knicks vs brooklyn nets match player stats

Knicks vs Broolyn Nets Match Player Stats

The knicks vs brooklyn nets match player stats from the November 9, 2025 meeting at Madison Square Garden tell a much deeper story than the final score alone. The New York Knicks defeated the Brooklyn Nets 134-98 in a game that featured outstanding shooting, strong rebounding, balanced scoring, and a dominant third-quarter response from New York. Karl-Anthony Towns led the Knicks with 28 points and 12 rebounds, while Jalen Brunson and OG Anunoby each scored 19. Michael Porter Jr. led Brooklyn with 25 points.

One important date correction is necessary before looking at the numbers. The supplied data lists the game as November 10, 2025, but the official NBA record and the detailed box score identify the game as Sunday, November 9, 2025. The game was played at Madison Square Garden in New York, with an attendance of 19,812.

This article uses the official game record and detailed box-score data to explain not only who scored, but also why the Knicks controlled the matchup. The goal is to make the numbers useful for readers checking player performances, team statistics, shooting efficiency, rebounding, playmaking, and the overall shape of the game.

knicks vs brooklyn nets match player stats

The headline result was New York 134, Brooklyn 98. The Knicks led 40-22 after the first quarter, held a 77-62 advantage at halftime, and then extended the margin dramatically in the third quarter. New York finished with a 54% field-goal rate, 46% three-point shooting, 31 assists, and 46 total rebounds. Brooklyn shot 40% from the field, 31% from three, recorded 21 assists, and committed 19 turnovers.

Category Brooklyn Nets New York Knicks
Final score 98 134
Q1 22 40
Q2 40 37
Q3 17 35
Q4 19 22
Field goals 33-82 48-89
Field-goal percentage 40.2% 53.9%
Three-pointers 14-45 17-37
Three-point percentage 31.1% 45.9%
Free throws 18-24 21-26
Free-throw percentage 75.0% 80.8%
Rebounds 46* 55*
Assists 21 31
Turnovers 19 14
Steals 5 9
Blocks 8 3
Offensive rebounds 15 15
Defensive rebounds 23 31
Team fouls 25 25

*The official detailed box score includes team rebounds, producing 46 total rebounds for Brooklyn and 55 for New York. The supplied summary data listed 38 and 46 respectively, so the detailed box score is the better reference for the complete rebounding total.

The difference is immediately visible. New York did not win because of one isolated statistical category. The Knicks combined superior shooting, better ball security, more assists, stronger defensive rebounding, and significantly more efficient offense.

Game overview and final score

The Knicks won 134-98, a 36-point margin. It was New York’s fourth consecutive victory at the time, and the win moved the Knicks to 6-3 overall and 6-0 at home. Brooklyn fell to 1-9 and 1-4 on the road.

The game began with New York establishing control immediately.

The Knicks opened with an 8-0 run and eventually closed the first quarter with another 11-0 burst. They finished the opening period ahead 40-22. New York also made seven of its 11 three-point attempts in the first quarter, while Brooklyn made only one of its 10 attempts from beyond the arc.

That first-quarter shooting difference mattered because Brooklyn never fully recovered from the early deficit.

The Nets responded well in the second period, actually outscoring New York 40-37. That helped reduce the damage, but the Knicks still went into halftime with a 77-62 advantage.

The third quarter became the decisive stretch.

New York opened the second half with a 12-0 run, pushing the score to 89-62. The Knicks continued applying pressure and eventually extended the margin to 107-70. Josh Hart contributed seven points during a 9-0 run that helped turn a large lead into an overwhelming one.

By the fourth quarter, the outcome was effectively settled.

Karl-Anthony Towns leads the Knicks

Karl-Anthony Towns was the most productive individual player for New York.

He finished with:

  • 28 points
  • 12 rebounds
  • 10-for-17 shooting
  • 8-for-8 free throws
  • 2 assists
  • 2 steals
  • 2 turnovers
  • 5 personal fouls
  • 28 minutes, 20 seconds

His 28 points were the highest total in the game, and his 12 rebounds were also a game high. He shot 58.8% from the field and converted every free-throw attempt.

What stands out is the efficiency behind the scoring.

Towns attempted only 17 field goals but produced 28 points. His free-throw performance was especially valuable because he went 8-for-8 from the line. He did not make a three-pointer, but New York did not need him to stretch the floor heavily because other Knicks handled that responsibility.

