Colts vs Kansas City Chiefs Match Player Stats
The colts vs kansas city chiefs match player stats from their Week 2 meeting tell the story of a game that was much closer than the final records suggested. Kansas City defeated Indianapolis 33-30 in overtime, but the Colts repeatedly challenged the Chiefs and forced the game into its final possession. Patrick Mahomes produced 382 passing yards and three touchdowns, while Daniel Jones led an Indianapolis offense that stayed competitive for four quarters and overtime.
One date detail is worth clarifying before looking at the numbers. The game was played on September 20, 2026, in Kansas City, although the supplied data lists September 21. The September 21 date corresponds to the following day in some time zones, including Pakistan. The official NFL game center lists the contest as Week 2 and confirms the 33-30 overtime result. (NFL)
This was not simply a game decided by one quarterback or one explosive play. Kansas City gained 523 total yards compared with Indianapolis’ 329, yet the Colts kept the score level late because they converted enough opportunities, protected the football and received productive work from Jonathan Taylor and their receiving group. Kansas City ultimately prevailed because Mahomes created more passing production, the Chiefs ran more efficiently and Harrison Butker delivered the decisive kick.
colts vs kansas city chiefs match player stats: Game Overview
The final score was:
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | OT | Final |
| Indianapolis Colts | 7 | 13 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 30 |
| Kansas City Chiefs | 10 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 33 |
The scoreboard reveals an unusual rhythm.
Indianapolis started well, scoring seven points in the opening quarter. The Colts then produced 13 points in the second quarter, giving them 20 points by halftime. Kansas City had 17.
The second half changed the shape of the contest. The Colts were shut out in the third quarter while Kansas City scored seven. The Chiefs then entered the fourth quarter with control, but Indianapolis responded with seven points and eventually forced overtime.
Kansas City scored three points in overtime first. Indianapolis answered with a field goal of its own, but the Chiefs eventually secured the win with another field goal.
The result left Kansas City at 2-0 and Indianapolis at 0-2. The official NFL recap also highlighted the Chiefs’ 523-329 advantage in total yardage and Mahomes’ 32-for-47 passing performance. (NFL)
Patrick Mahomes Leads Kansas City Through a High-Volume Passing Game
Patrick Mahomes was the statistical centerpiece of the Chiefs’ offense.
His passing line was:
- 32 completions
- 47 attempts
- 382 passing yards
- 8.1 yards per attempt
- 3 touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
- 78.0 QBR
- 114.0 passer rating
The most important part of the performance was not simply the 382-yard total. Mahomes attempted 47 passes, meaning Kansas City relied heavily on his ability to sustain the offense through the air.
A completion percentage of 32 completions on 47 attempts works out to approximately 68.1 percent. That is a strong completion rate considering the volume.
Mahomes also avoided interceptions, which became especially important in an overtime game. Indianapolis generated pressure and recorded two sacks as a team, but Kansas City continued to move the football.
His three touchdown passes also gave the Chiefs a major advantage in scoring efficiency.
The official NFL recap described the performance as a glimpse of the Chiefs’ familiar offensive identity, noting that Mahomes surpassed 300 passing yards while Travis Kelce topped 100 receiving yards. (NFL)
Daniel Jones Gives Indianapolis a Competitive Performance
Daniel Jones finished with:
| Category | Daniel Jones |
| Completions | 22 |
| Attempts | 31 |
| Passing yards | 210 |
| Yards per attempt | 6.8 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks | 0 |
| QBR | 76.8 |
| Passer rating | 86.8 |
| Rushing | 3 carries, 10 yards |
Jones did not match Mahomes statistically, but judging his performance only against the Kansas City quarterback would miss the larger picture.
Jones completed 22 of 31 attempts, which equals roughly 71.0 percent. He was also not sacked, an important detail against a Kansas City defense that needed to generate disruption without producing a traditional sack.
His 210 passing yards were modest compared with Mahomes’ total, but Indianapolis compensated through Jonathan Taylor’s rushing production and several targeted receiving options.
The interception was the main negative in Jones’ statistical profile. In a game decided in overtime, every turnover carries extra weight because it removes an offensive possession and potentially changes field position.
Still, the Colts entered overtime with a chance to win. That says something about how effectively the rest of the Indianapolis offense supported Jones.
Jonathan Taylor Remains the Foundation of the Colts Offense
Jonathan Taylor was one of Indianapolis’ most important players.
He recorded:
- 24 rushing attempts
- 92 rushing yards
- 3.8 yards per carry
- 2 rushing touchdowns
- 24-yard longest run
- 4 receptions
- 40 receiving yards
- 10.0 yards per reception
- 4 targets
Taylor therefore contributed 132 yards from scrimmage.
