76ers vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats

The 76ers vs charlotte hornets match player stats from October 26, 2025, reveal an exciting NBA contest in which the Philadelphia 76ers defeated the Charlotte Hornets 125-121 at Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia. The game featured impressive individual performances, strong three-point shooting, and a dramatic fourth-quarter comeback by Philadelphia. Tyrese Maxey led the 76ers with 28 points and nine assists, while Quentin Grimes contributed 24 points and Joel Embiid added 20. For Charlotte, LaMelo Ball delivered an outstanding performance with 27 points, 10 rebounds, and eight assists, but his team’s late defensive struggles prevented the Hornets from securing the victory.

The final score tells only part of the story. Charlotte actually produced more total rebounds, made 43 field goals, and recorded 30 assists. However, Philadelphia converted its opportunities more efficiently from three-point range and the free-throw line. The biggest difference emerged during the final 12 minutes, when the 76ers scored 39 points compared with Charlotte’s 25. That fourth-quarter advantage transformed a competitive game into a Philadelphia victory.

This detailed breakdown examines the final score, individual player performances, team statistics, scoring patterns, and the most important factors behind the result. It also explains what the numbers reveal about both teams beyond the scoreboard.

76ers vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The October 26 meeting between Philadelphia and Charlotte was an entertaining regular-season matchup. Both teams demonstrated offensive quality, but Philadelphia showed greater composure when the game reached its decisive moments.

Match information

Category	Details
Match	Philadelphia 76ers vs. Charlotte Hornets
Date	October 26, 2025
Competition	NBA regular season
Venue	Xfinity Mobile Arena
Location	Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Attendance	19,124
Final score	76ers 125, Hornets 121
Winning team	Philadelphia 76ers
Losing team	Charlotte Hornets
Match status	Final
Philadelphia record displayed	2-0
Charlotte record displayed	1-1

Philadelphia entered the contest looking to maintain its positive start to the season. Charlotte, meanwhile, wanted to demonstrate that its developing offensive group could compete against a strong opponent on the road.

The game provided an interesting contrast between two offensive approaches. Charlotte generated 30 assists and 45 rebounds, while Philadelphia relied on efficient perimeter shooting, aggressive free-throw production, and a strong finishing stretch.

The result was especially important because the 76ers did not dominate every statistical category. Instead, they found ways to win despite collecting five fewer rebounds and recording one fewer assist than their opponents.

Quarter-by-quarter score breakdown

The scoring progression explains why Philadelphia’s victory was so dramatic.

Quarter	Philadelphia 76ers	Charlotte Hornets
First Quarter	36	29
Second Quarter	25	29
Third Quarter	25	38
Fourth Quarter	39	25
Final Score	125	121

Philadelphia started strongly, winning the opening quarter by seven points. Charlotte responded in the second period and reduced the deficit to three points before halftime.

The third quarter completely changed the game’s momentum. Charlotte scored 38 points, while Philadelphia managed only 25. That 13-point advantage gave the Hornets a 96-86 lead entering the final quarter.

However, Philadelphia responded with its best offensive period of the evening. The 76ers scored 39 points in the fourth quarter and limited Charlotte to just 25. This 14-point advantage allowed Philadelphia to erase the 10-point deficit and win by four.

The fourth-quarter numbers are particularly important because they demonstrate how quickly an NBA game can change. Charlotte had established control through its third-quarter offense, but Philadelphia executed more effectively when the result was on the line.

Complete Philadelphia 76ers Player Stats

Philadelphia’s victory came through a combination of scoring contributions from its leading players. Tyrese Maxey was the primary offensive performer, while Quentin Grimes supplied valuable secondary scoring. Joel Embiid also contributed an important 20-point performance.

Philadelphia’s leading performers

Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists
Tyrese Maxey	28	Not specified	9
Quentin Grimes	24	Not specified	Not specified
Joel Embiid	20	Not specified	Not specified
Andre Drummond	Not specified	13	Not specified

The available game data identifies these players as Philadelphia’s leading statistical contributors. It does not provide every individual box-score category, so unreported figures are intentionally left unspecified rather than estimated.

1. Tyrese Maxey: 28 points and 9 assists

Team: Philadelphia 76ers

Philadelphia’s leading scorer

Tyrese Maxey delivered the strongest overall scoring performance for Philadelphia, finishing with 28 points and nine assists.

His scoring output gave the 76ers a reliable offensive foundation throughout the contest. Maxey’s ability to contribute as both a scorer and playmaker was particularly valuable in a game where Charlotte generated considerable offensive pressure.

