Cleveland Cavaliers vs Toronto Raptors Match Player Stats
The cleveland cavaliers vs toronto raptors match player stats from Game 3 tell a much deeper story than the 126-104 final score alone. Toronto combined elite shooting, efficient scoring from its leading players, aggressive defense, and a dominant fourth quarter to defeat Cleveland at Scotiabank Arena. Scottie Barnes and RJ Barrett each scored 33 points, while Collin Murray-Boyles added 22 and Jamison Battle delivered 14 points entirely in the fourth quarter. The result cut Cleveland’s series lead to 2-1. (NBA.com)
For Cleveland, James Harden led the team with 18 points, while Evan Mobley, Donovan Mitchell, and Max Strus each scored 15. Jaylon Tyson contributed 13 points and Jarrett Allen added 12. However, Cleveland struggled with turnovers and three-point efficiency, while Toronto produced one of its most explosive offensive stretches of the series.
This article breaks down the complete player statistics, team numbers, shooting efficiency, fourth-quarter swing, individual performances, and the statistical lessons that can be taken from the game.
Cleveland Cavaliers vs Toronto Raptors Match Player Stats
Game 3 was played at Scotiabank Arena in Toronto during the Eastern Conference first round. Toronto entered the contest trailing 2-0 in the series and needed a home victory to prevent Cleveland from taking a commanding position.
The final result was:
| Category | Cleveland Cavaliers | Toronto Raptors |
| Final Score | 104 | 126 |
| Q1 | 25 | 31 |
| Q2 | 29 | 23 |
| Q3 | 27 | 29 |
| Q4 | 23 | 43 |
| Field Goals | 36-81 | 50-87 |
| Field Goal % | 44% | 57% |
| Three-Pointers | 14-45 | 14-23 |
| Three-Point % | 31% | 61% |
| Free Throws | 18-23 | 12-21 |
| Free Throw % | 78% | 57% |
| Rebounds | 42 | 35 |
| Assists | 23 | 29 |
| Turnovers | 20 | 11 |
| Steals | 7 | 11 |
| Blocks | 6 | 4 |
The official NBA game record lists Toronto at 126 points and Cleveland at 104, with Toronto winning the fourth quarter 43-23. (NBA.com)
The most important statistical difference was not rebounding. Cleveland actually finished with more rebounds, 42 to 35. The decisive areas were shooting efficiency, ball security, assists, and defensive activity.
Toronto made 50 of 87 field-goal attempts, a remarkable 57% rate. Cleveland made 36 of 81, or about 44%.
From three-point range, the gap became even more significant. Toronto connected on 14 of 23 attempts, or roughly 61%, while Cleveland made 14 of 45, only 31%.
That difference created a difficult mathematical problem for Cleveland. Both teams made 14 threes, but Toronto needed only 23 attempts to reach that number. Cleveland needed 45.
How the Game Changed Quarter by Quarter
The final margin makes the game look one-sided from the opening tip, but the scoring pattern shows something different.
First Quarter: Toronto Starts Fast
Toronto opened the game with a 31-25 advantage.
That six-point lead was important because Cleveland never managed to create a significant early cushion. Toronto’s offensive efficiency immediately gave the home team confidence, particularly from the perimeter.
Scottie Barnes and RJ Barrett eventually became the major scoring engines, but Toronto’s offense was not dependent on one player.
Second Quarter: Cleveland Responds
Cleveland won the second quarter 29-23.
That reduced Toronto’s halftime advantage and kept the Cavaliers within striking distance. At this stage, the game was still competitive, and there was little indication that the final margin would reach 22 points.
Cleveland’s ability to respond in the second period is important when studying the game because it shows that the loss was not simply caused by a slow start.
Third Quarter: Toronto Regains Control
Toronto scored 29 points in the third quarter compared with Cleveland’s 27.
The Raptors entered the fourth quarter with an 83-81 advantage. That two-point lead meant the game was essentially decided during the final period rather than through three quarters of runaway basketball.
Scottie Barnes played a major role in that transition. His scoring, passing, and ability to create offensive opportunities kept Toronto’s attack balanced.
Fourth Quarter: The Decisive 43-23 Run
The fourth quarter was the defining statistical event.
Toronto scored 43 points while Cleveland managed only 23.
That produced a 20-point fourth-quarter advantage and transformed a two-point game into a 22-point Toronto victory.
The NBA reported that Toronto went on a 19-straight-possession scoring stretch spanning the third and fourth quarters, part of a 47-23 second-half run. (NBA.com)
Toronto also shot 8 of 9 from three-point range during the fourth quarter, while Jamison Battle went 4 of 4 from deep in the period. (NBA.com)
That is the clearest explanation for why the final score became so large.
