Sacramento Kings vs Lakers Match Player Stats

The sacramento kings vs lakers match player stats from the January 13, 2026 matchup tell a much more detailed story than the final score alone. Sacramento defeated Los Angeles 124-112 at Golden 1 Center, using exceptional three-point shooting, a strong third quarter, and balanced offensive production to overcome Luka Doncic’s 42-point performance. The official NBA game record confirms the 124-112 result, the venue, the attendance of 17,832, and the quarter-by-quarter scoring.

For readers searching for the sacramento kings vs lakers match player stats, the headline numbers are easy to find, but the useful part is understanding what those numbers actually mean. Doncic led all scorers with 42 points, DeMar DeRozan scored 32 for Sacramento, Malik Monk added 26 points while making seven three-pointers, and Russell Westbrook contributed 22 points and seven assists. On the Lakers side, LeBron James scored 22 points, while Deandre Ayton recorded 13 points and 13 rebounds.

This was not simply a case of one team having a better scoring night. Sacramento won because its shot-making profile was dramatically different from Los Angeles’ profile. The Kings shot 59% from the field and 65% from three-point range, while the Lakers made 49% of their field goals and only 22% of their three-point attempts. Those differences created the foundation for the 12-point final margin.

Game Overview

The matchup took place at Golden 1 Center in Sacramento, California, on January 13, 2026. Sacramento entered the game with a 10-30 record, while Los Angeles came in at 23-14.

The Lakers scored 28 points in the opening quarter, followed by 26 in the second, 29 in the third, and 29 in the fourth. Sacramento produced 32, 29, 34, and 29 points respectively.

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Final
Los Angeles Lakers	28	26	29	29	112
Sacramento Kings	32	29	34	29	124

The quarter-by-quarter pattern is important. Los Angeles did not collapse offensively. The Lakers scored at least 26 points in every quarter. Instead, Sacramento consistently produced slightly more offense and created its biggest separation in the third period.

The Kings outscored Los Angeles 34-29 in the third quarter, and that five-point difference helped protect the advantage they had built earlier. NBA’s official game information also records that Sacramento opened the second half with a 19-6 run and eventually built a 20-point lead.

Sacramento Kings vs Lakers Match Player Stats: Complete Player Breakdown

The most useful way to read this game is by looking beyond points. Minutes, shooting efficiency, rebounds, assists, turnovers, steals, blocks, and plus/minus help explain how each player affected the contest.

Los Angeles Lakers Player Stats

Player	MIN	PTS	FG	3PT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	+/-
Luka Doncic	37	42	16-25	2-9	7	8	4	0	4	-10
LeBron James	33	22	8-17	0-5	4	3	1	0	3	-9
Deandre Ayton	27	13	4-7	0-0	13	1	0	2	2	-12
Jaxson Hayes	19	12	5-6	0-0	5	1	0	0	0	-4
Gabe Vincent	18	9	3-6	3-5	0	1	1	0	0	-7
Dalton Knecht	13	5	2-6	1-4	2	1	0	0	1	+3
Jake LaRavia	31	2	1-7	0-5	2	3	1	0	0	-10
Marcus Smart	31	1	0-5	0-3	2	2	2	0	0	-20
Jarred Vanderbilt	26	0	0-3	0-3	4	0	0	0	0	-3
Precious Achiuwa	30	9	4-7	1-1	7	0	0	2	1	+15
Maxime Raynaud	31	11	5-8	1-2	4	1	0	0	1	+7
Russell Westbrook	34	22	8-16	4-8	5	7	1	0	5	+10
Zach LaVine	32	19	6-11	3-4	4	1	0	1	1	+9
Dylan Cardwell	17	2	1-3	0-0	7	0	0	1	1	+5
Malik Monk	32	26	9-15	7-9	1	8	1	0	2	+5
Keon Ellis	12	3	1-1	1-1	0	0	0	0	0	+3
Nique Clifford	15	0	0-2	0-1	2	0	1	0	1	+2

The player assignments above follow the supplied game data and official box-score record. The official NBA box score lists the Sacramento and Los Angeles players, their minutes, shooting figures, rebounds, assists, defensive statistics, turnovers, points, and plus/minus values.

Luka Doncic’s 42-Point Performance

Luka Doncic was easily the most productive Lakers scorer.

