Los Angeles Rams vs Tennessee Titans Match Player Stats

The los angeles rams vs tennessee titans match player stats from Week 3 of the 2025 NFL season tell a much deeper story than the 33-19 final score. Los Angeles finished the game with 298 passing yards, 149 rushing yards, five sacks, and two offensive touchdowns through the air plus two rushing scores. Tennessee produced 109 rushing yards and 175 passing yards, but five sacks allowed made it difficult for the Titans to maintain consistent offensive pressure.

The game was played on September 14, 2025, with the Rams entering the matchup at 1-0 and Tennessee at 0-1. Los Angeles ultimately moved to 2-0 with a 33-19 road victory, while the Titans fell to 0-2. The scoring pattern was also important. Tennessee actually led the Rams 13-10 at halftime, but Los Angeles controlled the second half by outscoring the Titans 23-6.

This breakdown looks beyond the final score to explain how individual performances shaped the game. It covers Matthew Stafford, Cam Ward, Kyren Williams, Tony Pollard, Davante Adams, Calvin Ridley, Elic Ayomanor, the defensive units, special teams, and the team-level numbers that connect those performances.

Table of Contents

Los Angeles Rams vs Tennessee Titans Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The most important numbers from the matchup are straightforward:

Category	Los Angeles Rams	Tennessee Titans
Final Score	33	19
Record After Game	2-0	0-2
Passing Yards	298	175
Completions	23	19
Passing TDs	2	1
Interceptions	1	0
Rushing Attempts	25	26
Rushing Yards	149	109
Rushing Average	6.0	4.2
Rushing TDs	2	0
Sacks Allowed	1	5
Defensive Sacks	5	1
Defensive Tackles	69	62

The biggest statistical difference was not simply passing or rushing. It was the combination of explosive rushing efficiency, quarterback protection, and defensive pressure.

Los Angeles averaged 6.0 yards per rushing attempt compared with Tennessee’s 4.2. The Rams also allowed only one sack, while the Titans surrendered five.

That combination gave Los Angeles a much stronger foundation as the game progressed.

Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring

Quarter	Rams	Titans
First	7	0
Second	3	13
Third	10	3
Fourth	13	3
Total	33	19

The scoring progression is particularly useful when studying the player statistics.

The Titans had their best stretch before halftime. They scored 13 points in the second quarter and entered halftime ahead 13-10. However, Tennessee managed only six points during the entire second half.

The Rams did the opposite. Their offensive production increased as the game moved along, with 23 points after halftime.

That makes the final score more meaningful when combined with the individual numbers. The Rams did not simply start fast and protect a lead. They recovered from a halftime deficit and generated their strongest scoring output late in the game.

Matthew Stafford’s Passing Performance

Matthew Stafford finished as the Rams’ leading passer with:

23 completions on 33 attempts
298 passing yards
2 touchdown passes
1 interception
105.4 passer rating

His completion percentage was approximately 69.7%, calculated from 23 completions on 33 attempts.

The 298 passing yards were especially important because Tennessee’s defense managed only one sack. That allowed Stafford to operate with significantly less disruption than Cam Ward faced on the other side.

Stafford’s statistical profile shows a productive but not flawless performance. The interception prevented the game from being completely clean, but the two touchdown passes and nearly 300 passing yards provided enough production to keep the Rams’ offense moving.

The 105.4 rating also indicates that the Rams received efficient quarterback play overall.

Why the Sack Difference Matters

Quarterback statistics can sometimes hide the effect of pass protection.

In this game, the Rams allowed one sack for eight yards. Tennessee allowed five sacks for 32 yards.

That is a substantial difference.

A sack does more than subtract passing yards. It can:

Put an offense behind schedule
Eliminate potential passing downs
Push an offense out of field-goal range
Create longer third downs
Increase pressure on the quarterback
Interrupt offensive momentum

For Tennessee, those problems became increasingly important as the Rams built their second-half advantage.

Cam Ward’s Passing Numbers

Cam Ward completed 19 of 33 passes for 175 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions.

His passer rating was 82.3.

The absence of an interception was one of the positive elements of his performance. However, the 175 passing yards were considerably below Stafford’s 298.

Ward completed the same number of attempts as Stafford, 33, but finished with six fewer completions and 123 fewer passing yards.

The difference becomes even more significant when the pressure numbers are considered.

Tennessee allowed five sacks, while the Rams allowed one. Ward therefore had to deal with considerably more negative plays in the passing game.

His 175 yards also suggest that Tennessee struggled to consistently create large chunks of passing offense. Even with a clean interception total, the Titans could not match the Rams’ overall passing production.

