zone opportunities.
On paper, that is a clear advantage for Las Vegas.
However, Chicago compensated with four successful field goals.
Cairo Santos converted all four of his attempts:
- 46 yards
- 43 yards
- 52 yards
- 51 yards
He finished with 13 points, including the extra point.
Daniel Carlson made one of two field-goal attempts and converted all three extra points, producing six points.
The kicking difference was substantial.
Chicago’s four field goals accounted for more than half of its total scoring.
Cairo Santos Was Crucial
Cairo Santos quietly became one of the most important players in the game.
His four field goals gave Chicago 12 points, while his extra point added another.
His 52-yard field goal was especially important because long-range kicking allowed the Bears to score despite struggling to finish drives.
The final kicking comparison was:
| Kicker | Field Goals | FG % | Long | Extra Points | Points |
| Cairo Santos | 4/4 | 100% | 52 | 1/1 | 13 |
| Daniel Carlson | 1/2 | 50% | 29 | 3/3 | 6 |
The nine-point difference in kicker production is enormous in a one-point game.
It also illustrates why field-goal accuracy should not be treated as a secondary statistic when analyzing close NFL contests.
Special Teams Comparison
The Raiders had the stronger kickoff return numbers.
Las Vegas returned seven kickoffs for 190 yards, averaging 27.1 yards per return.
Chicago returned five kickoffs for 122 yards, averaging 24.4 yards.
Chicago’s Devin Duvernay recorded three kickoff returns for 76 yards, while Luther Burden III had two for 46.
For Las Vegas, Raheem Mostert recorded four returns for 96 yards, while Dylan Laube produced 94 yards on three returns.
Punt return production was smaller:
- Devin Duvernay: 1 return, 19 yards
- Tre Tucker: 1 return, 7 yards
The Raiders therefore had a clear kickoff-return advantage, but it did not translate into enough scoring opportunities to secure the win.
Punting Statistics
Chicago’s Tory Taylor punted three times for 148 yards, averaging 49.3 yards per punt.
His longest punt traveled 62 yards, and one punt landed inside the 20-yard line.
Las Vegas punter AJ Cole punted only once for 60 yards.
The low number of Raiders punts reflects how the game was played. Las Vegas generally either scored, turned the ball over or reached a fourth-down situation without needing to punt repeatedly.
Chicago’s three punts also show that the Bears had more possessions that ended without points.
The Fourth Quarter Decided Everything
The final quarter was the defining period.
Chicago entered the fourth quarter trailing 21-16.
Santos kicked a 51-yard field goal to reduce the deficit to 21-19.
Las Vegas answered with a 29-yard field goal from Carlson, moving ahead 24-19 with 6:45 remaining.
Chicago then produced the decisive drive.
The Bears moved 69 yards over 11 plays and consumed 5:11.
The drive ended with Swift’s two-yard touchdown run.
The two-point conversion failed, leaving Chicago ahead 25-24.
Las Vegas received the kickoff and immediately generated a strong return from Dylan Laube, who brought the ball back 38 yards.
The Raiders eventually moved into position for a potential game-winning field goal.
But the kick was blocked.
The official recap identifies Josh Blackwell’s block as the play that preserved Chicago’s victory. (ESPN)
That sequence explains why the final score was not simply the product of statistical accumulation.
The game came down to execution in the final two minutes.
Why the Raiders Lost Despite 357 Total Yards
The Raiders’ 357 total yards were 86 more than Chicago’s 271.
They also rushed for 171 more yards than the Bears.
So why did Las Vegas lose?
There are several answers.
1. Turnovers
Las Vegas committed four turnovers compared with Chicago’s one.
That is the most obvious explanation.
2. Third Downs
The Raiders converted only two of eight third downs.
Chicago converted seven of 16.
3. Field Goals
Chicago made all four field-goal attempts.
Las Vegas made only one of two.
4. Offensive Volume
Chicago ran 64 plays.
Las Vegas ran 52.
The Bears created 12 more offensive snaps despite producing fewer yards per play.
5. Late-Game Execution
Chicago scored the winning touchdown with 1:34 remaining.