Toronto Raptors Player Stats
Toronto received major contributions from several players rather than relying on a single scorer.
RJ Barrett: 33 Points
RJ Barrett produced one of the strongest offensive performances of the game.
His line:
| Stat | RJ Barrett |
| Minutes | 39 |
| Points | 33 |
| FG | 12-19 |
| 3PT | 6-8 |
| FT | 3-7 |
| Rebounds | 5 |
| Assists | 5 |
| Steals | 2 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Turnovers | 2 |
| +/- | +24 |
Barrett’s 12-for-19 shooting was highly efficient, but his three-point shooting was particularly important.
He made 6 of 8 from beyond the arc.
That means Barrett alone produced 18 points from three-point shots. His perimeter efficiency forced Cleveland’s defense to respect the outside shot while also creating additional room for Toronto’s other scorers.
His +24 plus-minus was also one of the strongest figures in the game.
Scottie Barnes: 33 Points and 11 Assists
Scottie Barnes matched Barrett with 33 points and added an exceptional 11 assists.
| Stat | Scottie Barnes |
| Minutes | 35 |
| Points | 33 |
| FG | 11-17 |
| 3PT | 3-5 |
| FT | 8-10 |
| Rebounds | 5 |
| Assists | 11 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Turnovers | 1 |
| +/- | +23 |
Barnes was arguably the central offensive organizer for Toronto because his contribution extended beyond scoring.
He shot 11 of 17 from the field, made 3 of 5 three-pointers, and converted 8 of 10 free throws.
The 11 assists are especially important.
Toronto finished with 29 team assists, and Barnes’ 11 represented a substantial portion of that total. His combination of scoring and playmaking prevented Cleveland from focusing entirely on Barrett.
The NBA’s official recap noted that Barnes set playoff career highs in both points and assists during the game. (NBA.com)
Collin Murray-Boyles: 22 Points
Collin Murray-Boyles delivered another major contribution.
| Stat | Collin Murray-Boyles |
| Minutes | 28 |
| Points | 22 |
| FG | 11-15 |
| 3PT | 0-0 |
| Rebounds | 8 |
| Assists | 2 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Turnovers | 2 |
| +/- | +21 |
The most striking number is his 11-for-15 shooting.
Murray-Boyles did not need three-point attempts to influence the game. He scored efficiently from inside the arc and added eight rebounds.
His +21 plus-minus further demonstrates how effective Toronto was during his minutes.
The NBA reported that he became the first Raptors rookie to score at least 20 points in a playoff game. (NBA.com)
Jamison Battle: 14 Points
Jamison Battle had one of the most unusual stat lines of the night.
He played 16 minutes and scored 14 points.
Every point came from three-point range.
Battle went:
- 5-5 from the field
- 4-4 from three
- 14 total points
- 2 rebounds
- 0 turnovers
- +20
His fourth-quarter performance was particularly important. He made all four of his three-point attempts in the final period.
When a close playoff game reaches the final quarter, that type of shooting can completely alter defensive strategy. Cleveland could not afford to leave Battle open, but doing so could create space for Barnes, Barrett, and other Toronto players.
Brandon Ingram: 12 Points
Brandon Ingram finished with 12 points on 5-of-9 shooting.
He also added three rebounds, two assists, and two steals.
His 2-for-2 three-point shooting provided another efficient perimeter contribution.
Ingram did not need a high volume of attempts because Toronto’s offense was already generating efficient opportunities across the lineup.
Jakob Poeltl: 8 Points
Jakob Poeltl scored eight points on 4-of-6 shooting and grabbed six rebounds.
He also recorded two assists and one block.
His offensive role was relatively low volume, but his interior presence complemented Toronto’s perimeter attack.
Jamal Shead: Defensive Impact
Jamal Shead scored only two points, but the scoring total does not represent his overall influence.
He finished with:
- 30 minutes
- 5 assists
- 5 steals
- 3 turnovers
- +12
Five steals were especially significant.
Toronto finished with 11 steals as a team, compared with Cleveland’s seven. That aggressive defensive activity helped Toronto turn Cleveland’s mistakes into offensive opportunities.
Cleveland Cavaliers Player Stats
Cleveland’s top players produced respectable individual scoring totals, but the overall efficiency and turnover numbers worked against them.