His nine assists also demonstrate that his contribution extended beyond individual scoring. Playmaking is important in close games because it helps create opportunities for teammates instead of forcing one player to manufacture every possession.

There are three important aspects of Maxey’s performance:

• Scoring production: His 28 points made him the game’s leading scorer.
• Playmaking: Nine assists showed his ability to create scoring opportunities for teammates.
• Offensive responsibility: His contribution helped Philadelphia maintain its attacking threat even when Charlotte controlled the third quarter.

Maxey’s performance was especially meaningful during a contest decided by four points. Philadelphia needed consistent offensive production, and its leading guard supplied it.

His combination of scoring and passing also made him difficult to defend with a single approach. If Charlotte concentrated too heavily on limiting his individual scoring, Philadelphia could benefit from the opportunities created for other players.

Although the supplied data does not identify his individual fourth-quarter point total, his overall contribution was central to the team’s successful comeback.

2. Quentin Grimes: 24 points

Team: Philadelphia 76ers

Second-highest scorer

Quentin Grimes produced an important 24-point performance, giving Philadelphia another major offensive option.

His contribution was particularly significant because the 76ers did not depend entirely on Maxey to generate points. When a second player scores 24 points, opposing defenses have to account for multiple offensive threats.

This creates more difficult defensive decisions.

Charlotte could not simply concentrate its attention on Maxey without considering the possibility of Grimes taking advantage of available scoring opportunities.

Grimes finished only four points behind Maxey, showing how closely the two players contributed to Philadelphia’s overall scoring output.

His performance also highlights the value of secondary scoring in high-pressure situations. A team that receives substantial production from multiple players has more ways to respond when its primary offensive option faces defensive pressure.

In this particular matchup, Grimes’ 24 points helped Philadelphia build the scoring depth needed to overcome Charlotte’s third-quarter advantage.

3. Joel Embiid: 20 points

Team: Philadelphia 76ers

Joel Embiid added 20 points to Philadelphia’s winning effort.

His scoring contribution gave the 76ers a third player with at least 20 points. Having three players reach that mark is an important feature of Philadelphia’s offensive performance.

Embiid’s presence also gives Philadelphia a different type of offensive option from the perimeter-oriented contributions of its guards.

A productive center can create advantages through interior scoring, post positioning, and defensive attention. These possibilities make it more difficult for opponents to defend the entire lineup using one strategy.

The available statistics confirm Embiid’s 20 points, although they do not establish his individual shooting breakdown or rebound total for this particular game.

His contribution should therefore be understood primarily through his scoring output rather than unsupported assumptions about other categories.

4. Andre Drummond: 13 rebounds

Team: Philadelphia 76ers

Andre Drummond led Philadelphia in rebounding with 13 boards.

Rebounding was an important part of this matchup because Charlotte actually won the overall rebounding battle, 45-40.

Drummond’s individual performance helped Philadelphia compete on the glass despite finishing with fewer total rebounds.

His 13 rebounds represented a significant contribution to the team’s ability to secure possessions and limit Charlotte’s opportunities.

Rebounding has two major dimensions:

• Defensive rebounds help a team end an opponent’s possession.
• Offensive rebounds create additional scoring opportunities.

The supplied statistics do not separate Drummond’s 13 rebounds into offensive and defensive categories. However, his overall total confirms that he was Philadelphia’s leading rebounder.

His performance was especially relevant in a game where Charlotte recorded 13 offensive rebounds. Philadelphia needed strong work on the glass to prevent the Hornets from creating even more second-chance opportunities.

5. VJ Edgecombe: Three steals

VJ Edgecombe also made a notable defensive contribution.

The supplied data identifies him as Philadelphia’s leading starter in steals, with three.

Steals are valuable because they can immediately interrupt an opponent’s offensive possession. They can also create transition opportunities before the opposing defense has time to organize.

Philadelphia recorded 10 steals as a team, compared with Charlotte’s six.

Edgecombe’s three steals accounted for a meaningful portion of that difference.

His defensive contribution demonstrates that Philadelphia’s victory was not based entirely on offensive production. Creating turnovers and disrupting Charlotte’s possession flow also helped the 76ers establish an advantage.