Las Vegas then failed to finish the final opportunity after its potential winning field goal was blocked.
These factors show why raw yardage is not enough to explain NFL outcomes.
Why Chicago Won Despite Its Poor Rushing Numbers
Chicago’s victory came from a different statistical profile.
The Bears:
- Won the turnover battle
- Converted more third downs
- Controlled possession
- Made every field goal
- Converted their only fourth-down attempt
- Produced three defensive interceptions
- Scored the decisive touchdown late
- Prevented the Raiders from converting the final scoring opportunity
The rushing attack was clearly a weakness.
Chicago’s 69 rushing yards on 26 attempts were not efficient enough to control the game conventionally.
Instead, Chicago found other ways to stay within striking distance.
That is an important lesson for analyzing team performance. A team does not always win by dominating the category it performs best in.
Sometimes it wins by minimizing the consequences of its weaknesses.
Player Performance That Changed the Game
Several individual performances deserve particular attention.
Ashton Jeanty
Jeanty was the game’s most explosive offensive player.
His 138 rushing yards, 64-yard touchdown run and two receiving touchdowns made him central to almost everything Las Vegas did successfully.
Kevin Byard
Byard’s two interceptions created crucial defensive stops and helped Chicago survive the Raiders’ rushing dominance.
Cairo Santos
Santos converted all four field goals and scored 13 points.
In a one-point victory, that is enormous.
D’Andre Swift
Swift struggled to create consistent rushing yardage but scored the game-winning touchdown.
Rome Odunze
Odunze produced 69 receiving yards and Chicago’s only passing touchdown.
Josh Blackwell
Blackwell’s blocked field goal prevented Las Vegas from taking a potential final lead.
Team Statistical Comparison
A side-by-side view makes the result easier to understand.
| Statistic | Bears | Raiders |
| Score | 25 | 24 |
| First Downs | 16 | 17 |
| Total Yards | 271 | 357 |
| Plays | 64 | 52 |
| Yards per Play | 4.2 | 6.9 |
| Passing | 202 net | 117 net |
| Rushing | 69 | 240 |
| Third Down | 43.8% | 25.0% |
| Fourth Down | 100% | 0% |
| Turnovers | 1 | 4 |
| Penalties | 8 for 60 | 5 for 36 |
| Red Zone | 25% | 67% |
| Time of Possession | 33:10 | 26:50 |
| Field Goals | 4/4 | 1/2 |
The numbers create a fascinating picture.
Las Vegas was better in explosive production.
Chicago was better in possession management and mistake avoidance.
That difference decided the game.
What These Stats Say About the Matchup
The game provides several useful lessons for anyone analyzing NFL player statistics.
First, turnovers can overwhelm yardage advantages.
The Raiders generated 357 yards but gave the ball away four times.
Second, third-down efficiency extends opportunities.
Chicago did not run the ball well, but its offense converted enough third downs to maintain possession.
Third, kicking can become the difference in a close game.
Santos scored 13 points and made every attempt.
Fourth, late-game execution has disproportionate value.
Swift’s touchdown and Blackwell’s blocked field goal were more important to the final result than many of the statistics accumulated during the first three quarters.
Finally, individual player stats need context.
Jeanty was more productive than Swift as a runner, but Swift scored the winning touchdown.
Smith threw two touchdown passes, but Williams’ team won.
The Raiders had more rushing yards, more total yards and better yards per play, yet Chicago still walked away with the victory.
A Deeper Look at Offensive Efficiency
Chicago’s offense averaged only 4.2 yards per offensive play.
That number is not impressive.
However, Chicago compensated through volume.
The Bears ran 64 plays.
At 4.2 yards per play, that generated 271 total yards.
The Raiders averaged 6.9 yards per play, but only ran 52 plays.
The difference was 12 offensive snaps.
This is where possession becomes strategically important.
Chicago had the ball for 33:10.
Las Vegas had it for 26:50.
That means the Bears had more time to create opportunities, even though those opportunities were less explosive.
The Raiders’ offense was more efficient per play, but the Bears’ offense had more chances to operate.