His two rushing touchdowns were especially valuable because Indianapolis needed to turn possessions into points rather than rely entirely on Jones throwing against Kansas City’s secondary.
The 3.8-yard rushing average was not spectacular, but workload matters. Taylor received 24 carries, which accounted for three-quarters of Indianapolis’ 32 team rushing attempts.
That workload demonstrates how heavily the Colts depended on their lead back.
The challenge for Indianapolis was efficiency. The team produced 119 rushing yards on 32 attempts, an average of 3.7 yards per carry. Kansas City, by comparison, generated 152 rushing yards on only 29 attempts.
That difference of 33 rushing yards helped Kansas City maintain offensive balance.
Kansas City Wins the Rushing Efficiency Battle
The Chiefs did not need Mahomes to throw on every possession.
Kansas City rushed 29 times for 152 yards, averaging 5.2 yards per attempt.
The leading rusher was Kenneth Walker III:
- 24 carries
- 117 yards
- 4.9 yards per carry
- 19-yard longest run
- 0 rushing touchdowns
Walker also caught six passes for 61 yards, giving him 178 total yards from scrimmage.
That is one of the most significant individual statistical performances in the game.
Walker produced 117 rushing yards and another 61 receiving yards. His receiving contribution gave Kansas City a reliable way to keep him involved even when the offense shifted away from traditional rushing situations.
Mahomes also added 17 rushing yards on two attempts, averaging 8.5 yards per carry.
The Chiefs’ rushing production made the passing attack harder to defend because Indianapolis could not focus exclusively on Mahomes.
Travis Kelce Produces Another Major Receiving Performance
Travis Kelce was Kansas City’s most productive receiver by total receiving yards.
His numbers were:
| Statistic | Travis Kelce |
| Receptions | 9 |
| Targets | 11 |
| Receiving yards | 101 |
| Average | 11.2 |
| Long | 18 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
Kelce caught nine of his 11 targets, giving him a catch rate of approximately 81.8 percent.
His 101 receiving yards also made him the only Kansas City receiver to reach the 100-yard mark.
What makes the performance more interesting is that Kansas City did not depend on Kelce alone. Tyquan Thornton and Rashee Rice both averaged more than 20 yards per reception, while Walker provided a second layer of production underneath.
That combination gave Mahomes several different ways to attack Indianapolis.
The official NFL recap specifically noted that this was the first time since Week 7 of 2023 that Mahomes had more than 300 passing yards while Kelce simultaneously recorded more than 100 receiving yards. (NFL)
Tyquan Thornton Provides the Explosive Element
Tyquan Thornton finished with four receptions for 86 yards.
His average was an impressive 21.5 yards per reception, with a 45-yard long reception.
Those numbers show why explosive plays were such an important part of Kansas City’s offensive advantage.
Thornton did not need a large target volume to influence the game. Four catches produced 86 yards, meaning a small number of successful plays generated a substantial amount of field position.
This is an important lesson when interpreting player statistics.
A receiver with 10 catches for 80 yards may have a larger reception total, but a receiver with four catches for 86 yards can still have a major impact on the game because of the type and timing of those catches.
Rashee Rice Adds More Big-Play Production
Rashee Rice recorded:
- 4 receptions
- 6 targets
- 83 yards
- 20.8 yards per reception
- 31-yard longest reception
- 0 touchdowns
Rice’s 83 yards combined with Thornton’s 86 gave Kansas City 169 yards from two receivers.
Add Kelce’s 101 yards and the Chiefs had three major receiving contributors before considering Walker’s 61 receiving yards.
That distribution is one reason Kansas City’s 382 passing yards were so difficult for Indianapolis to overcome.
The Colts could not simply remove one receiver and expect the passing attack to disappear.
Xavier Worthy and the Kansas City Touchdown Distribution
Xavier Worthy finished with five catches for 25 yards and one touchdown.
His average was only 5.0 yards per reception, but the touchdown made his contribution more valuable than the yardage total alone suggests.
Jalen Royals also recorded a touchdown on two receptions for six yards.
This demonstrates an important distinction between volume statistics and scoring statistics.
A player can have limited yardage but still make a decisive contribution if his opportunities arrive near the goal line.
Kansas City finished with three passing touchdowns, with the receiving group converting those opportunities into points.
Josh Downs Leads Indianapolis in Receiving
Josh Downs was the Colts’ leading receiver by both receptions and receiving yards.
He recorded:
- 7 receptions
- 9 targets
- 72 yards
- 10.3 yards per reception
- 20-yard longest reception
- 0 touchdowns
Downs’ seven receptions represented nearly one-third of Indianapolis’ 22 team completions.