His 12 rebounds also gave New York an interior advantage.

Towns grabbed nine defensive rebounds and three offensive rebounds. That meant he contributed on both ends of the possession cycle, helping New York finish defensive possessions while also creating additional opportunities on the offensive glass.

Jalen Brunson controls the offense

Jalen Brunson did not lead the Knicks in scoring, but his seven assists were central to New York’s offensive structure.

His final line included:

  • 19 points
  • 7 assists
  • 6-for-14 field goals
  • 3-for-8 three-pointers
  • 4-for-4 free throws
  • 28 minutes, 47 seconds
  • 4 turnovers

Brunson’s 19 points tied OG Anunoby for second among Knicks scorers. More importantly, he was the team’s leading assist producer.

His three made three-pointers also helped keep Brooklyn’s defense from focusing exclusively on the paint.

The four turnovers are worth noting, particularly because Brooklyn forced New York into 14 total turnovers. However, New York still created 31 assists compared with 21 for Brooklyn, showing that the Knicks generated substantially more successful passing sequences overall.

Brunson’s value in this game was therefore broader than his point total. He combined scoring with primary ball handling and helped distribute the offense across multiple starters and reserves.

OG Anunoby provides two-way production

OG Anunoby finished with 19 points, matching Brunson for second on the Knicks.

His statistical line was particularly efficient:

  • 19 points
  • 6-for-11 shooting
  • 4-for-6 from three
  • 3-for-4 free throws
  • 8 rebounds
  • 3 assists
  • 1 steal
  • 1 turnover

Anunoby’s four made three-pointers tied Michael Porter Jr. for the game high in made threes. His 66.7% three-point accuracy was one of the clearest examples of New York’s perimeter efficiency.

The eight rebounds also show that his contribution was not limited to outside shooting.

For a game in which New York scored 134 points, having multiple players efficiently contribute from different areas of the floor made the offense difficult to contain.

Mikal Bridges adds efficient scoring

Mikal Bridges scored 16 points and shot 6-for-8 from the field.

His most notable number was his three-point shooting. Bridges made four of five attempts from beyond the arc, producing an 80% three-point rate. He also added five assists without committing a turnover.

That combination is important.

A player does not need to score 25 or 30 points to have a major statistical influence. Bridges supplied efficient shooting and secondary playmaking while avoiding turnovers. His five assists were second on the Knicks behind Brunson.

Mitchell Robinson makes an impact in limited minutes

Mitchell Robinson played only 16 minutes and 36 seconds, yet he finished with eight points, eight rebounds, two steals, and two blocks.

Even more striking, he went 4-for-4 from the field.

His offensive rebound total was three, while he added five defensive rebounds. That gave him eight total rebounds in a limited workload.

Robinson’s defensive statistics also help explain why the Knicks could maintain pressure without relying solely on Towns. The two blocks and two steals added extra defensive events, while his perfect field-goal shooting allowed him to contribute offensively without consuming many possessions.

Knicks bench production

New York received useful scoring from several reserves.

Jordan Clarkson scored 11 points in 18 minutes and seven seconds, shooting 5-for-8 from the field. Josh Hart also scored 11 points, adding seven rebounds and two assists. Landry Shamet contributed eight points, while Guerschon Yabusele scored five.

Ariel Hukporti scored two points, Mohamed Diawara scored five, and Pacome Dadiet scored two. Tyler Kolek did not score but recorded three assists in just over five minutes.

The distribution matters because New York did not need its starters to carry the entire scoring burden.

The Knicks had seven players reach at least eight points, and six players scored 11 or more. That kind of distribution can make an offense more resilient because opponents cannot simply concentrate defensive attention on one scorer.

Michael Porter Jr. leads Brooklyn

Michael Porter Jr. was Brooklyn’s leading scorer with 25 points.

He shot:

  • 9-for-18 from the field
  • 4-for-9 from three
  • 3-for-4 at the free-throw line
  • 25 points
  • 4 rebounds
  • 1 steal
  • 2 turnovers

His 44.4% three-point shooting was one of Brooklyn’s more efficient perimeter performances.

Porter Jr. was also the only Nets player to reach 20 points.

That becomes significant when compared with New York’s balanced scoring. The Knicks had several reliable scoring options, while Brooklyn depended more heavily on Porter Jr. to provide offensive production.