He finished with:

• 42 points
• 16-of-25 shooting
• 2-of-9 from three-point range
• 8-of-8 from the free-throw line
• 7 rebounds
• 8 assists
• 4 steals
• 4 turnovers

His 16 made field goals were the most by any player in the game. He also combined scoring and playmaking at a level that kept Los Angeles competitive despite Sacramento’s shooting advantage.

The important detail is that Doncic’s performance was not inefficient overall. He made 64% of his field-goal attempts. His weakness from a shooting perspective came primarily from long range, where he made only two of nine attempts.

Doncic therefore supplied elite individual production without getting enough perimeter support from the rest of the lineup.

LeBron James Added 22 Points

LeBron James finished with 22 points on 8-of-17 shooting. He also went 6-of-6 at the free-throw line.

His three-point shooting was a different story. James attempted five threes and missed all five.

That matters because the Lakers were already facing a team that converted three-point opportunities at an extraordinary rate. Los Angeles needed more perimeter efficiency to match Sacramento’s shot-making.

James also contributed four rebounds, three assists, one steal, and three turnovers.

Deandre Ayton Controlled the Glass

Deandre Ayton produced one of the strongest rebounding performances in the game.

He recorded:

• 13 points
• 13 rebounds
• 4-of-7 field goals
• 5 offensive rebounds
• 8 defensive rebounds
• 2 blocks

His 13 rebounds were the highest total for either team.

The offensive rebounding figure is particularly notable. Five offensive boards gave Los Angeles additional possessions and helped the Lakers finish with 12 offensive rebounds as a team.

However, Sacramento’s shooting efficiency meant that those extra possessions did not completely offset the Kings’ advantage from the perimeter.

Russell Westbrook’s All-Around Contribution

Russell Westbrook scored 22 points and supplied seven assists, five rebounds, and one steal.

His shooting line was 8-of-16 from the field and 4-of-8 from three-point range.

Westbrook was also one of Sacramento’s strongest positive plus/minus players at +10.

The five turnovers are the main negative in his statistical line, but his overall contribution was substantial. He gave Sacramento another creator alongside DeRozan and Monk, reducing the burden on any single offensive player.

Sacramento’s Offensive Leaders

DeMar DeRozan

DeMar DeRozan finished with 32 points, six assists, two rebounds, and three steals.

He shot 14-of-19 from the field, an outstanding 73.7% conversion rate.

Unlike Monk and several other Sacramento players, DeRozan did not need three-point shooting to create his offense. He scored efficiently through his mid-range game, drives, and free-throw opportunities.

He went 4-of-5 at the line.

That combination made DeRozan a crucial stabilizing scorer. When the Lakers were trying to respond to Sacramento’s perimeter shooting, DeRozan provided another route to points.

Malik Monk

Malik Monk delivered one of the defining performances of the night.

He finished with:

• 26 points
• 9-of-15 field goals
• 7-of-9 three-pointers
• 1-of-1 free throws
• 8 assists
• 1 steal

His seven made three-pointers were the most by any player in the matchup.

Monk’s 7-of-9 shooting from deep translates to 77.8% from three-point range. That level of accuracy dramatically changed the defensive geometry of the game.

The official NBA recap identifies Monk’s seven made threes and 26 points as central to Sacramento’s victory.

Zach LaVine

Zach LaVine scored 19 points on 6-of-11 shooting.

He was also efficient from long range, making three of four three-point attempts.

LaVine added four rebounds, one assist, one block, and one turnover.

His +9 plus/minus reflected his contribution to Sacramento’s successful stretches.

Precious Achiuwa

Precious Achiuwa supplied important work away from the scoring column.

He finished with:

• 9 points
• 7 rebounds
• 4-of-7 shooting
• 1-of-1 from three
• 2 blocks
• 2 offensive rebounds
• +15 plus/minus

His +15 was the highest plus/minus among the players listed in the supplied data.

That does not mean plus/minus alone proves he was Sacramento’s most important player. It does, however, show that the Kings were particularly successful during his minutes.

Team Shooting Was the Biggest Statistical Difference

The most important team-level statistic was shooting efficiency.