James Harden: 18 Points
James Harden led Cleveland with 18 points.
| Stat | James Harden |
| Minutes | 33 |
| Points | 18 |
| FG | 5-13 |
| 3PT | 3-10 |
| FT | 5-6 |
| Rebounds | 4 |
| Assists | 4 |
| Turnovers | 8 |
| +/- | -17 |
Harden’s eight turnovers were one of the most important individual numbers in the game.
He contributed 18 points and four assists, but eight turnovers created too many lost possessions.
Toronto’s defensive pressure was clearly relevant here. The official NBA recap noted Cleveland coach Kenny Atkinson saying Toronto made Harden work. (NBA.com)
For a primary ball handler, turnovers can have a greater effect than the basic scoring line suggests because each mistake removes an offensive opportunity and may create transition offense for the opponent.
Donovan Mitchell: 15 Points
Donovan Mitchell scored 15 points on 7-of-16 shooting.
His complete line included:
- 15 points
- 7-16 field goals
- 1-7 three-pointers
- 5 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 3 turnovers
Mitchell’s biggest statistical issue was three-point efficiency.
He made only one of seven attempts from deep.
That mattered because Cleveland attempted 45 threes overall but converted only 14.
Mitchell did shoot 43.8% from the field overall, which was much stronger than his three-point percentage. The challenge was that Toronto’s defense and the game situation demanded more efficient perimeter production.
Evan Mobley: 15 Points, 7 Assists
Evan Mobley posted one of the more versatile lines for Cleveland.
| Stat | Evan Mobley |
| Minutes | 33 |
| Points | 15 |
| FG | 4-13 |
| 3PT | 0-4 |
| FT | 7-8 |
| Rebounds | 6 |
| Assists | 7 |
| Steals | 2 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Turnovers | 2 |
| +/- | -20 |
The seven assists stand out.
Mobley was not simply scoring inside. He was also helping move the offense.
However, his 4-for-13 shooting and 0-for-4 performance from three show that Toronto’s defense made it difficult for him to score efficiently.
Max Strus: 15 Points
Max Strus gave Cleveland useful perimeter scoring.
He finished with:
- 15 points
- 5-10 field goals
- 4-8 three-pointers
- 6 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 1 steal
His four made threes were one of Cleveland’s more efficient shooting contributions.
However, Toronto received more efficient three-point production from its leading scorers and role players.
Jaylon Tyson: 13 Points
Jaylon Tyson provided a positive spark from the Cleveland bench.
He scored 13 points on 5-of-9 shooting and made 3 of 6 three-pointers.
He also added four assists, two rebounds, and one steal.
Most notably, Tyson finished with a +1 plus-minus, one of only a small number of Cleveland players to finish the game on the positive side of that statistic.
Jarrett Allen: 12 Points and 3 Blocks
Jarrett Allen was extremely efficient offensively.
He made 5 of 7 field-goal attempts and both of his free throws.
He also recorded:
- 12 points
- 4 rebounds
- 1 assist
- 2 steals
- 3 blocks
His 71.4% field-goal shooting was excellent.
The problem for Cleveland was that individual efficiency from Allen could not offset the broader team-level problems with turnovers and perimeter shooting.
The Biggest Statistical Difference: Shooting Efficiency
The most important lesson from the game is that raw three-point makes do not tell the complete story.
Both teams made 14 threes.
At first glance, that looks identical.
The difference is how many attempts were required.
Cleveland:
14 made from 45 attempts
Toronto:
14 made from 23 attempts
Toronto therefore generated the same number of made threes while taking 22 fewer attempts.
That is a major efficiency advantage.
Toronto’s 61% three-point shooting was dramatically higher than Cleveland’s 31%.
The Raptors also shot 57% overall compared with Cleveland’s 44%.
When two teams have the same number of made threes but one team shoots them far more efficiently, the possession value becomes very different.
Turnovers Created a Second Advantage
Cleveland committed 20 turnovers.
Toronto committed only 11.
That is a nine-turnover difference.
The official NBA game summary also reported that Toronto scored 23 points off Cleveland turnovers. (NBA.com)
This is important because turnovers affect both sides of the game.
A Cleveland turnover means:
- Cleveland loses a possession.
- Toronto gains an offensive opportunity.
- Toronto may receive a transition scoring chance.
- Cleveland loses the opportunity to attempt a shot.
The problem compounds when turnovers happen against an aggressive defensive team.
Toronto’s 11 steals also show that its defensive activity was not passive.
Rebounding Was Not the Problem for Cleveland
Cleveland actually won the overall rebounding battle.
The Cavaliers had 42 rebounds.
Toronto had 35.
That means the 22-point loss cannot reasonably be explained by Toronto dominating the glass.
In fact, Cleveland’s rebounding advantage shows why a deeper statistical analysis matters.
