Pacers vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats

The pacers vs dallas mavericks match player stats from the Indiana Pacers’ 135-131 win over the Dallas Mavericks provide a useful example of how a close NBA game can be decided by late-game execution rather than simply by the leading scorer. Indiana overcame a 40-point fourth quarter from Dallas by producing 45 points of its own in the final period. Pascal Siakam led all scorers with 29 points, while P.J. Washington paced Dallas with 26. Bennedict Mathurin added 23 points and seven rebounds, and Andrew Nembhard delivered 22 points and eight assists in place of the injured Tyrese Haliburton.

There is one important date clarification before looking at the numbers. The game was played on March 19, 2025, at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis. Some search results may associate it with March 20 because the game recap and related coverage were published after midnight in some locations. The official NBA game record lists March 19, 2025.

The final score was:

Indiana Pacers 135, Dallas Mavericks 131

The result completed a 2-0 season-series sweep for Indiana and moved the Pacers to 39-29, while Dallas fell to 33-37. The game was much closer than the final four-point margin suggests. Dallas entered the fourth quarter trailing, then surged ahead before Indiana produced a decisive late rally.

Pacers vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats: Game Overview

This matchup is especially interesting because the basic team shooting numbers were remarkably close.

Dallas shot 48 of 88 from the field, or 55 percent. Indiana shot 45 of 82, also 55 percent. Dallas made 11 of 27 three-pointers for 41 percent, while Indiana made 16 of 35 for 46 percent. From the free-throw line, Dallas converted 24 of 32 attempts, compared with Indiana’s 29 of 37.

Those numbers show that Indiana did not win because Dallas suddenly stopped making shots. Instead, the Pacers created enough additional value through three-point shooting, free throws, assists, defensive plays and fourth-quarter execution to overcome Dallas’ offensive efficiency.

Team	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	TOV	STL	BLK
Dallas Mavericks	48-88, 55%	11-27, 41%	24-32, 75%	41	23	12	6	0
Indiana Pacers	45-82, 55%	16-35, 46%	29-37, 78%	38	29	11	4	5

The official box score confirms the team totals and individual player production.

One of the clearest differences is the three-point margin. Indiana made five more threes than Dallas. At three points each, that represents 15 additional points from outside the arc, even though the Mavericks were also highly efficient at 41 percent.

Indiana also generated five blocks compared with none for Dallas. The Pacers did not dominate the glass, with Dallas actually holding a 41-38 rebounding advantage, but Indiana’s combination of perimeter efficiency and defensive activity helped offset that disadvantage.

How the Game Developed Quarter by Quarter

The quarter-by-quarter score tells the story better than the final score alone.

Quarter	Dallas	Indiana
1st	21	33
2nd	36	35
3rd	34	22
4th	40	45
Final	131	135

The Pacers established control early, scoring 33 points in the opening period while holding Dallas to 21. Dallas then responded with a 36-point second quarter and entered halftime within striking distance.

The third quarter represented the major swing toward Dallas. The Mavericks outscored Indiana 34-22, cutting into the Pacers’ advantage and setting up a dramatic fourth quarter.

Then the game flipped again.

Dallas scored 40 points in the final period, an enormous offensive output in its own right. Indiana still scored 45, which proved decisive.

That fourth-quarter scoring pattern is one of the most important pieces of the game when evaluating the pacers vs dallas mavericks match player stats. The box score shows who scored the most, but the quarter breakdown shows when those points mattered.

Pascal Siakam Leads Indiana With 29 Points

Pascal Siakam was Indiana’s leading scorer and one of the most efficient offensive players in the game.

He finished with:

• 29 points
• 11-of-16 shooting
• 3-of-4 from three-point range
• 4-of-5 free throws
• 1 rebound
• 5 assists
• 1 steal
• 1 block

Siakam’s 11 made field goals were the most by any player in the game. He also shot 68.8 percent from the field, making his 29-point total particularly efficient. The official Pacers box score lists his full shooting line and all-around production.