Lakers

Los Angeles finished:

• 41-of-84 from the field
• 8-of-36 from three
• 22-of-28 from the free-throw line
• 39 total rebounds
• 21 assists
• 10 turnovers
• 9 steals
• 2 blocks

Kings

Sacramento finished:

• 48-of-82 from the field
• 17-of-26 from three
• 11-of-14 from the free-throw line
• 32 total rebounds
• 23 assists
• 12 turnovers
• 6 steals
• 4 blocks

The field-goal percentage gap was significant:

Sacramento: 59%

Los Angeles: 49%

The three-point percentage gap was even larger:

Sacramento: 65%

Los Angeles: 22%

That 43-percentage-point difference from three-point range is the clearest statistical explanation for the result.

ESPN’s game analysis noted that Sacramento’s 17-of-26 three-point shooting produced a 65.4% rate and represented the worst three-point defensive rate allowed by the Lakers in a game with at least 25 opposing three-point attempts, according to ESPN’s statistical analysis.

Why the Three-Point Gap Mattered So Much

Sacramento made nine more three-pointers than Los Angeles.

That alone produced a 27-point advantage in made three-point scoring.

Los Angeles attempted 36 threes but made only eight.

This is where the game becomes more interesting than a simple box-score comparison.

The Lakers actually attempted 10 more three-point shots than the Kings. Sacramento did not need volume. It needed efficiency.

That distinction matters.

A team can sometimes survive poor three-point shooting by attacking the rim, dominating offensive rebounds, generating free throws, or forcing turnovers. Los Angeles did some of those things, particularly on the offensive glass, but Sacramento’s perimeter efficiency was too large a gap to erase.

The Third Quarter Changed the Game

The Lakers were still within striking distance after halftime.

Then Sacramento opened the third quarter with a 19-6 run.

That sequence turned a competitive game into a game controlled by the Kings.

Sacramento ultimately scored 34 points in the third quarter while Los Angeles scored 29.

The five-point quarter margin does not fully capture the significance of the run because momentum and game state matter. Once Sacramento created a large advantage, Los Angeles had to chase the game rather than dictate the pace.

The official game recap states that Sacramento eventually opened a 20-point lead during the third quarter.

The Lakers Still Scored 112 Points

It is worth emphasizing that Los Angeles did not have a disastrous offensive game in absolute terms.

The Lakers scored 112 points.

They shot 49% from the field.

They made 22 free throws on 28 attempts.

They recorded 21 assists.

They grabbed 39 rebounds.

They also committed only 10 turnovers.

Those numbers would often be competitive.

The problem was that Sacramento was even more efficient.

The Kings scored 124 points while shooting 59% from the field and 65% from three.

That is the difference between an offense that performs well and an offense that converts its possessions at an exceptional rate.

Rebounding: Lakers Had the Volume Advantage

Los Angeles won the total rebounding battle 39-32.

That is a seven-rebound advantage.

The Lakers also collected 12 offensive rebounds compared with six for Sacramento.

This was one of the clearest areas where Los Angeles had an advantage.

Ayton led the Lakers with 13 rebounds, while Precious Achiuwa and Dylan Cardwell each grabbed seven for Sacramento.

The Lakers’ 12 offensive rebounds created second-chance opportunities. Yet Sacramento’s superior shooting reduced the value of that advantage.

This is a useful lesson when interpreting basketball statistics: winning one major category does not automatically determine the outcome.

Assists and Ball Movement

Sacramento finished with 23 assists compared with 21 for Los Angeles.

The margin was small, but the distribution is worth noting.

Monk led the Kings with eight assists.

DeRozan added six.

Westbrook contributed seven.

That meant Sacramento had multiple players capable of creating shots for teammates.

Los Angeles also had a primary creator in Doncic, who recorded eight assists, but the Lakers’ supporting production did not match Sacramento’s combination of shooting and playmaking.

Doncic finished with 42 points and eight assists, meaning he directly contributed to a large share of the Lakers’ offensive production.

Turnovers Were Not the Main Reason Los Angeles Lost

The Lakers committed 10 turnovers.

The Kings committed 12.

That gave Los Angeles a two-turnover advantage.

Therefore, this was not a game where Sacramento simply won because it protected the ball better.

In fact, Los Angeles had fewer turnovers and more rebounds.

The main separation came from shooting efficiency.

That is an important distinction because it prevents a misleading interpretation of the box score.

Plus/Minus Provides Another Layer

Plus/minus should not be treated as a standalone measure of individual performance, but it can help identify which lineups controlled the game.