His 25 points were strong individually, but they were not enough to offset the overall difference in offensive efficiency.

Brooklyn’s secondary scoring

Drake Powell scored 15 points for Brooklyn and shot 5-for-8 from the field, including 3-for-3 from three-point range. His perfect three-point shooting was one of the brightest individual shooting performances for the Nets.

Ziaire Williams added 13 points while shooting 5-for-8 overall and 3-for-6 from three.

Nicolas Claxton contributed 12 points, five rebounds, and five assists. He also went 3-for-4 from the field and 6-for-6 at the free-throw line.

Egor Demin scored 10 points, grabbed four rebounds, and produced three assists.

Day’Ron Sharpe also scored 10 points and grabbed six rebounds in just over 12 minutes.

These performances show that Brooklyn did have several productive individual stretches. The problem was consistency across the lineup. Noah Clowney, for example, shot 1-for-9 from the field and missed all seven of his three-point attempts. Jalen Wilson went 0-for-8 and scored zero points.

Tyson Etienne did not score 15 points

The supplied data lists Tyson Etienne as Brooklyn’s second-leading scorer with 15 points. The official detailed box score does not support that figure.

Etienne played 10 minutes and 14 seconds and finished 0-for-4 from the field, 0-for-3 from three, with zero points. Drake Powell was the Nets’ second-highest scorer with 15 points, followed by Ziaire Williams with 13 and Nicolas Claxton with 12.

This is an important example of why player statistics should be checked against a detailed box score rather than copied from an incomplete or incorrectly labeled data table.

Brooklyn Nets player statistics

Here is the detailed Brooklyn scoring and production from the game:

Player MIN PTS REB AST FG 3PT FT
Michael Porter Jr. 25:52 25 4 0 9-18 4-9 3-4
Drake Powell 22:31 15 2 3 5-8 3-3 2-2
Ziaire Williams 28:21 13 3 1 5-8 3-6 0-2
Nicolas Claxton 22:00 12 5 5 3-4 0-0 6-6
Egor Demin 25:28 10 4 3 4-6 2-4 0-0
Day’Ron Sharpe 12:11 10 6 1 3-3 0-0 4-4
Tyrese Martin 24:51 5 8 2 2-10 1-5 0-0
Noah Clowney 22:27 4 1 2 1-9 0-7 2-4
E.J. Liddell 8:05 4 1 0 1-2 1-2 1-2
Terance Mann 17:44 0 1 4 0-2 0-2 0-0
Jalen Wilson 20:16 0 3 0 0-8 0-4 0-0
Tyson Etienne 10:14 0 0 0 0-4 0-3 0-0

The Nets’ scoring was spread across nine players, but their efficiency varied sharply. Porter Jr., Powell, Williams, Claxton, Demin, and Sharpe all produced double-digit scoring, while three players finished scoreless.

That uneven efficiency is one of the clearest reasons the 98-point total was difficult to sustain against a team shooting nearly 54% from the field.

New York Knicks player statistics

The Knicks’ player production was more balanced.

Player MIN PTS REB AST FG 3PT FT
Karl-Anthony Towns 28:20 28 12 2 10-17 0-2 8-8
Jalen Brunson 28:47 19 0 7 6-14 3-8 4-4
OG Anunoby 27:06 19 8 3 6-11 4-6 3-4
Mikal Bridges 27:41 16 1 5 6-8 4-5 0-0
Jordan Clarkson 18:07 11 2 3 5-8 1-3 0-0
Josh Hart 21:06 11 7 2 5-7 1-2 0-0
Mitchell Robinson 16:36 8 8 0 4-4 0-0 0-0
Landry Shamet 21:18 8 1 3 2-5 2-4 2-4
Guerschon Yabusele 10:25 5 2 0 1-6 1-4 2-4
Mohamed Diawara 5:13 5 0 0 2-2 1-1 0-0
Ariel Hukporti 8:05 2 2 0 1-1 0-0 0-0
Pacome Dadiet 5:53 2 1 0 0-2 0-0 2-2
Miles McBride 16:12 0 2 3 0-4 0-2 0-0
Tyler Kolek 5:13 0 0 3 0-0 0-0 0-0

The official detailed box score shows that New York had seven players in double figures or close to it, while Towns led the team with 28. The distribution also included substantial contributions from the bench.