His three-point shooting was also important. Siakam connected on three of four attempts from deep, giving Indiana an interior and perimeter scoring combination.

The most important part of his night came late, however.

With Dallas threatening to close the game, Siakam generated a crucial steal that helped create the possession leading to Nembhard’s go-ahead three-pointer. The NBA’s official recap identifies that sequence as a key moment in the final stretch.

That is why a simple points ranking does not fully explain Siakam’s impact. His scoring was significant, but his late defensive play directly contributed to the decisive possession.

P.J. Washington Leads Dallas in Scoring

P.J. Washington was Dallas’ top scorer with 26 points.

His statistical line included:

• 26 points
• 9-of-18 field goals
• 2-of-6 three-pointers
• 6-of-10 free throws
• 5 rebounds
• 1 steal

Washington was aggressive throughout the game and remained heavily involved as Dallas mounted its fourth-quarter comeback.

His 26 points came on 18 field-goal attempts, giving him a 50 percent field-goal rate. He also reached the free-throw line 10 times, which helped Dallas maintain its scoring pace.

The official Mavericks game page identifies Washington as the team’s scoring leader with 26 points.

His production was one reason Dallas remained competitive even after falling behind early.

Bennedict Mathurin’s Fourth Quarter Changed the Game

Bennedict Mathurin’s overall numbers were impressive, but the timing of his scoring is even more important.

He finished with:

• 23 points
• 6-of-12 field goals
• 1-of-4 three-pointers
• 10-of-12 free throws
• 7 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 1 steal

The striking statistic is that 16 of his 23 points came in the fourth quarter.

That means nearly 70 percent of Mathurin’s scoring came during the period in which the game was decided. Reuters reported that he scored 16 points in the final 5:54, including a stretch of 10 straight points during Indiana’s rally.

This is a good example of why game-level player statistics should be read in context.

A player who scores 23 points evenly across four quarters can influence a game differently from a player who scores 16 points during a critical late-game stretch. Mathurin’s production arrived when Indiana needed an offensive response to Dallas’ fourth-quarter surge.

His seven rebounds also made him Indiana’s leading rebounder.

Andrew Nembhard Provides the Playmaking

Andrew Nembhard filled the lead-guard role with Tyrese Haliburton unavailable because of injury.

His final line:

• 22 points
• 7-of-14 field goals
• 2-of-5 three-pointers
• 6-of-9 free throws
• 3 rebounds
• 8 assists
• 2 turnovers
• 1 block

His eight assists tied for the game high and his decision-making was especially important in the closing minutes.

Nembhard hit the go-ahead three-pointer with 14.7 seconds remaining after Siakam’s steal created the opportunity. The official NBA recap describes the play as the decisive basket that moved Indiana in front 131-130.

This is one of the clearest examples of why assists matter when examining a close game.

Nembhard was not Indiana’s leading scorer, but his combination of 22 points and eight assists gave the Pacers another major offensive creator. With Haliburton unavailable, his ability to organize the offense became even more significant.

Spencer Dinwiddie Controls Dallas’ Offense

Spencer Dinwiddie was Dallas’ leading playmaker.

He recorded:

• 17 points
• 6-of-16 field goals
• 2-of-7 three-pointers
• 3-of-3 free throws
• 3 rebounds
• 12 assists
• 3 steals
• 1 turnover

His 12 assists were the most by any player in the game.

Dinwiddie’s assist total is particularly notable because Dallas produced 131 points. His 12 assists helped distribute the offense across several productive scorers.

He also finished with three steals, giving him a substantial defensive contribution alongside his playmaking.

The official NBA game record highlights Dinwiddie’s 12 assists as one of the game’s major individual performances.

Kai Jones Delivers a Double-Double

Kai Jones produced one of Dallas’ most efficient individual performances.