For Sacramento, the strongest supplied plus/minus figures included:

• Precious Achiuwa: +15
• Russell Westbrook: +10
• Zach LaVine: +9
• Maxime Raynaud: +7
• Malik Monk: +5
• Dylan Cardwell: +5

For Los Angeles, the notable positive figures included:

• Dalton Knecht: +3
• Bronny James: +4
• Maxi Kleber: +4

Among the primary Lakers contributors, however, the plus/minus figures were mostly negative.

Doncic finished at -10 despite his 42 points.

Ayton finished at -12 despite his 13 rebounds and two blocks.

LeBron James finished at -9.

This illustrates why plus/minus should be read alongside the full box score. A player can have an excellent individual scoring performance while still being on the floor during stretches in which the opposing team gains ground.

Efficiency Versus Volume

One of the most useful ways to understand this game is to compare high-volume scoring with efficient scoring.

Doncic had the largest scoring total at 42 points.

DeRozan scored 32 on 14-of-19 shooting.

Monk scored 26 on 9-of-15 shooting and made seven of nine threes.

LaVine scored 19 on 6-of-11 shooting.

Westbrook scored 22 on 8-of-16 shooting.

The Lakers had Doncic producing at a huge individual level, but Sacramento had several players converting their opportunities efficiently.

This created a broader offensive base.

Key Statistical Takeaways

Several numbers stand out immediately from the matchup.

1. Sacramento’s three-point shooting decided the margin

The Kings made 17 threes compared with eight by Los Angeles.

2. Doncic was the game’s leading scorer

His 42 points were 10 more than DeRozan’s 32.

3. DeRozan was exceptionally efficient

He shot 14-of-19 from the field.

4. Monk combined scoring and playmaking

He recorded 26 points and eight assists while shooting 7-of-9 from three.

5. Ayton dominated individual rebounding

His 13 rebounds were the highest total in the game.

6. Los Angeles won the rebounding battle

The Lakers collected 39 rebounds to Sacramento’s 32.

7. Sacramento still won comfortably

The Kings led 124-112 at the final buzzer.

What the Matchup Says About Shot Quality

Raw points can sometimes hide how a team creates those points.

The Lakers generated 84 field-goal attempts.

Sacramento generated 82.

So the difference was not primarily the number of attempts.

It was what happened when those attempts were taken.

Sacramento made 48 field goals.

Los Angeles made 41.

That seven-field-goal difference becomes much more significant when combined with Sacramento’s three-point accuracy.

The Kings made 17 threes, meaning more than one-third of their made field goals came from beyond the arc.

Los Angeles made only eight threes.

That gave Sacramento a major scoring advantage without requiring substantially more possessions.

Individual Matchup: Doncic vs DeRozan

The two leading scorers offered very different offensive profiles.

Doncic:

• 42 points
• 16-of-25 shooting
• 2-of-9 from three
• 8-of-8 free throws
• 7 rebounds
• 8 assists
• 4 steals

DeRozan:

• 32 points
• 14-of-19 shooting
• 0-of-0 from three
• 4-of-5 free throws
• 2 rebounds
• 6 assists
• 3 steals

Doncic produced 10 more points and more rebounds and assists.

DeRozan, however, was significantly more efficient from the field.

This contrast is useful because it shows that scoring totals and shooting efficiency answer different questions.

Individual Matchup: Monk vs Lakers Perimeter Shooters

Monk’s seven three-pointers were a major factor because the Lakers did not have an equivalent perimeter shooting performance.

Gabe Vincent made three of five threes.

LaVine made three of four for Sacramento.

Westbrook made four of eight.

Monk’s 7-of-9 shooting from deep stood apart.

Los Angeles’ team-wide 8-of-36 performance from three was simply not enough to counter that production.

Bench Production and Secondary Scoring

Sacramento also benefited from contributions beyond its highest-profile scorers.

Maxime Raynaud scored 11 points.

Precious Achiuwa scored nine.

Dylan Cardwell grabbed seven rebounds.

Keon Ellis made his only field-goal attempt, a three-pointer.

Nique Clifford did not score but added two rebounds and one steal.

The distribution meant Sacramento did not need DeRozan and Monk to generate every possession.

Los Angeles received useful production from Jaxson Hayes, Gabe Vincent, and Ayton, but the supporting perimeter shooting remained inconsistent.