Philadelphia starting lineup

The following players were listed as starters for the 76ers:

Player	Jersey Number
Dominick Barlow	25
Joel Embiid	21
Kelly Oubre Jr.	9
Tyrese Maxey	0
VJ Edgecombe	77

Philadelphia bench players

The available box-score information lists the following Philadelphia bench players:

• Jabari Walker
• Justin Edwards
• Andre Drummond
• Adem Bona
• Quentin Grimes
• Johni Broome
• Kyle Lowry
• Eric Gordon

Johni Broome, Kyle Lowry, and Eric Gordon were marked DNP due to the coach’s decision.

DNP means Did Not Play. It does not necessarily indicate an injury or an unavailable player. In this case, the recorded reason was a coaching decision.

The presence of productive players such as Grimes and Drummond among the listed reserves demonstrates the importance of Philadelphia’s available lineup depth.

Complete Charlotte Hornets Player Stats

Charlotte’s offensive performance was strong for most of the game. The team recorded 121 points, 45 rebounds, and 30 assists.

LaMelo Ball was the standout performer, while Collin Sexton and the rest of the offensive group helped maintain pressure on Philadelphia.

Charlotte’s leading performers

Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists
LaMelo Ball	27	10	8
Collin Sexton	21	Not specified	7
Miles Bridges	Not specified	Not specified	7

LaMelo Ball was Charlotte’s leader in points, rebounds, and assists. This makes his performance one of the most complete individual displays of the matchup.

1. LaMelo Ball: 27 points, 10 rebounds, and 8 assists

Team: Charlotte Hornets

Charlotte’s leading performer

LaMelo Ball delivered an outstanding all-around performance, finishing with 27 points, 10 rebounds, and eight assists.

He was Charlotte’s leading scorer and rebounder while also sharing responsibility for creating scoring opportunities.

His 27 points placed him just one point behind Maxey’s game-high 28.

Ball’s double-double was another important feature of his performance. Reaching double figures in both scoring and rebounding demonstrates his contribution across multiple areas.

His eight assists also show how important he was to Charlotte’s offensive organization.

Rather than focusing only on his individual scoring, Ball helped involve teammates and maintain the Hornets’ attacking rhythm.

His performance can be understood through three main categories:

• Scoring: His 27 points made him Charlotte’s leading offensive contributor.
• Rebounding: Ten rebounds gave him the team’s highest individual total.
• Playmaking: Eight assists made him one of Charlotte’s most important creators.

One particularly interesting aspect of Ball’s performance was his ability to influence multiple statistical categories in the same game.

Charlotte needed his scoring to remain competitive, but it also benefited from his passing and rebounding.

Despite his impressive numbers, the Hornets could not maintain their advantage during the final quarter. This illustrates an important distinction between individual performance and team results.

A player can deliver an excellent statistical display without his team necessarily winning.

2. Collin Sexton: 21 points and 7 assists

Team: Charlotte Hornets

Collin Sexton finished as Charlotte’s second-highest scorer with 21 points.

He also recorded seven assists, making him an important contributor to the team’s offensive creation.

Sexton’s performance was valuable because Charlotte needed more than one player to generate scoring opportunities.

His 21 points gave the Hornets another player capable of producing significant offensive output.

The seven assists also indicate that he contributed to team offense through passing rather than relying entirely on individual scoring.

When combined with Ball’s eight assists, Sexton helped Charlotte establish a strong playmaking foundation.

Together, the two players accounted for 15 assists.

This was half of Charlotte’s total 30 assists, demonstrating how important their individual contributions were to the team’s ball movement.

Sexton’s performance was one of the major reasons Charlotte remained competitive until the final minutes.

3. Miles Bridges: 7 assists

Team: Charlotte Hornets

Miles Bridges contributed seven assists in the matchup.

Although the supplied information does not specify his final points or rebounds, his playmaking contribution deserves attention.

Seven assists represent a significant number for a forward and show that Bridges played a role in creating opportunities for teammates.

His passing helped Charlotte maintain its offensive rhythm, particularly during the third quarter when the Hornets scored 38 points.

Ball, Sexton, and Bridges combined for 22 assists.

That represents a substantial share of Charlotte’s 30 team assists.

The figures demonstrate that Charlotte’s offense was not based on one player making every decision. Multiple players participated in creating opportunities.

Charlotte starting lineup

The Hornets’ starting five were listed as follows:

Player	Jersey Number
Miles Bridges	0
Brandon Miller	24
Ryan Kalkbrenner	11
Collin Sexton	8
LaMelo Ball	1

Charlotte bench players

The listed Charlotte bench included:

• Moussa Diabate
• Tidjane Salaun
• Mason Plumlee
• Tre Mann
• Sion James
• Kon Knueppel
• Pat Connaughton
• Liam McNeeley

Pat Connaughton and Liam McNeeley were marked DNP due to the coach’s decision.