His 72 yards also accounted for more than one-third of the Colts’ 210 passing yards.
That makes Downs one of the clearest indicators of how Indianapolis moved the ball through the passing game.
He was not simply an occasional big-play threat. He was a consistent possession option who gave Jones a dependable target.
Laquon Treadwell Creates One of the Game’s Biggest Plays
Laquon Treadwell caught three passes for 61 yards.
His most important statistic was the 48-yard reception, which was the longest catch recorded by either team.
That play became even more significant in overtime.
According to the NFL’s postgame account, Treadwell appeared to have lost the football after making a 48-yard overtime catch, but replay determined that he had been down by contact. Indianapolis retained possession and continued its attempt to win the game. (NFL)
This sequence illustrates why box scores sometimes fail to capture the full drama of a football game.
A 48-yard reception is already significant statistically. When it occurs in overtime and is followed by a replay review that changes the interpretation of a potential turnover, its importance becomes even greater.
Tyler Warren Provides a Red-Zone Contribution
Tyler Warren had an unusual statistical profile.
He rushed once for three yards and caught six passes for 21 yards and one touchdown.
His six receptions ranked second on Indianapolis behind Downs, but his receiving average was only 3.5 yards.
That suggests a role built around short-area opportunities rather than explosive gains.
His touchdown was therefore particularly important because it gave the Colts scoring value from relatively limited yardage.
This is another reason not to evaluate receivers purely by yards per catch.
Comparing the Two Passing Attacks
The quarterback comparison is straightforward.
| Statistic | Daniel Jones | Patrick Mahomes |
| Completions | 22 | 32 |
| Attempts | 31 | 47 |
| Completion rate | 71.0% | 68.1% |
| Passing yards | 210 | 382 |
| Yards per attempt | 6.8 | 8.1 |
| TD passes | 1 | 3 |
| INT | 1 | 0 |
| Sacks | 0 | 2 |
| QBR | 76.8 | 78.0 |
| Passer rating | 86.8 | 114.0 |
Jones had the higher completion percentage, but Mahomes dominated the overall production.
The difference in passing attempts was also substantial. Mahomes threw 16 more passes and gained 172 more yards.
More importantly, he threw three touchdowns without an interception.
That combination of volume, efficiency and scoring explains much of Kansas City’s offensive advantage.
Comparing the Running Games
The rushing statistics reveal another meaningful difference.
| Category | Indianapolis | Kansas City |
| Attempts | 32 | 29 |
| Yards | 119 | 152 |
| Average | 3.7 | 5.2 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 0 |
| Long | 24 | 19 |
Indianapolis actually scored two rushing touchdowns while Kansas City scored none.
However, Kansas City’s 5.2 yards per carry was considerably more efficient.
The Chiefs gained 33 more rushing yards despite making three fewer attempts.
That is a useful example of why rushing touchdowns and rushing efficiency must be analyzed separately.
Indianapolis had the stronger rushing touchdown output, but Kansas City generated more consistent yardage.
Total Offensive Production Explains the Final Result
The overall yardage difference was significant.
Kansas City produced 523 total yards.
Indianapolis produced 329.
That is a difference of 194 yards.
Yet the final score was separated by only three points.
This tells us that total yardage alone did not determine the outcome.
Indianapolis found ways to convert its possessions into points, while Kansas City had to withstand several challenges despite controlling overall production.
The Colts also avoided fumbles, while Kansas City did not lose a fumble either.
Kansas City recorded one interception through Kristian Fulton.
Indianapolis recorded none.
The turnover margin therefore favored Kansas City, although the overall turnover picture was not extremely lopsided.
Defensive Statistics Tell a Different Story
Indianapolis recorded:
- 93 total tackles
- 43 solo tackles
- 2 sacks
- 4 tackles for loss
- 4 passes defended
- 4 quarterback hits
Kansas City recorded:
- 77 total tackles
- 37 solo tackles
- 0 sacks
- 6 tackles for loss
- 5 passes defended
- 4 quarterback hits
- 1 interception
The most interesting defensive contrast is that Indianapolis recorded two sacks while Kansas City recorded none.
On the surface, that might suggest Indianapolis had the better pass rush.
But Kansas City’s defense still generated an interception and six tackles for loss, and the Chiefs ultimately held the Colts to 329 total yards.
Kansas City’s ability to limit Indianapolis without producing a sack is an important reminder that defensive success does not always appear in the sack column.
Kristian Fulton Provides a Turnover for Kansas City
Kristian Fulton recorded the Chiefs’ only interception.