Defensive Efficiency Versus Defensive Statistics
Chicago did not record a sack.
At first glance, that may look like a defensive weakness.
But the Bears intercepted Smith three times.
Las Vegas recorded one sack and one interception.
This highlights two different ways a defense can affect a quarterback.
Pressure can create hurried throws and sacks.
Coverage can create interceptions.
Against the Raiders, Chicago’s secondary generated the bigger impact.
Kevin Byard’s two interceptions and Stevenson’s additional takeaway gave Chicago repeated opportunities to reset the game.
The Bears’ defensive line did not need to dominate the sack column to influence the result.
The Importance of Situational Football
Situational football was arguably the biggest difference between these teams.
Chicago was better on:
- Third downs
- Fourth downs
- Turnover margin
- Field-goal accuracy
- Time of possession
- Late-game execution
Las Vegas was better on:
- Total yards
- Rushing yards
- Yards per play
- Red-zone efficiency
- Kickoff returns
The final result shows which group of categories mattered more.
This is why analysts should avoid using one headline statistic as the complete explanation for an NFL game.
What Fans Should Take Away From the Box Score
For Chicago fans, the victory demonstrated resilience.
The Bears did not dominate offensively. They struggled to run the ball and scored only one offensive touchdown before the final drive.
Yet the team found enough ways to stay competitive.
For Las Vegas fans, the loss was frustrating because the underlying offensive efficiency was strong.
A 240-yard rushing performance should normally give a team an excellent chance to win.
But four turnovers and poor third-down performance undermined that advantage.
For neutral observers, this was a classic example of an NFL game in which the winning team did not lead the most traditional statistical categories.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Chicago Bears vs Las Vegas Raiders game?
The Chicago Bears defeated the Las Vegas Raiders 25-24 in the Week 4 matchup at Allegiant Stadium. (ESPN)
How many passing yards did Caleb Williams have?
Caleb Williams completed 22 of 37 passes for 212 yards, with one touchdown and one interception.
How many rushing yards did Ashton Jeanty have?
Ashton Jeanty rushed 21 times for 138 yards, averaging 6.6 yards per carry. He also had a 64-yard touchdown run.
Who was Chicago’s leading receiver?
Rome Odunze led Chicago with four receptions for 69 yards and one touchdown.
How many interceptions did Geno Smith throw?
Geno Smith threw three interceptions. Kevin Byard recorded two for Chicago, while Tyrique Stevenson recorded the third.
Why did Chicago win despite having fewer total yards?
Chicago won because it created a major turnover advantage, converted third downs more effectively, made all four field goals, controlled possession and scored the decisive touchdown late in the fourth quarter. Las Vegas also missed the potential game-winning field goal after Chicago’s late touchdown. (NFL)
Conclusion
The chicago bears vs las vegas raiders match player stats tell the story of a game defined by contrast.
Las Vegas produced 357 total yards and 240 rushing yards. Ashton Jeanty delivered the most explosive individual rushing performance with 138 yards and a 64-yard touchdown. The Raiders also scored three touchdowns and controlled the game for long stretches.
Chicago, however, found ways to compensate for its offensive limitations.
Caleb Williams delivered 212 passing yards, Rome Odunze produced 69 receiving yards and a touchdown, Kevin Byard intercepted Geno Smith twice, and Cairo Santos converted all four field-goal attempts.
The decisive factor was not one statistical category.
It was the combination of turnovers, third-down efficiency, possession, kicking and late-game execution.
The Bears finished with only 271 total yards, but they ran 64 plays, possessed the football for more than 33 minutes and committed only one turnover. The Raiders produced more yards and more explosive plays, but four turnovers and a late missed opportunity proved costly.
D’Andre Swift’s two-yard touchdown run with 1:34 remaining gave Chicago the lead. Josh Blackwell’s blocked field goal then preserved the 25-24 victory.
Ultimately, this matchup is a strong example of why NFL box scores need context. The Raiders won the yardage battle decisively, but Chicago won the possession battle, turnover battle, field-goal battle and most important moments of the game. (NFL)
