Atlanta Hawks vs Memphis Grizzlies Match Player Stats
The atlanta hawks vs memphis grizzlies match player stats reveal how Memphis secured a 132-123 victory over Atlanta in the game data provided for October 5, 2026, at State Farm Arena in Atlanta, Georgia. Memphis finished with a more efficient shooting performance, converting 52% of its field-goal attempts and 42% of its three-pointers. Atlanta recorded more total rebounds and offensive rebounds, but its lower shooting percentages and Memphis’ stronger assist total helped shape the final result.
This matchup provides several useful lessons for basketball fans who want to understand more than the final score. The shooting numbers show where Memphis held an advantage, the rebounding figures highlight Atlanta’s opportunities for second-chance points, and the turnover and assist totals offer additional context about ball movement and possession management. Looking at these figures together gives a clearer picture of the reported game than the scoreboard alone.
Data note: This analysis uses the supplied box-score information. The source data contains date and record inconsistencies, and the listed player statistics are incomplete beyond the individual leaders. The team totals and reported leaders below are reproduced from the supplied information rather than independently verified.
Game Overview: Memphis Grizzlies 132, Atlanta Hawks 123
The supplied box score lists Memphis as the winning team, with 132 points against Atlanta’s 123. The nine-point margin reflects an offensive performance in which Memphis made better use of its shooting opportunities, particularly from beyond the three-point line.
Reported Final Score
132
Memphis Grizzlies
Away team
123
Atlanta Hawks
Home team
Venue
State Farm Arena
Reported attendance
10,923
Reported game date
October 5, 2026
Final margin
Memphis by 9
The game information also displays October 6, 2026, at 4:00 AM, which may reflect a time-zone or page-display difference. Because the source includes conflicting dates and season records, the date and other metadata should be treated as reported details, not independently confirmed facts.
Quarter-by-Quarter Score
The scoring progression helps explain how Memphis established its advantage and how Atlanta responded.
| Quarter | Memphis Grizzlies | Atlanta Hawks |
| First quarter | 32 | 35 |
| Second quarter | 49 | 26 |
| Third quarter | 29 | 37 |
| Fourth quarter | 22 | 25 |
| Final score | 132 | 123 |
The first quarter favored Atlanta by three points. Memphis then scored 49 points in the second quarter, outscoring the Hawks by 23 in that period. That scoring burst created a substantial advantage and became the defining stretch of the reported game.
Atlanta responded with a 37-point third quarter, outscoring Memphis by eight. The Hawks also finished the fourth quarter ahead by three points. However, those late improvements were not enough to overcome the second-quarter deficit.
The key takeaway is that a team can win the final two quarters and still lose the game. Memphis’ second-quarter production was the difference-maker in this scoring breakdown.
Atlanta Hawks vs Memphis Grizzlies Match Player Stats: Team Comparison
The team statistics provide the strongest evidence for understanding the outcome. Both teams scored efficiently enough to reach triple digits, but Memphis was more accurate from the field and beyond the arc. Atlanta’s advantages came primarily in rebounding and offensive rebounding.
| Team statistic | Memphis Grizzlies | Atlanta Hawks |
| Points | 132 | 123 |
| Field goals made | 43 | 43 |
| Field goals attempted | 83 | 94 |
| Field-goal percentage | 52% | 46% |
| Three-pointers made | 18 | 14 |
| Three-pointers attempted | 43 | 43 |
| Three-point percentage | 42% | 33% |
| Free throws made | 28 | 23 |
| Free throws attempted | 37 | 33 |
| Free-throw percentage | 76% | 70% |
| Total rebounds | 41 | 45 |
| Offensive rebounds | 9 | 14 |
| Defensive rebounds | 32 | 31 |
| Assists | 32 | 25 |
| Turnovers | 18 | 17 |
| Steals | 13 | 11 |
| Blocks | 3 | 1 |
| Personal fouls | 26 | 23 |
Percentages are reproduced as supplied and rounded to whole numbers. Made and attempted totals are more precise for calculations.
Shooting Efficiency: Memphis Made the Same Number of Field Goals With Fewer Attempts
One of the most important details in the box score is that both teams made 43 field goals. Memphis reached that total on 83 attempts, while Atlanta needed 94 attempts.