Players Who Did Not Play

Several players were listed as inactive or did not enter the game.

For Los Angeles, Rui Hachimura was listed as DNP due to the coach’s decision.

For Sacramento, Doug McDermott, Dario Saric, Drew Eubanks, and Devin Carter were listed as DNP due to the coach’s decision, while Dennis Schroder was listed as DNP due to league suspension.

These details matter when reviewing a box score because a DNP is not the same thing as a poor statistical performance. A player who did not play has no game statistics to evaluate.

Season Series Context

The supplied season-series data shows four meetings between the teams:

Game	Result
October 27	Lakers 127, Kings 120
December 29	Lakers 125, Kings 101
January 13	Kings 124, Lakers 112
March 2	Lakers 128, Kings 104

After the January meeting, the Lakers held a 2-1 advantage in the season series according to the supplied information.

That context is useful because Sacramento’s January victory did not erase the Lakers’ earlier success in the matchup.

Why the Final Score Can Be Misleading

A 124-112 score might suggest a straightforward 12-point win.

The detailed numbers show a more complicated story.

Los Angeles:

• Rebounded better
• Turned the ball over less
• Had 39 total rebounds
• Scored 112 points
• Received 42 points from Doncic

Sacramento:

• Shot 59% overall
• Shot 65% from three
• Made 17 threes
• Had three players score at least 19 points
• Produced 23 assists
• Built a large second-half lead

The deciding factor was therefore not one isolated category. It was the interaction between Sacramento’s shooting efficiency and its balanced scoring.

How to Read These Player Stats Correctly

When reviewing an NBA box score, a useful process is:

Start with the final score

This establishes the basic outcome.

Check quarter scoring

This shows when the game changed.

Compare field-goal percentage

It gives an immediate view of overall shooting efficiency.

Compare three-point attempts and makes

This can reveal whether the game was driven by perimeter variance.

Look at rebounds

Rebounding indicates which team generated extra possessions and defensive finishes.

Review assists and turnovers together

This helps identify offensive organization and possession control.

Then examine individual players

Only after understanding the team context should individual performances be evaluated.

This approach prevents overreacting to a single stat such as points or plus/minus.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who scored the most points in the Kings vs Lakers game?

Luka Doncic led all scorers with 42 points for the Lakers. DeMar DeRozan led Sacramento with 32 points.

Who led the Kings in scoring?

DeMar DeRozan led Sacramento with 32 points, followed by Malik Monk with 26 and Russell Westbrook with 22.

How many points did Luka Doncic score against the Kings?

Luka Doncic scored 42 points on 16-of-25 shooting, along with seven rebounds, eight assists, and four steals.

How many three-pointers did Malik Monk make?

Malik Monk made seven of nine three-point attempts and finished with 26 points.

Who had the most rebounds in the game?

Deandre Ayton led all players with 13 rebounds, including five offensive rebounds.

What was the final score of the Kings vs Lakers game?

Sacramento defeated Los Angeles 124-112 at Golden 1 Center.

Final Thoughts

The sacramento kings vs lakers match player stats show why a box score should be read as a connected story rather than a collection of isolated numbers.

Luka Doncic produced the game’s biggest individual scoring performance with 42 points, while LeBron James added 22. Deandre Ayton controlled the boards with 13 rebounds, and the Lakers finished with more total rebounds and fewer turnovers than Sacramento.

Yet Sacramento’s offensive efficiency proved decisive.

DeMar DeRozan scored 32 points on 14-of-19 shooting. Malik Monk added 26 points and seven three-pointers while also recording eight assists. Russell Westbrook contributed 22 points and seven assists, while Zach LaVine added 19 points on efficient shooting.

At the team level, the biggest difference was the three-point line. Sacramento converted 17 of 26 attempts from deep, while Los Angeles made only eight of 36.

That shooting gap explains much of the 124-112 result.

The game also demonstrates why individual statistics need context. Doncic’s 42 points were outstanding, but Sacramento’s balanced scoring and perimeter efficiency created a larger team advantage. Ayton’s 13 rebounds were significant, but the Lakers could not turn their rebounding edge into enough points to overcome Sacramento’s shooting.

For anyone researching the sacramento kings vs lakers match player stats, the most useful takeaway is therefore not simply who scored the most. It is how scoring efficiency, three-point shooting, rebounding, playmaking, and game flow combined to produce the final result.