The supplied data does not provide complete individual scoring, rebounding, and assist totals for every player in Charlotte’s rotation. Those numbers should be checked against the full official box score before publishing additional player-specific claims.

This distinction matters because a reliable statistical article should never assign a player numbers that are not supported by the available game record.

Philadelphia 76ers vs Charlotte Hornets: Complete Team Stats Comparison

Individual performances explain much of the game, but team statistics reveal why Philadelphia ultimately won.

The Hornets were competitive in several categories. They recorded more rebounds and assists and made two more field goals than Philadelphia.

However, the 76ers were more effective from the three-point line and free-throw line. They also recorded more steals and blocks.

Full team statistical comparison

Statistical Category	Philadelphia 76ers	Charlotte Hornets
Total Points	125	121
Field Goals Made	41	43
Field Goals Attempted	87	89
Field Goal Percentage	47%	48%
Three-Pointers Made	18	16
Three-Pointers Attempted	39	42
Three-Point Percentage	46%	38%
Free Throws Made	25	19
Free Throws Attempted	32	28
Free-Throw Percentage	78%	68%
Total Rebounds	40	45
Offensive Rebounds	11	13
Defensive Rebounds	29	32
Assists	29	30
Turnovers	15	16
Steals	10	6
Blocks	5	3
Personal Fouls	25	26

These figures reveal that the contest was relatively balanced in several traditional basketball categories. The difference came from how effectively each team converted its opportunities.

1. Field goal efficiency

Charlotte made 43 of its 89 field-goal attempts, finishing at approximately 48%.

Philadelphia converted 41 of 87 attempts, finishing at approximately 47%.

The Hornets therefore had a slight advantage in overall field-goal percentage.

At first glance, this might suggest that Charlotte was the more efficient shooting team. However, field-goal percentage does not give equal value to every successful shot.

A made three-pointer is worth one additional point compared with a made two-pointer. That difference becomes important when comparing these teams.

Charlotte made two more field goals overall, but Philadelphia produced more points from its three-point shooting.

The 76ers also converted more free throws, helping them finish with four additional points.

This is a useful example of why basketball analysis should consider multiple shooting categories instead of relying on one percentage.

2. Three-point shooting: Philadelphia’s major advantage

Three-point shooting was one of the clearest statistical differences between the teams.

Philadelphia converted 18 of 39 attempts, producing a 46% shooting percentage.

Charlotte made 16 of 42 attempts, finishing at 38%.

Three-point statistics	76ers	Hornets
Made	18	16
Attempted	39	42
Percentage	46%	38%
Points from made threes	54	48

Philadelphia made two more three-pointers despite attempting three fewer shots.

The difference was six points from beyond the arc.

That advantage was especially important in a game decided by four points.

It shows how perimeter efficiency can influence the result even when another team has a slightly higher overall field-goal percentage.

Charlotte generated more total field goals, but Philadelphia extracted more value from its outside shooting.

The 76ers also demonstrated better conversion efficiency when taking perimeter shots.

For Charlotte, the numbers suggest an opportunity for improvement. The team attempted more three-pointers but converted fewer of them.

The issue was not a lack of willingness to shoot. It was the difference between attempts and successful conversions.

3. Free-throw shooting: Another Philadelphia advantage

Free throws provided another important scoring difference.

Philadelphia converted 25 of 32 attempts, finishing at 78%.

Charlotte made 19 of 28 attempts, finishing at 68%.

Free-throw statistics	76ers	Hornets
Free throws made	25	19
Free throws attempted	32	28
Free-throw percentage	78%	68%

Philadelphia made six more free throws than Charlotte.

Those six additional successful attempts were more than enough to account for the four-point final margin.

Free-throw shooting becomes especially important in close games because these opportunities allow teams to score without needing to make a field goal.

The difference also shows why teams must maintain concentration at the free-throw line.

Charlotte scored 121 points and had enough offensive production to win. However, converting a greater percentage of its free throws could have changed the final result.

Philadelphia’s 78% conversion rate gave it a useful advantage in a game where every possession mattered.

4. Rebounding: Charlotte controlled the glass

Charlotte won the total rebounding battle 45-40.

The Hornets also recorded more offensive and defensive rebounds.