He finished with:

• 18 points
• 8-of-9 field goals
• 2-of-2 free throws
• 11 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 1 turnover

His 11 rebounds led all players.

More importantly, he scored 18 points on just nine field-goal attempts, making eight of them. That is an 88.9 percent field-goal rate.

Jones therefore supplied Dallas with efficient interior production while also controlling the rebounding category.

The official Mavericks record lists Jones as the team’s leading rebounder with 11 boards.

His performance also highlights an interesting contrast between the two teams. Dallas won the overall rebounding battle 41-38, but Indiana won the game.

Jaden Hardy Gives Dallas a Major Bench Boost

Jaden Hardy was one of the most important reserves in the matchup.

He scored 24 points in 24 minutes, shooting 8-of-13 from the field, 3-of-6 from three-point range and 5-of-6 at the free-throw line.

His full statistical line was:

• 24 points
• 8-of-13 field goals
• 3-of-6 three-pointers
• 5-of-6 free throws
• 2 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 2 turnovers

Hardy’s scoring was particularly valuable because Dallas received substantial production from its second unit.

In a four-point loss, bench scoring can easily become a secondary storyline, but Dallas’ reserves clearly helped keep the offense moving. Hardy’s 24 points were only two fewer than Washington’s 26.

Obi Toppin Provides Efficient Bench Scoring for Indiana

Indiana’s leading bench scorer was Obi Toppin with 13 points.

He shot:

• 4-of-6 from the field
• 3-of-4 from three-point range
• 2-of-2 from the free-throw line

He also added four rebounds and two assists.

Toppin’s 13 points were efficient, particularly because he made three of four attempts from outside the arc.

His contribution helped Indiana maintain scoring pressure beyond its starting lineup. The Pacers ultimately received meaningful production from several players, rather than depending on one scorer.

Full Player Stats Breakdown

Dallas Mavericks

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	FG	3PT
Kai Jones	24	18	11	1	8-9	0-0
P.J. Washington	38	26	5	0	9-18	2-6
Naji Marshall	39	20	9	3	8-15	0-1
Kessler Edwards	21	9	2	1	3-5	3-4
Spencer Dinwiddie	42	17	3	12	6-16	2-7
Dwight Powell	15	0	1	3	0-1	0-0
Max Christie	36	17	8	1	6-11	1-3
Jaden Hardy	24	24	2	2	8-13	3-6

Dallas finished with 48 made field goals from 88 attempts and 23 assists as a team.

Indiana Pacers

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	FG	3PT
Pascal Siakam	34	29	1	5	11-16	3-4
Myles Turner	22	9	6	2	3-6	0-2
Andrew Nembhard	32	22	3	8	7-14	2-5
Aaron Nesmith	35	18	5	2	6-9	3-5
Bennedict Mathurin	32	23	7	1	6-12	1-4
Obi Toppin	23	13	4	2	4-6	3-4
Jarace Walker	6	3	1	0	1-2	1-2
Thomas Bryant	11	7	3	0	3-4	1-2
Tony Bradley	4	3	0	0	1-1	1-1
T.J. McConnell	16	3	2	8	1-6	1-2
Ben Sheppard	26	5	6	1	2-6	0-4

Indiana’s official box score records 45 made field goals, 16 made threes, 29 made free throws, 29 assists and 38 rebounds.

The Most Important Statistical Differences

Looking beyond the leading scorers reveals several factors that explain the outcome.

1. Indiana’s Three-Point Advantage

Dallas made 11 three-pointers.

Indiana made 16.

That five-shot difference from three-point range was one of the largest statistical advantages in the game.

Both teams shot well overall, but Indiana generated more points from the perimeter.

2. Indiana Created More Assists

The Pacers finished with 29 assists compared with 23 for Dallas.

That six-assist advantage suggests that Indiana’s scoring was more heavily connected to team play and ball movement.

Nembhard and McConnell each recorded eight assists, giving Indiana two players with substantial playmaking totals.