The play did not produce return yardage or a touchdown, but it still represented a critical change of possession.
Indianapolis did not intercept Mahomes.
In a three-point overtime game, even one turnover can become highly significant.
Kansas City’s ability to protect Mahomes from interceptions while producing one takeaway from Jones helped tilt the possession battle.
Special Teams Were Also Important
The kicking statistics were:
Spencer Shrader
- 3-for-3 field goals
- 100 percent
- 49-yard long
- 3-for-3 extra points
- 12 points
Harrison Butker
- 4-for-5 field goals
- 80 percent
- 46-yard long
- 3-for-3 extra points
- 15 points
Butker scored 15 points, three more than Shrader.
Those three additional points were the difference between winning and losing.
Kansas City also benefited from strong kick-return production.
The Chiefs recorded 167 kick-return yards on six returns, averaging 27.8 yards per return.
Indianapolis recorded 160 yards on six returns, averaging 26.7.
Neither team scored a kick-return touchdown.
Punting also favored Kansas City in average distance.
Matt Araiza averaged 54.5 yards per punt for Kansas City, while Rigoberto Sanchez averaged 43.0 for Indianapolis.
Field position is difficult to capture in a basic box score, but these special teams numbers contributed to the broader game context.
The Fourth Quarter and Overtime Were the Defining Stages
The first half belonged to both offenses.
Indianapolis scored 20 points before halftime.
Kansas City scored 17.
The third quarter was different. Kansas City scored seven while Indianapolis failed to score.
That gave the Chiefs momentum entering the final period.
But the Colts did not collapse.
Indianapolis scored seven points in the fourth quarter, while Kansas City managed only three. The game therefore moved into overtime tied at 30.
Overtime became a test of execution rather than volume.
The Colts had opportunities, including the dramatic Treadwell catch and replay sequence. Kansas City’s defense eventually held, and Butker delivered the decisive kick.
The official NFL recap described Butker’s 40-yard overtime game-winner as the play that secured Kansas City’s 2-0 start. (NFL)
What the Numbers Say About Kansas City’s Offense
Several themes stand out from the Kansas City statistics.
1. Mahomes created massive passing volume
Forty-seven attempts gave Kansas City a large number of opportunities to attack Indianapolis through the air.
2. The Chiefs were efficient on the ground
Kansas City’s 5.2 yards per carry was considerably better than Indianapolis’ 3.7.
3. The receiving production was distributed
Kelce had 101 yards, Thornton had 86 and Rice had 83. Walker added 61 receiving yards.
4. The Chiefs protected the football
Mahomes threw no interceptions, and Kansas City did not lose a fumble.
5. Special teams delivered points
Butker scored 15 points and ultimately provided the winning margin.
What the Numbers Say About Indianapolis
The Colts’ statistics also provide useful lessons.
1. Taylor remained heavily involved
Twenty-four rushing attempts plus four receptions made him one of the central pieces of the offense.
2. Downs was a reliable target
Seven catches on nine targets gave Jones a consistent passing option.
3. Treadwell produced a major explosive play
His 48-yard reception became especially important during overtime.
4. Indianapolis stayed competitive despite a yardage disadvantage
The Colts gained 194 fewer yards than Kansas City but still forced overtime.
5. The defense generated pressure without sacks dominating the game
Two sacks and four quarterback hits showed some ability to disrupt Mahomes, even though Kansas City’s passing production remained high.
How to Read Player Stats Beyond the Box Score
A useful way to analyze an NFL game is to avoid treating every statistic equally.
A quarterback’s passing yards matter, but so do attempts, touchdowns and interceptions.
A running back’s rushing yards matter, but workload and yards per attempt provide additional context.
A receiver’s catches matter, but targets and yards per reception reveal whether the player was functioning as a possession option or an explosive threat.
The same principle applies to defense.
A sack is valuable, but tackles for loss, quarterback hits, interceptions and passes defended can also explain how a defense performed.
In this matchup, the most revealing combination was Kansas City’s offensive balance.
The Chiefs passed for 382 yards and rushed for 152. That gave them 534 combined passing and rushing yards before accounting for any other yardage categories.
Indianapolis had 210 passing yards and 119 rushing yards, or 329 combined passing and rushing yards.
That 205-yard difference in passing plus rushing production shows why Kansas City controlled the statistical profile even though the scoreboard remained close.
Why the Colts Still Had a Chance to Win
The statistics might make the final 30-33 score surprising.
Kansas City gained much more yardage.
Mahomes threw three touchdowns compared with one for Jones.
Kansas City rushed more efficiently.
The Chiefs had the only interception.
Yet Indianapolis reached overtime.