Rebounding category	76ers	Hornets
Total rebounds	40	45
Offensive rebounds	11	13
Defensive rebounds	29	32

The five-rebound advantage shows that Charlotte was effective at collecting missed shots.

Offensive rebounds are particularly valuable because they allow a team to extend possessions.

Instead of giving the ball back to the opponent after a missed shot, an offensive rebound creates another opportunity to score.

Charlotte collected 13 offensive rebounds compared with Philadelphia’s 11.

This advantage helped the Hornets maintain offensive pressure.

However, rebounding superiority does not automatically produce a victory.

Teams must convert their additional possessions into points. Philadelphia’s shooting efficiency and free-throw production helped offset Charlotte’s advantage on the glass.

Andre Drummond’s 13 rebounds were also important for the 76ers. He was Philadelphia’s leading rebounder and provided an individual contribution that helped the team remain competitive in this category.

5. Assists: Both offenses shared the ball effectively

Charlotte recorded 30 assists, while Philadelphia finished with 29.

This one-assist difference indicates that both teams relied heavily on offensive cooperation.

The Hornets had a particularly strong contribution from their leading playmakers:

• LaMelo Ball: 8 assists
• Collin Sexton: 7 assists
• Miles Bridges: 7 assists

These three players combined for 22 assists.

Philadelphia’s leading playmaker was Tyrese Maxey, who recorded nine assists.

Assists help explain how teams create efficient scoring opportunities through passing and player movement.

However, a higher assist total does not necessarily mean an offense was more effective.

Charlotte recorded one more assist, but Philadelphia finished with four additional points.

This demonstrates that the quality of the final shot matters just as much as the pass that creates it.

6. Turnovers: Philadelphia made fewer mistakes

Turnovers were another small but relevant difference.

Philadelphia recorded 15 turnovers, while Charlotte committed 16.

The difference was only one possession, but it favored the winning team.

Turnovers can be costly because they end an offensive opportunity without guaranteeing a shot.

They can also create transition scoring chances for the opposing team.

Philadelphia’s lower turnover total suggests that it protected the basketball slightly better.

However, the difference was not large enough to explain the entire result.

The larger statistical advantages came from three-point shooting, free throws, and defensive activity.

7. Steals and blocks: Philadelphia’s defensive edge

Philadelphia recorded 10 steals and five blocks.

Charlotte finished with six steals and three blocks.

Defensive category	76ers	Hornets
Steals	10	6
Blocks	5	3

Philadelphia produced four more steals and two more blocks.

These numbers demonstrate that the 76ers created more recorded defensive events that directly disrupted Charlotte’s offense.

VJ Edgecombe led Philadelphia’s starters with three steals.

Defensive statistics do not always capture the full value of a team’s defensive performance. For example, forcing a difficult shot or denying a passing lane may not appear directly in the box score.

Nevertheless, steals and blocks provide useful evidence of defensive activity.

Philadelphia’s advantage in both categories helped complement its offensive production.

8. Personal fouls

Charlotte committed 26 personal fouls, compared with Philadelphia’s 25.

The difference was relatively small.

However, the fouls and free-throw numbers together provide useful context.

Philadelphia attempted 32 free throws, while Charlotte attempted 28.

The 76ers also converted a higher percentage of their attempts.

These factors helped create a six-made-free-throw advantage.

It would be incorrect to assume that every additional free-throw opportunity resulted directly from a specific foul category without the full play-by-play record. The available team statistics establish the difference in attempts and conversions, but not every individual foul’s circumstances.

How Philadelphia Won the Fourth Quarter

The fourth quarter was the decisive part of this matchup.

Philadelphia entered the period trailing 96-86 after Charlotte produced a strong 38-point third quarter.

A 10-point deficit is significant in the NBA, particularly against a team that has already established offensive rhythm.

However, Philadelphia scored 39 points in the final quarter.

Charlotte managed only 25.

The resulting 14-point advantage was enough to turn the game around.

Understanding the comeback

Three aspects of the final period stand out.

1. Philadelphia increased its offensive production

The 76ers scored 25 points in the third quarter before increasing that figure to 39 in the fourth.

This represented a 14-point increase in their quarter scoring output.

It was their highest-scoring period of the game.

2. Charlotte could not maintain its third-quarter pace

Charlotte had scored 38 points in the third quarter.

Its fourth-quarter total dropped to 25.

That was a 13-point reduction.

The Hornets’ offense had been highly productive before the final period, but it could not maintain the same scoring rate.