Shooting efficiency explains much of the margin

One of the strongest statistical differences was field-goal efficiency.

Brooklyn made 33 of 82 attempts, or 40.2%.

New York made 48 of 89 attempts, or 53.9%.

That represents a gap of almost 14 percentage points.

The Knicks also had the edge from three-point range. They made 17 of 37 attempts, or 45.9%, while Brooklyn made 14 of 45, or 31.1%.

That combination created a major offensive advantage.

New York attempted only seven more field goals than Brooklyn, yet made 15 more shots. The Knicks also made three more three-pointers.

This is the type of efficiency difference that can produce a large final margin even when the possession count is relatively similar.

RealGM’s detailed statistical breakdown lists both teams at approximately 95 possessions. It also shows New York with a 141.4 offensive rating compared with 103.4 for Brooklyn. The Knicks also posted a .635 effective field-goal percentage compared with .488 for the Nets.

Three-point shooting was a major separator

The three-point numbers deserve special attention.

Brooklyn attempted 45 threes and made 14.

New York attempted 37 threes and made 17.

That means the Knicks attempted fewer long-range shots but made more of them.

New York’s 45.9% three-point rate was driven by several efficient shooters. Anunoby made four of six, Bridges made four of five, and Brunson made three of eight. Shamet also made two of four.

For Brooklyn, Porter Jr. made four of nine, Powell made all three of his attempts, and Williams made three of six.

The difference was not simply volume. It was shot conversion.

Rebounding tells another part of the story

The detailed box score credits New York with 55 total rebounds and Brooklyn with 46, including team rebounds. New York had 31 defensive rebounds compared with 23 for Brooklyn. Both teams collected 15 offensive rebounds.

The offensive rebounding numbers were surprisingly even.

That means the Knicks’ overall rebounding advantage came largely from defensive control.

Towns led New York with 12 rebounds. Robinson and Anunoby each collected eight, while Hart added seven.

For Brooklyn, Tyrese Martin had eight rebounds, Sharpe had six, and Claxton and Demin each had five.

The Nets did not completely lose the battle on the offensive glass. Their 15 offensive rebounds show that they created second-chance opportunities. The problem was that those extra possessions did not compensate for their lower shooting efficiency and higher turnover count.

Ball movement and turnovers

New York recorded 31 assists against 14 turnovers.

Brooklyn recorded 21 assists against 19 turnovers.

That creates an important contrast.

The Knicks generated more than twice as many assists as turnovers, while the Nets were much closer to an even relationship between the two categories.

Jalen Brunson’s seven assists led New York. Mikal Bridges added five, while Jordan Clarkson, Landry Shamet, Miles McBride, and Tyler Kolek each contributed three.

Brooklyn’s leading assist producer was Nicolas Claxton with five. Terance Mann had four, while Demin and Powell each recorded three.

The 17-assist advantage for New York indicates that the Knicks were not relying exclusively on individual shot creation. Their offense was producing scoring opportunities through multiple players.

Free-throw shooting

The free-throw difference was smaller than the field-goal and three-point differences.

Brooklyn went 18-for-24, or 75%.

New York went 21-for-26, or 80.8%.

Towns was perfect from the line, going 8-for-8.

Brunson was also perfect at 4-for-4.

Claxton was 6-for-6 for Brooklyn, while Sharpe was 4-for-4.

So although New York had a better free-throw percentage, this category did not determine the outcome by itself. The much larger difference came from field-goal and three-point efficiency.

Quarter-by-quarter analysis

First quarter: Knicks establish control

New York scored 40 points in the opening quarter while Brooklyn managed 22.

The Knicks’ 18-point advantage was built through efficient shooting and a fast start. New York made seven of 11 three-point attempts in the period, while Brooklyn went one of 10 from three.

Starting with such a large lead changed the game immediately.

Brooklyn was forced to chase the score rather than play from a neutral position.

Second quarter: Nets respond

Brooklyn scored 40 points in the second quarter, compared with 37 for New York.

That was the Nets’ best offensive period of the night and showed that the game was not simply a four-quarter shutdown.

However, New York still entered halftime with a 77-62 lead.

Brooklyn’s response reduced the deficit by only three points during the quarter, meaning the first-period damage remained significant.

Third quarter: New York pulls away

The third quarter was the decisive period.