There are several reasons.
First, the Colts converted enough opportunities into touchdowns.
Second, Taylor scored twice on the ground.
Third, Indianapolis received useful production from Downs, Treadwell and Warren.
Fourth, Jones was not sacked.
Fifth, the Colts kept fighting after Kansas City gained control in the second half.
This is why final scores and box scores should be considered together.
A team can dominate yardage and still need overtime to win.
Key Player Rankings From the Game
Based strictly on the supplied statistics and game impact, the leading individual performances can be grouped as follows.
Patrick Mahomes
Mahomes was the strongest overall offensive performer. His 382 passing yards, three touchdowns and zero interceptions gave Kansas City the most productive quarterback performance.
Kenneth Walker III
Walker produced 178 yards from scrimmage through rushing and receiving. His 117 rushing yards and 61 receiving yards made him a major part of Kansas City’s balanced attack.
Travis Kelce
Kelce’s nine catches, 101 yards and touchdown made him the Chiefs’ top receiving producer.
Jonathan Taylor
Taylor delivered two rushing touchdowns and 132 total yards.
Tyquan Thornton
Four catches for 86 yards at 21.5 yards per reception gave Thornton substantial explosive-play value.
Josh Downs
Downs led Indianapolis with seven receptions and 72 yards.
Laquon Treadwell
His three catches for 61 yards included a 48-yard reception that became central to the overtime drama.
The Most Important Statistical Takeaways
The most useful conclusions from the game can be summarized in a few numbers:
- Kansas City won 33-30 in overtime.
- Kansas City gained 523 total yards.
- Indianapolis gained 329 total yards.
- Mahomes threw for 382 yards and three touchdowns.
- Jones threw for 210 yards and one touchdown.
- Mahomes had no interceptions.
- Jones threw one interception.
- Kansas City rushed for 152 yards.
- Indianapolis rushed for 119 yards.
- Taylor scored two rushing touchdowns.
- Kelce caught nine passes for 101 yards and one touchdown.
- Walker produced 178 total yards.
- Downs caught seven passes for 72 yards.
- Thornton averaged 21.5 yards per reception.
- Butker scored 15 points.
- The Chiefs improved to 2-0.
- The Colts fell to 0-2.
Taken together, these numbers show a Kansas City team that won through offensive volume, balance and late-game execution rather than through one isolated statistical category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Colts vs Kansas City Chiefs game?
The Kansas City Chiefs defeated the Indianapolis Colts 33-30 in overtime.
How many yards did Patrick Mahomes pass for?
Patrick Mahomes passed for 382 yards on 32 completions in 47 attempts. He threw three touchdowns and no interceptions.
How did Daniel Jones perform against the Chiefs?
Daniel Jones completed 22 of 31 passes for 210 yards, one touchdown and one interception. He was not sacked.
How many rushing yards did Jonathan Taylor have?
Jonathan Taylor rushed 24 times for 92 yards, averaging 3.8 yards per carry. He scored two rushing touchdowns.
Who was Kansas City’s leading receiver?
Travis Kelce led Kansas City with nine receptions for 101 yards and one touchdown.
Which team gained more total yards?
Kansas City gained 523 total yards, while Indianapolis gained 329. The Chiefs therefore had a 194-yard advantage.
Conclusion
The colts vs kansas city chiefs match player stats show a game in which Kansas City controlled the broader statistical picture but Indianapolis remained close enough to force overtime.
Patrick Mahomes was the central figure for the Chiefs, producing 382 passing yards, three touchdowns and no interceptions. Travis Kelce supplied 101 receiving yards, while Kenneth Walker III contributed 178 yards from scrimmage. Kansas City’s 152 rushing yards also gave the offense a more balanced foundation.
Indianapolis had strong individual contributions of its own. Jonathan Taylor delivered two rushing touchdowns and 132 total yards. Josh Downs provided seven receptions for 72 yards, while Laquon Treadwell’s 48-yard reception became one of the defining moments of overtime.
The largest statistical difference came in total yardage. Kansas City produced 523 yards compared with 329 for Indianapolis. The Chiefs were also more efficient on the ground, averaging 5.2 yards per carry against Indianapolis’ 3.7.
Still, the final score demonstrates why player statistics require context. The Colts overcame a major yardage disadvantage by producing timely touchdowns and making the game competitive through the final possession. Kansas City ultimately had the better combination of passing production, rushing efficiency, turnover control and kicking output.
The final 33-30 result therefore reflects more than Mahomes’ passing numbers. It was the product of Kansas City’s ability to sustain offensive production, withstand Indianapolis’ late push and execute when the game reached its most important moments.