3. The final-period difference exceeded the halftime advantage

Charlotte entered the fourth quarter with a 10-point lead.

Philadelphia won the final period by 14.

That means the 76ers did more than simply erase the deficit. They created enough separation to finish four points ahead.

This is the most important statistical explanation of the result.

Why the fourth quarter matters more than the overall shooting percentage

Charlotte finished with a slightly better field-goal percentage.

It also had more rebounds and one additional assist.

Yet Philadelphia won.

The fourth-quarter scoring pattern explains why the overall numbers can be misleading when viewed without context.

A team can perform well across the first three quarters but struggle to maintain its advantage during the closing period.

Philadelphia’s ability to produce 39 points under pressure was more important to the final outcome than Charlotte’s small advantages in total field goals or rebounds.

The result also highlights the importance of game management.

Maintaining a lead requires more than continuing to score. It requires protecting possessions, limiting defensive breakdowns, and responding when the opposing team changes its approach.

Charlotte had built a strong position, but Philadelphia finished with greater scoring effectiveness.

Key Matchups That Shaped the Game

The individual performances reveal several interesting comparisons between the teams.

Tyrese Maxey vs LaMelo Ball

Maxey and Ball were the leading offensive players for their respective teams.

Category	Tyrese Maxey	LaMelo Ball
Points	28	27
Rebounds	Not specified	10
Assists	9	8
Team result	Win	Loss

Maxey finished one point ahead of Ball in scoring.

Ball, however, recorded a double-double with 10 rebounds and eight assists.

Maxey’s nine assists were also the highest individual assist total among the players highlighted in the supplied statistics.

Both guards demonstrated their importance as primary offensive creators.

The main difference was the result. Maxey’s team won, while Ball’s team could not maintain its lead.

This does not mean Maxey necessarily had a better performance in every aspect. Ball contributed more documented rebounds, while Maxey finished with more points and one additional assist.

The comparison shows that both players were central to their teams’ offensive identities.

Quentin Grimes vs Collin Sexton

Grimes and Sexton provided important secondary scoring.

Category	Quentin Grimes	Collin Sexton
Points	24	21
Rebounds	Not specified	Not specified
Assists	Not specified	7
Team result	Win	Loss

Grimes scored three more points than Sexton.

Sexton, meanwhile, had a documented seven-assist contribution.

Both players helped prevent their respective teams from becoming overly dependent on their primary scorers.

Their performances demonstrate why secondary scoring is so important in competitive NBA games.

Andre Drummond vs Charlotte’s rebounding group

Drummond recorded 13 rebounds to lead Philadelphia.

Charlotte had the stronger collective rebounding performance, finishing with 45 total rebounds.

This comparison highlights the difference between individual and team statistics.

Drummond was the leading rebounder for his team, but Charlotte won the overall rebounding battle through contributions across its lineup.

Despite this advantage, the Hornets could not convert their broader rebounding success into a victory.

Three Major Reasons the 76ers Defeated the Hornets

The statistical record points to three particularly important reasons behind Philadelphia’s win.

1. Better three-point conversion

Philadelphia made 18 three-pointers compared with Charlotte’s 16.

The 76ers also shot 46% from beyond the arc, while the Hornets finished at 38%.

This created a six-point advantage in three-point scoring.

In a game decided by four points, that difference was highly significant.

2. Stronger free-throw efficiency

Philadelphia converted 25 free throws, while Charlotte made 19.

The 76ers also achieved a better percentage from the line.

This helped them generate points without relying exclusively on field-goal attempts.

3. A decisive fourth-quarter response

Philadelphia scored 39 points in the final quarter.

Charlotte scored 25.

The 14-point difference was the largest quarter-to-quarter scoring advantage in the game for either team.

The 76ers turned a 10-point deficit into a four-point victory.

These three factors provide a clearer explanation of the outcome than simply looking at the final score.

What the Match Statistics Reveal About Philadelphia

Philadelphia’s victory offered several useful insights into the team’s performance.

Offensive depth was important

Three Philadelphia players scored at least 20 points.

Maxey finished with 28, Grimes recorded 24, and Embiid added 20.

This balanced production made it difficult for Charlotte to focus its defensive attention on just one player.

It also provided the 76ers with multiple scoring options.

Perimeter shooting created an advantage

Philadelphia attempted fewer three-pointers than Charlotte but made more.

This is an important distinction.

Taking more shots does not automatically produce more points. Conversion efficiency determines how much value a team receives from its attempts.

The 76ers were more successful in this area.

Defensive activity supported the offense

Philadelphia’s 10 steals and five blocks show that the team contributed defensively as well as offensively.

The defensive numbers helped distinguish the 76ers from a Charlotte team that was otherwise competitive in several statistical categories.

The team demonstrated late-game resilience

The 10-point deficit entering the final quarter could have created significant pressure.

Instead, Philadelphia produced its strongest scoring period.

That response was central to the victory.

What the Match Statistics Reveal About Charlotte

Although Charlotte lost, the statistical record contains several positive elements.

LaMelo Ball delivered an all-around performance

Ball’s 27 points, 10 rebounds, and eight assists demonstrated his value as a scorer, rebounder, and playmaker.

He was involved in multiple areas of the game and provided consistent offensive production.

Ball movement was effective

Charlotte recorded 30 assists, narrowly exceeding Philadelphia’s 29.

The Hornets also received playmaking contributions from Sexton and Bridges.

This suggests that their offensive approach involved multiple creators rather than depending exclusively on one player.

Rebounding was a team strength

Charlotte collected 45 rebounds, five more than Philadelphia.

Its 13 offensive rebounds also created additional opportunities.

This was one of the strongest statistical areas for the Hornets.

Finishing efficiency needs attention

The most obvious areas of difference were three-point and free-throw conversion.

Charlotte attempted more three-pointers but made fewer.

It also converted fewer free throws despite attempting 28.

Improving these areas could help the team turn competitive performances into victories in similar games.

Season Series: Philadelphia 76ers vs Charlotte Hornets

The supplied matchup information lists three meetings between Philadelphia and Charlotte during the 2025-26 season.

The results are as follows:

Game	Date	Philadelphia	Charlotte	Winner
Game 1	October 26, 2025	125	121	Philadelphia
Game 2	January 27, 2026	130	93	Philadelphia
Game 3	March 29, 2026	114	118	Charlotte

According to the supplied season-series results, Philadelphia won the first two meetings, while Charlotte won the third.

The three-game series therefore finished with Philadelphia winning two games and Charlotte winning one.

Game 1: October 26, 2025

Philadelphia defeated Charlotte 125-121.

This was the closely contested matchup discussed throughout this article.

Maxey led the 76ers with 28 points, while Ball led Charlotte with 27.

The fourth-quarter scoring difference was the defining factor.

Game 2: January 27, 2026

Philadelphia recorded a much more comfortable 130-93 victory.

The 37-point margin was significantly larger than the four-point difference in October.

This result indicates that the second meeting was a different type of contest, with Philadelphia producing a substantially larger scoring advantage.

The supplied information does not include the individual player statistics for this game, so those figures should not be confused with the October box score.

Game 3: March 29, 2026

Charlotte responded with a 118-114 victory.

The Hornets won by four points, reversing the result of the October meeting.

This gave Charlotte a positive result in the final listed game of the season series.

Looking at all three meetings provides a more complete picture than examining only one game.

It also shows that the teams produced different results across their matchups rather than one side dominating every contest.

How to Read NBA Player Statistics Correctly

Understanding basketball statistics is essential when comparing individual performances.

A box score provides much more information than points alone. It can help readers understand offensive production, defensive contribution, possession management, and overall team efficiency.

Here are some of the most important categories to understand.

Points

Points represent the total scoring contribution of a player.

A player can score through:

• Two-point field goals.
• Three-point field goals.
• Successful free throws.

In this game, Maxey led all players with 28 points, while Ball finished with 27.

Rebounds

Rebounds are collected after missed shots.

They are divided into two categories:

• Offensive rebounds: Recovered by the attacking team.
• Defensive rebounds: Recovered by the defending team.

A rebound can end an opponent’s possession or create an additional scoring opportunity.

Drummond led Philadelphia with 13 rebounds, while Ball led Charlotte with 10.

Assists

An assist is credited when a player’s pass directly leads to a teammate’s successful field goal under NBA statistical rules.

Maxey led Philadelphia with nine assists.

Ball recorded eight for Charlotte.

Steals

A steal occurs when a defensive player legally takes possession of the basketball from an opponent.

Philadelphia recorded 10 team steals, compared with Charlotte’s six.

Blocks

A block is credited when a defensive player deflects an opponent’s shot attempt.

Philadelphia recorded five blocks, while Charlotte recorded three.

Turnovers

A turnover occurs when a team loses possession without completing a successful field-goal attempt or another scoring action.

Turnovers are important because they remove scoring opportunities and can create chances for the opposition.