A team can win rebounds and still lose badly if it struggles in other possession-based categories.
In this game, turnovers and shooting efficiency outweighed Cleveland’s rebounding edge.
Assists Reveal Toronto’s Offensive Balance
Toronto recorded 29 assists compared with Cleveland’s 23.
The difference is not enormous by itself, but it fits the broader picture.
Barnes had 11 assists.
That means a large portion of Toronto’s offensive creation flowed through a player who was simultaneously scoring 33 points.
That combination is difficult to defend.
If a player is primarily a scorer, defenders can concentrate on stopping his shot.
If the same player can score efficiently and create shots for teammates, defensive help becomes more complicated.
Barnes’ 33-point, 11-assist performance therefore had a broader effect than his scoring total alone suggests.
Why the Fourth Quarter Matters So Much
The fourth quarter deserves separate attention because the game was still close after three periods.
Toronto led 83-81 entering the final quarter.
Then Toronto scored 43 points.
Cleveland scored 23.
That means Toronto’s fourth-quarter margin was 20 points.
The Raptors’ fourth-quarter three-point shooting was extraordinary, with the team making 8 of 9 attempts from deep.
Jamison Battle made all four of his fourth-quarter threes.
RJ Barrett also finished with six made threes overall.
These numbers show how quickly a competitive playoff game can change when perimeter shooting becomes highly efficient.
Cleveland’s Turnovers vs Toronto’s Ball Movement
The contrast between the teams can be summarized through two numbers:
Cleveland: 20 turnovers
Toronto: 29 assists
Those figures describe very different offensive experiences.
Cleveland had multiple high-level creators, but its possession management deteriorated.
Toronto consistently converted possessions into quality offensive actions and protected the ball better.
Harden’s eight turnovers were particularly costly, while Barnes’ one turnover demonstrated how effectively Toronto’s primary creator managed the game.
Plus-Minus Leaders and What They Show
Plus-minus should never be treated as a complete evaluation of an individual player, but it can provide useful context when combined with the rest of the box score.
Toronto’s notable figures included:
- RJ Barrett: +24
- Scottie Barnes: +23
- Collin Murray-Boyles: +21
- Jamison Battle: +20
- Jamal Shead: +12
Cleveland’s leading positive figures were:
- Jaylon Tyson: +1
- Keon Ellis: +1
- Several limited-minute players: 0
The contrast reflects how strongly Toronto controlled the game during the minutes played by its primary rotation.
Full Cleveland Cavaliers Player Statistics
| Player | MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | REB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | +/- |
| Dean Wade | 22 | 5 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -10 |
| Jarrett Allen | 26 | 12 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -22 |
| Evan Mobley | 33 | 15 | 4-13 | 0-4 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | -20 |
| James Harden | 33 | 18 | 5-13 | 3-10 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 | -17 |
| Donovan Mitchell | 33 | 15 | 7-16 | 1-7 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -14 |
| Larry Nance Jr. | 3 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nae’Qwan Tomlin | 3 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thomas Bryant | 3 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dennis Schroder | 5 | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -8 |
| Max Strus | 26 | 15 | 5-10 | 4-8 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -16 |
| Sam Merrill | 18 | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -5 |
| Jaylon Tyson | 16 | 13 | 5-9 | 3-6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 |
| Craig Porter Jr. | 3 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Keon Ellis | 15 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 |
| Tyrese Proctor | 3 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Full Toronto Raptors Player Statistics
| Player | MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | REB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | +/- |
| Brandon Ingram | 29 | 12 | 5-9 | 1-2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | +15 |
| RJ Barrett | 39 | 33 | 12-19 | 6-8 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | +24 |
| Scottie Barnes | 35 | 33 | 11-17 | 3-5 | 5 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +23 |
| Jakob Poeltl | 18 | 8 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +4 |
| Ja’Kobe Walter | 26 | 0 | 0-6 | 0-3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +6 |
| Sandro Mamukelashvili | 11 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trayce Jackson-Davis | 2 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 |
| Jamison Battle | 16 | 14 | 5-5 | 4-4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +20 |
| Collin Murray-Boyles | 28 | 22 | 11-15 | 0-0 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | +21 |
| Jonathan Mogbo | 2 | 2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 |
| Garrett Temple | 2 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 |
| A.J. Lawson | 2 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 |
| Jamal Shead | 30 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 0 | +12 |
| Gradey Dick | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 |
What These Numbers Tell Us About the Matchup
The cleveland cavaliers vs toronto raptors match player stats provide several useful lessons for anyone analyzing playoff basketball.
First, scoring totals should always be considered alongside efficiency.