New York scored 35 points while holding Brooklyn to 17.

The Knicks began the half with a 12-0 run and stretched the lead rapidly. All five starters scored during that opening sequence.

This quarter transformed a 15-point halftime lead into a 33-point advantage entering the final period.

Fourth quarter: Game management

New York scored 22 points in the fourth quarter and Brooklyn scored 19.

The margin was already too large for a comeback, so the final period was primarily about completing the game without allowing Brooklyn to create momentum.

The Knicks finished with 134 points, while the Nets ended at 98.

Defensive statistics

The Knicks recorded nine steals compared with five for Brooklyn.

They also had three blocks, while Brooklyn recorded eight.

The block advantage for Brooklyn is notable because it did not translate into overall defensive success.

This is an important lesson when reading box scores. A team can lead a single defensive category while still struggling to defend efficiently.

New York’s defensive advantage was more visible through its ability to limit Brooklyn’s shooting efficiency and control defensive rebounds.

What the advanced numbers reveal

The basic box score explains the result, but the advanced numbers provide additional context.

RealGM lists New York at a 141.4 offensive rating and Brooklyn at 103.4. Both teams had an estimated 95 possessions, making the difference in scoring efficiency particularly striking.

The effective field-goal percentage was .635 for New York and .488 for Brooklyn.

Effective field-goal percentage adjusts for the extra value of three-point shots. That is useful here because New York made 17 three-pointers despite attempting fewer than Brooklyn.

Turnover percentage also favored New York. RealGM lists Brooklyn at .200 and New York at .148. In simple terms, Brooklyn lost a larger share of its possessions to turnovers.

These numbers support what the traditional box score already suggests: New York was not simply scoring more. The Knicks were converting possessions more effectively.

The most important statistical takeaways

Several numbers summarize the game particularly well.

134 points: New York’s final offensive total.

98 points: Brooklyn’s final scoring total.

28 points and 12 rebounds: Towns’ leading performance.

19 points and 7 assists: Brunson’s combination of scoring and playmaking.

19 points and 4 made threes: Anunoby’s perimeter contribution.

16 points on 6-for-8 shooting: Bridges’ efficient scoring.

25 points: Porter Jr.’s team-leading total for Brooklyn.

31 assists: New York’s team assist total.

14 turnovers: New York’s turnover count.

19 turnovers: Brooklyn’s turnover count.

45.9% from three: New York’s three-point percentage.

31.1% from three: Brooklyn’s three-point percentage.

53.9% from the field: New York’s overall shooting percentage.

40.2% from the field: Brooklyn’s overall shooting percentage.

Taken together, these figures show why the final margin reached 36 points.

Why the Knicks offense was so effective

The most useful way to understand New York’s offense is to look at how many different sources of production were available.

Towns supplied interior scoring and rebounding.

Brunson provided primary creation and seven assists.

Anunoby and Bridges provided high-level perimeter shooting.

Robinson contributed efficient interior finishing and offensive rebounding.

Hart provided energy, rebounding, and secondary scoring.

Clarkson supplied bench scoring.

Shamet added additional three-point shooting.

This created a difficult defensive problem for Brooklyn.

If Brooklyn concentrated on Towns, Brunson, Anunoby, and Bridges could create or shoot. If the defense focused heavily on perimeter threats, Towns and Robinson could attack inside.

The box score reflects that balance.

Why Brooklyn struggled despite several individual performances

Brooklyn actually had several efficient individual performances.

Porter Jr. scored 25.

Powell scored 15 on 5-for-8 shooting.

Williams scored 13 on 5-for-8 shooting.

Claxton scored 12 while going 3-for-4 and 6-for-6 at the line.

Sharpe scored 10 on perfect field-goal and free-throw shooting.

Yet the team still scored only 98.

The reason is that the less efficient performances were significant.

Clowney shot 1-for-9.

Wilson shot 0-for-8.

Etienne shot 0-for-4.

Martin shot 2-for-10.

The Nets also committed 19 turnovers.

That combination created too many empty possessions against a Knicks team that was converting its opportunities at a high rate.

Season-series context

This game was the first meeting between the teams during the 2025-26 regular season.

New York won 134-98 on November 9. The teams later met again on November 24, January 21, and March 20, with New York winning each of those games as well. The complete season series therefore finished 4-0 in New York’s favor.