Kyren Williams and the Rams Running Game

Kyren Williams led Los Angeles in rushing with:

17 carries
66 yards
3.9 yards per carry

Williams was the Rams’ primary rushing option by volume.

His 17 carries represented a substantial portion of the team’s 25 rushing attempts. Although his 3.9-yard average was below the Rams’ overall 6.0-yard team average, the team number was lifted by an explosive contribution from Puka Nacua.

Williams’ value should therefore not be judged solely by his average.

A lead running back can influence a game through workload, defensive attention, short-yardage opportunities, clock management, and the ability to keep the passing game balanced.

The Rams finished with 149 rushing yards as a team, so the ground attack clearly contributed to the overall offensive result.

Puka Nacua Provides the Rams’ Explosive Rushing Play

One of the most unusual numbers in the game came from Puka Nacua.

Nacua recorded:

1 rushing attempt
45 rushing yards
1 rushing touchdown

That is an average of 45.0 yards per carry.

This single play had a major effect on the Rams’ team rushing statistics.

Without Nacua’s 45-yard rushing contribution, the Rams would have recorded 104 rushing yards from their other 24 carries. With the play included, the team finished with 149 yards.

This is a useful reminder when interpreting team averages. A 6.0-yard rushing average does not necessarily mean every running play was highly efficient. One explosive play can substantially change the final number.

It also demonstrates why player-level data matters when analyzing a box score.

Tony Pollard Leads the Titans on the Ground

Tony Pollard was Tennessee’s leading rusher:

20 carries
92 yards
4.6 yards per carry

Pollard accounted for most of the Titans’ 26 rushing attempts.

His 92 yards represented approximately 84.4% of Tennessee’s 109 rushing yards.

That level of workload shows how central the running game was to Tennessee’s offensive approach.

Pollard’s 4.6-yard average was also higher than Kyren Williams’ 3.9-yard figure. Yet Tennessee still finished with fewer rushing yards overall because the Rams generated an explosive 45-yard rushing touchdown and produced a higher team rushing average.

The contrast illustrates why comparing two lead rushers using only yards per carry can be misleading.

Pollard was more productive on a traditional rushing workload, while the Rams received an unusually large contribution from a single explosive play.

Davante Adams Emerges as the Rams’ Receiving Leader

Davante Adams led Los Angeles in receiving with:

6 receptions
106 receiving yards
1 touchdown
13 targets

His 13 targets were also the highest target total listed for the Rams.

Adams therefore played a major role in Stafford’s passing production.

His 106 yards accounted for more than one-third of the Rams’ 298 passing yards. Specifically, his yardage represented approximately 35.6% of Stafford’s total passing output.

The six receptions also represented a meaningful share of Stafford’s 23 completions.

Perhaps the most revealing figure is the 13 targets. That volume shows that Adams was not simply productive because of one unusually long reception. He was repeatedly involved in the passing game.

For readers studying fantasy football, player usage, or offensive strategy, targets can provide important context that raw receiving yards alone cannot.

Calvin Ridley Leads Tennessee in Receiving Yardage

Calvin Ridley finished as Tennessee’s leading receiver by yardage:

3 receptions
57 yards

His three catches produced an average of 19.0 yards per reception.

That is a strong per-catch figure, but his limited reception total also shows that Tennessee did not consistently turn his involvement into sustained possession-level production.

The Titans needed more consistent passing output as the game moved into the second half. Instead, their offense managed only six second-half points.

Ridley’s numbers therefore illustrate an important distinction between explosive receiving efficiency and overall passing volume.

Elic Ayomanor Scores Tennessee’s Receiving Touchdown

Elic Ayomanor recorded:

4 receptions
56 yards
1 touchdown

His four receptions were the highest total among the listed Titans receiving leaders, while his 56 yards ranked just behind Ridley’s 57.

Most importantly, Ayomanor produced Tennessee’s receiving touchdown.

His contribution was therefore efficient and impactful even though Tennessee’s overall passing attack finished with only 175 yards.

The combination of Ayomanor and Ridley gave the Titans two notable receiving contributors, but the offense still finished well behind the Rams in total passing yardage.

Comparing the Passing Attacks

The passing comparison is one of the clearest areas where the teams separated.

Passing Category	Rams	Titans
Completions	23	19
Attempts	33	33
Completion Rate	69.7%	57.6%
Passing Yards	298	175
Passing TDs	2	1
Interceptions	1	0
Passer Rating	105.4	82.3
Sacks Allowed	1	5

Both quarterbacks attempted 33 passes.