Barrett and Barnes each scored 33, but they did so with efficient shooting. Murray-Boyles scored 22 on 11-for-15 shooting. Battle scored 14 without missing a field goal.
Second, turnovers can completely change a game.
Cleveland’s 20 turnovers gave Toronto additional opportunities, while Toronto committed only 11.
Third, identical three-point makes do not mean identical perimeter performances.
Both teams made 14 threes, but Toronto did so on 23 attempts while Cleveland used 45.
Fourth, the fourth quarter can dramatically distort a final score.
Toronto entered the final period ahead by only two points and eventually won by 22.
That 24-point swing over one quarter explains much of the final margin.
Important Numbers for Game Analysis
For readers studying box scores, these are the numbers that deserve the most attention:
126: Toronto’s final score.
104: Cleveland’s final score.
43: Toronto’s fourth-quarter points.
23: Cleveland’s fourth-quarter points.
61%: Toronto’s three-point shooting.
31%: Cleveland’s three-point shooting.
20: Cleveland turnovers.
11: Toronto turnovers.
33: Barrett’s points.
33: Barnes’ points.
11: Barnes’ assists.
22: Murray-Boyles’ points.
14: Battle’s points.
8: Harden’s turnovers.
5: Shead’s steals.
These figures provide a clearer statistical picture than the final score by itself.
Why Box Score Context Matters
A traditional box score is useful, but it can hide the sequence of events that produced the result.
For example, Cleveland’s 42 rebounds look positive.
But Toronto still won comfortably.
Cleveland’s 14 made three-pointers also sound competitive.
But the Raptors made the same number on far fewer attempts.
Mobley’s seven assists show strong playmaking.
But Cleveland’s overall turnover total remained high.
Allen shot 5-for-7 and blocked three shots.
Yet Toronto’s offensive efficiency remained too strong.
This is why player statistics should be read as a connected system rather than a collection of isolated numbers.
Historical and Series Context
Game 3 was especially important because Cleveland entered the contest with a 2-0 series lead.
Toronto’s victory moved the series to 2-1.
The official NBA record confirms the Game 3 result and series status. (NBA.com)
The game also ended a long postseason winning streak Cleveland had held against Toronto. The official recap noted that the Cavaliers had won 12 consecutive playoff games against the Raptors before this result. (NBA.com)
That context adds significance to Toronto’s performance, but the box score itself remains the most useful tool for understanding how the game was won.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Cavaliers and Raptors?
The Toronto Raptors defeated the Cleveland Cavaliers 126-104 in Game 3 of the Eastern Conference first round. (NBA.com)
Who led the Cavaliers in scoring?
James Harden led Cleveland with 18 points. Donovan Mitchell, Evan Mobley, and Max Strus each scored 15.
Who led the Raptors in scoring?
RJ Barrett and Scottie Barnes both scored 33 points for Toronto. Barnes also recorded 11 assists.
How many three-pointers did Toronto make?
Toronto made 14 three-pointers on 23 attempts, shooting approximately 61% from beyond the arc.
How many turnovers did Cleveland have?
Cleveland committed 20 turnovers, while Toronto committed 11.
What was the key difference in the fourth quarter?
Toronto outscored Cleveland 43-23 in the fourth quarter. The Raptors also shot 8-for-9 from three-point range during the final period. (NBA.com)
Conclusion
The cleveland cavaliers vs toronto raptors match player stats from Game 3 show that Toronto’s 126-104 victory was built on efficiency, ball movement, defensive pressure, and an extraordinary fourth-quarter performance.
RJ Barrett and Scottie Barnes supplied 33 points each. Barnes added 11 assists, giving Toronto both scoring and playmaking from the same player. Collin Murray-Boyles added 22 points on 11-for-15 shooting, while Jamison Battle provided a perfect 4-for-4 fourth-quarter performance from three-point range.
Cleveland had several productive individual performances. James Harden scored 18 points, while Donovan Mitchell, Evan Mobley, and Max Strus each scored 15. Jaylon Tyson added 13 points, and Jarrett Allen scored 12 while blocking three shots.
The team numbers explain the final result more clearly. Toronto shot 57% from the field and approximately 61% from three-point range. Cleveland shot 44% overall and approximately 31% from three. Toronto also committed nine fewer turnovers and recorded six more assists.
The fourth quarter ultimately decided the contest. Toronto entered the period with an 83-81 lead and finished it with a 43-23 scoring advantage.
For anyone studying this matchup, the most useful takeaway is that the final score was produced by a combination of shooting efficiency and possession quality rather than one isolated statistic.