For readers specifically researching this individual matchup, however, the November 9 game should be treated separately from the later meetings. Later results should not be mixed into the player statistics for this particular contest.

Game information

Detail Information
Matchup Brooklyn Nets vs New York Knicks
Official game date November 9, 2025
Venue Madison Square Garden
Location New York, New York
Attendance 19,812
Final score Knicks 134, Nets 98
Brooklyn record entering game 1-9
New York record entering game 6-3
Knicks home record 6-0
Game ID 401810047
Officials Scott Twardoski, Ray Acosta, Jonathan Sterling

The official NBA game record confirms the final score, venue, attendance, officials, and November 9 date.

For readers who want to cross-check the official game record, the NBA game page and box score provide the primary reference.

How to read these player stats correctly

A common mistake when reviewing a basketball box score is focusing only on points.

Points matter, but they do not explain the entire game.

For this matchup, a more complete evaluation should include:

  1. Scoring efficiency: Look at field-goal and three-point percentages, not just total points.
  2. Shot volume: A player scoring 20 points on 8-for-10 shooting had a different offensive impact from someone scoring 20 points on 8-for-22 shooting.
  3. Playmaking: Assists help reveal how effectively a player creates opportunities for teammates.
  4. Turnovers: High turnover totals can erase otherwise strong offensive production.
  5. Rebounding: Offensive rebounds create extra chances, while defensive rebounds help end possessions.
  6. Defensive events: Steals and blocks matter, but they should be considered alongside overall defensive efficiency.
  7. Minutes: A player producing eight points in 10 minutes has a different context from a player producing eight points in 30 minutes.
  8. Game situation: A player’s production during a competitive stretch can carry different strategic importance from statistics accumulated after the game is already decided.

Using those principles makes the box score much more informative.

Common questions about the matchup

Who scored the most points for the Knicks?

Karl-Anthony Towns led New York with 28 points. He also grabbed 12 rebounds and shot 10-for-17 from the field.

Who was the Knicks’ assist leader?

Jalen Brunson led New York with seven assists. He also scored 19 points and made three three-pointers.

Who led the Nets in scoring?

Michael Porter Jr. led Brooklyn with 25 points. He shot 9-for-18 from the field and made four three-pointers.

How many points did the Knicks score?

New York scored 134 points, while Brooklyn scored 98. The Knicks led 40-22 after the first quarter and 77-62 at halftime.

What was the biggest shooting difference?

New York shot 53.9% from the field and 45.9% from three, compared with Brooklyn’s 40.2% field-goal percentage and 31.1% three-point percentage.

Was the game played on November 10, 2025?

The official NBA record lists the game as Sunday, November 9, 2025. The supplied data showed November 10, but the official game record and detailed box score use November 9.

Conclusion

The knicks vs brooklyn nets match player stats from this matchup show a game decided by much more than the 36-point final margin.

Karl-Anthony Towns was the leading scorer and rebounder for New York, producing 28 points and 12 rebounds with efficient shooting. Jalen Brunson added 19 points and seven assists, while OG Anunoby also scored 19 and made four three-pointers. Mikal Bridges contributed 16 points on 6-for-8 shooting and made four of five attempts from deep.

Brooklyn’s Michael Porter Jr. led all Nets scorers with 25 points. Drake Powell added 15, Ziaire Williams had 13, and Nicolas Claxton contributed 12 points, five rebounds, and five assists.

The team statistics explain the larger story. New York shot 53.9% from the field and 45.9% from three, compared with 40.2% and 31.1% for Brooklyn. The Knicks also produced 31 assists while committing 14 turnovers. Brooklyn had 21 assists and 19 turnovers.

The quarter-by-quarter progression was equally important. New York established an 18-point lead in the first quarter, Brooklyn answered with a strong second period, and then the Knicks produced a 35-17 third quarter that effectively ended the competitive portion of the game.

The most important correction to the supplied information is also clear: the official game date was November 9, 2025, not November 10, and Tyson Etienne scored zero points rather than 15. Drake Powell was Brooklyn’s second-leading scorer with 15 points.

For anyone researching this matchup, the detailed box score is therefore more useful than a simple list of leading scorers. It shows how shooting efficiency, ball movement, rebounding, turnovers, and player distribution combined to produce New York’s 134-98 victory.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *