Louisville Cardianals Football vs Miami Hurricanes Football Match Player Stats
The louisville cardinals football vs miami hurricanes football match player stats from October 18, 2025, tell the story of a tightly contested ACC game decided by quarterback efficiency, defensive pressure, and Louisville’s ability to capitalize on turnovers. Louisville defeated Miami 24-21 in Week 6, improving to 5-1 overall and 2-1 in ACC play, while Miami also moved to 5-1 despite falling to 1-1 in conference action. The final score was close, but the underlying numbers reveal an important difference: Miami produced more passing yards and more total tackles, yet Louisville created four interceptions and converted that defensive advantage into a three-point victory.
Louisville cardinals football vs miami hurricanes football match player stats
The louisville cardinals football vs miami hurricanes football match player stats provide a useful way to understand why this game ended differently from what a simple box-score glance might suggest.
Louisville finished with 24 points and Miami scored 21. The teams were relatively close in several offensive categories, but their efficiency and turnover results were dramatically different.
Game Overview
| Category | Louisville Cardinals | Miami Hurricanes |
| Final Score | 24 | 21 |
| Record | 5-1 | 5-1 |
| Conference Record | 2-1 ACC | 1-1 ACC |
| Passing Yards | 248 | 271 |
| Rushing Yards | 119 | 63 |
| Total Passing Attempts | 37 | 35 |
| Completions | 23 | 25 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 4 |
| Team Rushing Attempts | 31 | 24 |
| Total Tackles | 52 | 55 |
| Sacks | 0 | 1 |
| Field Goals | 1/1 | 2/2 |
The most important statistic is not necessarily the 23-point or 24-point offensive total. It is the turnover margin.
Louisville intercepted four Miami passes and did not throw an interception of its own. That gave the Cardinals a major possession advantage in a game decided by only three points.
Miami actually completed more passes and gained more passing yards. Carson Beck finished 25 of 35 for 271 yards, while Miller Moss completed 23 of 37 for 248 yards. On paper, those numbers might suggest a slight passing advantage for Miami.
However, four interceptions completely changed the value of those possessions.
Miller Moss vs Carson Beck
The quarterback comparison is central to understanding the game.
Miller Moss delivered a controlled performance for Louisville, completing 23 of 37 passes for 248 yards. He averaged 6.7 yards per attempt, threw two touchdowns, and did not commit an interception. His listed QBR was 81.0.
Carson Beck produced more passing yards for Miami, completing 25 of 35 attempts for 271 yards. His 7.7 yards per attempt were also higher than Moss’s 6.7.
But Beck threw four interceptions and did not throw a touchdown.
Quarterback Comparison
| Statistic | Miller Moss | Carson Beck |
| Completions | 23 | 25 |
| Attempts | 37 | 35 |
| Completion Rate | 62.2% | 71.4% |
| Passing Yards | 248 | 271 |
| Yards per Attempt | 6.7 | 7.7 |
| Passing TDs | 2 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 4 |
| QBR | 81.0 | 64.4 |
The contrast is important.
Beck’s 271 passing yards were not enough to overcome the cost of four interceptions. Moss had fewer passing yards, but his two touchdown passes and zero interceptions gave Louisville much greater possession security.
This is a classic example of why passing yards alone should not be used to evaluate a quarterback’s performance.
A quarterback can produce a higher completion percentage and more passing yards while still putting his team in a worse position if turnovers occur at critical moments.
Moss’s performance was particularly valuable because Louisville also received productive rushing output from Isaac Brown. That allowed the Cardinals to avoid putting the entire offensive burden on the passing game.
Isaac Brown Leads Louisville’s Ground Game
Isaac Brown was Louisville’s leading rusher and one of the most important individual players in the game.
Brown carried the ball 15 times for 113 yards, averaging 7.5 yards per carry. His longest run covered 28 yards.
His production accounted for almost the entire Louisville rushing advantage.
Louisville finished with 31 rushing attempts for 119 yards, averaging 3.8 yards per carry. Brown therefore accounted for 113 of those 119 rushing yards.
That is an extraordinary share of the team’s rushing production.
Louisville Rushing Leaders
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Isaac Brown | 15 | 113 | 7.5 | 0 | 28 |
| Louisville Team | 31 | 119 | 3.8 | 1 | 28 |
Brown’s numbers also show why individual rushing efficiency can matter more than the team’s overall average.
Louisville’s team average of 3.8 yards per carry looks ordinary. Brown’s 7.5-yard average was considerably stronger.
That difference indicates that Louisville’s rushing attack was heavily concentrated around its leading back rather than being consistently productive across the entire ground game.
For analysts studying the louisville cardinals football vs miami hurricanes football match player stats, Brown’s workload is one of the clearest examples of a player whose individual efficiency significantly shaped the offensive balance.
Miami’s Rushing Attack Struggled
Miami’s rushing production was considerably lower.
The Hurricanes recorded 24 rushing attempts for only 63 yards, an average of 2.6 yards per carry. Mark Fletcher Jr. led the team with eight carries for 18 yards and one touchdown.
Miami Rushing Numbers
| Statistic | Miami |
| Team Carries | 24 |
| Rushing Yards | 63 |
| Average | 2.6 |
| Rushing TDs | 2 |
| Long Run | 12 yards |
| Mark Fletcher Jr. | 8 carries, 18 yards, 1 TD |
The two rushing touchdowns helped Miami’s scoring output, but the low rushing efficiency limited the offense’s ability to consistently stay ahead of the chains.
A 2.6-yard team average means Miami often needed to rely on its passing game to generate meaningful yardage.
That made the interceptions thrown by Beck even more damaging.
When an offense has limited rushing efficiency, turnovers become especially costly because the offense has fewer reliable ways to recover from difficult down-and-distance situations.
Chris Bell Was Louisville’s Top Receiving Threat
Chris Bell produced Louisville’s biggest receiving performance.
He caught nine passes for 136 yards and two touchdowns. His 15.1 yards per reception demonstrated that Louisville was able to combine volume with explosive receiving production.
His longest reception traveled 36 yards.
Louisville Receiving Leaders
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Chris Bell | 9 | 136 | 15.1 | 2 | 36 |
| Louisville Team | 23 | 248 | 10.8 | 2 | 36 |
Bell’s nine receptions represented a large portion of Louisville’s completed passes.
He was not simply a deep threat used occasionally. He was heavily involved in the passing structure, giving Moss a reliable target throughout the contest.
The combination of nine receptions, 136 yards, and two touchdowns makes Bell one of the most significant individual statistical contributors in the matchup.
Malachi Toney Keeps Miami’s Passing Game Productive
Miami’s leading receiver was Malachi Toney.
Toney caught nine passes for 135 yards, averaging 15.0 yards per reception. His longest reception covered 61 yards.
Miami Receiving Leaders
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Malachi Toney | 9 | 135 | 15.0 | 0 | 61 |
| Miami Team | 25 | 271 | 10.8 | 0 | 61 |
Toney’s numbers are particularly interesting because they closely mirror Bell’s production in receptions and total yardage.
Both receivers caught nine passes.
Bell finished with 136 yards and two touchdowns, while Toney finished with 135 yards and no touchdowns.
That one-yard difference in receiving yardage is almost irrelevant compared with the difference in scoring impact.
Toney’s 61-yard long reception also shows that Miami generated explosive passing plays. The problem was not a total absence of big-play ability. The bigger issue was converting offensive production into a winning possession profile.
The Four Louisville Interceptions Changed the Game
The defensive story is where the matchup becomes most revealing.
Louisville intercepted Carson Beck four times.
The interceptions were recorded by:
- JoJo Evans Jr.
- Antonio Watts
- Jabari Mack
- T.J. Capers
Louisville finished with four interceptions for five return yards and no interception return touchdowns.
That means Louisville did not need to score directly on an interception return to benefit from its defensive work.
Simply ending Miami possessions was enough to change the game.
Louisville Defensive Takeaways
| Player | Interceptions |
| JoJo Evans Jr. | 1 |
| Antonio Watts | 1 |
| Jabari Mack | 1 |
| T.J. Capers | 1 |
| Team Total | 4 |
This is arguably the defining statistical feature of the matchup.
Four interceptions in a one-score game represent an enormous swing in possession value.
It also explains why Miami could lead Louisville in passing yards while still losing.
The Hurricanes moved the ball through the air, but they repeatedly ended drives with turnovers.
Louisville Defensive Statistics
Louisville recorded 52 total tackles, including 34 solo tackles.
The Cardinals had no sacks, two tackles for loss, and five passes defended.
TJ Quinn led Louisville individually with six total tackles, four solo tackles, half a tackle for loss, and one pass defended.
Louisville Defensive Leaders
| Statistic | TJ Quinn |
| Total Tackles | 6 |
| Solo Tackles | 4 |
| Sacks | 0 |
| Tackles for Loss | 0.5 |
| Passes Defended | 1 |
The lack of sacks is noteworthy.
Louisville did not need consistent quarterback takedowns to disrupt Miami’s passing game. Instead, the Cardinals created four interceptions.
That distinction matters when interpreting defensive performance.
Pressure can influence quarterbacks, but turnovers are ultimately more direct possession-changing events.
Louisville’s defense found a way to finish plays without recording a sack.
Keionte Scott Leads Miami’s Defense
Miami finished with 55 total tackles and 41 solo tackles.
Keionte Scott led the Hurricanes with nine total tackles, eight solo tackles, one sack, and three tackles for loss.
Miami Defensive Leader
| Statistic | Keionte Scott |
| Total Tackles | 9 |
| Solo Tackles | 8 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 3 |
| Passes Defended | 0 |
Scott’s nine tackles and three tackles for loss demonstrate how active he was around the football.
Miami’s defense also finished with five passes defended, matching Louisville’s team total.
The defensive statistics therefore show that Miami was not simply overwhelmed defensively. The Hurricanes produced 55 tackles, five tackles for loss, one sack, and five passes defended.
The crucial difference was that Miami did not generate an interception.
Louisville’s Turnover Advantage Was the Defining Difference
The turnover comparison is straightforward.
Louisville:
- 4 interceptions
- 0 interceptions thrown
- 1 lost fumble
- 4 total interceptions gained
Miami:
- 0 interceptions
- 4 interceptions thrown
- 0 lost fumbles
- 4 interceptions allowed
Louisville did lose a fumble by Isaac Brown, so its offense was not mistake-free.
Still, the four defensive interceptions more than offset that lost possession.
This is one of the strongest lessons from the louisville cardinals football vs miami hurricanes football match player stats.
- The team with more passing yards did not win.
- The team with more defensive tackles did not win.
- The team that won the turnover battle had the decisive statistical advantage.
Special Teams Played a Supporting Role
Special teams did not dominate the box score, but several individual performances were meaningful.
Louisville kicker Cooper Ranvier converted his only field-goal attempt and all three extra-point attempts.
He finished with six points and a long field goal of 48 yards.
Miami’s Carter Davis made both of his field-goal attempts and his only extra-point attempt. He scored seven points, with a long field goal of 41 yards.
Kicking Comparison
| Statistic | Cooper Ranvier | Carter Davis |
| Field Goals | 1/1 | 2/2 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 100% | 100% |
| Long FG | 48 | 41 |
| Extra Points | 3/3 | 1/1 |
| Points | 6 | 7 |
Both kickers were perfect on their attempts.
That means Louisville’s victory was not the result of missed kicks by Miami. The deciding difference came from offensive touchdowns and defensive takeaways.
Punting Comparison
Louisville used David Chapeau and Carter Schwartz during the game.
Chapeau punted four times for 151 yards, averaging 37.8 yards per punt. He recorded one touchback and two punts inside the 20-yard line.
Schwartz added two punts for 80 yards, averaging 40.0 yards per punt, with one punt inside the 20.
Louisville’s combined punting totals were six punts for 231 yards, an average of 38.5 yards.
Miami’s Dylan Joyce punted three times for 151 yards, averaging 50.3 yards per punt. His longest punt traveled 55 yards, and one finished inside the 20.
Punting Numbers
| Statistic | Louisville | Miami |
| Punts | 6 | 3 |
| Punt Yards | 231 | 151 |
| Average | 38.5 | 50.3 |
| Inside 20 | 3 | 1 |
| Long | 47 | 55 |
Miami had the higher punting average, but Louisville placed more punts inside the 20.
That is another reminder that raw average distance does not tell the entire special teams story.
Return Game Statistics
Louisville’s Caullin Lacy returned three punts for 24 yards, averaging 8.0 yards per return. His longest return was 16 yards.
Miami had no punt returns.
Keelan Marion recorded Miami’s only listed kick return, gaining 19 yards on one attempt.
These numbers were not the main reason for the final result, but field position remains an important secondary factor in close games.
Team Statistical Comparison
Looking at the matchup as a whole helps put individual performances into context.
| Category | Louisville | Miami |
| Final Score | 24 | 21 |
| Passing Yards | 248 | 271 |
| Rushing Yards | 119 | 63 |
| Passing TDs | 2 | 0 |
| Rushing TDs | 1 | 2 |
| Interceptions | 4 | 0 |
| Team Tackles | 52 | 55 |
| Sacks | 0 | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 2 | 5 |
| Passes Defended | 5 | 5 |
This table shows just how competitive the statistical profile was.
Miami had:
- More passing yards
- More completions
- A higher completion percentage
- More total tackles
- More tackles for loss
- One sack
Louisville had:
- More rushing yards
- Two passing touchdowns
- Zero interceptions thrown
- Four interceptions created
- The victory
The final result therefore cannot be explained by simply saying Louisville dominated Miami statistically.
Instead, Louisville won several of the most valuable moments.
Why Four Interceptions Matter More Than Passing Yardage
Passing yards measure how much territory an offense gained through the air.
They do not measure how safely that yardage was generated.
A 25-of-35 passing performance for 271 yards looks strong until four interceptions are added to the equation.
Miami’s passing game produced 271 yards, but the four turnovers repeatedly gave Louisville opportunities to end drives and gain possession.
By comparison, Moss threw for 248 yards with two touchdowns and no interceptions.
That is 23 fewer passing yards than Beck, but the difference in turnovers was four.
This is why turnover-adjusted analysis is essential when examining football player statistics.
A stat line should always be interpreted in context.
What the Box Score Says About Louisville’s Offense
Louisville’s offense was built around balance.
Moss provided efficient quarterback play without giving away possessions through interceptions.
Brown provided the explosive rushing element.
Bell supplied a high-volume receiving target and scored twice.
That combination gave Louisville three distinct ways to create offense.
The Cardinals did not need their quarterback to throw for 300-plus yards because the running game supplied 119 yards and Bell produced 136 receiving yards.
The most efficient Louisville formula was therefore not extreme passing volume. It was avoiding negative possessions while getting explosive contributions from key skill players.
What the Box Score Says About Miami’s Offense
Miami’s offense was more dependent on the passing game.
The Hurricanes gained 271 yards through the air but only 63 on the ground.
That produced a clear imbalance.
Toney was highly productive, catching nine passes for 135 yards. Beck also completed 25 passes.
But the four interceptions disrupted whatever rhythm Miami established.
The two rushing touchdowns prevented the offense from becoming completely one-dimensional on the scoreboard, but the low rushing average made it harder to maintain consistent offensive efficiency.
The Most Important Individual Performances
Several players stand out when the complete statistical profile is considered.
Miller Moss
Moss completed 23 of 37 passes for 248 yards and two touchdowns without an interception. His 81.0 QBR was the higher listed QBR between the two quarterbacks.
Carson Beck
Beck completed 25 of 35 passes for 271 yards. His 7.7 yards per attempt and 71.4% completion rate were strong, but four interceptions proved costly.
Isaac Brown
Brown carried 15 times for 113 yards, averaging 7.5 yards per carry. He supplied Louisville with the majority of its rushing production.
Chris Bell
Bell caught nine passes for 136 yards and two touchdowns. His receiving performance directly influenced Louisville’s scoring output.
Malachi Toney
Toney caught nine passes for 135 yards and averaged 15.0 yards per reception. His 61-yard reception was the longest listed reception in the game.
TJ Quinn
Quinn led Louisville with six tackles, including four solo stops, and recorded one pass defended.
Keionte Scott
Scott recorded nine tackles, eight solo tackles, one sack, and three tackles for loss for Miami.
Louisville’s Interception Group
JoJo Evans Jr., Antonio Watts, Jabari Mack, and T.J. Capers each recorded one interception.
Collectively, that group created the biggest defensive statistical advantage in the matchup.
How to Read These Stats Without Overvaluing One Category
Football statistics are most useful when several categories are considered together.
For this matchup, a sensible evaluation starts with five questions:
- Who won the turnover battle?
- Which team was more efficient on the ground?
- Which quarterback protected possessions?
- Which receivers created consistent production?
- Which defensive plays changed possession or field position?
Louisville answers the first three particularly well.
Miami’s passing numbers were strong, but the turnover results were decisive.
This approach is more informative than simply comparing total yardage.
What This Game Reveals About One-Score ACC Football
A 24-21 final score leaves very little room for wasted possessions.
When two teams are separated by three points, a single interception, missed opportunity, or field-position swing can become highly influential.
The Louisville-Miami box score illustrates this perfectly.
Miami gained 271 passing yards and completed 25 passes. Those numbers would normally give an offense a strong statistical foundation.
But four interceptions changed the value of those drives.
Louisville, meanwhile, generated 119 rushing yards and 248 passing yards while scoring three touchdowns.
The Cardinals did not need overwhelming statistical dominance. They needed enough offensive production and a defense capable of ending Miami possessions.
That is exactly what the numbers show.
Historical and Analytical Context
For readers who want to place the game within a broader college football statistical framework, the NCAA football statistics resources provide an authoritative reference point for understanding common team and player categories.
The value of using an authoritative statistical reference is that categories such as passing efficiency, rushing production, tackles, interceptions, and scoring can be interpreted consistently across games and seasons.
For this particular matchup, however, the supplied game data should remain the primary basis for evaluating individual performances.
Key Takeaways From the Match
The biggest lessons from the box score are clear.
Louisville won the turnover battle. Four interceptions were the defining defensive statistic.
Miami won the passing-yardage comparison. The Hurricanes gained 271 passing yards compared with Louisville’s 248.
Louisville won the rushing-yardage comparison. The Cardinals produced 119 rushing yards against Miami’s 63.
Moss protected the football. He threw two touchdown passes without an interception.
Beck produced yardage but lost possessions. His 271 passing yards came with four interceptions.
Bell and Toney were the leading receivers. Bell finished with 136 yards and two touchdowns, while Toney recorded 135 yards.
Brown was Louisville’s leading rusher. His 113 yards represented nearly all of Louisville’s 119 rushing yards.
Scott led Miami defensively. His nine tackles, one sack, and three tackles for loss were team-leading figures in the supplied data.
Both kickers were perfect on field goals. Louisville’s Ranvier was 1-for-1, while Miami’s Davis was 2-for-2.
The game was decided by execution rather than a huge statistical gap. Louisville’s 24-21 victory came despite Miami holding several conventional statistical advantages.
louisville cardinals football vs miami hurricanes football match player stats: Final Statistical View
The louisville cardinals football vs miami hurricanes football match player stats demonstrate why football analysis needs more than a simple look at total yards.
Miami passed for 271 yards and completed 25 passes, but four interceptions undermined that production.
Louisville passed for 248 yards, rushed for 119, and produced two passing touchdowns. More importantly, Miller Moss finished without an interception while the defense intercepted Beck four times.
Isaac Brown gave Louisville a powerful rushing contribution with 113 yards on 15 carries. Chris Bell added nine receptions for 136 yards and two touchdowns. On the other side, Malachi Toney delivered nine receptions for 135 yards, while Keionte Scott led Miami defensively with nine tackles, one sack, and three tackles for loss.
The final 24-21 score reflects the closeness of the matchup, but the statistical explanation is relatively straightforward. Miami generated meaningful offensive yardage, particularly through the passing game, while Louisville was more successful at protecting possessions and creating turnovers.
That combination made the difference.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between Louisville and Miami?
Louisville defeated Miami 24-21 on October 18, 2025, in Week 6 of the NCAAF season.
Who was Louisville’s leading passer?
Miller Moss was Louisville’s leading passer. He completed 23 of 37 passes for 248 yards, two touchdowns, and zero interceptions.
Who led Miami in passing?
Carson Beck completed 25 of 35 passes for 271 yards. He threw four interceptions and no touchdowns.
Who was Louisville’s leading rusher?
Isaac Brown led Louisville with 15 carries for 113 yards, averaging 7.5 yards per carry.
Who were the leading receivers?
Chris Bell led Louisville with nine receptions for 136 yards and two touchdowns. Malachi Toney led Miami with nine receptions for 135 yards.
How many interceptions did Louisville record?
Louisville recorded four interceptions. JoJo Evans Jr., Antonio Watts, Jabari Mack, and T.J. Capers each recorded one.
Conclusion
The louisville cardinals football vs miami hurricanes football match player stats show a game in which the final result was shaped by efficiency and turnovers rather than overwhelming statistical dominance.
Louisville finished with 119 rushing yards and 248 passing yards, while Miami produced 63 rushing yards and 271 passing yards. The Hurricanes moved the ball effectively through the air, but four interceptions prevented that production from translating into enough points.
Miller Moss provided Louisville with two touchdown passes and zero interceptions. Isaac Brown supplied 113 rushing yards, and Chris Bell produced 136 receiving yards with two touchdowns. Miami received strong individual performances from Carson Beck, Malachi Toney, and Keionte Scott, but the turnover margin remained the clearest statistical difference.
The 24-21 result therefore offers a useful lesson in football analysis: total yardage can describe offensive production, but turnovers, scoring efficiency, and possession security often explain the outcome more accurately.