That difference matters because successful offense is not only about how many shots a team makes. It also depends on how frequently its attempts turn into points.
Memphis recorded a field-goal percentage of approximately 51.8%, compared with Atlanta’s 45.7%. The difference of about 6.1 percentage points represents a meaningful shooting advantage.
The practical interpretation is straightforward:
- Memphis converted a greater share of its overall field-goal attempts.
- Atlanta took 11 more shots from the field but did not make any additional field goals.
- Memphis generated more scoring value from its available shooting opportunities.
These numbers do not explain every possession or identify the exact tactical cause of the difference. They do, however, establish that Memphis was the more accurate team in the reported contest.
Three-Point Shooting: A Significant Scoring Advantage
The three-point line was another major difference between the teams.
Memphis made 18 three-pointers from 43 attempts, while Atlanta made 14 from the same number of attempts. Memphis therefore scored four additional three-point baskets.
Because every made three-pointer is worth one more point than a made two-pointer, those four additional long-range baskets represent a 12-point advantage in three-point scoring.
| Three-point measure | Memphis | Atlanta |
| Three-pointers made | 18 | 14 |
| Attempts | 43 | 43 |
| Reported percentage | 42% | 33% |
| Points from three-pointers | 54 | 42 |
Memphis scored 54 points from three-point range, compared with Atlanta’s 42. The 12-point difference is larger than the final nine-point margin.
This does not mean three-point shooting alone explains the result. Other scoring categories, including two-point baskets and free throws, also influenced the final total. Nevertheless, Memphis’ advantage from outside was substantial.
Atlanta attempted the same number of three-pointers, so the difference was not simply about volume. It was about conversion.
For readers evaluating similar games, comparing attempts and makes together is more useful than looking at three-point percentage in isolation. The percentage shows accuracy, while the made-basket total demonstrates how much scoring the accuracy produced.
Free Throws: Memphis Added More Points at the Line
Free throws also favored Memphis.
The Grizzlies made 28 of 37 attempts, while the Hawks made 23 of 33. Memphis scored five more points at the line despite attempting only four additional free throws.
| Free-throw measure | Memphis | Atlanta |
| Made | 28 | 23 |
| Attempted | 37 | 33 |
| Percentage from supplied data | 76% | 70% |
The difference between the teams was not limited to shooting from the field. Memphis also converted more of its free-throw opportunities.
Free throws can be especially important in high-scoring games because they allow a team to add points without needing to make a field goal. However, the supplied team totals do not establish which players drew the fouls, how many attempts came from particular types of plays, or whether late-game fouling affected the totals.
The reliable conclusion is that Memphis had the higher free-throw total and percentage in the supplied box score.
Memphis Grizzlies Player Stats and Individual Leaders
Individual statistics help readers identify the players credited with the strongest reported contributions. The supplied data names GG Jackson as Memphis’ leading scorer and Ty Jerome as the team’s assist leader.
However, it does not include a complete, verified player-by-player statistical table for all starters and bench players. A responsible analysis should distinguish confirmed individual figures from information that is unavailable.
GG Jackson: Memphis’ Reported Top Scorer
GG Jackson led the Grizzlies with 14 points, according to the supplied data.
His reported scoring total identifies him as Memphis’ leading individual scorer in this particular box-score record. It does not, by itself, establish that he had the highest efficiency, the most influential defensive performance, or the greatest overall impact on the game.
To assess those aspects, readers would need additional statistics, such as:
- Field goals made and attempted.
- Three-pointers made and attempted.
- Free throws made and attempted.
- Rebounds and assists.
- Turnovers and personal fouls.
- Minutes played.
For example, a player scoring 14 points on efficient shooting may have a different statistical profile from a player scoring 14 points after taking many attempts. Without those details, the safest conclusion is that Jackson recorded the highest individual scoring total listed in the supplied Memphis data.
It is also important not to confuse a team’s leading scorer with its most valuable player. Scoring is a major component of basketball performance, but it does not capture every contribution to winning.
Ty Jerome: Memphis’ Assist Leader
Ty Jerome was credited with five assists in the provided summary, making him Memphis’ reported assist leader.
An assist is credited when a pass directly leads to a made basket under the official scoring rules. It is therefore one measure of a player’s contribution to team offense.
Jerome’s five assists form part of Memphis’ overall total of 32. That team total exceeded Atlanta’s 25 assists by seven.
This gap supports the observation that Memphis recorded more assisted scoring connections, although it does not prove that every possession was better organized or that one player was responsible for the team’s entire offensive advantage.
A fuller assessment of Jerome’s performance would require his minutes, turnovers, shooting numbers and the number of scoring opportunities he helped create. Five assists are a useful starting point, but they are not a complete measure of playmaking.
Memphis’ Starting Lineup
The supplied lineup lists the following Memphis starters:
| Player | Jersey number |
| Cedric Coward | 23 |
| Cameron Boozer | 27 |
| Jaylen Wells | 0 |
| Quinten Post | 41 |
| Ty Jerome | 2 |
These names and numbers are reproduced from the provided data. Individual point totals, rebounds and shooting figures were not supplied for every starter, so assigning additional statistics to them would be speculative.
A starting lineup also does not reveal how a team performed throughout the full game. Players may have different roles, playing times and responsibilities, while bench contributions can affect scoring runs and defensive matchups.
The available figures allow us to identify the reported starters and Jerome’s assist lead, but they are insufficient to rank every starter’s complete performance.
Memphis’ Bench Contributions
The supplied Memphis bench list includes the following players:
- Jerami Grant
- Kris Murray
- Olivier-Maxence Prosper
- Taylor Hendricks
- GG Jackson
- Karim Lopez
- Isaiah Stewart
- Carson Cooper
- Scotty Pippen Jr.
- Cam Spencer
- Jahmai Mashack
- Javon Small
- Walter Clayton Jr.
GG Jackson’s 14 points are the highest individual scoring figure specifically identified in the supplied summary. The data does not provide complete individual totals for the other listed bench players.
Bench analysis usually benefits from comparing points, minutes, rebounds, assists and shooting efficiency. It can also reveal whether reserves maintained a lead, helped close a deficit or provided defensive support.
In this case, the available evidence supports naming the listed bench players and identifying Jackson as the reported leading scorer. It does not support attributing the second-quarter scoring burst to a specific reserve or claiming that Memphis’ bench outscored Atlanta’s bench.
That distinction is important for accuracy. A team may win because of its starters, its bench, its collective shooting or several factors working together. The final score alone cannot determine which explanation is correct.
Atlanta Hawks Player Stats and Individual Leaders
Atlanta lost the reported contest by nine points, but its individual and team statistics still show several positive contributions. The supplied data identifies Corey Kispert as the Hawks’ leading scorer and Asa Newell as their leading rebounder.
The team also finished with more total rebounds and offensive rebounds than Memphis. Those numbers indicate that Atlanta had opportunities to gain extra possessions, even though it did not convert its overall statistical advantages into a win.
Corey Kispert: Atlanta’s Leading Scorer
Corey Kispert led Atlanta with 19 points in the supplied data.
His total was five points higher than GG Jackson’s reported team-leading figure for Memphis. However, Memphis won the game despite having a lower reported individual scoring leader.
That contrast illustrates why basketball results should not be evaluated by comparing only the highest scorer on each side. A team can have the leading individual scorer and still lose because the opponent distributes its scoring more effectively or gains advantages in other categories.
Atlanta’s 123 points were spread across the team’s overall offensive output. The available information does not provide enough player-level data to calculate Kispert’s shooting efficiency or determine how his scoring was distributed between two-pointers, three-pointers and free throws.
His 19-point total is nevertheless the clearest individual scoring highlight for the Hawks in the supplied summary.
Asa Newell: Atlanta’s Leading Rebounder
Asa Newell led Atlanta with 12 rebounds.
Rebounding is important because it determines which team gains possession after a missed shot. Defensive rebounds generally end the opponent’s immediate scoring opportunity, while offensive rebounds give a team another chance to score.
Newell’s 12 rebounds represent a substantial individual contribution to Atlanta’s reported total of 45 team rebounds. However, the summary does not specify how many of his rebounds were offensive or defensive.
That distinction matters when evaluating his impact. Offensive rebounds can create second-chance opportunities, while defensive rebounds help a team finish possessions and begin its own offense.
The broader team figures show that Atlanta recorded 14 offensive rebounds, five more than Memphis. Newell’s individual total should not be interpreted as 12 offensive rebounds, because the supplied data does not make that claim.
Atlanta’s Leading Playmakers
The supplied summary lists Jalen Johnson, Aaron Wiggins and RayJ Dennis as Atlanta’s assist leaders, with three assists each.
Their figures contribute to Atlanta’s team total of 25 assists. Memphis finished with 32, giving the Grizzlies a seven-assist advantage.
The assist totals provide one way to compare how often each team’s made baskets were directly connected to a credited pass. They do not reveal every aspect of ball movement, since a possession can involve multiple useful passes without producing an official assist.
The data also does not establish which of Atlanta’s three reported assist leaders had the strongest overall performance. A player with three assists might have contributed through rebounding, scoring or defense, but those details must be confirmed through a complete box score.
Atlanta’s Starting Lineup
The provided data lists these Atlanta starters:
| Player | Jersey number |
| Onyeka Okongwu | 17 |
| Jalen Johnson | 1 |
| Nickeil Alexander-Walker | 7 |
| Dyson Daniels | 5 |
| Kingston Flemings | 4 |
These names and jersey numbers are presented as supplied, not as independently verified roster information.
The source does not provide full individual scoring, rebounding and shooting figures for each starter. As a result, it would be misleading to claim that a particular starter struggled offensively or that a specific matchup caused Atlanta’s defeat.
A proper player-by-player comparison should use actual minutes played, field-goal attempts, three-point attempts, free throws, rebounds, assists, turnovers and defensive statistics. Without those figures, lineup-level conclusions should remain limited.
Atlanta’s Bench Players
The supplied bench list includes:
- Dorian Finney-Smith
- Corey Kispert
- Jalen Wilson
- Cameron Corhen
- Asa Newell
- Zuby Ejiofor
- Jock Landale
- Aaron Wiggins
- RayJ Dennis
- Keshon Gilbert
- Kobe Johnson
Kispert’s 19 points and Newell’s 12 rebounds are the individual highlights identified in the provided data.
The remaining players are listed without complete statistical lines. It is therefore not possible to determine accurately which reserve played the most minutes, had the best shooting percentage or contributed the most to Atlanta’s offensive rebounding.
The team numbers do show that Atlanta collected 14 offensive rebounds and 45 total rebounds. Those results suggest that the Hawks created opportunities to extend possessions. Whether particular bench players were responsible for those opportunities requires player-level rebound totals and minutes.
What Decided the Game? Five Statistical Takeaways
The final score provides the result, but the combined team statistics help explain why Memphis came out ahead. Five details deserve particular attention.
1. Memphis Was More Efficient From the Field
Memphis made 43 field goals on 83 attempts. Atlanta also made 43, but needed 94 attempts.
This difference suggests that Memphis converted its opportunities at a higher rate. Atlanta’s additional attempts did not produce additional field goals, which limited the value of its higher shot volume.
A useful way to assess shooting is to consider both accuracy and volume. A team that takes more shots does not automatically have the better offense. It must also convert enough attempts to justify that volume.
2. Three-Point Accuracy Created a Clear Gap
Memphis made 18 three-pointers, while Atlanta made 14. Both teams attempted 43.
The Grizzlies therefore produced 12 more points from three-point baskets. That advantage exceeded the nine-point difference in the final score.
Three-point shooting can change a game quickly because a short scoring run may erase a lead or create separation. The supplied quarter scores show Memphis scoring 49 points in the second quarter, but they do not identify how many of those points came from three-pointers.
The correct conclusion is that Memphis had a major overall advantage from beyond the arc, not that every part of its second-quarter surge resulted from long-range shooting.
3. Atlanta Won the Rebounding Battle
Atlanta finished with 45 rebounds compared with Memphis’ 41. The Hawks also collected 14 offensive rebounds, while the Grizzlies recorded nine.
An offensive rebound can extend a possession after a missed shot. If a team consistently recovers its own misses, it gains additional opportunities to score without requiring another defensive stop.
Atlanta’s five-rebound advantage on the offensive glass is particularly relevant because the team also attempted 11 more field goals. Extra attempts can help explain how a team remains competitive despite lower shooting accuracy.
However, the supplied data does not show how many second-chance points either team scored. More offensive rebounds do not guarantee more points, because the follow-up attempts can also miss.
4. Memphis Recorded More Assists
Memphis had 32 assists, compared with Atlanta’s 25.
The seven-assist gap indicates that Memphis recorded more baskets credited to a direct pass. That is consistent with a team producing a greater number of assisted scoring plays, although assists alone cannot measure every element of offensive execution.
A complete evaluation would also examine turnovers, potential assists, player usage and shooting efficiency. Even so, the combination of more assists and a higher field-goal percentage makes Memphis’ offensive performance stand out in the supplied figures.
5. Turnovers Were Similar
Memphis committed 18 turnovers, while Atlanta committed 17.
Atlanta therefore had one fewer turnover, but that small difference did not offset Memphis’ shooting advantages.
Turnovers matter because they end possessions without a field-goal attempt or a trip to the free-throw line. Yet their impact depends on when they occur, whether the opponent converts them into points and how many total possessions each team has.
The available data does not identify points off turnovers or individual turnover totals. It would therefore be inaccurate to claim that Memphis won because it forced more turnovers. The reported figures actually show one more Memphis turnover.
Advanced Statistical Perspective: Looking Beyond the Box Score
The supplied numbers allow several useful calculations that provide more context than the basic totals alone.
Effective Field-Goal Percentage
Effective field-goal percentage adjusts ordinary field-goal percentage to account for the additional value of three-point baskets.
The formula is:
\[ eFG\%=\frac{FGM+0.5\times 3PM}{FGA}\times100 \]
Using the supplied totals:
- Memphis: (43+0.518)/83100, or approximately 62.7%.
- Atlanta: (43+0.514)/94100, or approximately 53.2%.
Memphis’ estimated effective field-goal percentage was about 9.5 percentage points higher.
This calculation reinforces the central shooting takeaway. The Grizzlies made the same number of field goals but received more scoring value from their three-point baskets and used fewer attempts.
Points From Three-Point Shooting
Each made three-pointer contributes three points. Memphis’ 18 makes produced 54 points, while Atlanta’s 14 makes produced 42.
| Measure | Memphis | Atlanta |
| Points from three-pointers | 54 | 42 |
| Total points | 132 | 123 |
| Approximate share of team points | 40.9% | 34.1% |
Memphis obtained a larger share of its total scoring from three-point baskets.
This does not necessarily mean that the Grizzlies relied exclusively on perimeter shooting. They also made 28 free throws and 25 two-point field goals, based on the supplied field-goal and three-point totals. Atlanta made 23 free throws and 29 two-point field goals.
The difference shows that Memphis’ extra perimeter scoring was a major component of the final margin.
Assist-to-Turnover Ratio
The assist-to-turnover ratio compares recorded assists with turnovers.
AST/TO=AssistsTurnovers
Using the reported totals:
- Memphis: 32/18, approximately 1.78.
- Atlanta: 25/17, approximately 1.47.
Memphis recorded more assists relative to its turnovers. This is a useful indicator of the relationship between credited playmaking and lost possessions, although it is not a complete measure of decision-making or offensive quality.
The ratio should be interpreted alongside shooting efficiency, pace and opponent pressure. A team can record a strong ratio while still having weaknesses in other areas.
Rebounding Share and Second Chances
Atlanta collected four more total rebounds and five more offensive rebounds than Memphis. The Hawks’ defensive rebound total was 31, compared with Memphis’ 32.
These numbers indicate that Atlanta’s overall rebounding advantage came from the offensive glass rather than a higher defensive rebound total.
That distinction is important. Defensive rebounds help end opponents’ possessions, while offensive rebounds create additional scoring opportunities. Atlanta’s performance on the offensive glass was a positive statistical result, but it did not overcome the shooting difference.
The supplied data does not include total rebound opportunities, so a precise rebound percentage cannot be calculated reliably from the available figures alone.
How to Read the Official Box Score Correctly
For readers who want to verify the reported numbers, the ESPN box score for the game is the relevant reference supplied with the data.
When reviewing a basketball box score, start with the final score and quarter totals, then compare the team shooting figures. After that, examine rebounds, assists, turnovers and individual player lines.
Pay particular attention to the distinction between a team total and an individual statistic. For example, Atlanta’s 45 rebounds are a team figure, while Newell’s 12 rebounds are an individual figure. One cannot be substituted for the other.
It is also important to distinguish a player’s starting status from his statistical contribution. A starting lineup tells readers who was listed as a starter, but it does not automatically show who played the most minutes or made the largest contribution.
Why the Source Data Needs Caution
The supplied record contains several inconsistencies that should not be ignored.
First, the page title lists October 5, 2026, while the game information displays October 6, 2026, at 4:00 AM. A time-zone difference may explain the display, but the supplied text does not establish that conclusively.
Second, the listed season records and matchup information are not fully consistent with the other metadata. The next-game listings also lack enough context to establish a verified schedule.
Third, the individual player statistics are incomplete. The summary identifies certain leaders but does not provide full statistical lines for every player.
These limitations do not prevent a useful comparison of the supplied team totals. They do mean that the article should not present the roster details, individual figures or game metadata as independently confirmed facts.
For readers researching the matchup, the most dependable approach is to use the reported team totals for statistical comparisons and verify individual player lines against an authoritative, complete box score before drawing further conclusions.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What was the final score of the Atlanta Hawks vs Memphis Grizzlies game?
According to the supplied data, Memphis defeated Atlanta 132-123. The game record lists State Farm Arena in Atlanta, Georgia, as the venue.
2. Who was the leading scorer for Memphis?
GG Jackson was listed as Memphis’ leading scorer with 14 points. The supplied summary does not include a complete statistical line for every Grizzlies player.
3. Who led Atlanta in scoring and rebounds?
Corey Kispert led Atlanta with 19 points, while Asa Newell led the Hawks with 12 rebounds, according to the supplied data.
4. Which team shot better from three-point range?
Memphis made 18 of 43 three-point attempts, compared with Atlanta’s 14 of 43. The supplied percentages were 42% for Memphis and 33% for Atlanta.
5. Why did Memphis win despite having fewer rebounds?
Memphis shot more efficiently, made four additional three-pointers and recorded seven more assists. Atlanta’s rebounding advantage did not compensate for the shooting difference in the reported result.
6. Where can readers find complete player statistics?
Readers can consult the supplied ESPN box-score reference to review the listed game and individual player statistics. Because the provided record contains inconsistencies, the game date, roster details and full player lines should be checked before being treated as independently verified.
Conclusion
The atlanta hawks vs memphis grizzlies match player stats provide a useful example of how shooting efficiency can outweigh a rebounding advantage. Memphis recorded a 132-123 victory in the supplied game data, with both teams making 43 field goals but the Grizzlies requiring fewer attempts to reach that total.
The clearest statistical differences were Memphis’ 18 three-pointers compared with Atlanta’s 14, its 32 assists compared with Atlanta’s 25, and its higher field-goal percentage. Atlanta responded with 45 total rebounds and 14 offensive rebounds, but those advantages were not enough to close the nine-point gap.
The individual leaders identified in the source were GG Jackson with 14 points and Ty Jerome with five assists for Memphis, alongside Corey Kispert’s 19 points and Asa Newell’s 12 rebounds for Atlanta. These figures provide useful highlights, although a complete player-by-player assessment requires the full individual box score.
The reported second-quarter score was particularly important. Memphis scored 49 points in that period, building an advantage that Atlanta’s stronger third quarter and slightly better fourth quarter could not erase. The overall figures point to more effective shooting and greater assisted scoring production as the main statistical differences.
The source’s date and roster inconsistencies remain important qualifications. The team totals support the comparisons presented here, but the individual details and game metadata should be verified before being used as definitive historical records.
