New York Giants vs Denver Broncos Match Player Stats

The new york giants vs denver broncos match player stats from October 19, 2025 tell the story of one of the most unusual fourth-quarter comebacks of the season. The Denver Broncos defeated the New York Giants 33-32 after trailing 26-0 through three quarters, then scored 33 unanswered points in the fourth quarter. The final result was decided by Wil Lutz’s 39-yard field goal as time expired.

For most of the afternoon, New York controlled the game. Jaxson Dart produced three passing touchdowns and added a rushing touchdown. The Giants also received productive performances from Wan’Dale Robinson, Daniel Bellinger, Theo Johnson, Cam Skattebo, Tyrone Tracy Jr., and Brian Burns.

Denver’s statistics looked very different. Bo Nix did not have a spectacular passing line, but he remained aggressive throughout the comeback and finished with two passing touchdowns, two rushing touchdowns, and no interceptions. J.K. Dobbins provided a strong rushing contribution, while Marvin Mims Jr. became particularly important during the late-game rally.

The result makes this matchup especially useful for anyone studying individual production rather than simply looking at the final score. The box score shows how New York generated explosive plays, how Denver’s offense eventually found answers, and how a game that appeared almost decided after three quarters turned completely around.

For the complete statistical record, the ESPN box score provides the game’s official statistical breakdown.

New York Giants vs Denver Broncos Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The game took place on October 19, 2025, with Denver hosting New York.

Category	New York Giants	Denver Broncos
Final Score	32	33
Record After Game	2-5	5-2
Home/Away Record	0-4 Away	3-0 Home
Q1	7	0
Q2	6	0
Q3	6	0
Q4	13	33
Team Rushing	119 yards	142 yards
Rushing Average	3.7	5.9
Passing Leader	Jaxson Dart	Bo Nix
Passing TDs	3	2
Interceptions	1	0
Team Sacks Allowed	4	2
Team Receptions	15	27
Receiving Yards	283	279
Defensive Sacks	2	4
Defensive Interceptions	0	1

The most striking statistic is the scoring distribution.

New York scored in every quarter, producing 7 points in the first, 6 in the second, 6 in the third, and 13 in the fourth. Denver, meanwhile, went scoreless for three quarters before exploding for 33 points in the final period.

That scoring pattern is unusual enough to change how the entire box score should be interpreted.

Denver’s offense ultimately produced enough yards to win, but the decisive difference was timing. The Broncos turned their statistical production into points when the game was at its most critical stage.

How the Broncos Came Back From 26-0 Down

The final score alone does not explain how extraordinary this game was.

New York entered the fourth quarter with a 19-point lead. The Giants extended that advantage to 26-0 before Denver finally found an offensive rhythm.

Then everything changed.

Denver scored 33 points in the fourth quarter. The Broncos scored on multiple consecutive possessions, including touchdowns by Bo Nix and RJ Harvey, followed by another Nix rushing touchdown.

The comeback included:

• A Bo Nix rushing touchdown
• An RJ Harvey receiving touchdown
• Another Bo Nix rushing touchdown
• A Giants touchdown that briefly put New York back ahead
• A final Denver drive that covered enough ground for Wil Lutz to kick the winning field goal

The Giants took a 32-30 lead with 37 seconds remaining after Jaxson Dart scored on a one-yard rushing touchdown. However, Jude McAtamney missed the extra point, leaving Denver within a field goal of winning.

That missed extra point became extremely important because Denver did not need a touchdown on its final possession.

Bo Nix immediately attacked the field. He connected with Marvin Mims Jr. for 29 yards and then found Courtland Sutton for 22 yards. After a spike stopped the clock, Lutz converted from 39 yards as time expired.

The comeback was therefore not simply a case of Denver gradually reducing the deficit. It was a sequence of rapid scoring possessions, explosive passing plays, quarterback rushing production, and late-game execution.

Jaxson Dart’s Statistical Performance

Jaxson Dart was one of the most productive individual players in the matchup.

His passing line was:

• 15 completions
• 33 attempts
• 283 passing yards
• 8.6 yards per attempt
• 3 passing touchdowns
• 1 interception
• 4 sacks
• 64.9 QBR
• 93.4 passer rating

Dart’s numbers show a quarterback who created explosive opportunities but also faced considerable pressure.

An average of 8.6 yards per attempt is particularly notable. It indicates that New York’s passing attack was not built entirely around short completions. The Giants generated significant yardage on completed passes, and several of those plays became touchdowns.

Dart also contributed 11 rushing yards and a touchdown on five carries.

His rushing touchdown came with only 37 seconds remaining. The play initially appeared to be stopped short of the goal line, but replay reversed the ruling and awarded New York the touchdown.

That score temporarily gave the Giants a 32-30 lead.

The one weakness in Dart’s statistical profile was efficiency. Completing 15 of 33 attempts means he finished below a 50 percent completion rate. The four sacks also show that Denver’s pass rush was able to create pressure despite allowing several explosive plays.

That combination is important when interpreting quarterback statistics. A player can generate big passing numbers while still experiencing difficulty maintaining consistent offensive efficiency.

Bo Nix’s Passing and Rushing Numbers

Bo Nix finished with:

• 27 completions
• 50 attempts
• 279 passing yards
• 5.6 yards per attempt
• 2 passing touchdowns
• 0 interceptions
• 2 sacks
• 81.1 QBR
• 83.7 passer rating

On the surface, Nix’s passing numbers were less explosive than Dart’s.

His 5.6 yards per attempt was significantly lower than Dart’s 8.6. Yet Nix’s overall contribution became more valuable as the game progressed because he added 48 rushing yards and two rushing touchdowns.

That rushing production changed the shape of Denver’s offense.

Nix averaged 9.6 yards per carry on his five rushing attempts. His longest run was 21 yards, and both of his rushing touchdowns came during the comeback.

The quarterback’s ability to create yards with his legs was therefore a major part of Denver’s fourth-quarter production.

Another important difference was turnovers. Nix threw no interceptions, while Dart threw one.

Nix did record one fumble, but it was recovered by Denver and did not directly produce a turnover.

The overall statistical picture is therefore more balanced than the final passing numbers might suggest. Dart generated more yards per attempt, but Nix combined passing production with significant rushing value and protected the football through the air.

Giants Rushing Statistics

New York finished with 119 rushing yards on 32 attempts.

That worked out to 3.7 yards per carry.

Cam Skattebo

Cam Skattebo led the Giants in rushing:

• 16 carries
• 60 yards
• 3.8 yards per carry
• 0 touchdowns
• 18-yard long

Skattebo was the Giants’ primary ball carrier and received half of New York’s rushing attempts.

His workload was important because the Giants attempted to maintain balance even while Dart was responsible for much of the passing attack.

Skattebo also contributed through the air with three receptions for 34 yards and a touchdown.

That gave him 94 total yards from scrimmage and four total touchdowns-related scoring opportunities in the statistical sense of rushing and receiving production, although his rushing total itself did not include a touchdown.

Tyrone Tracy Jr.

Tyrone Tracy Jr. recorded:

• 9 carries
• 46 yards
• 5.1 yards per carry
• 1 touchdown
• 31-yard long

Tracy was more efficient on a per-carry basis than Skattebo.

His 31-yard run was also the longest rushing play by either team in several key situations and demonstrated his ability to create a large gain from limited volume.

He averaged more than five yards per carry, making his rushing contribution particularly efficient.

Jaxson Dart

Dart added:

• 5 carries
• 11 yards
• 2.2 yards per carry
• 1 touchdown
• 9-yard long

His most important rushing attempt was his final touchdown.

Although his total rushing yardage was modest, the touchdown was extremely significant because it temporarily put New York ahead with less than a minute remaining.

Devin Singletary

Devin Singletary had:

• 2 carries
• 2 yards
• 1.0 yards per carry
• 0 touchdowns

His workload was limited compared with Skattebo and Tracy.

Broncos Rushing Statistics

Denver ran the ball 24 times for 142 yards.

That produced an impressive 5.9 yards per carry.

J.K. Dobbins

J.K. Dobbins led Denver’s running backs with:

• 14 carries
• 81 yards
• 5.8 yards per carry
• 0 touchdowns
• 32-yard long

Dobbins was Denver’s primary conventional rushing threat.

His 81 yards represented more than half of the Broncos’ total rushing production.

The 32-yard run was also Denver’s longest rushing play of the game.

Dobbins’ contribution is easy to overlook when focusing on the fourth-quarter scoring explosion, but his workload helped provide the foundation for Denver’s rushing attack.

Bo Nix

Nix finished with:

• 5 carries
• 48 yards
• 9.6 yards per carry
• 2 touchdowns
• 21-yard long

His rushing efficiency was exceptional compared with the rest of Denver’s offense.

More importantly, his two rushing touchdowns directly contributed to the comeback.

The quarterback’s rushing ability forced New York to account for another dimension of the offense. That becomes particularly valuable in short-yardage and red-zone situations.

Marvin Mims Jr.

Mims recorded one rushing attempt for 13 yards.

That was a small part of his overall performance because he also played a major role as a receiver and punt returner.

RJ Harvey

RJ Harvey had four rushing attempts for zero yards.

His most important offensive contribution came as a receiver, where he caught a two-yard touchdown pass.

New York Receiving Leaders

The Giants produced 283 receiving yards on 15 receptions.

That equals an impressive 18.9 yards per reception.

The number is one of the clearest indicators that New York relied heavily on explosive passing plays.

Wan’Dale Robinson

Robinson led the Giants with:

• 6 receptions
• 95 yards
• 15.8 yards per reception
• 23-yard long
• 12 targets

His six receptions were the most on the Giants, while his 95 yards were also a team high.

The 12 targets show how central Robinson was to the passing game.

He did not score a touchdown, but his volume and yardage made him Dart’s most consistent receiving outlet.

Daniel Bellinger

Bellinger recorded:

• 3 receptions
• 88 yards
• 29.3 yards per reception
• 1 touchdown
• 44-yard long
• 4 targets

His 44-yard touchdown was the longest receiving play by a Giants player.

The efficiency is striking. Bellinger needed only three catches to gain 88 yards.

His average of 29.3 yards per reception was easily the highest among the Giants’ major contributors.

Theo Johnson

Johnson finished with:

• 3 receptions
• 66 yards
• 22.0 yards per reception
• 1 touchdown
• 41-yard long
• 7 targets

Like Bellinger, Johnson created significant yardage on relatively few receptions.

The Giants’ two tight ends combined for 154 yards and two touchdowns on six receptions.

That was a major part of the team’s explosive passing output.

Cam Skattebo

Skattebo added:

• 3 receptions
• 34 yards
• 11.3 yards per reception
• 1 touchdown
• 13-yard long
• 6 targets

His receiving touchdown gave him an important dual-role contribution.

Denver Receiving Leaders

Denver’s receiving production was distributed more evenly.

The Broncos completed 27 passes for 279 receiving yards, with 49 total targets.

That produced a team average of 10.3 yards per reception.

Courtland Sutton

Sutton led Denver with:

• 6 receptions
• 87 yards
• 14.5 yards per reception
• 32-yard long
• 10 targets

His 10 targets tied Troy Franklin for the most on the Broncos.

Sutton’s importance became particularly clear during the final drive.

With Denver needing to move quickly, Nix found Sutton for a 22-yard completion that positioned the Broncos for Lutz’s game-winning kick.

Marvin Mims Jr.

Mims finished with:

• 6 receptions
• 85 yards
• 14.2 yards per reception
• 31-yard long
• 7 targets

He was one of the most versatile players in the game.

Mims contributed as a receiver, runner, and punt returner.

His biggest receiving moment came during the final possession, when Nix connected with him for a 29-yard gain.

That play immediately moved Denver into favorable field position.

Evan Engram

Engram caught:

• 5 passes
• 42 yards
• 8.4 yards per reception
• 20-yard long
• 8 targets

His production was more possession-oriented than the explosive output produced by Sutton and Mims.

Still, five receptions made him an important part of Denver’s passing distribution.

Troy Franklin

Franklin recorded:

• 3 receptions
• 19 yards
• 6.3 yards per reception
• 1 touchdown
• 10 targets

His touchdown was one of Denver’s key fourth-quarter scoring plays.

Despite the relatively modest yardage, the touchdown gave his performance greater significance in the final score.

RJ Harvey

Harvey caught one pass for two yards and a touchdown.

His reception directly produced a touchdown during the comeback.

Defensive Player Stats

The defensive numbers provide another important layer of the game.

New York recorded:

• 69 total tackles
• 43 solo tackles
• 2 sacks
• 5 tackles for loss
• 8 passes defended
• 5 quarterback hits

Denver recorded:

• 70 total tackles
• 33 solo tackles
• 4 sacks
• 4 tackles for loss
• 8 passes defended
• 10 quarterback hits

The most obvious difference is quarterback pressure.

Denver generated twice as many sacks and twice as many quarterback hits.

That pressure became particularly important because New York’s passing attack was producing explosive plays.

Dane Belton

Belton led New York with:

• 10 total tackles
• 6 solo tackles

His tackle total was the highest defensive figure for either team.

Brian Burns

Burns recorded:

• 2 sacks
• 3 tackles for loss
• 1 pass defended
• 2 quarterback hits

His two sacks represented all of New York’s team sack production.

Burns therefore created direct pressure against Nix even though Denver ultimately managed to produce 33 fourth-quarter points.

Alex Singleton

Singleton led Denver with eight total tackles.

He recorded three solo tackles.

His production reflected Denver’s defensive involvement throughout a game in which the unit was asked to recover from a huge early deficit.

Jonathon Cooper

Cooper produced:

• 1.5 sacks
• 1 tackle for loss
• 2 quarterback hits

His pressure was part of Denver’s four-sack total.

Justin Strnad

Strnad made the game’s only interception.

He returned it 21 yards without scoring a touchdown.

The interception was particularly valuable because it occurred during Denver’s fourth-quarter comeback and helped create another scoring opportunity.

The Turnover Battle

Turnovers were not frequent in this game.

New York did not lose a fumble and finished with no defensive interceptions.

Denver had one fumble by Nix, but it was not lost.

The major turnover difference came from Strnad’s interception of Dart.

That gave Denver one takeaway compared with zero for New York.

A single interception does not fully explain a 33-point fourth quarter, but its timing was important.

Denver needed additional possessions after falling far behind, and the interception helped the Broncos maintain their comeback momentum.

Special Teams Impact

Special teams did not dominate the statistical story, but several individual contributions mattered.

Wil Lutz

Lutz finished:

• 1-for-1 on field goals
• Long of 39 yards
• 2-for-2 on extra points
• 5 total points

His 39-yard field goal was the decisive score.

He was perfect on his opportunities.

Jude McAtamney

McAtamney recorded:

• 0-for-0 on field goals
• 2-for-4 on extra points
• 2 points

The two missed extra points were significant because one occurred after New York’s late touchdown.

That left the Giants with 32 points instead of 33 and allowed Denver to win with a field goal.

Gunner Olszewski

Olszewski handled both kick and punt returns.

Kick returns:

• 3 returns
• 85 yards
• 28.3 average
• 30-yard long

Punt returns:

• 3 returns
• 28 yards
• 9.3 average
• 13-yard long

His return production gave New York useful field-position contributions throughout the game.

Marvin Mims Jr.

Mims returned two punts for 29 yards.

His 14.5-yard average was an efficient special-teams contribution.

Punting

Jamie Gillan punted six times for 263 yards, averaging 43.8 yards per punt.

Jeremy Crawshaw also punted six times, producing 303 yards at an average of 50.5 yards.

Both punters placed two punts inside the 20-yard line.

Why the Receiving Numbers Matter

One of the most interesting elements in the matchup is the difference between receiving volume and receiving efficiency.

New York completed only 15 passes but gained 283 receiving yards.

Denver completed 27 passes and gained 279 yards.

That means the Giants gained four more receiving yards despite making 12 fewer receptions.

The explanation is explosive-play efficiency.

New York averaged 18.9 yards per reception.

Denver averaged 10.3.

This is a major statistical distinction.

The Giants were creating larger chunks of yardage when they completed passes. The Broncos relied more heavily on volume and distribution.

For a box-score analyst, this is one of the clearest reasons not to evaluate a passing attack solely by completion totals.

Why Denver’s Rushing Efficiency Was Important

Denver’s 142 rushing yards came on only 24 attempts.

That produced 5.9 yards per carry.

New York ran the ball eight more times but produced only 119 yards.

The difference was 23 rushing yards in favor of Denver despite the Broncos having fewer attempts.

Dobbins supplied consistent production, while Nix added explosive quarterback rushing.

The combination gave Denver an efficient ground attack that became especially useful in the red zone.

New York, meanwhile, received solid production from Tracy but struggled to generate the same overall rushing efficiency.

Explosive Plays Defined the Game

The box score contains several large plays.

For New York:

• Daniel Bellinger had a 44-yard touchdown
• Theo Johnson had a 41-yard touchdown
• Tyrone Tracy Jr. had a 31-yard run
• Wan’Dale Robinson had a 23-yard reception

For Denver:

• J.K. Dobbins had a 32-yard run
• Courtland Sutton had a 32-yard reception
• Marvin Mims Jr. had a 31-yard reception
• Bo Nix had a 21-yard run

These plays demonstrate that both teams had the ability to produce explosive gains.

The major difference was when Denver’s explosive plays occurred.

New York generated several big plays earlier in the game and built a substantial lead.

Denver generated its most important explosive plays during the fourth quarter, when every possession carried enormous significance.

A Closer Look at the Final Minute

The final minute deserves separate attention because it explains why the final score was 33-32.

New York scored with 37 seconds remaining.

Dart’s rushing touchdown gave the Giants a 32-30 lead.

However, the extra point was missed.

Denver then received the kickoff and quickly moved into scoring range.

Nix hit Mims for 29 yards.

A neutral-zone penalty against New York added five yards.

Nix then found Sutton for 22 yards.

With three seconds remaining, Nix spiked the ball.

That left Lutz with a 39-yard field-goal attempt.

Lutz converted.

Denver won 33-32.

This sequence shows why football scoring situations cannot be understood through offensive yardage alone.

A single extra-point miss changed Denver’s final requirement from needing a touchdown to needing only a field goal.

The final drive then became a field-position exercise rather than a full-field touchdown drive.

What the Player Stats Reveal About Both Offenses

The statistical profiles of the two teams were almost mirror images in certain areas.

New York produced more explosive passing efficiency.

Denver produced better rushing efficiency.

New York’s quarterback threw three touchdowns.

Denver’s quarterback produced four total touchdowns when passing and rushing scores are combined.

New York completed fewer passes but gained slightly more receiving yards.

Denver completed more passes and spread the ball across more receivers.

The Giants also had a stronger average per reception, while Denver had more total receptions.

This suggests two different offensive approaches.

New York’s production was concentrated in explosive passing plays.

Denver’s production was more distributed and eventually combined passing volume with quarterback rushing.

Neither statistic by itself explains the final result.

The fourth-quarter scoring sequence does.

Most Important Statistical Takeaways

1. Denver scored all 33 points in the fourth quarter

This is the defining statistic of the game.

2. Jaxson Dart produced four total touchdowns

He threw three touchdown passes and ran for another.

3. Bo Nix produced four total touchdowns

He threw two touchdown passes and ran for two touchdowns.

4. New York’s passing game was highly explosive

The Giants averaged 18.9 yards per reception.

5. Denver’s running game was more efficient

The Broncos averaged 5.9 yards per rushing attempt.

6. Denver generated more quarterback pressure

The Broncos recorded four sacks and 10 quarterback hits.

7. Brian Burns led the Giants’ pass rush

He produced two sacks.

8. Justin Strnad created the only interception

His takeaway helped Denver during the comeback.

9. Wil Lutz delivered the deciding points

His 39-yard field goal ended the game.

10. The missed Giants extra points mattered

McAtamney finished 2-for-4 on extra points, including the miss after New York took a 32-30 lead.

How to Read These Stats Without Overlooking Context

Player statistics are most useful when they are connected to game situation.

For example, Dart’s 283 passing yards look excellent in isolation. His 93.4 passer rating also indicates meaningful production.

But his 15-for-33 completion line shows that his passing success came through selective explosive plays rather than high completion volume.

Similarly, Nix’s 279 passing yards do not look dramatically different from Dart’s total.

However, Nix added 48 rushing yards and two rushing touchdowns while throwing no interceptions.

That additional production mattered.

The same principle applies to the receiving numbers.

Robinson’s 95 yards were important, but Bellinger’s 88 yards on three catches demonstrate a different form of impact.

For Denver, Sutton’s 87 yards and Mims’ 85 yards were both valuable, but Mims also added punt-return production and a critical 29-yard catch on the final drive.

Context turns a basic box score into a meaningful game analysis.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who led the Giants in passing against the Broncos?

Jaxson Dart led New York with 15 completions on 33 attempts for 283 yards, three passing touchdowns, and one interception.

Who led the Broncos in passing?

Bo Nix completed 27 of 50 attempts for 279 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions.

Who was the Giants’ leading rusher?

Cam Skattebo led New York with 60 rushing yards on 16 carries.

Who led Denver in rushing?

J.K. Dobbins led the Broncos with 81 rushing yards on 14 carries.

Who led the Giants in receiving?

Wan’Dale Robinson led New York with six receptions for 95 yards.

Who kicked the game-winning field goal?

Wil Lutz kicked a 39-yard field goal as time expired to give Denver a 33-32 victory.

New York Giants vs Denver Broncos Match Player Stats: Final Statistical Picture

The new york giants vs denver broncos match player stats show a game that cannot be properly understood by looking only at the final score.

New York’s offense generated 283 receiving yards from only 15 receptions, with major explosive contributions from Wan’Dale Robinson, Daniel Bellinger, Theo Johnson, and Cam Skattebo.

Jaxson Dart produced three touchdown passes and one rushing touchdown. His 283-yard passing performance demonstrated his ability to create explosive gains, although the Giants struggled to maintain consistent completion efficiency.

Denver’s offense was more balanced.

Bo Nix threw for 279 yards, added 48 rushing yards, and accounted for four touchdowns. J.K. Dobbins contributed 81 rushing yards, while Courtland Sutton and Marvin Mims Jr. combined for 172 receiving yards.

The Broncos also produced more quarterback pressure, recording four sacks compared with New York’s two.

The biggest statistical difference, however, was the fourth quarter.

Denver scored 33 points after failing to score during the first three quarters.

That comeback changed the meaning of every other statistic in the box score.

New York had the explosive passing numbers.

Denver had the stronger rushing efficiency.

New York’s quarterback produced three passing touchdowns.

Denver’s quarterback produced two passing touchdowns and two rushing touchdowns.

The Giants generated 283 receiving yards.

The Broncos generated 279.

Yet Denver finished with 33 points and New York finished with 32.

The final play explains why.

After the Giants moved ahead 32-30 with 37 seconds left, Denver used two major completions from Nix to Mims and Sutton to move into field-goal range. Lutz then converted from 39 yards as time expired.

That sequence turned an apparent Giants victory into one of Denver’s most dramatic wins of the season.

For readers studying individual performance, this game is a strong reminder that football statistics require context. Passing yards, rushing totals, receptions, sacks, turnovers, and touchdowns all matter, but the timing of those plays can be just as important as the raw numbers.

The most complete reading of this matchup is therefore not simply that Denver won 33-32.

It is that New York produced three quarters of effective football, Denver produced one extraordinary fourth quarter, and individual performances from Dart, Nix, Dobbins, Robinson, Sutton, Mims, Burns, and Lutz shaped the game in very different ways.