3. Dallas Won the Rebounding Battle

Dallas grabbed 41 rebounds.

Indiana grabbed 38.

This was an area where the Mavericks had an advantage. Kai Jones’ 11 rebounds were particularly important, while Naji Marshall added nine and Max Christie recorded eight.

The Pacers still won despite losing the overall rebounding battle.

4. Turnovers Were Nearly Even

Dallas committed 12 turnovers.

Indiana committed 11.

The one-turnover difference was not large enough to explain the result by itself.

This matters because the game was not simply a case of one team giving the ball away repeatedly. Both teams maintained relatively strong possession control.

5. Indiana Had Five Blocks

Indiana recorded five blocks.

Dallas recorded none.

Myles Turner accounted for three of Indiana’s five blocks, while Siakam and Nembhard each added one.

That defensive activity did not dominate the entire game, but it provided another area in which Indiana generated value.

Why the Fourth Quarter Decided the Game

The fourth quarter deserves special attention.

Dallas scored 40 points.

That would normally be enough to put enormous pressure on an opponent.

Indiana scored 45.

That five-point difference was exactly the margin needed to turn a four-point deficit into a four-point victory after Dallas had built momentum during the third period.

According to the NBA and AP accounts, Dallas held a lead late before Indiana responded. Mathurin scored 16 points in the fourth quarter, while Siakam made an important defensive play and Nembhard hit the go-ahead three.

The final sequence illustrates how individual statistics connect.

1. Siakam generated a steal.
2. The turnover created a transition opportunity.
3. Nembhard found space beyond the arc.
4. Nembhard made the go-ahead three.
5. Indiana followed with late free throws.
6. Dallas could not produce another scoring sequence sufficient to regain the lead.

This is the difference between reading a box score and understanding the game behind it.

Shooting Efficiency Was Not the Whole Story

At first glance, both teams appear almost identical.

Each shot 55 percent from the field.

But the Pacers attempted 35 three-pointers compared with 27 for Dallas. Indiana made 16, while Dallas made 11.

The Pacers also attempted five more free throws and made five more.

That means Indiana generated additional scoring opportunities through both three-point volume and free-throw volume.

Dallas compensated in other areas, especially rebounding and interior scoring, but the distribution of those advantages mattered.

This is why field-goal percentage alone can be misleading when evaluating a close NBA game.

The Role of Ball Movement

Indiana’s 29 assists stand out.

The team had several players capable of creating offense:

• Nembhard: 8 assists
• McConnell: 8 assists
• Siakam: 5 assists
• Nesmith: 2 assists
• Toppin: 2 assists

Dallas also moved the ball effectively, led by Dinwiddie’s 12 assists, but Indiana had more distributed playmaking.

The Pacers’ ability to have multiple players contribute as passers made the offense less dependent on a single creator.

That became especially important with Haliburton unavailable.

The Importance of Free Throws

Indiana went 29-of-37 from the line.

Dallas went 24-of-32.

The difference was five made free throws.

That is significant in a game decided by four points.

Indiana’s 78 percent free-throw shooting was only slightly better than Dallas’ 75 percent, so the main advantage came from volume rather than a dramatic efficiency gap.

Mathurin was particularly important. He made 10 of 12 free throws, accounting for a substantial portion of Indiana’s total.

What the Matchup Says About Individual Value

The pacers vs dallas mavericks match player stats demonstrate why a single “best player” number cannot adequately summarize a close game.

Siakam led all scorers with 29.

Washington led Dallas with 26.

Mathurin scored 23 and dominated the fourth quarter.

Nembhard scored 22 and delivered eight assists.

Dinwiddie produced 17 points and 12 assists.

Jones had 18 points and 11 rebounds.

Hardy added 24 points from the bench.

Each of those performances addressed a different part of the game.

For Indiana, Siakam provided efficient scoring, Mathurin supplied late-game offense, and Nembhard handled much of the playmaking.

For Dallas, Washington and Hardy supplied scoring, Jones controlled the glass, and Dinwiddie organized the offense.

The final result therefore came from the interaction of multiple player roles rather than one statistical category.

What Fans Should Look for When Reading Similar Box Scores

A useful way to analyze future Pacers or Mavericks games is to avoid starting with points alone.

Instead, examine these categories in order:

Scoring efficiency

Look at field goals, three-pointers and free throws together.

A player who scores 25 points on 20 shots has a different offensive profile from a player who scores 25 on 12 shots.

Playmaking

Assists show who was involved in creating scoring opportunities for teammates.

Also check turnovers. High assist totals are more meaningful when a player maintains reasonable possession control.

Rebounding

Separate offensive rebounds from defensive rebounds when possible.

Offensive boards can create additional possessions, while defensive rebounds generally end the opponent’s possession.

Defensive events

Steals and blocks are useful, but they are not the entire defensive picture.

The Pacers’ five blocks and four steals tell only part of their defensive contribution.

Timing

Finally, examine when the production occurred.

Mathurin’s 16 fourth-quarter points were more consequential to this particular game than a generic statement that he scored 23.

Pacers vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways

The most useful conclusions from this game can be summarized through the numbers.

Indiana won 135-131.

Pascal Siakam led all scorers with 29 points.

P.J. Washington led Dallas with 26 points.

Bennedict Mathurin scored 23 points and grabbed seven rebounds.

Andrew Nembhard recorded 22 points and eight assists.

Spencer Dinwiddie produced 17 points and 12 assists.

Kai Jones recorded 18 points and 11 rebounds.

Jaden Hardy scored 24 points off the bench.

Indiana made 16 three-pointers compared with Dallas’ 11.

Indiana recorded 29 assists compared with Dallas’ 23.

Dallas won the rebounding battle 41-38.

Indiana committed one fewer turnover, 11 to 12.

Indiana scored 45 fourth-quarter points compared with Dallas’ 40.

The official NBA records and ESPN box score support these team and player statistics.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score of the Pacers vs Mavericks game?

The Indiana Pacers defeated the Dallas Mavericks 135-131 at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis.

Who scored the most points for the Pacers?

Pascal Siakam led Indiana with 29 points on 11-of-16 shooting.

Who led the Mavericks in scoring?

P.J. Washington led Dallas with 26 points.

Who had the most assists in the game?

Spencer Dinwiddie led all players with 12 assists. Andrew Nembhard and T.J. McConnell each recorded eight assists for Indiana.

Who led the game in rebounds?

Kai Jones led all players with 11 rebounds for Dallas.

How many three-pointers did each team make?

Indiana made 16 of 35 three-point attempts, while Dallas made 11 of 27.

Conclusion

The Pacers’ 135-131 victory over the Mavericks was a high-scoring game in which both teams produced strong offensive numbers. Dallas shot 55 percent from the field and scored 131 points, but Indiana matched the 55 percent overall shooting rate while making more three-pointers and free throws.

Pascal Siakam’s 29 points established the scoring lead, while P.J. Washington’s 26 points kept Dallas competitive. Kai Jones’ 11 rebounds, Spencer Dinwiddie’s 12 assists and Jaden Hardy’s 24 points showed the range of Dallas’ contributions. For Indiana, Bennedict Mathurin’s 23 points, Andrew Nembhard’s 22 points and eight assists, and Obi Toppin’s efficient bench scoring were central to the offensive balance.

The decisive difference came late. Dallas produced 40 points in the fourth quarter, but Indiana answered with 45. Mathurin’s late scoring, Siakam’s defensive play and Nembhard’s go-ahead three-pointer ultimately shaped the final result.

For anyone studying pacers vs dallas mavericks match player stats, this game is a strong example of why a complete box-score analysis should consider scoring efficiency, three-point production, assists, turnovers, rebounding and fourth-quarter timing together rather than focusing only on the highest point total.