That makes the yardage gap particularly informative.

The Rams gained 298 yards on those 33 attempts, while Tennessee gained 175. Los Angeles therefore averaged approximately 9.0 passing yards per attempt, compared with approximately 5.3 for Tennessee.

The Rams also completed a significantly higher percentage of their attempts.

Tennessee’s advantage was its interception-free performance from Ward. But the Titans did not convert that advantage into enough passing production to keep pace.

The Defensive Battle

The defensive statistics also explain the result.

Los Angeles recorded:

69 total tackles
46 solo tackles
5 sacks

Tennessee recorded:

62 total tackles
36 solo tackles
1 sack
1 interception

The Rams’ five sacks were particularly important.

Tennessee’s defense did produce the only interception of the game through Cody Barton, but the Rams generated four more sacks than the Titans.

That difference reflects two different forms of defensive impact.

An interception can immediately end a possession and create a potential scoring opportunity. Sacks can repeatedly disrupt drives and make future downs more difficult.

In this matchup, Los Angeles’ sustained pass rush became a major factor.

Cody Barton Records Tennessee’s Interception

Cody Barton recorded the Titans’ only interception.

The Rams did not record an interception.

This is one of the few defensive statistical categories where Tennessee held the advantage.

However, the interception did not outweigh the broader defensive numbers. The Titans generated only one sack, while Los Angeles recorded five.

This is why box-score analysis works best when multiple categories are considered together rather than focusing on one headline statistic.

The Rams’ Five-Sack Defensive Performance

Five sacks against Tennessee were among the most consequential defensive numbers in the matchup.

The Rams’ defense also recorded 69 total tackles, including 46 solo tackles.

The difference between total tackles and solo tackles is worth understanding.

A solo tackle represents an individual defensive stop, while total tackles include assisted tackles as well. The Rams’ 46 solo tackles therefore made up a significant portion of their 69 total tackles.

The defensive unit consistently participated in stopping Tennessee’s offense, and the five sacks provided additional negative plays.

The result was a Titans offense that produced only 175 passing yards and 19 total points.

Special Teams Statistics

Special teams contributed to the final score as well.

Rams Kicking

Joshua Karty finished with:

2 field goals made on 2 attempts
3 extra points made on 4 attempts
9 points

Karty converted every field-goal attempt but missed one extra-point attempt.

His nine points were a meaningful contribution in a game decided by 14 points.

Titans Kicking

Joey Slye recorded:

4 field goals made on 4 attempts
1 extra point made on 1 attempt
13 points

Slye was perfect on field goals and finished with 13 points.

Interestingly, the Titans’ kicker scored more points than the Rams’ kicker despite Tennessee losing by 14.

That happened because Tennessee relied heavily on field goals while the Rams converted more of their offensive opportunities into touchdowns.

This is an important scoring distinction.

Field goals keep an offense on the scoreboard, but touchdowns create larger scoring swings.

Kick Return Statistics

Blake Corum handled the Rams’ kick returns:

3 returns
80 yards
26.7-yard average

Chimere Dike handled Tennessee’s kick returns:

5 returns
83 yards
16.6-yard average

Corum’s 26.7-yard average was substantially higher than Dike’s 16.6-yard average.

Although return yardage does not always translate directly into points, strong field position can shorten the distance an offense needs to travel.

That can affect play selection and scoring opportunities.

Punt Return Statistics

Los Angeles used Xavier Smith as its listed punt returner:

2 returns
14 yards

Tennessee’s Chimere Dike recorded:

2 punt returns
37 yards
18.5-yard average

Dike’s punt return average was therefore higher than Smith’s.

Again, this is an example of why special teams statistics should be evaluated separately from offensive and defensive production.

Punting Comparison

The punting numbers were:

Category	Rams	Titans
Punts	3	5
Punt Yards	145	250
Average	48.3	50.0

Ethan Evans averaged 48.3 yards across three Rams punts.

Johnny Hekker averaged 50.0 yards across five Tennessee punts.

The raw average slightly favored Tennessee, but the number of punts also tells us something about offensive possessions.

Tennessee punted five times, compared with three punts by Los Angeles.

That difference suggests the Rams were able to sustain more possessions without ending drives through punts.

Why the Rams Won the Statistical Battle

The final score can be explained by several connected statistical advantages.

1. Los Angeles produced more passing yardage

The Rams gained 298 passing yards compared with Tennessee’s 175.

That is a 123-yard advantage.

2. Los Angeles produced more rushing yardage

The Rams gained 149 rushing yards compared with 109 for Tennessee.

That created a 40-yard rushing advantage.

3. Los Angeles protected its quarterback better

The Rams allowed one sack.

The Titans allowed five.

That is a four-sack difference.

4. The Rams created explosive rushing production

Puka Nacua’s 45-yard rushing touchdown dramatically affected the team rushing totals.

5. The Rams finished stronger after halftime

Los Angeles scored 23 second-half points.

Tennessee scored only six.

That was arguably the most important scoring pattern in the entire matchup.

What the Box Score Says About Offensive Efficiency

The most useful way to understand the game is to combine the numbers rather than isolate individual statistics.

Los Angeles finished with 447 combined passing and rushing yards based on the supplied team totals:

298 passing yards + 149 rushing yards = 447 total yards.

Tennessee finished with 284:

175 passing yards + 109 rushing yards = 284 total yards.

That creates a 163-yard advantage for Los Angeles.

The Rams also produced four offensive touchdowns according to the supplied passing and rushing touchdown totals:

2 passing touchdowns
2 rushing touchdowns

Tennessee produced one passing touchdown and no rushing touchdowns.

This difference explains why Tennessee could score 19 points while still losing by 14.

The Titans’ four field goals contributed 12 points, with one additional extra point bringing their total kicking contribution to 13.

First Half Versus Second Half

The halftime score was one of the most interesting elements of the matchup.

Los Angeles led 7-0 after the first quarter, but Tennessee responded with 13 points in the second quarter.

At halftime:

Titans 13, Rams 10

The game changed after the break.

Third quarter:

Rams 10, Titans 3

Fourth quarter:

Rams 13, Titans 3

That means Los Angeles outscored Tennessee 23-6 during the second half.

For anyone studying player performance, this is important because full-game statistics can hide when the decisive production occurred.

The Rams’ statistical profile was not simply the product of a strong first quarter. The team adjusted and produced its best scoring output after halftime.

Understanding the Importance of Explosive Plays

One of the strongest lessons from this game is the influence of explosive plays.

Puka Nacua’s 45-yard rushing touchdown was an extreme example.

Davante Adams also generated more than 100 receiving yards.

Those plays can change the shape of an entire game.

A team can accumulate yards through many short plays, but a single explosive gain can eliminate several downs of expected offensive work.

This is particularly important when evaluating rushing averages.

The Rams’ 6.0-yard team rushing average looks excellent, but Williams himself averaged 3.9 yards per carry. The difference comes largely from explosive contributions such as Nacua’s 45-yard touchdown run.

That is why serious player-stat analysis should always look at individual distributions rather than only team averages.

The Biggest Individual Statistical Contributions

The leading performers can be summarized as follows.

Rams

Matthew Stafford

23/33 passing
298 yards
2 TD
1 INT
105.4 rating

Kyren Williams

17 carries
66 yards
3.9 average

Puka Nacua

1 carry
45 yards
1 rushing TD

Davante Adams

6 receptions
106 yards
1 TD
13 targets

Joshua Karty

2/2 field goals
3/4 extra points
9 points

Rams Defense

69 tackles
46 solo tackles
5 sacks

Titans

Cam Ward

19/33 passing
175 yards
1 TD
0 INT
82.3 rating

Tony Pollard

20 carries
92 yards
4.6 average

Calvin Ridley

3 receptions
57 yards

Elic Ayomanor

4 receptions
56 yards
1 TD

Joey Slye

4/4 field goals
1/1 extra point
13 points

Cody Barton

1 interception

Titans Defense

62 tackles
36 solo tackles
1 sack

What These Numbers Mean for Player Evaluation

A player-stat page should not simply list numbers without explaining their context.

For Stafford, the important combination was high passing volume, nearly 300 yards, two touchdowns, and only one sack allowed by the offensive line.
For Ward, the key contrast was zero interceptions but lower yardage, lower completion efficiency, and significant pressure from the Rams defense.
For Williams, the workload was more important than the raw average.
For Pollard, the 92 rushing yards represented the majority of Tennessee’s rushing production.
For Adams, the 13 targets showed strong involvement in the passing game.
For Nacua, one rushing attempt was enough to generate a 45-yard touchdown and materially change the Rams’ rushing statistics.
For the defensive units, the sack difference was one of the clearest indicators of how the game developed.

How to Read This Matchup for Fantasy and Statistical Research

These numbers can also be useful for fantasy football research, player comparisons, and historical analysis.

A fantasy player researching Adams would want to note both his six receptions and 13 targets. Target volume can be useful when evaluating whether a receiver’s production was supported by consistent involvement.

A researcher examining Pollard would note his 20 carries and 92 yards. His workload was significant even though Tennessee’s overall offensive production was limited.

Williams’ 17 carries demonstrate his central role in the Rams’ rushing attack, while Nacua’s 45-yard touchdown highlights the volatility that can exist in small-sample rushing statistics.

Quarterback analysis should include both production and pressure. Stafford produced 298 passing yards while being sacked once. Ward produced 175 passing yards while Tennessee surrendered five sacks.

Those distinctions provide a more complete picture than simply comparing touchdown totals.

A Practical Framework for Analyzing NFL Player Stats

When reviewing a game like this, use a five-step approach.

Step 1: Start with team production

Check passing yards, rushing yards, total touchdowns, and turnovers.

This establishes the overall statistical environment.

Step 2: Identify the highest-volume players

Look at pass attempts, rushing attempts, targets, receptions, and defensive involvement.

Volume helps explain opportunity.

Step 3: Look for explosive plays

Search for unusually long runs, receptions, returns, or defensive plays.

These plays can heavily influence team averages.

Step 4: Examine negative plays

Sacks, interceptions, lost yardage, and failed scoring attempts can change the outcome even when raw yardage totals appear competitive.

Step 5: Compare scoring by quarter

Quarter-by-quarter scoring shows when the game changed.

For this matchup, the second-half scoring split is particularly revealing.

For broader NFL statistics and official league information, readers can also consult the NFL’s official website.

Key Statistical Takeaways

Several numbers stand out from the matchup.

447 total yards for Los Angeles: The Rams combined for 298 passing yards and 149 rushing yards.

284 total yards for Tennessee: The Titans produced 175 passing yards and 109 rushing yards.

163-yard total-yardage advantage: Los Angeles generated substantially more offensive yardage.

5 Rams sacks: The Los Angeles defense consistently pressured the Titans’ passing attack.

5 Titans sacks allowed: Tennessee’s offense experienced repeated negative plays.

106 receiving yards for Adams: He was the Rams’ leading receiver and finished with 13 targets.

92 rushing yards for Pollard: He was the Titans’ leading rusher.

45-yard rushing touchdown for Nacua: One explosive play significantly affected the Rams’ rushing numbers.

23 completions for Stafford: He completed nearly 70% of his attempts.

19 completions for Ward: His completion rate was approximately 57.6%.

23-6 second-half scoring advantage: This was one of the clearest indicators of how the game changed after halftime.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score of the Rams vs Titans game?

The Los Angeles Rams defeated the Tennessee Titans 33-19 on September 14, 2025, during NFL Week 3.

Who was the Rams’ leading passer?

Matthew Stafford led Los Angeles with 23 completions on 33 attempts for 298 yards, two touchdowns, one interception, and a 105.4 passer rating.

Who led the Rams in rushing?

Kyren Williams led the Rams with 17 carries for 66 yards. Puka Nacua also had one rushing attempt for 45 yards and a touchdown.

Who led the Titans in rushing?

Tony Pollard led Tennessee with 20 carries for 92 yards, averaging 4.6 yards per carry.

Who was the Rams’ leading receiver?

Davante Adams led Los Angeles with six receptions for 106 yards and one touchdown. He also received 13 targets.

How many sacks did the Rams record?

The Rams recorded five sacks against Tennessee. The Titans recorded one sack against Los Angeles.

Conclusion

The los angeles rams vs tennessee titans match player stats show that the 33-19 result was built on several connected advantages rather than one isolated performance.

Matthew Stafford delivered 298 passing yards and two touchdown passes, while Davante Adams surpassed 100 receiving yards and received 13 targets. Kyren Williams handled the majority of the Rams’ rushing workload, and Puka Nacua supplied an explosive 45-yard rushing touchdown.

Tennessee received a strong rushing effort from Tony Pollard, who produced 92 yards on 20 carries. Calvin Ridley and Elic Ayomanor provided the primary receiving contributions, while Cam Ward avoided an interception. Cody Barton also recorded Tennessee’s only interception of the game.

The biggest statistical differences came from total offensive production and defensive pressure. Los Angeles produced 447 combined passing and rushing yards compared with Tennessee’s 284. The Rams recorded five sacks while allowing only one, and they outscored Tennessee 23-6 after halftime.

Taken together, these numbers provide a clearer explanation of the game than the final score alone. The Rams combined passing production, explosive rushing, stronger protection, and second-half defensive pressure to turn a 13-10 halftime deficit into a 33-19 road victory.