Philadelphia recorded 15 turnovers, while Charlotte had 16.

Field-goal percentage

Field-goal percentage measures the percentage of attempted field goals that a team or player successfully makes.

The formula is:

\[ FG\% = \frac{\text{Field Goals Made}}{\text{Field Goals Attempted}}\times100 \]

For Philadelphia:

\[ \frac{41}{87}\times100 \approx 47.1\% \]

For Charlotte:

\[ \frac{43}{89}\times100 \approx 48.3\% \]

Charlotte therefore had a small advantage in overall field-goal percentage.

Plus/minus

Plus/minus measures the team’s net scoring difference while a particular player is on the court.

For example, if a player’s team scores 30 points and allows 24 while that player is playing, the player’s plus/minus is +6.

This statistic can provide additional context about a player’s impact during their minutes.

However, it should not be treated as a complete measure of individual quality because it is affected by teammates, opponents, substitutions, and game circumstances.

The supplied game data explains the meaning of plus/minus but does not include individual values. Therefore, no player-specific plus/minus figures are assigned here.

What Fans Should Take Away From This Match

This game offered several important lessons about the relationship between individual performance and team success.

First, a player can record excellent numbers without winning. Ball’s 27-point, 10-rebound, eight-assist performance was impressive, but Charlotte still lost.

Second, balanced scoring can make a team harder to defend. Philadelphia received 20 or more points from three players.

Third, statistical advantages must be evaluated in context. Charlotte had more rebounds, assists, and field goals, but Philadelphia converted its three-point and free-throw opportunities more effectively.

Finally, the timing of scoring matters. The 76ers did not need to lead for all four quarters. They needed to perform better when the game was decided.

The final quarter demonstrated exactly that.

For readers following NBA player statistics, this matchup is a useful example of why the complete box score is more informative than the final score alone.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. Who won the 76ers vs Charlotte Hornets game on October 26, 2025?

The Philadelphia 76ers defeated the Charlotte Hornets 125-121 at Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia. The 76ers secured the victory through a strong fourth-quarter performance.

2. Who was the leading scorer in the 76ers vs Hornets matchup?

Tyrese Maxey was the game’s leading scorer with 28 points for Philadelphia. LaMelo Ball was Charlotte’s leading scorer with 27 points.

3. How many points did LaMelo Ball score against Philadelphia?

LaMelo Ball scored 27 points. He also collected 10 rebounds and recorded eight assists, delivering an impressive all-around performance.

4. How many points did Tyrese Maxey score against the Hornets?

Tyrese Maxey finished with 28 points and nine assists. He led Philadelphia in both scoring and assists.

5. Which team had more rebounds in the game?

Charlotte recorded 45 total rebounds, while Philadelphia collected 40. The Hornets therefore won the overall rebounding battle by five.

6. What was the biggest difference between the two teams?

Philadelphia’s three-point and free-throw shooting were important differences. The 76ers made 18 three-pointers and 25 free throws, compared with Charlotte’s 16 three-pointers and 19 free throws. Philadelphia also outscored Charlotte 39-25 in the fourth quarter.

Conclusion

The October 26, 2025, matchup between the Philadelphia 76ers and Charlotte Hornets was a competitive NBA contest that demonstrated the importance of shooting efficiency, team contributions, and fourth-quarter execution.

Philadelphia secured a 125-121 victory after overcoming a 10-point deficit entering the final period. Tyrese Maxey led the winning team with 28 points and nine assists, while Quentin Grimes contributed 24 points and Joel Embiid added 20. Andre Drummond also made an important contribution by collecting 13 rebounds.

Charlotte had several impressive statistical achievements of its own. LaMelo Ball recorded 27 points, 10 rebounds, and eight assists. Collin Sexton added 21 points and seven assists, while Miles Bridges contributed seven assists. The Hornets also finished with more total rebounds and assists than Philadelphia.

However, the 76ers had important advantages in three-point shooting, free-throw conversion, steals, and blocks. Their 39-point fourth quarter ultimately decided the contest.

The 76ers vs charlotte hornets match player stats demonstrate why basketball results should be evaluated through individual performances and complete team statistics. Although Charlotte performed well across several categories, Philadelphia converted its opportunities more effectively when the game reached its decisive moments.

For anyone studying this matchup, the most important takeaway is that strong individual statistics and advantages in selected team categories do not always guarantee victory. Consistent execution, efficient shooting, and performance under pressure can make the difference between winning and losing.